A mathematical model is developed to predict the energy consumption of a heavy vehicle. It includes the important factors of heavy-vehicle energy consumption, namely engine and drivetrain performances, losses due to accessories, aerodynamic drag, rolling resistance, road gradients, and driver behaviour. Novel low-cost testing methods were developed to determine engine and drivetrain characteristics. A simple drive cycle was used to validate the model. The model is able to predict the fuel use for a 37 t tractor–semitrailer vehicle over a 4 km drive cycle within 1 per cent. This paper demonstrates that accurate and reliable vehicle benchmarking and model parameter measurement can be achieved without expensive equipment overheads, e.g. engine and chassis dynamometers.
Energy consumption in the UK transport data tables, 2009, (Department of Energy and Climate Change, London).
2.
Transport trends, 2008, section 5: freight and logistics (Department for Transport, London.
3.
PostK.Fuel economy and emissions. Annual report, University of SydneySydney, New South Wales, Australia, 1980.
4.
KentJ.PostK.TomlinJ. A.Fuel consumption and emission modelling in traffic links. In Proceedings of the Second SAE-A/ARRB Conference on Traffic, energy and emissions, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 1982, paper 82140, pp. 10.1–10.20.
5.
BiggsD. C.AkcelikR.Validation of a power based-model of car fuel consumption. Internal Report AIR 390-4, Australian Road Research Board, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 1984.
6.
BiggsD. C.AkcelikR., Further work on modelling car fuel consumption, Internal Report AIR 390-10, Australian Road Research Board, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 1985.
7.
WestB. H.McGillR. N.HodgsonJ. W.SluderC. S.SmithD. E.Development of data-based light-duty modal emissions and fuel consumption models. SAE paper 972910, 1997.
8.
AhnK.RakhaH.TraniA.Van AerdeM.Estimating vehicle fuel consumption and emissions based on instantaneous speed and acceleration levels. J. Transpn Engng, 2002, 128, 182–190.
9.
AndreM.HickmanA. J.HasselD.JoumardR.Driving cycles for emission measurements under European conditions. SAE paper 950926, 1995.
10.
Montazeri-GhM.VarastehH.NaghizadehM.Driving cycle simulation for heavy-duty engine emission evaluation and testing. SAE paper 2005-01-3796, 2005.
11.
GokasanM.BogosyanS.GoeringD. J.A diesel engine map model based observer for HEVs. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Conference on Vehicle power and propulsion, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 7-9 September 2005, pp. 545–550 (IEEE, New York).
12.
YanowitzJ.GraboskiM. S.McCormickR. L.Prediction of in-use emissions of heavy-duty diesel vehicles from engine testing. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2002, 36, 270–275.
13.
ÇelikV.ArcakliogluE.Performance maps of a diesel engine. Appl. Energy, 2005, 81, 247–254.
14.
YanowitzJ.GraboskiM. S.RyanL. B. A.AllemanT. L.McCormickR. L.Chassis dynamometer study of emissions from 21 in-use heavy-duty diesel vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol., 1998, 33, 209–216.
15.
CloseH.KhatibE.SAE - a truck fuel conservation project. SAE paper 871234, 1988.
16.
WatsonH. C.MilkinsE. E.PrestonM. O.ChittleboroughC.AlimoradianB.Predicting fuel consumption and emissions - transferring chassis dynamometer results to real driving conditions. SAE paper 830435, 1983.
17.
WatersW. C.General purpose automotive vehicle performance and economy simulator. SAE paper 720043, 1972.
18.
RousseauA.PasquierM.Validation process of a system analysis model: PSAT. In Proceedings of the SAE World Congress, Detroit, Michigan, USA, 4–8 March 2001, SAE paper 01P-183 (SAE International, Warrendale, Pennsylvania).
19.
GaoZ.ConklinJ. C.DawC. S.ChakravarthyV. K.A proposed methodology for estimating transient engine-out temperature and emissions from steady-state maps.Int. J. Engine Res., 2010, 11(2), 137–151 DOI: 10.1243/14680874JER05609.
20.
RexeisM.HausbergerS.RiemersmaI.TartakovskyL.ZvirinY.ErwinC.Heavy-duty vehicle emissions. Final Report I 02/2005/Hb 20/2000 I680 of WP 400 in ARTEMIS (Assessment and Reliability of Transport Emission Models and Inventory Systems), Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria, 2005.
21.
SamsT.TieberJ.Emission behaviour of heavy duty vehicles - a holistic calculation method. In Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Traffic-induced air pollution, Technical University, Graz, Austria, 1996.
RafaelM.SanchezM.MucinoV.CervantesJ.LozanoA.Impact of driving styles on exhaust emissions and fuel economy from a heavy-duty truck: laboratory tests. Int. J. Heavy Veh. Systems, 2006, 13, 56–73.
24.
SolticP.On road measurements, test bench measurements and emission simulations for a tractor-semitrailer in trans-Alpine operation. Report 200103, EMPA Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland, 2004.
25.
WhiteR.KorstH.Determination of vehicle drag contributions from coast-down tests. SAE paper 720099, 1972.
26.
BuckleyF. T.ABCD - an improved coast down test and analysis method. SAE paper 950626, 1995.
27.
PetrushovV. A.Coast down method in time-distance variables. SAE paper 970408, 1997.
28.
ChaS. L.SloanR.BlackF. M.Study of models for the prediction of average road load of in-use delivery trucks. SAE paper 831799, 1983.
29.
RossM.Automobile fuel consumption and emissions: effects of vehicle and driving characteristics. A. Rev. Energy Environ, 1994, 19, 75–112.
30.
J2264Chassis dynamometer simulation of road load using coastdown techniques, 2007, (SAE International, Warrendale, Pennsylvania).
31.
KoY.HosoiK.Measurements of power losses in automobile drive train. SAE paper 840054, 1984.
32.
MehraniP.WatsonH. C.A search for maximum efficiency and NOx reduction through spark-ignition engine design optimization at λ = 1. Proc. IMechE, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2008, 222(5), 875–886 DOI: 10.1243/09544070JAUTO245.
33.
Esteves-BoothA.MuneerT.KubieJ.KirbyH.A review of vehicular emission models and driving cycles. Proc. IMechE, Part C: J. Mechanical Engineering Science, 2002, 216(8), 777–792 DOI: 10.1243/09544060260171429.
34.
SamuelS.AustinL.MorreyD.Automotive test drive cycles for emission measurement and real-world emission levels - a review. Proc. IMechE, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2002, 216(7), 555–564 DOI: 10.1243/095440702760178587.
35.
OdhamsA. M. C.RoebuckR. L.LeeY. J.CebonD.Energy use in heavy vehicles. Technical Report CUED/C-MECH/TR.94, Department of EngineeringUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, August2008.
36.
YangB.KeqiangL.UkawaH.HandaM.Modelling and control of a non-linear dynamic system for heavy-duty trucks. Proc. IMechE, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2006, 220(1), 1423–1435 DOI: 10.1243/09544070JAUTO237.
37.
BiX.HanS.MaZ.LiuX.Transient modeling for heavy tracked vehicle performance and fuel consumption under accelerating conditions. SAE paper 2002-01-0630, 2002.
38.
RakhaH.LucicI.DemarchiS. H.SettiJ. R.Van AerdeM.Vehicle dynamics model for predicting maximum truck acceleration levels. J. Transpn Engng, 2001, 127, 418–425.
39.
AllenR. W.ChrstosJ. P.LeeD. C.Driver/vehicle modelling and simulation. SAE paper 200201-1568, 2002.
AguileraC. A. V.moving_average v3.1. In MATLAB central file exchange, March2008 (The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts).
42.
RT inertial and GPS measurement systems user manual, 2008 (Oxford Technical Solutions, Bicester, Oxfordshire).
43.
HuntS. W.OdhamsA. M. C.RoebuckR. L.CebonD.Modelling the fuel consumption of heavy vehicles. Technical Report CUED/C-MECH/TR.95, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, August2009.
44.
StolleryJ.GarryK. P.Techniques for reducing commercial vehicle aerodynamic drag, 1983 (Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, St Helier, Jersey, Channel Islands).
