ArrowH. E.McGrathJ. E.BerdahlJ. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development and adaptation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
CroninM. A.WeingartL. R.TodorovaG. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? In WalshJ. P.BriefA. P. (Eds.), The Academy of Management annals (Vol. 5, pp. 571–612). Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
3.
GardnerS. D.QuigleyN. R. (2015). Toward a dynamic multilevel theory of team personality. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(4), 364–384.
4.
HerndonB.LewisK. (2015). Applying sequence methods to the study of team temporal dynamics. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(4), 318–332.
5.
HollenbeckJ. R.DeRueD. S.NahrgangJ. D. (2015). The opponent process theory of leadership succession. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(4), 333–363.
6.
KozlowskiS. W. J.BellB. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In BormanW. C.IlgenD. R.KlimoskiR. J. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333–375). London, UK: Wiley.
7.
LevineJ. M.MorelandR. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585–634.
8.
MarksM. A.MathieuJ. A.ZaccaroS. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team process. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376.
9.
McGrathJ. E. (1986). Studying groups at work: Ten critical needs for theory and practice. In GoodmanP. S. (Ed.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 362–392). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
SmaldinoP. E.CalanchiniJ.PickettC. L. (2015). Theory development with agent-based models. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(4), 300–317.
11.
StermanJ. D. (2000). Business dynamics. Boston, MA: Irwin/McGraw Hill.
12.
WallerM. J.OkhuysenG.SaghafianM. (in press). Conceptualizing emergent states: A strategy to advance the study of group dynamics. Academy of Management Annals.