Antimicrobial polymer composites with anti-biofouling features for floating solar power plant applications: Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles

Abstract

Antimicrobial hybrid polymer composites are developed for application in floating solar power plants. To avoid the degradation of the floater because of microbes living in the water as well as possible biofouling, zinc oxide (ZnO) is used as an antimicrobial agent, varying the weight percent (1, 2, and 3 wt%) within the high-density polyethylene (HDPE) matrix, along with carbon black (CB) as a reinforcing agent (1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5 wt%). Escherichia coli (facultative anaerobic) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (aerobic-facultatively anaerobic) gram-negative bacteria formed a biofilm on HDPE in a 96-well plate for 5 days. In vitro, biofilm formation was determined by measuring absorbance (A420) in crystal violet dye, and the colony-forming unit (CFU) was determined by the spread plating technique. The biofilm formation and disruption are observed through a scanning electron microscope (SEM), where both the CFU and the SEM revealed uniform formation of biofilm onto neat HDPE. The best performance in terms of reduced biofilm formation and biofouling onto HDPE floaters was achieved for E. coli (ZnO: 2 wt% and CB: 2 wt%), whereas for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ZnO: 3 wt% and CB: 2 wt%). Application of greener polymers and nanoparticles for future studies is highly recommended.

Keywords

Floating solar power plant zinc oxide high density polythene escherichia coli pseudomonas aeruginosa spread plating technique colony forming unit biofouling

Introduction

Over the past two decades, a great deal of effort has been made by academia and industry to apply more renewable materials,^1–3 sustainable technologies,^4,5 and renewable energy resources.^6,7 In this regard, there has been a continued attempt to respond to worldwide demand for renewable energy targeted at electricity generation. Estimates predict that the electric power sector’s demand for electric energy will rise from 43% in 2017 to almost 47% in the next two decades. Therefore, the number of renewable energy source installations has increased by 8% in the last 10 years. The renewable energy resource mainly depends on solar energy, as the main sources are land-based and floating solar power plants. Typically, floating solar power plants enjoy a number of privileges compared to land-based solar, such as saving land, decreasing water evaporation, and generating more energy. In this sense, polymers and nanomaterials have been widely used for the sake of storage and heat and mass transfer.⁸ In general, it is accepted that the use of bacteria can make some polymers biodegradable, depending on circumstances and formulation.⁹ Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most ideal type of species in view of its considerable strains, large population on the surface of plastic, and effectiveness as an organism for biodegrading plastics such as polyethylene (PE), polypropylene, polystyrene, and polyphenylene sulfide.¹⁰ However, the efficiency of biodegradation depends on multiple parameters, necessitating engineering the whole process.

The biodegradation of PE (polyethylene) has been comprehensively reviewed.¹¹ When it comes to microorganism-assisted degradation, the diversity of mechanistic microbial degradation as well as the lack of detailed information about biodegradation circumstances have to be considered.¹² High-density polyethylene (HDPE) is a commodity plastic with a wide range of applications, such as agriculture, household goods, packaging, flexible pipes, and bottles. More specifically, HDPE was used as a floating block in floating solar panels for support structure.¹³ The genus pseudomonas and its sub-families are well-known species used for the biodegradation of plastics through the formation of a biofilm around the plastic material.¹⁴ HDPE can be degraded by using Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria under different environmental conditions.¹⁵ For instance, Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been used to compare the biodegradability of chiton, polybutylene adipate terephthalate, and non-biodegradable HDPE based on the OECD 301D aerobic biodegradation test method.¹⁶ Biofilm formation onto the surface of chitosan was observed quickly, whereas band rupture took place slowly in the case of HDPE, as per microscopic and spectroscopic analyses. Similar studies reveal biodegradation of HDPE depending on the applied condition.¹⁷ In these studies, Ranan et al. reported that the microbes reduced the molecular weight of HDPE, and the microscopic and spectroscopic analyses also revealed structural changes and the absence of functional group. Plastic bag degradation reported by Sinosh et al. shows that different microbes were taken for the study of the biodegradation of plastic bags, but the most effective species were found to be Pseudomonas spp.¹⁸ In total, 248 microbes were taken for the study of HDPE biodegradation. On the basis of weight loss, viability, and microscopic analysis, spectroscopic analyses revealed that Bacillus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. were most effective for the degradation of HDPE.¹⁹ In view of the mechanistic explanation of the biodegradation pathway, the effects of fungi and microbes on different types of PE have been reported, concluding that microbes such as Bacillus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most effective.²⁰ The biodegradation of PE-based bags and caps was also evaluated using Pseudomonas aeruginosa microbes. In a comparative study, the degradation of HDPE by Pseudomonas species and Arthrobacter species was evaluate.²¹ The losses after a month of incubation were approximately 15 wt% and 12 wt%, respectively. The bacterial adhesion of the former was indeed higher indeed.

Incorporation of antimicrobial nanoparticles into plastics for biodegradation was also considered a technique by many researchers.²² ZnO nanoparticles have taken credit for their antimicrobial and antibacterial characteristics and are widely used for packaging, antifouling, and biomedical purposes.^23–25 The effect of ZnO as an antimicrobial agent on the semiconductor material was investigated using a biofilm reactor with and without ZnO coating.²⁶ It was observed that bacterial biofilm growth was reduced by ZnO coating application. Several studies also reported the effects of ZnO nanoparticles on microbes like Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. It was reported that the addition of ZnO concentration increased the effectiveness; moreover, the antibacterial effect of ZnO on S. aureus was greater than that of Escherichia coli.²⁷ It was also concluded elsewhere that ZnO acts as an excellent antimicrobial agent against Gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli. It is promising that the addition of ZnO to polymers can enhance the mechanical properties of the resulting composites.^28–30 The biofilm and microbial secretion were responsible for forming the fouling membrane over a long period of time under service before converting into macro biofouling.³¹ Otherwise, the biofouling increases the cost of cleaning, and when we plant it on the water bed, it is also difficult to clean on site from the floater. Biofouling also causes the sinking of the floater by decreasing the buoyancy of the material.^32–34

Graphene and its derivatives worked as promising antimicrobial agents for Gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli,^35–38 but carbon black does not show antimicrobial properties to avoid microbial effect.³⁹ On the other hand, carbon black is known as a commodity filler in the polymer industry, with reinforcing effects on mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties.^40,41

In this study, a floater material was first developed, which is a characteristic of non-degradable plastic with resilience against short-domain degradation by microbes in marine or aquatic environments. Then, it was attempted to prevent the developed material from forming biofouling from the biofilm. A series of polymer composites based on HDPT, ZnO, and carbon black are prepared to study biofouling under variable conditions.⁴² Escherichia coli (facultative-anaerobic) and Pseudomonas-aeruginosa (aerobic-facultatively anaerobic) gram-negative bacteria were used to monitor biofilm formation on HDPE. It was attempted to evaluate the effect of ZnO as an antimicrobial agent, avoiding the formation of biofilm by the microbes, considering the complexity of the system when using carbon black additionally.

Material and method

Preparation of composite material

The composite of floater material was made from a commercial type of HDPE polymer (grade 156A200) supplied by GAIL India PVT with a density of 960 kg/m³ without additives. The virgin HDPE was compounded with zinc oxide (ZnO) with size of 40 nm and carbon black (size 40–48 nm) with different percentages in lab mixture for 15 min and then mix powder fed to the twin screw extruder for processing into granules composite. Processing of composite had been done at temperatures 190, 200 & 210°C. Here, we had taken 1, 2 & 3% of ZnO and 1, 1.5, 2 & 2.5% of carbon black in the composite.³⁰

Preparation of inoculum

Microbes were taken from glycerol stock and kept at normal temperature because it was stored stably at −80°C glycerol stocks. When we kept it in room temperature, it was converted into liquid form. 10 μL of microbes was added to 10 mL of Nutrient broth (NB). Here, we had taken two types of microbes Escherichia Coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and added 10 μL Escherichia coli in 10 mL of NB and 10 μL Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 10 mL of NB. These two solutions were incubated at 37°C for 24 h at shaking conditions in the Incubator. Use this solution as an inoculum to inoculate in our tube containing the beads or granules of polymer composite.¹⁶

Producing microbial biofilm on polymer composite

Total 13 batches of samples have been taken for the development of biofilm. We prepared 13*2 = 26 tubes for each bacteria or microbe so a total of 52 test tubes were prepared. Prepared Nutrient Broth (NB), added 13 gm of Nutrient Broth powder in 1 L of distilled water mix and dissolved completely. 10 mL of NB was added to the test tube and prepared 52 test tubes for the microbes after adding 30 granules into each test tube and a cotton plug was used to close the mouth of the test tube. Autoclaving for all test tubes at 121°C 15 psi pressure for 20 min is done for sterilization of media.

Inoculate the broth culture by using inoculum which was prepared after that inoculate 10 μL culture from each inoculum in every test tube respectively. All test tubes incubate at 37°C shaker in incubator for 2 h. Shift all test tubes from shaker to static condition in the incubator for 3 days at 37°C. After 3 days, remove all test tubes from the incubator and take out the only 15 granules which were totally sunk then put granules into 2 mL of Eppendorf tube and prepare 52 Eppendorf for further process. Add Crystal Violet Dye to all 52 Eppendorf to stain the granules. Incubate all Eppendorf at room temperature to stain all microbes with biofilm for 30 min. Throw away excess dye from granules.

Then add tap water in the same Eppendorf tube and keep it for 5 min. After 5 min, throw away excess water and stain each Eppendorf. Add 33% glacial acetic acid in all Eppendorf 1 mL or maximum 2 mL to dissolve Crystal Violet Dye from microbes and keep it for 5 min at room temperature. Once removed all granules from Eppendorf only dye, microbes and biofilm will be available in Eppendorf. Transform 200 μL of each sample in a 96-well plate. Read each plate containing the sample in UV spectrophotometer at 420 nm and prepare the observation table for all batches from UV spectrophotometer to get the reading in the form of Optical density or absorbance.⁴³ Calculated the Colony Forming Unit (CFU) by the spread plate technique.⁴⁴

Result and discussion

Efficacy of Zinc Oxide (ZnO) in Presence of Carbon Black in reducing E. coli Microbes and its Biofilm

Some of the oxides like calcium oxide, magnesium oxide, and zinc oxide used are very good antimicrobial agents^27,28 so that we have used ZnO (zinc oxide) as an antimicrobial agent in the weight percentage of 1, 2 & 3%. With carbon black. The carbon black is used to enhance the properties of the polymer (HDPE).³⁰ A total of 13 batches were prepared including pure HDPE and all were put into E. coli culture for 5 days and the results obtained from the UV spectrophotometer are shown in Figure 1. Here, we observe in vitro by measuring the absorbance.

Figure 1.

Variation of absorbance with increase of percentage of ZnO.

All the batches significantly show some value of absorbance in Figure 1, but E. coli at 2% of ZnO and 2% of carbon black was most effective to avoid the generation of microbes and biofilm compared to the pure form of polymer composite. When we considered 1% carbon black and 1, 2 and 3% of ZnO, we got less formation of biofilm at 1% of ZnO, and after that, the bar chart shows the higher formation of biofilm. If we see that 1.5% of carbon black and 1, 2 and 3% of ZnO, the bar chart shows that till 2% of ZnO, the formation of biofilm was reduced because the zinc oxide,^45,46 but after 2%, the effect of ZnO was reduced. Similarly, for 2.5% carbon black, the bar chart shows that ZnO was effective at 1% and 3%. It was observe that the ZnO (zinc oxide) shows excellent anti-biofilm and antimicrobial property comparing to the other antimicrobial agent like CuO and Fe2O3 NPs on E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, etc.⁴⁷

The further effect of ZnO doped with CB was tested for inhibition of microbes like E. coli and its biofilm on HDPE with 0,2 and 3% (only selected batches taken with respect to the result obtained in absorbance) of ZnO. The pathogen population on HDPE is calculated as 0.418 × 10⁴ CFU/ml. But when HDPE was treated with 2% and 3% of ZnO, the pathogen population and its biofilm were not seen, which showed the strong effect of ZnO as an antimicrobial on E. coli microbes.^1,45,46,48 This result is supported by the SEM images in Figure 2 which were taken and revealed that only pathogen populations and their biofilms formed on pure HDPE material.

Figure 2.

Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of Escherichia coli and its biofilm on HDPE at (a) Pure HDPE material, (b) HDPE treated with 2% of ZnO, (c) HDPE treated with 3% of ZnO.

Efficacy of ZnO (Zinc Oxide) in presence of Carbon black in reducing Pseudomonas aeruginosa microbes and its biofilm

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a microbe used to degrade microplastic polymers in aquatic systems and soil.^13–20 So, here we have also considered these bacteria for the study. Now form Figure 3 which shows the quantity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa forming biofilm in the form of absorbance. Here all batches were put into Pseudomonas aeruginosa culture. The result shows that the absorbance value for ZnO at 3% and carbon black at 2% was the most effective compared to pure HDPE. When we consider 1% CB and 1,2,3% of ZnO at 1% of ZnO shows effective nature but as ZnO increases the population of pathogens decreases shows in bar chart and at 2% of ZnO the absorbance value increases. If 1.5% of carbon black is considered the absorbance decreases but after 2% of ZnO it again increases. When 2% of CB is considered, the value most effective goes down from 1 to 3% ZnO. So, here, we had considered the 2.5 of CB for Different percentages ZnO so till 2% it was effective and after that absorbance again increases.

Figure 3.

Variation of absorbance with increase of percentage of ZnO.

The further effect of ZnO doped with CB was tested for inhibition of microbes like Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its biofilm on HDPE with 0,2 and 3% (only selected batches taken with respect to the result obtained in absorbance) of ZnO. The pathogen population on HDPE is calculated as 0.449 × 10⁷ CFU/ml but when HDPE was treated with 2% and 3% of ZnO, the pathogen population and its biofilm were not seen so biofouling formation also avoided,⁴⁹ which showed the strong effect of ZnO as an antimicrobial.^35,36 This result is supported by the SEM images from Figure 4 which were taken and revealed that only pathogen populations and their biofilms formed on pure HDPE material.

Figure 4.

Scanining electron micrographs of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its biofilm on HDPE at. (a) Pure HDPE material, (b) HDPE treated with 2% of ZnO, (c) HDPE treated with 3% of ZnO.

Comparison of E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with respect to ZnO and carbon black

Due to differences in bacterial cell structure and susceptibility to ZnO’s mechanisms of antibacterial action, different bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and E. coli, can respond differently to zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles⁵⁰ and its composite used to make the floater using the floating solar power plant, so it will be exposed to sunlight, hence the ZnO nanoparticle produces reactive oxygen species (ROS). The reactive oxygen species also damage the bacterial cell membrane and biomolecules, leading to the death of the cell.⁵¹ Pseudomonas aeruginosa is more susceptible to reactive oxygen species due to differences in its cell membrane composition and metabolic processes.^52,53 Insoo et al. (2009) reported that ZnO was a superior antimicrobial for Pseudomonas aeruginosa when compared to E. coli.⁵⁴ The study also shows that Pseudomonas aeruginosa microbes used to degrade the polymer (HDPE) had higher absorbance and colony-forming units than E. coli bacteria in the pure form of HDPE, but in the composite form, ZnO in the presence of CB (carbon black) showed a greater effect on Pseudomonas aeruginosa compared to E. coli.^47,55 So, we can say that ZnO with CB has a good effect on Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria, which is mainly responsible for the degradation of the polymer. By doing so, we can increase the life of the floater, which is used in floating solar power plants, and avoid the excess maintenance cost due to biofouling cleaning. When zinc oxide is doped with carbon black in HDPE matrix, the carbon black alone does not have any anti-microbial effect³⁹ on the polymer composite, but carbon black is added to HDPE to increase the mechanical properties of the polymer composite because, during exposure to sunlight, the UV light degrades the HDPE, and carbon black works as an anti-UV (ultra-violet) additive to avoid degradation of materials.^30,56,57 But here in these studies, we have focused only on the antimicrobial properties of materials, so only the ZnO effect was elaborated.

Conclusion

In this study, the ability of ZnO in the presence of carbon black to reduce the growth of pathogens such as E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa within their biofilm was demonstrated. The pathogen population on HDPE is calculated as 0.418 × 10⁴ CFU/ml and 0.449 × 10⁷ CFU/ml for E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa microbes, but for polymer composites in the presence of ZnO, the growth of E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa reduces, and it can also prevent the biofilm that is formed on the floaters and, after a period of time, transforms into biofouling as well as the final product of ZnO and carbon black. The study concludes that 2% of ZnO (E. coli) and 3% of ZnO (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) in the presence of 2% carbon black is useful to activate the antimicrobial activity; therefore, the bacteria that are present in the aquatic system should not degrade the floaters rapidly. In addition, the total maintenance costs are reduced by limiting the growth of biofouling. The study also revealed that ZnO nanoparticles are more effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa compared to E. coli. Further study of the longer lifespan of polymer composites shows the loss of molecular weight in the form of degradation.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

I express my gratitude to DBT ICT centre for providing facility to conduct the research on antimicrobial activity. I am thankful to Mr Mohammed Khalid and Mr Israr for their support in the process of experimentation which supported to complete this study. I am also thankful to Prof. M.S.Balasubramani from THEEM COE for his continuous support in proofreading my manuscript.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Mohammed W Khan

References

Coneo

Ramos

De Ávila

, et al. Active chitosan- poly (vinyl alcohol) film reinforced with zinc oxide nanoparticles for food packaging applications. Polym Renew Resour 2023; 14(3): 173–194. DOI: 10.1177/20412479231174442.

Howell

. Efficient biobased oligomeric plasticizers from the renewable biomonomers, glycerol and adipic acid. Polym Renew Resour 2023; 14(3): 207–214. DOI: 10.1177/20412479231182700.

Zarrintaj

Seidi

Youssefi Azarfam

, et al. Biopolymer-based composites for tissue engineering applications: a basis for future opportunities. Composites Part B 2023; 258: 110701. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110701.

Rabiee

Sharma

Foorginezhad

, et al. Green and sustainable membranes: a review. Environ Res 2023; 231: 116133. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116133.

Wiśniewska

Haponiuk

Colom

, et al. Green approaches in rubber recycling technologies: present status and future perspective. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 2023; 11(24): 8706–8726. DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c01314.

Olabi

Abdelkareem

. Renewable energy and climate change. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2022; 158: 112111. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112111.

Moayed Mohseni

Jouyandeh

Mohammad Sajadi

, et al. Metal-organic frameworks (MOF) based heat transfer: a comprehensive review. Chem Eng J 2022; 449: 137700. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.137700.

Ronte

Wagle

Mahmodi

, et al. High-flux ZIF-8 membranes on ZnO-coated supports for propane/propylene separation. Energy & Fuels 2023; 37(12): 8456–8464. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c00212.

Bahl

Dolma

Jyot Singh

, et al. Biodegradation of plastics: a state of the art review. Mater Today Proc 2021; 39: 31–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.096.

10.

Lee

Kim

Jeon

, et al. Evaluation of the biodegradation efficiency of four various types of plastics by pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from the gut extract of superworms. Microorganisms 2020; 8(9): 1341. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8091341.

11.

Ghatge

Yang

Ahn

, et al. Biodegradation of polyethylene: a brief review. Appl Biol Chem 2020; 63(1): 27. DOI: 10.1186/s13765-020-00511-3.

12.

Montazer

Habibi Najafi

Levin

. Challenges with verifying microbial degradation of polyethylene. Polymers 2020; 12(1): 123. DOI: 10.3390/polym12010123.

13.

Mouafo Tamnou

Tamsa Arfao

Nougang

, et al. Biodegradation of polyethylene by the bacterium pseudomonas aeruginosa in acidic aquatic microcosm and effect of the environmental temperature. Environ Challenges 2021; 3: 100056. DOI: 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100056.

14.

Wilkes

Aristilde

. Degradation and metabolism of synthetic plastics and associated products by pseudomonas sp.: capabilities and challenges. J Appl Microbiol 2017; 123(3): 582–593. DOI: 10.1111/jam.13472.

15.

Kotova

Taktarova

Tsavkelova

, et al. Microbial degradation of plastics and approaches to make it more efficient. Microbiol Russian Fed 2021; 90(6): 671–701. DOI: 10.1134/S0026261721060084.

16.

Das

Bordoloi

Rai

, et al. Biodegradable and biocompatible epoxidized vegetable oil modified thermostable poly (vinyl chloride): thermal and performance characteristics post biodegradation with pseudomonas aeruginosa and achromobacter sp. J Hazard Mater 2012; 210: 434–442. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.01.043.

17.

Bonilla

Paiano

Lourenço

, et al. Biodegradability in aquatic system of thin materials based on chitosan, PBAT and HDPE polymers: respirometric and physical-chemical analysis. Int J Biol Macromol 2020; 164: 1399–1412. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.309.

18.

Skariyachan

Megha

Kini

, et al. Selection and screening of microbial consortia for efficient and ecofriendly degradation of plastic garbage collected from urban and rural areas of Bangalore, India. Environ Monit Assess 2015; 187(1): 4174. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-014-4174-y.

19.

Sangeetha Devi

Ramya

Kannan

, et al. Investigation of biodegradation potentials of high density polyethylene degrading marine bacteria isolated from the coastal regions of Tamil Nadu, India. Mar Pollut Bull 2019; 138: 549–560. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.12.001.

20.

Kunlere

Fagade

Nwadike

. Biodegradation of low density polyethylene (LDPE) by certain indigenous bacteria and fungi. Int J Environ Stud 2019; 76(3): 428–440. DOI: 10.1080/00207233.2019.1579586.

21.

Balasubramanian

Natarajan

Hemambika

, et al. High-density polyethylene (HDPE)-degrading potential bacteria from marine ecosystem of Gulf of Mannar, India. Lett Appl Microbiol 2010; 51(2): 205–211. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02883.x.

22.

Omerović

Djisalov

Živojević

, et al. Antimicrobial nanoparticles and biodegradable polymer composites for active food packaging applications. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2021; 20(3): 2428–2454. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12727.

23.

Vatanpour

Mousavi Khadem

Dehqan

, et al. Application of g-C3N4/ZnO nanocomposites for fabrication of anti-fouling polymer membranes with dye and protein rejection superiority. J Membr Sci 2022; 660: 120893, DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120893.

24.

Rabiee

Akhavan

Fatahi

, et al. CaZnO-based nanoghosts for the detection of ssDNA, pCRISPR and recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen and targeted delivery of doxorubicin. Chemosphere 2022; 306: 135578, DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135578.

25.

Hashem

Al-Askar

Saeb

, et al. Sustainable biosynthesized bimetallic ZnO@SeO nanoparticles from pomegranate peel extracts: antibacterial, antifungal and anticancer activities. RSC Adv 2023; 13(33): 22918–22927. DOI: 10.1039/D3RA03260D.

26.

Gittard

Perfect

Monteiro-Riviere

, et al. Assessing the antimicrobial activity of zinc oxide thin films using disk diffusion and biofilm reactor. Appl Surf Sci 2009; 255(11): 5806–5811. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.01.009.

27.

Ohira

Yamamoto

Iida

, et al. Antibacterial activity of ZnO powder with crystallographic orientation. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008; 19(3): 1407–1412. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-007-3246-8.

28.

Sahu

Sudhakar

Sarviya

. U.V light effect on the mechanical behaviour of HDPE/Carbon black composites. In: 5th International Conference on Mechanical Engineering Research 2019 (ICMER 2019) 30 - 31 July 2019, Kuantan, Malaysia, 2020, Vol 788. Institute of Physics Publishing. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/788/1/012054.

29.

Abebe

Zereffa

Tadesse

, et al. A review on enhancing the antibacterial activity of zno: mechanisms and microscopic investigation. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2020; 15(1): 1–19. DOI:10.1186/s11671-020-03418-6

30.

Espitia

PJP

Soares

N de FF

Coimbra Js dos

, et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, antimicrobial activity and food packaging applications. Food Bioprocess Technol 2012; 5(5): 1447–1464. DOI: 10.1007/s11947-012-0797-6.

31.

Raghupathi

Koodali

Manna

. Size-dependent bacterial growth inhibition and mechanism of antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Langmuir 2011; 27(7): 4020–4028. DOI: 10.1021/la104825u.

32.

Amaral-Zettler

Zettler

Mincer

, et al. Biofouling impacts on polyethylene density and sinking in coastal waters: a macro/micro tipping point? Water Res. 2021; 201: 1–9. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2021.117289

33.

Wang

Ren

, et al. Transition of fouling characteristics after development of membrane wetting in membrane-aerated biofilm reactors (MABRs). Chemosphere 2022; 299: 134355, DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134355.

34.

Kaiser

Kowalski

Waniek

. Effects of biofouling on the sinking behavior of microplastics. Environ Res Lett. 2017; 12(12): 1–10. DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/aa8e8b

35.

Mohan

. Surface modified graphene/SnO2 nanocomposite from carbon black as an efficient disinfectant against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mater Chem Phys 2019; 232: 137–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.04.074.

36.

Babu

Antony

. Green synthesis of silver doped nano metal oxides of zinc & copper for antibacterial properties, adsorption, catalytic hydrogenation & photodegradation of aromatics. J Environ Chem Eng. 2019; 7(1): 1–40. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2018.102840

37.

Siddiqi

ur Rahman

Tajuddin

. Properties of zinc oxide nanoparticles and their activity against microbes. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2018; 13: 1–13. DOI:10.1186/s11671-018-2532-3

38.

Al-Naamani

Dobretsov

Dutta

, et al. Chitosan-zinc oxide nanocomposite coatings for the prevention of marine biofouling. Chemosphere 2017; 168: 408–417. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.033.

39.

De Guzman

Wen

, et al. Characterization of antibacterial nanocomposites of polyethylene terephthalate filled with nanosilver-doped carbon black. Polym Polym Compos 2020; 29(6): 797–806. DOI: 10.1177/0967391120935305.

40.

Zedler

Colom

Saeb

, et al. Preparation and characterization of natural rubber composites highly filled with brewers’ spent grain/ground tire rubber hybrid reinforcement. Composites Part B 2018; 145: 182–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.024.

41.

Ciampaglia

Ciardiello

Cesano

, et al. Multifunctional material design for strain sensing: carbon black effect on mechanical and electrical properties of polyamides. Compos Struct 2023; 304: 116373, DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116373.

42.

Miranville

. Annual report 2020. AIMS Math 2021; 6(12): 14064–14068. DOI: 10.3934/math.2021814.

43.

Annapurna

Rajkumar

Prasad

MNV

. Potential of castor bean (Ricinus Communis l.) for phytoremediation of metalliferous waste assisted by plant growth-promoting bacteria: possible cogeneration of economic products. Bioremediation and Bioeconomy. Elsevier Inc., 2016.

44.

Hartman

. Perfecting your spread plate technique. J Microbiol Biol Educ 2011; 12(2): 204–205. DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.v12i2.324.

45.

Beyene

Ghosh

. Effect of zinc oxide addition on antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of hydroxyapatite: a potential nanocomposite for biomedical applications. Mater Today Commun 2019; 21: 100612. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100612.

46.

Chen

Jing

, et al. Functionalized zinc oxide microparticles for improving the antimicrobial effects of skin-care products and wound-care medicines. Biomater Adv 2022; 135: 212728, DOI: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212728.

47.

Mahamuni-Badiger

Patil

Badiger

, et al. Biofilm formation to inhibition: Role of zinc oxide-based nanoparticles. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020; 108: 1–20. DOI:10.1016/j.msec.2019.110319

48.

Huang

Hao

, et al. Preparation of organic-inorganic composites with high antibacterial activity based on sepiolite, chitosan and zinc: The study of the active antibacterial sites of chitosan-zinc oxide structure. Appl Clay Sci 2022; 216: 106325. DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2021.106325.

49.

Lee

Kim

Cho

, et al. ZnO nanoparticles inhibit Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and virulence factor production. Microbiol Res 2014; 169(12): 888–896, DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2014.05.005.

50.

Abdelraheem

Mohamed

. The effect of Zinc Oxide nanoparticles on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and virulence genes expression. J Infect Dev Ctries 2021; 15(6): 826–832. DOI: 10.3855/jidc.13958.

51.

Khameneh

Diab

Ghazvini

, et al. Breakthroughs in bacterial resistance mechanisms and the potential ways to combat them. Microb Pathog 2016; 95: 32–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.02.009.

52.

Saleh

Sadeq

Abdel Latif

, et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles inhibits quorum sensing and virulence in pseudomonas aeruginosa. Afr Health Sci 2019; 19(2): 2043–2055. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v19i2.28.

53.

Caliskan

Poschmann

Gudzuhn

, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa responds to altered membrane phospholipid composition by adjusting the production of two-component systems, proteases and iron uptake proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids 2023; 1868(6): 159317. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2023.159317.

54.

Kim

Viswanathan

Kasi

, et al. ZnO nanostructures in active antibacterial food packaging: preparation methods, antimicrobial mechanisms, safety issues, future prospects, and challenges. Food Rev Int 2022; 38(4): 537–565. DOI: 10.1080/87559129.2020.1737709.

55.

Heydari-Majd

Ghanbarzadeh

Shahidi-Noghabi

, et al. A new active nanocomposite film based on PLA/ZnO nanoparticle/essential oils for the preservation of refrigerated otolithes ruber fillets. Food Packag Shelf Life 2019; 19: 94–103. DOI: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.12.002. 2018.

56.

Hadi

Kadhim

. A study of the effect of nano zinc oxide on cure characteristics and mechanical properties of rubber composites. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019; 1234(1): 1–15. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1234/1/012043

57.

Anand

Nussana

Sham Aan

, et al. Synthesis and characterization of ZnO nanoparticles and their natural rubber composites. J Macromol Sci, Part B: Phys 2020; 59(11): 697–712. DOI: 10.1080/00222348.2020.1798097.

58.

BP . BP Statistical Review of World Energy. Energy Institute (EI), 2017, https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html#tab_sr-2017.

59.

Where Sun Meets Water: Floating Solar Handbook for Practitioners. World Bank Group, ESMAP, and SERIS, 2019, https://www.seris.nus.edu.sg/doc/publications/ESMAP_FloatingSolar_TEXT-A4-WEB.pdf.

60.

Baculi

. Biodegradation of high density polyethylene by bacteria isolated from root nodules of Phaseolus vulgaris. Philippine Agricultural Scientist. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327200483.

61.

Kathiresan

. Polythene and plastics-degrading microbes from the Mangrove soil. Pum Med National Liabrary of Medicine. 2003; 5115162769.