Biodegradable bioplastic films have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional plastics due to their environmental benefits. However, starch-based bioplastics often exhibit poor mechanical properties, which limit their practical applications. The incorporation of reinforcing agents can enhance these properties while promoting sustainability. This study aims to investigate the mechanical properties and biodegradability of starch-based bioplastic films reinforced with organic waste fillers, including eggshell, sawdust, and biochar. The films were fabricated from isolated potato starch, glycerol, vinegar, and water using a starch:glycerol:vinegar:water weight ratio of 1:0.23:0.23:10, with 10% weight by weight (w/w) filler reinforcement. Mechanical properties were evaluated using a universal testing machine (UTM). Functional groups were analyzed by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and biodegradability was assessed through soil burial tests. Sawdust reinforced films (SD) exhibited a significantly higher tensile strength of 5.7 ± 0.510 MPa and a Young’s modulus of 130 ± 2.050 MPa compared with the control pure starch film (PS), which showed 1.9 ± 0.352 MPa tensile strength and 13.7 ± 0.456 MPa Young’s modulus. FTIR spectra confirmed the presence of functional groups conducive to biodegradation. Soil burial tests revealed up to 36% mass loss within 15 days, indicating substantial biodegradability. The integration of organic waste fillers, particularly sawdust, significantly enhances the mechanical and biodegradation properties of starch-based bioplastics. These findings support the potential of organic waste reinforcements for developing sustainable and biodegradable plastic alternatives.
SinghNOgunseitanOAWongMH, et al.Sustainable materials alternative to petrochemical plastics pollution: a review analysis. Sustainable Horizons2022; 2: 100016.
2.
KumarRLalnundikiVShelareSD, et al.An investigation of the environmental implications of bioplastics: recent advancements on the development of environmentally friendly bioplastics solutions. Environ Res2024; 244: 117707.
3.
KibriaMGMasukNISafayetR, et al.Plastic waste: challenges and opportunities to mitigate pollution and effective management. Int J Environ Res2023; 17: 20.
4.
SinghNWalkerTR. Plastic recycling: a panacea or environmental pollution problem. Npj Mater Sustain2024; 2: 17.
5.
JayavelSGovindarajuBMichaelJR, et al.Impacts of micro and nanoplastics on human health. Bull Natl Res Cent2024; 48: 110.
6.
MarichelvamMKManimaranPSanjayM, et al.Extraction and development of starch-based bioplastics from Prosopis Juliflora plant: eco-friendly and sustainability aspects. Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry2022; 5: 100296.
7.
MaharjanKK. Microplastics research in Nepal: present scenario and current gaps in knowledge. Heliyon2024; 10: e24956.
8.
FayshalMA. Current practices of plastic waste management, environmental impacts, and potential alternatives for reducing pollution and improving management. Heliyon2024; 10: e40838.
9.
FolinoAKarageorgiouACalabròPS, et al.Biodegradation of wasted bioplastics in natural and industrial environments: a review. Sustainability2020; 12: 6030.
10.
NizamuddinSBalochAJChenC, et al.Bio-based plastics, biodegradable plastics, and compostable plastics: biodegradation mechanism, biodegradability standards and environmental stratagem. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad2024; 195: 105887.
11.
RosenboomJ-GLangerRTraversoG. Bioplastics for a circular economy. Nat Rev Mater2022; 7: 117–137.
12.
NandaSPatraBRPatelR, et al.Innovations in applications and prospects of bioplastics and biopolymers: a review. Environ Chem Lett2022; 20: 379–395.
13.
IslamMXayachakTHaqueN, et al.Impact of bioplastics on environment from its production to end-of-life. Process Saf Environ Prot2024; 188: 151–166.
14.
do Val SiqueiraLAriasCILFManigliaBC, et al.Starch-based biodegradable plastics: methods of production, challenges and future perspectives. Curr Opin Food Sci2021; 38: 122–130.
15.
JiangTDuanQZhuJ, et al.Starch-based biodegradable materials: challenges and opportunities. Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research2020; 3: 8–18.
16.
SinghPPandeyVKSinghR, et al.Unveiling the potential of starch-blended biodegradable polymers for substantializing the eco-friendly innovations. J Agric Food Res2024; 15: 101065.
17.
IsmailNAMohd TahirSYahyaN, et al.Synthesis and characterization of biodegradable starch-based bioplastics. Mater Sci Forum2016; 846: 673–678. Trans Tech Publications Ltd.
18.
GadhaveRVDasAMahanwarPA, et al.Starch based bio-plastics: the future of sustainable packaging. OJPChem2018; 08: 21–33.
19.
ZhaoXWangYChenX, et al.Sustainable bioplastics derived from renewable natural resources for food packaging. Matter2023; 6: 97–127.
20.
BertoftEBlennowA. Structure of potato starch. In: SinghJKaurL (eds) Advances in Potato Chemistry and Technology. Elsevier, 2016, pp. 57–73.
21.
RajakSKChoubeyVSmritiA, et al.Production of bio-plastic from potato starch. J Pharm Innov2023; 12: 1312–1316.
22.
TabassumZGirdharMAnandA, et al.Trash to treasure: advancing resource efficiency using waste-derived fillers as sustainable reinforcing agents in bioplastics. Mater Adv2025; 6: 527–546.
23.
MomotazFHasanNSarkarAChowdhuryHK. A details study on: developing biodegradable plastics from potato starch with enhanced physico-mechanical properties. International Textile and Apparel Association Annual Conference Proceedings, 2022, 78(1).
24.
KhalidMYAl RashidAArifZU, et al.Natural fiber reinforced composites: sustainable materials for emerging applications. Results Eng2021; 11: 100263.
25.
OluwasinaOOAkinyeleBPOlusegunSJ, et al.Evaluation of the effects of additives on the properties of starch-based bioplastic film. SN Appl Sci2021; 3: 421.
26.
TanSXAndriyanaAOngHC, et al.A comprehensive review on the emerging roles of nanofillers and plasticizers towards sustainable starch-based bioplastic fabrication. Polymers2022; 14: 664.
27.
Abu UbaidahASMohamad PuadNIHamzahF, et al.Synthesis of bioplastics and the effects of additives on the mechanical, thermal and biodegradable properties. Polym Renew Resour2024; 15: 430–490.
28.
DasOBabuKShanmugamV, et al.Natural and industrial wastes for sustainable and renewable polymer composites. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2022; 158: 112054.
29.
LizundiaELuziFPugliaD. Organic waste valorisation towards circular and sustainable biocomposites. Green Chem2022; 24: 5429–5459.
30.
BoeyJYLeeCKTayGS. Factors affecting mechanical properties of reinforced bioplastics: a review. Polymers2022; 14: 3737.
31.
BodirlauRTeacaCASpiridonI. Influence of natural fillers on the properties of starch-based biocomposite films. Compos B Eng2013; 44: 575–583.
32.
SoykeabkaewNLaosatNNgaoklaA, et al.Reinforcing potential of micro- and nano-sized fibers in the starch-based biocomposites. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72: 845–852.
33.
KwaśniewskaAŚwietlickiMKowalskaB, et al. Wood dust as an additive for starch-based biocomposite films. Research Square, 2022.
34.
DhalMKMadhuKBanerjeeA, et al.Polylactic acid/polycaprolactone/sawdust based biocomposites trays with enhanced compostability. Int J Biol Macromol2023; 253: 126977.
35.
SuarezNEInalbonMCMeyerCI, et al.A wood bioplastic composite from soy flour and sawdust: influence of process parameters and composition on physical and mechanical properties. Lat Am Appl Res2020; 50: 95–100.
36.
MalińskaKDróżdżDPostawaP, et al.Biochar—A filler in “Bioplastics” for horticultural applications. Materials2024; 17: 6208.
37.
Feliz FlorianGRagoubiMLeblancN, et al.Biochar production and its potential application for biocomposite materials: a comprehensive review. J Compos Sci2024; 8: 220.
38.
KongUMohammad RawiNFTayGS. The potential applications of reinforced bioplastics in various industries: a review. Polymers2023; 15: 2399.
39.
RanakotiLPokhriyalMKumarA. Natural fibers and biopolymers characterization: a future potential composite material. J Mech Eng-Strojnícky časopis2018; 68: 33–50.
40.
OleyaeiSAZahediYGhanbarzadehB, et al.Modification of physicochemical and thermal properties of starch films by incorporation of TiO2 nanoparticles. Int J Biol Macromol2016; 89: 256–264.
41.
HamdanZKOgailiAJeburNA, et al.Waste eggshell and sawdust as reinforcements for sustainable polyester composites: mechanical characterization and environmental durability assessment. J Teknol2025; 87: 73–88.
42.
XuHLiJMcClementsDJ, et al.Eggshell waste act as multifunctional fillers overcoming the restrictions of starch-based films. Int J Biol Macromol2023; 253: 127165.
43.
BaniasadiHLizundiaEPaganelliZ, et al.Structure-property correlations study in biochar-enhanced polyamide composites for sustainable materials development. Compos B Eng2024; 286: 111809.
44.
AdegokeKAAdesinaOOOkon-AkanOA, et al.Sawdust-biomass based materials for sequestration of organic and inorganic pollutants and potential for engineering applications. Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry2022; 5: 100274.
45.
ThakkarAPatelBSahuSK, et al.Potato starch bioplastic films reinforced with organic and inorganic fillers: a sustainable packaging alternative. Int J Biol Macromol2025; 306: 141630.
46.
KovačMRavnjakBŠubarićD, et al.Isolation and characterization of starch from different potato cultivars grown in Croatia. Appl Sci2024; 14: 909.
47.
GyawaliKGhimirePBhandariA. A study on synthesis and characterization of bio-plastic obtained from potato. Am J Chem Pharm2024; 3: 20–26.
48.
KasmuriNSafwanMZaitA. Enhancement of bio-plastic using eggshells and chitosan on potato starch based. Int J Eng Technol2018; 7: 110–115. https://www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/IJET
49.
TanSXOngHCAndriyanaA, et al.Characterization and parametric study on mechanical properties enhancement in biodegradable chitosan-reinforced starch-based bioplastic film. Polymers2022; 14: 278.
50.
NigamSDasAKPatidarMK. Synthesis, characterization and biodegradation of bioplastic films produced from Parthenium hysterophorus by incorporating a plasticizer (PEG600). Environ Chall2021; 5: 100280.
51.
Guerrero-PérezMOPatienceGS. Experimental methods in chemical engineering: fourier transform infrared spectroscopy—FTIR. Can J Chem Eng2020; 98: 25–33.
52.
MohamedMAJaafarJIsmailAF, et al.Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. In: Membrane Characterization. Elsevier B.V, 2017, pp. 3–29.
53.
GongYChenXWuW. Application of fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy in sample preparation: material characterization and mechanism investigation. Advances in Sample Preparation2024; 11: 100122.
54.
CoatesJ.Interpretation of infrared spectra: A practical approach. Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry. Wiley Online, 2006, pp. 10815–10837. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470027318.a5606
55.
NandiyantoABDRagadhitaRFiandiniM. Interpretation of fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR): a practical approach in the polymer/plastic thermal decomposition. Indonesian J Sci Technol2023; 8: 113–126.
56.
NandiyantoABDOktianiRRagadhitaR. How to read and interpret ftir spectroscope of organic material. Indonesian J Sci Technol2019; 4: 97–118.
57.
AnggrainiTUlfimarjanFAzimaFYenrinaR. The effect of chitosan concentration on the characteristics of sago (Metroxylon sp.) starch bioplastics. Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences2017; 8: 1–7.
58.
LokeshPShobikaROmerS, et al.Bioremediation of plastics by the help of microbial tool: a way for control of plastic pollution. Sustainable Chemistry for the Environment2023; 3: 100027.
59.
YıldırımA. The effect of temperature and method of drying on isot (urfa pepper) and its vitamin C degradation kinetics. Article in Italian Journal of Food Science2018; 30: 2018–2505.
60.
OluwasinaOOOlaleyeFKOlusegunSJ, et al.Influence of oxidized starch on physicomechanical, thermal properties, and atomic force micrographs of cassava starch bioplastic film. Int J Biol Macromol2019; 135: 282–293.
61.
RazaviSMAMohammad AminiAZahediY. Characterisation of a new biodegradable edible film based on sage seed gum: influence of plasticiser type and concentration. Food Hydrocoll2015; 43: 290–298.
62.
TariqueJSapuanSMKhalinaA. Effect of glycerol plasticizer loading on the physical, mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of arrowroot (Maranta arundinacea) starch biopolymers. Sci Rep2021; 11: 13900.
63.
Alim BahmidNSyamsuKMadduA. Influence of cellulose acetate fiber size and diethylene glycol (DEG) addition on physical and mechanical properties of bioplastics. Jurnal Teknik Industri Pertanian2014; 24: 226–230.
64.
GuoLSatoHHashimotoT, et al.FTIR study on hydrogen-bonding interactions in biodegradable polymer blends of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and poly(4-vinylphenol). Macromolecules2010; 43: 3897–3902.
65.
YangWQiGKennyJM, et al.Effect of cellulose nanocrystals and lignin nanoparticles on mechanical, antioxidant and water vapour barrier properties of glutaraldehyde crosslinked PVA films. Polymers2020; 12: 1364.
66.
JangongOSGaresoPLMutmainnaI, et al.Fabrication and characterization starch/chitosan reinforced polypropylene as biodegradable. J Phys : Conf Ser2019; 1341: 082022. Institute of Physics Publishing.
67.
BeigBNiaziMBKJahanZ, et al.Biodegradable polymer coated granular urea slows down n release kinetics and improves spinach productivity. Polymers2020; 12: 2623.
68.
HospodarovaVSingovszkaEStevulovaN. Characterization of cellulosic fibers by FTIR spectroscopy for their further implementation to building materials. Am J Anal Chem2018; 09: 303–310.
69.
RaoLSNaiduCDTiwariS. Investigation on synthesis, structure and degradability of starch based bioplastics. Mater Today Proc2022; 49: 257–261.
70.
ShresthaBChapainKShahS, et al.Starch/polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) blend bioplastics: synthesis and physicochemical properties. J Nepal Chem Soc2023; 43: 103–109.
HorisawaSSunagawaMTamaiY, et al.Biodegradation of nonlignocellulosic substances II: physical and chemical properties of sawdust before and after use as artificial soil. J Wood Sci1999; 45: 492–497.
73.
ChenJLongZWangJ, et al.Preparation and properties of microcrystalline cellulose/hydroxypropyl starch composite films. Cellulose2017; 24: 4449–4459.
74.
GarcíaMAMartinoMNZaritzkyNE. Lipid addition to improve barrier properties of edible starch-based films and coatings. J Food Sci2000; 65: 941–944.
75.
NovisaSNugrohoBBBudiastutiH, et al.Characterization and production of biodegradable plastics from cassava rubber starch and old newsprint using glycerol plasticizer. Atlantis Press, 2020.
76.
IheanachoBCAjogeHNIsmailU, et al.A comprehensive study on the production and characterization of eco-friendly biodegradable plastic films from dent corn starch. Archives of Advanced Engineering Science2024; 3: 178–187.
77.
AminMRChowdhuryMAKowserMA. Characterization and performance analysis of composite bioplastics synthesized using titanium dioxide nanoparticles with corn starch. Heliyon2019; 5: e02009.
78.
HirparaNJDabhiMNRathodPJ. Development of potato starch based biodegradable packaging film. Biological Forum-An International Journal2021; 13: 529.
79.
GabrielAASolikhahAFRahmawatiAY. Tensile strength and elongation testing for starch-based bioplastics using melt intercalation method: a review. J Phys: Conf Ser2021; 1858: 012028. IOP Publishing Ltd.
80.
Sayid AbdullahSHYMohd DiahSBYewBS, et al.Impact of starch-based bioplastic film reinforced with alkaline treated lemongrass fibre and lemongrass essential oil on the barrier and mechanical properties. J Adv Res Appl Mech2024; 123: 120–134.
81.
DarniYSumartiniSLismeriL, et al.Bioplastics synthesis based on sorghum-Eucheuma spinosum modified with sorghum stalk powder. J Phys: Conf Ser2019; 1376: 012042. Institute of Physics Publishing.
82.
SergioJChavez-RosalesPintor-Ibarra, et al. Basic chemical composition of Pinus spp. sawdust from five regions of Mexico for bioenergetic purposes. BioResources2021; 16(1): 816–824.
83.
AdornaARubyRLDangVD, et al. Biodegradable polyhydroxybutyrate/cellulose/calcium carbonate bioplastic composites prepared by heat-assisted solution casting method. J Appl Polym Sci2022; 139(7): 51645.
84.
WillförSSundbergAHemmingJ, et al.Polysaccharides in some industrially important softwood species. Wood Sci Technol2005; 39: 245–258.
85.
ParandeGManakariVSharma KopparthySD, et al.A study on the effect of low-cost eggshell reinforcement on the immersion, damping and mechanical properties of magnesium–zinc alloy. Compos B Eng2020; 182: 107650.
86.
PokharelPMaZChangSX. Biochar increases soil microbial biomass with changes in extra- and intracellular enzyme activities: a global meta-analysis. Biochar2020; 2: 65–79.
87.
NcubeLKUdeAUOgunmuyiwaEN, et al.Environmental impact of food packaging materials: a review of contemporary development from conventional plastics to polylactic acid based materials. Materials2020; 13: 4994.
88.
MoshoodTDNawanirGMahmudF, et al.Sustainability of biodegradable plastics: new problem or solution to solve the global plastic pollution?Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry2022; 5: 100273.
89.
OtoniCGAzeredoHMCMattosBD, et al.The food–materials nexus: next generation bioplastics and advanced materials from agri-food residues. Adv Mater2021; 33: e2102520.
90.
ValleCVossMCalcio GaudinoE, et al.Harnessing agri-food waste as a source of biopolymers for agriculture. Appl Sci2024; 14: 4089.
91.
SahaAEndüstrisindeGAtıkS, et al.Circular economy strategies for sustainable waste management in the food industry circular economy strategies for sustainable waste management in the food industry. A N A H T A R K E L İ M E L E R. J Recycling Economy & Sustain Policy2023; 2: 1–15.
92.
SpierlingSKnüpfferEBehnsenH, et al.Bio-based plastics - a review of environmental, social and economic impact assessments. J Clean Prod2018; 185: 476–491.
93.
SantagataGSchettiniEVoxG, et al. Biodegradable spray mulching and nursery pots: new frontiers for research. Soil Degradable Bioplastics for a Sustainable Modern Agriculture. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2017, pp. 105–137.
94.
HayesDGAnunciadoMDeBruynJM, et al.Biodegradable plastic mulch films for sustainable specialty crop production. In: Polymers for Agri-Food Applications. Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 183–213.
