Classical tail modelling is based on performing a relatively small number of limit-state calculations through Monte Carlo sampling, and then fitting a generalized Pareto distribution to the tail part of the data. The limit-state calculations that do not belong to the tail part are discarded. To reduce the amount of discarded data, this article proposes an efficient tail modelling procedure based on guiding the limit-state evaluations towards the sampling points that have high chances of yielding limit-state values falling into the tail region. The guidance of the limit-state evaluations is achieved through a procedure that utilizes limit-state approximation and distribution fitting. The accuracy of the proposed method is tested through a mathematical problem and four structural mechanics problems, and it is found that the accuracy of reliability estimations can be significantly increased compared to classical tail modelling techniques for the same number of limit-state function evaluations. In addition, it is also found that the improvement in accuracy can be traded off for reducing the number of limit-state evaluations.
WuY. T.ShinY.SuesR.CesareM.Safety-factor based approach for probability-based design optimization. In Proceedings of the 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. 16–19 April 2001, Seattle, WA, paper no. AIAA-2001-1522.
CastilloE.Extreme value theory in engineering, 1988 (Academic Press (San Diego, CA).
5.
CaersJ.MaesM.Identifying tails, bounds, and end-points of random variables. Struct. Safety, 1998, 20. 1–23.
6.
KimN. H.RamuP.QueipoN. V.Tail modeling in reliability-based design optimization for highly safe structural systems. In Proceedings of the 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Newport, RI, 2006, AIAA paper 2006-1825.
7.
RamuP.KimN. H.HaftkaR. T.QueipoN.V.System reliability analysis and optimization using tail modeling. In Proceedings of the 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Portsmouth, VA, 2006, AIAA paper 2006-7012.
8.
RahmanS.XuH.A univariate dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics. Probab. Eng. Mech., 2004, 19. 393–408.
9.
MaesM. A.BreitungK.Reliability-based tail estimation. In Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium on Probabilistic structural mechanics (advances in structural reliability methods). June 1993, San Antonio, TX, 335–346.
10.
BoosD.Using extreme value theory to estimate large percentiles. Technometrics, 1984, 26(1), 33–39.
11.
HasoferA.Non-parametric estimation of failure probabilities. Mathematical models for structural reliability, CasciatiF.RobertsB.. 1996 (CRC Press (Boca Raton, FL, 195–226.
12.
RamuP.Multiple tail models including inverse measures for structural design under uncertainties, 2007, PhD Thesis, University of Florida (Gainesville, FL).
13.
FreimerM.MudholkarG.KolliaG.LinC.A study of the generalized tukey lambda family. Commun. Stat. – Theory Methods, 1988, 17(10), 3547–3567.
14.
KarianZ. E.DudewiczE. J.McDonaldP.The extended generalized lambda distribution system for fitting distributions to data: history, completion of theory, tables, applications, the ‘final word’ on moment fits. Commun. Stat. – Comput. Simul., 1996, 25(3), 611–642.
15.
LakhanyA.MausserH.Estimating the parameters of the generalized lambda distribution. Algo Res. Q., 2000, 3(3), 47–58.
16.
FournierB.RupinN.BigerelleM.NajjarD.IostA.WilcoxR.Estimating the parameters of a generalized lambda distribution. Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 2007, 51. 2813–2835.
17.
AcarE.Rais-RohaniM.EamonC.Reliability estimation using univariate dimension reduction and extended generalized lambda distribution. Int. J. Reliab. Safety, 2010, 24(2/3), 166–187.
18.
RamuP.KimN. H.HaftkaR. T.Error amplification in failure probability estimates of small errors in surrogates. In Proceedings of the World Congress. 16–19 April 2007, Detroit, MI, 2007, paper no. 2007-01-0549, SAE-2007.
Ba-abbadM. A.NikolaidisE.KapaniaR. K.New approach for system reliability-based design optimization. AIAA J., 2006, 44(5), 1087–1096.
21.
GoldsteinA. A.PriceJ. F.On descent from local minima. Math. Comput., 1971, 25(115), 569–574.
22.
HuangB.DuX.Uncertainty analysis by dimension reduction integration and Saddlepoint approximations. J. Mech. Des., 2006, 126(1), 26–33.
23.
BennettJ. A.BotkinM. E.The optimum shape, 1986 (Plenum Press (New York, NY).
24.
PichenyV.KimN. H.HaftkaR. T.QuiepoN. V.Conservative predictions using surrogate modeling. In Proceedings of the 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials. April 2008, Schaumburg, IL.
25.
MauteK.Design element toolbox, 2009 (Center for Aerospace Structures, University of Colorado (Boulder, CO).
26.
CALFEM. A finite element toolbox to MATLAB, 1999, version 3.3, Structural Mechanics and Solid Mechanics, Lund University (Lund, Sweden).
27.
HasoferA. M.LindN. C.Exact and invariant second-moment code format. J. Eng. Mech. Div. ASCE, 1974, 100. 111–121.
28.
WuY. T.Computational methods for efficient structural reliability and reliability sensitivity analysis. AIAA J., 1994, 32(8), 1717–1723.
29.
NeumannH. J.FiesslerB.RackwitzR.Quadratic limit states in structural reliability. J. Eng. Mech., 1979, 105(4), 661–676.
30.
RosenbluethE.Two-point estimates in probability. Appl. Math. Model., 1981, 5. 329–335.
31.
XuS.GrandhiR. V.Multi-point approximation for reducing the response surface model development cost in optimization. In Proceedings of the 1st ASMO UK/ISSMO Conference on Engineering design optimization. 8–9 July 1999, pp., West Yorkshire, UK, 381–388.
32.
KimN. H.WangH.QueipoN. V.Efficient shape optimization under uncertainty using polynomial chaos expansions and local sensitivities. AIAA J., 2006, 44(5), 1112–1116.
