Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Behçet disease is a chronic inflammatory systemic disorder, characterized by a relapsing and remitting course. It manifests with oral and genital ulcerations, skin lesions, uveitis, and vascular, central nervous system and gastrointestinal involvement. The main histopathological finding is a widespread vasculitis of the arteries and veins of any size. The cause of this disease is presumed to be multifactorial involving infectious triggers, genetic predisposition, and dysregulation of the immune system. As the clinical expression of Behçet disease is heterogeneous, pharmacological therapy is variable and depends largely on the severity of the disease and organ involvement. Treatment of Behçet disease continues to be based largely on anecdotal case reports, case series, and a few randomized clinical trials.

Keywords

Behçet disease Behçet syndrome biologic therapy therapy treatment tumor necrosis factor α

Introduction

Behçet’s disease (BD) is a multigenetic inflammatory systemic disorder of unknown etiology. Clinical features include oral and genital ulcers, ocular inflammation, skin lesions, as well as articular, vascular, neurological, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, renal, vascular and genitourinary manifestations. The disease may start with one or more of the above symptoms but other symptoms may gradually appear over the years [Arayssi and Hamdan, 2004]. Outside the eye, its course is characterized by recurrent self-limiting episodes of acute inflammation that can lead to significant disability [Sakane et al. 1999].

The disease is present worldwide but its prevalence is the highest in the Middle East, Mediterranean region and Asia. The usual age of onset is around 30 and the male to female ratio varies with the ethnic background [Sakane et al. 1999] (range of male/female patients 1:1–3:1) [Hamdan et al. 2006]. The disease burden of BD is confined to the early years (around 15 years) of its course, and in many patients the syndrome burns out over the years [Kural-Seyahi et al. 2003]. Major vessel disease and central nervous system (CNS) involvement account for most of the deaths seen in this condition and can rarely appear for the first time relatively late in the course of the disease [Kural-Seyahi et al. 2003].

As in most complex diseases, both genetic and environmental factors are implicated in the pathogenesis of BD. Although detailed discussion of the pathogenesis of BD is beyond the scope of this paper, it is important to note the significant strides that have been made in the last decade in understanding its complex genetic architecture. HLA-B51 is by far the strongest associated genetic factor with reported odds ratio (OR) in patients with BD compared with controls ranging from 3.49 to 5.78 [Remmers et al. 2010; Meguro et al. 2010; de Menthon et al. 2009]. Recent data, however, from Italian and Turkish BD cohorts suggest that this association may be explained by a variant located between the HLA-B and MICA genes (OR = 3.88) and not by the HLA-B51 [Hughes et al. 2013].

In addition to HLA-B51, several susceptibility genes within and outside the major histocompatibility complex have been described and are thought to play a role in this complex disease. These include HLA-A26, PSORS1C1 [Hughes et al. 2013], HLA-Cw1602 [Hughes et al. 2013], GIMAP [Lee et al. 2013], UBAC2 [Sawalha et al. 2011], IL10 and IL23-IL12RB2 [Remmers et al. 2010; Mizuki et al. 2010], CCR1/CCR3 [Hou et al. 2012], MEFV and TLR4 [Kirino et al. 2013]. As further understanding of the functional relevance of those genes emerge, new therapeutic targets may be developed to treat the disease in a more specific manner.

Therapeutic options in Behçet’s disease

The main goal of therapy in patients with BD is to induce and maintain remission and improve patients’ quality of life. Selecting treatment is based on the organ involved and the assessment of the severity of the disease. The choice of therapy, however, is limited by the scarceness of high-quality therapy trials and is based largely on case reports, case series and several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Randomized controlled trials in Behçet’s disease.

Authors [year]	Intervention	No. patients (cases versus controls)	Duration	Outcome	Result	Side effects (n)
Davatchi et al. [2010]	Rituximab 1 g intravenously every 2 weeks ×2 + MTX 15 mg/week + Pred 0.5 mg/kg/day versus cyclophosphamide intravenously 1 g/month + azathioprine 2–3 mg/kg/day + Pred 0.5 mg/kg/day	10 versus 10	6 months	Retinal vasculitis	Improvement	Conjunctivitis (2)
						Pneumonia (1)
						Herpes Zoster (1)
						Severe allergic reaction (1)
Davatchi et al. [2009]	Colchicine 1 mg/day versus placebo	169 (crossover trial)	8 months	Oral ulcers, genital ulcers, pseudofolliculitis, erythema nodosum	Improvement	Nausea, vomiting (1)
Melikoglu et al. [2005]	Etanercept 25 mg subcutaneously twice a week versus placebo	20 versus 20	4 weeks	Oral ulcers, genital ulcers, papulopustular lesions, nodular lesions, arthritis	Improvement	Diarrhea (1)
Matsuda et al. [2003]	Rebamipide 300 mg/day versus placebo	19 versus 16	6 months	Oral ulcers	Improvement	None reported
Alpsoy et al. [2002]	IFN-2a subcutaneously 6 MU three times a week versus placebo	23 versus 21	3 months	Oral ulcers, genital ulcers, papulopustular lesions	Improvement	None reported
Sharquie et al. [2002]	Dapsone 100 mg/day versus placebo	10 versus 10	3 months	Oral ulcers, genital ulcers, EN-like lesions, papulopustular lesions, acneiform lesions	Improvement	None reported
Yurdakul et al. [2001]	Colchicine 1–2 mg/day versus placebo	58 versus 58	2 years	Genital ulcers	Improvement in women	None reported
				Erythema nodosum	Improvement in M and F
				Arthritis	Improvement in M and F
Hamuryudan et al. [1998]	Thalidomide 300 mg/day versus placebo	32 versus 32	24 weeks	Oral ulcers, genital ulcers, follicular lesions	Improvement	Polyneuropathy (1)
Hamuryudan et al. [1998]	Thalidomide 300 mg/day versus placebo	32 versus 32	24 weeks	Oral ulcers, genital ulcers, follicular lesions	Improvement	Polyneuropathy (3)
Ozyazgan et al. [1992]	Ciclosporin A 5 mg/kg/day versus cyclophosphamide 1 g/month intravenously	12 versus 11	6 months	Uveitis	Improvement	Not specified
Yazici et al. [1990]	Azathioprine 2.5 mg/kg/day versus placebo (without eye disease)	12 versus 13	2 years	New eye disease	Prevention of development of new eye disease	None reported
Yazici et al. [1990]	Azathioprine 2.5 mg/kg/day versus placebo (with eye disease)	25 versus 23	2 years	Uveitis	Improvement	None reported
Masuda et al. [1989]	Ciclosporin 10 mg/kg/day versus colchicine 1 mg/day	47 versus 49	16 weeks	Ocular attacks	Improvement	Renal dysfunction (1)
Masuda et al. [1989]	Ciclosporin 10 mg/kg/day versus colchicine 1 mg/day	47 versus 49	16 weeks	Ocular attacks	Improvement	Hepatic dysfunction (2)
BenEzra et al. [1988]	Ciclosporin 10 mg/day (later 5 mg/day) versus conventional therapy (prednisolone 1–1.5 mg/day or chlorambucil 0.1–0.2 mg/day)	20 versus 20	3 years	Ocular attacks	Improvement	Renal dysfunction (1)

EN, erythema nodosum; MTX, methotrexate; Pred, prednisone.

In this section, we review the different drug classes utilized in the care of patients with BD with special emphasis on the use of biologic agents that provided an important therapeutic advancement for patients with severe or resistant disease (Table 2).

Table 2.

Indications for the use of common therapeutic agents in Behçet’s disease.

Therapy	Indication	Evidence
Infliximab	Eye involvement	Case reports/series [Munoz-Fernandez et al. 2001; Sfikakis et al. 2001; Capella and Foster, 2012; Alokaily et al. 2010; Olivieri et al. 2008; Takamoto et al. 2007; Merino et al. 2006; Lindstedt et al. 2005; Lanthier et al. 2005; Wechsler et al. 2004; Sayarlioglu et al. 2004a; Rosenbaum, 2004; Giansanti et al. 2004; Falappone et al. 2004; Morris et al. 2003; Gulli et al. 2003; Triolo et al. 2002; Takayama et al. 2013]
		Open-label clinical trials [Okada et al. 2012; Handa et al. 2011; Giardina et al. 2011; Tanaka et al. 2010; Adan et al. 2010; Al-Rayes et al. 2008; Tognon et al. 2007; Niccoli et al. 2007; Accorinti et al. 2007; Tugal-Tutkun et al. 2005; Benitez-del-Castillo et al. 2005; Arayssi et al. 2005; Abu El-Asrar et al. 2005; Sfikakis et al. 2004; Ohno et al. 2004; Cantarini et al. 2012; Keino et al. 2011]
		Nonrandomized comparative studies [Tabbara and Al-Hemidan, 2008; Yamada et al. 2010; Markomichelakis et al. 2011]
	GI involvement	Case series [Maruyama et al. 2012; Lee et al. 2007; Ju et al. 2007; Kram et al. 2003; Travis et al. 2001; Hassard et al. 2001; Naganuma et al. 2008]
	GI involvement	Prospective study [Iwata et al. 2011]
	Neuro-Behçet	Case reports/series [Giardina et al. 2011; Licata et al. 2003; Ribi et al. 2005; Sarwar et al. 2005; Fujikawa et al. 2007; Borhani Haghighi and Safari, 2008; Kikuchi et al. 2008; Pipitone et al. 2008; Abalos-Medina et al. 2009]
	Vascular involvement	Case reports [Schreiber et al. 2011; Yoshida et al. 2012]
	Vascular involvement	Retrospective case series [Adler et al. 2012]
	Joint involvement	Case reports/series [Arida et al. 2011]
	Mucocutaneous involvement	Case reports [Chan and Lee, 2012; Aikawa et al. 2011; Kasugai et al. 2010; Lestre et al. 2009; Olivieri et al. 2008; Almoznino and Ben-Chetrit, 2007; Connolly et al. 2005; Takayama et al. 2013; Gulli et al. 2003]
Etanercept	Mucocutaneous involvement	RCT [Melikoglu et al. 2005]
Etanercept	Eye involvement	Case reports/series [Curigliano et al. 2008; Sfikakis, 2002]
Adalimumab	Eye involvement	Case reports [Adan et al. 2010; Mushtaq et al. 2007; Takase et al. 2011]
	Eye involvement	Retrospective case series [Bawazeer et al. 2010]
	Mucocutaneous involvement	Case reports [Olivieri et al. 2009; Atzeni et al. 2010]
	Mucocutaneous involvement	Retrospective case series [Perra et al. 2012]
	GI involvement	Case reports [De Cassan et al. 2011; Ariyachaipanich et al. 2009]
	Neuro-Behçet	Case report [Belzunegui et al. 2008]
	Vascular involvement	Case report [Lee et al. 2010]
Rituximab	Eye involvement	Case report [Sadreddini et al. 2008]
Rituximab	Eye involvement	Randomized single-blind study [Davatchi et al. 2010]
Gevokizumab	Eye involvement	Open label study [Gul et al. 2012]
Canakinumab	Eye involvement	Case report [Ugurlu et al. 2012]
Canakinumab	Extraocular disease	Case report [Cantarini et al. 2012]
Anakinra	Extraocular disease	Case report [Botsios et al. 2008]
Tocilizumab	Neuro-Behçet	Case reports [Urbaniak et al. 2012; Shapiro et al. 2012]
Tocilizumab	Eye involvement	Case report [Hirano et al. 2012]
Interferon alpha	Mucocutaneous disease	RCT [Alpsoy et al. 2002]
	Mucocutaneous disease	Open-label studies [Boyvat et al. 2000; O’Duffy et al. 1998; Georgiou et al. 1998; Azizlerli et al. 1996; Alpsoy et al. 1994]
	Eye involvement	Uncontrolled prospective study [Kotter et al. 2003]
		Retrospective studies [Onal et al. 2011; Sobaci et al. 2010; Deuter et al. 2010; Bodaghi et al. 2007; Tugal-Tutkun et al. 2006; Deuter et al. 2004; Krause et al. 2003; Calguneri et al. 2003; Hamuryudan et al. 2002; Wechsler et al. 2000; Yalcindag and Uzun, 2012]
		Systematic review [Kotter et al. 2004a]
	Mucocutaneous disease and arthritis	Uncontrolled prospective study [Kotter et al. 2004b]
	Mucocutaneous disease and arthritis	Systematic review [Kotter et al. 2004a]
	Neuro-Behçet	Case reports [Nichols et al. 2001; Kuemmerle-Deschner et al. 2008; Chroni et al. 2008; Calguneri et al. 2005; Monastirli et al. 2010]
Corticosteroids	Severe or life-threatening manifestations such as ocular, vascular, gastrointestinal, or neurologic disease	Expert committee report (EULAR) [Hatemi et al. 2009]
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs	Joint involvement	RCT [Moral et al. 1995]
	Joint involvement	Open-label study [Simsek et al. 1991]
	Mucocutaneous disease	Open-label study [Simsek et al. 1991]
Colchicine	Mucocutaneous disease	RCTs [Aktulga et al. 1980; Yurdakul et al. 2001; Davatchi et al. 2009]
Colchicine	Joint involvement	RCTs [Yurdakul et al. 2001; Aktulga et al. 1980]
Azathioprine	Eye involvement	RCT [Yazici et al. 1990]
	Eye involvement	Retrospective study [Saadoun et al. 2010]
	Vascular disease	RCT [Yazici et al. 1990]
	GI involvement	Retrospective study [Hatemi et al. 2013]
	Neuro-Behçet	Case series [Kurtuncu et al. 2008]
Mycophenolate mofetil	Neuro-Behçet	Case series [Shugaiv et al. 2011]
Cyclosporine A	Eye involvement	RCTs [Ozyazgan et al. 1992; Masuda et al. 1989; BenEzra et al. 1988]
	Eye involvement	Open-label studies [Ermakova, 2003; Ozdal et al. 2002; Fujino et al. 1999; Sullu et al. 1998; Whitcup et al. 1994; Sajjadi et al. 1994; Pacor et al. 1994; Hayasaka et al. 1994; Atmaca and Batioglu, 1994; Chavis et al. 1992; Nussenblatt et al. 1985; Diaz-Llopis et al. 1990; Binder et al. 1987; Wechsler et al. 1986; Muftuoglu et al. 1987]
	Vascular disease	Open-label study [Cantini et al. 1999]
Tacrolimus	Eye involvement	Open-label studies [Mochizuki et al. 1991, 1992; Ishioka et al. 1994]
Cyclophosphamide	Vascular disease	Retrospective studies [Hamuryudan et al. 1994, 2004]
Cyclophosphamide	Neuro-Behçet	Retrospective study [Ait Ben Haddou et al. 2012]
Thalidomide	Mucocutaneous disease	RCT [Hamuryudan et al. 1998]
	Mucocutaneous disease	Open-label studies [Gardner-Medwin et al. 1994; Hamza, 1986; Saylan and Saltik, 1982]
	GI involvement	Case reports [Sayarlioglu et al. 2004b; Larsson, 1990; Postema et al. 1996]
Methotrexate	Eye involvement	Retrospective study [Davatchi et al. 2003]
Methotrexate	Neuro-Behçet	Open-label studies [Kikuchi et al. 2003; Hirohata et al. 1998]
Dapsone	Mucocutaneous disease	RCT [Sharquie et al. 2002]
Anticoagulation	Cerebral vein thrombosis	Open-label study [Saadoun et al. 2009]
Anticoagulation	Cerebral vein thrombosis	Systematic review [Aguiar de Sousa et al. 2011]

EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; GI, gastrointestinal; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

Biologics and monoclonal therapy

Tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors

Over the last decade, a considerable amount of literature has been published regarding the use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in BD. Beneficial effects have been noted with infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab.

Infliximab

Although there are no controlled trials, the existing evidence suggests efficacy of infliximab in treating patients with BD with refractory uveoretinitis, entero-Behçet, neuro-Behçet, vascular BD, and arthritis.

In uveoretinitis, a large number of case reports/series [Munoz-Fernandez et al. 2001; Sfikakis et al. 2001; Capella and Foster, 2012; Alokaily et al. 2010; Olivieri et al. 2008; Takamoto et al. 2007; Merino et al. 2006; Lindstedt et al. 2005; Lanthier et al. 2005; Wechsler et al. 2004; Sayarlioglu et al. 2004a; Rosenbaum, 2004; Giansanti et al. 2004; Falappone et al. 2004; Morris et al. 2003; Gulli et al. 2003; Triolo et al. 2002; Takayama et al. 2013], open-label clinical trials [Okada et al. 2012; Handa et al. 2011; Giardina et al. 2011; Tanaka et al. 2010; Adan et al. 2010; Al-Rayes et al. 2008; Tognon et al. 2007; Niccoli et al. 2007; Accorinti et al. 2007; Tugal-Tutkun et al. 2005; Benitez-del-Castillo et al. 2005; Arayssi et al. 2005; Abu El-Asrar et al. 2005; Sfikakis et al. 2004; Ohno et al. 2004; Cantini et al. 2012; Keino et al. 2011], and nonrandomized comparative studies [Tabbara and Al-Hemidan, 2008; Yamada et al. 2010; Markomichelakis et al. 2011] showed that intravenous infliximab, as single therapy, is effective in inducing prompt suppression of ocular inflammation, decreasing the frequency of uveitis attacks and allowing gradual tapering of corticosteroids (CS). As would be expected, vision of eyes with permanent lesions due to irreversible retinal damage does not improve. The most commonly used dose is 5 mg/kg every 6–8 weeks and repeated infusions are required to maintain long-term remission. The combination of infliximab with azathioprine or cyclosporine A (CsA) or methotrexate (MTX) appears to be superior to infliximab monotherapy for sustained ocular remission [Arida et al. 2011]. Side effects of its use have been reported as mild. Some serious adverse events described include a case of pyomyositis [Morris et al. 2003], one with perianal abscess [Tabbara and Al-Hemidan, 2008] and another with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [Giardina et al. 2011].

None of the long-term prospective studies compared treatment with infliximab with any other treatment. However, two retrospective studies compared infliximab with cyclosporine in patients with refractory uveoretinitis [Tabbara and Al-Hemidan, 2008; Yamada et al. 2010]. Both studies found infliximab to be safe and more effective in reducing the number of uveitis flares.

Recently and in a prospective, 4-week, noncomparative pilot study, a single intravitreal injection of infliximab (1 mg/0.05 ml) was given to 15 patients with relapsing posterior uveitis at the onset of a unilateral attack [Markomichelakis et al. 2012]. Eleven patients were receiving additional immunosuppressive treatment or CS and their condition remained stable during follow up. Thirteen patients were naïve to anti-TNF treatment, whereas two patients had received intravenous treatment with infliximab for relapsing ocular inflammation in the past. A beneficial effect was seen on best-corrected visual acuity, anterior chamber cells, vitreous haze, and posterior eye segment inflammation. Ocular or extraocular side effects were not observed. This trial suggested that intravitreal infliximab may be an option for BD-associated relapsing uveitis when systemic TNF inhibitors are contraindicated.

In entero-Behçet, one prospective study evaluated the efficacy of infliximab in patients with severe intestinal involvement [Iwata et al. 2011]. In this trial, 10 patients received infliximab (3-5 mg/kg) administered at 0, 2, and 6 weeks and every 8 weeks thereafter in combination with MTX. All patients had improvement of gastrointestinal symptoms within 4 weeks and in 9 out of 10 ileocecal ulcerations disappeared at 12 months of therapy. No severe adverse effects were observed during the 24 months of follow up. Similar findings were found in several published case series [Maruyama et al. 2012; Lee et al. 2007; Ju et al. 2007; Kram et al. 2003; Travis et al. 2001; Hassard et al. 2001; Naganuma et al. 2008]. Currently, infliximab is approved in Japan for the treatment of entero-Behçet disease.

Infliximab was also administered in patients with neuro-Behçet refractory to high doses of steroids combined with cyclosporine, azathioprine, or MTX [Giardina et al. 2011; Licata et al. 2003; Ribi et al. 2005; Sarwar et al. 2005; Fujikawa et al. 2007; Borhani Haghighi and Safari, 2008; Kikuchi et al. 2008; Pipitone et al. 2008; Abalos-Medina et al. 2009]. The infliximab dose most commonly used was 3–5 mg/kg administered at 0, 2, and 6 weeks and every 6–8 weeks. Overall, results were favorable as most patients had a satisfactory clinical remission and regression of parenchymal lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Similarly, published experience with infliximab for vascular involvement is limited to case reports [Schreiber et al. 2011; Yoshida et al. 2012]. Adler and colleagues reported the largest cohort of vascular BD responding to infliximab [Adler et al. 2012]. They analyzed seven patients, three with aortic involvement, one with recurrent venous thrombosis of the pelvic veins, one with recurrent venous and arterial thromboses of the thigh, and two with retinal vasculitis. Control of inflammation was seen 1–5 days after infliximab induction in all patients. The authors concluded that infliximab is effective in inducing and maintaining remission of vasculitic activity.

Additionally, inflximab was shown to be beneficial in the treatment of BD arthritis. Most of the information regarding its therapeutic efficacy derives from prospective studies evaluating its use for ocular involvement. Arida and colleagues reviewed the efficacy of TNF inhibitors for the treatment of several manifestations of BD, including joint involvement, in 369 patients. They found that joint involvement improved with infliximab in 94%, and remission was sustained in 91% [Arida et al. 2011].

In a similar manner, infliximab was shown to be effective in reducing the various mucocutaneous manifestations of the disease [Chan and Lee, 2012; Aikawa et al. 2011; Kasugai et al. 2010; Lestre et al. 2009; Olivieri et al. 2008; Almoznino and Ben-Chetrit, 2007; Connolly et al. 2005; Takayama et al. 2013; Gulli et al. 2003].

Etanercept

Etanercept is the only TNF inhibitor evaluated in an RCT that demonstrated its efficacy in suppressing most of the mucocutaneous manifestations of BD [Melikoglu et al. 2005]. In this 4-week study, 20 patients received etanercept 25 mg twice a week and 20 received placebo injections. Without suppressing the pathergy reaction, etanercept decreased the frequency of oral ulcers, papulopustular lesions and arthritis with a moderate effect size, and the frequency of genital ulcers and nodular lesions with a small effect size. This trial did not address the effect of etanercept on more serious clinical manifestations of BD.

Only two case reports describe patients with ocular BD treated with etanercept. In the first report, one patient with refractory papillitis and retinal vasculitis despite treatment with azathioprine, cyclosporine, colchicine, and prednisone was reported to have no active disease on fluorescein angiography after 2 months of etanercept treatment. He remained asymptomatic after 1 year on continued treatment with etanercept and low-dose prednisone [Curigliano et al. 2008]. In the second report, the efficacy of etanercept (25 mg twice a week for 6 months) was evaluated in 10 patients with refractory uveitis. All patients had severe ocular inflammation despite combination treatment with CS, azathioprine, and CsA. The addition of etanercept had a beneficial effect in maintaining visual acuity with a concomitant decrease of CS dose. This effect lasted during the whole treatment period but was not sustained in the 6 months post treatment follow up [Sfikakis, 2002].

Adalimumab

Based on case reports [Mushtaq et al. 2007; Takase et al. 2011; Adan et al. 2010] and retrospective case series [Bawazeer et al. 2010], adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks appears to be effective in BD uveitis. In the largest study published to date regarding the use of adalimumab in ocular BD [Bawazeer et al. 2010], 17 out of 21 eyes had improvement of visual acuity by more than three lines. This improvement was noticed after an average period of 4 weeks. Adalimumab was also found to have a CS-sparing effect. The steroid dose was reduced by 43% in 10 of 11 patients and was stopped completely in three patients. Similarly, the doses of azathioprine and cyclosporine were reduced in most of the patients and discontinued in 6 out of 10 patients.

Information on the response of extraocular manifestations is provided by a number of case reports [Atzeni et al. 2010; Olivieri et al. 2009; De Cassan et al. 2011; Ariyachaipanich et al. 2009; Belzunegui et al. 2008; Lee et al. 2010] and retrospective chart reviews [Perra et al. 2012]. Overall, the results were favorable. Adalimumab was beneficial in treating leg and recalcitrant genital ulcers [Atzeni et al. 2010; Olivieri et al. 2009; Perra et al. 2012], steroid-dependent ileocolitis [De Cassan et al. 2011; Ariyachaipanich et al. 2009], cerebral vasculitis [Belzunegui et al. 2008], and life-threatening bilateral pulmonary artery aneurysms [Lee et al. 2010]. Adalimumab use also allowed the reduction in the number and dose of standard immunosuppressive agents in most of these cases.

Data on the efficacy of switching amongst anti-TNF inhibitors is only available for patients transitioning from infliximab to adalimumab. In those patients, adalimumab was effective in maintaining disease remission and visual acuity in patients who had to switch due to difficulty in attending infusions (three patients) [Mushtaq et al. 2007], anaphylactoid infusion reaction (one patient) [Takase et al. 2011], relapse after discontinuation of infliximab (two patients) [Adan et al. 2010] or lack of response to infliximab (one patient) [Bawazeer et al. 2010].

Additionally, a prospective, longitudinal, observational study showed that switching from infliximab to adalimumab, due to lack or loss of efficacy or infusion reactions, was successful regardless of the reason for switching [Olivieri et al. 2011].

Rituximab

Sadreddini and colleagues reported the first case of retinal vasculitis in BD treated successfully with rituximab [Sadreddini et al. 2008]. Prior to rituximab, the patient had developed an allergic reaction to etanercept and had no significant amelioration in visual acuity after 2 months of treatment with azathioprine and steroids. Treatment with two doses of rituximab 1 g/dose given 15 days apart led to significant improvement in ophthalmic vasculitis and visual acuity during 6 weeks with no relapse after the steroid-tapering period.

More recently, a pilot randomized, single-blind study compared rituximab with cytotoxic therapy for patients with refractory ocular BD [Davatchi et al. 2010]. Patients in the rituximab arm received two infusions of 1 g, 15 days apart, along with methotrexate and prednisolone. The cytotoxic combination therapy arm received intravenous cyclophosphamide 1000 mg monthly, azathioprine, and prednisolone. Ten patients were enrolled in each arm. The total adjusted disease activity index, the primary endpoint, improved significantly in the rituximab group, but not in the cytotoxic therapy group. In terms of secondary endpoints, posterior uveitis, retinal vasculitis, and the total inflammatory activity index improved in both groups, but more so in the rituximab group than in the cytotoxic therapy group. Mean visual acuity declined slightly in both groups (though not statistically significantly). These results are promising but long-term study on a larger series of patients comparing rituximab with proven efficacious therapy for ocular BD is warranted.

Other biologics

Interleukin 1β (Il-1β) inhibition therapy has been evaluated in the treatment of various manifestations of BD.

An open-label pilot study evaluated the efficacy of a single infusion of gevokizumab, a recombinant humanized anti-IL-1β antibody, in seven patients with acute posterior or panuveitis, or retinal vasculitis [Gul et al. 2012]. These patients had disease that failed to respond to azathioprine or CsA, and were receiving 10 mg/day or less of prednisolone. Gevokizumab was associated with rapid and durable clinical response in all patients. Complete resolution of intraocular inflammation was achieved in 4–21 days, with a median duration of response of 49 days.

Canakinumab, a fully human anti-IL-1β antibody, was effective in treating one patient with BD with resistant panuveitis and retinal vasculitis [Ugurlu et al. 2012]. The patient’s condition had failed to respond to multiple immunosuppressive and biologic agents that included azathioprine, CsA, interferon (IFN), infliximab, adalimumab, and anakinra. Following a single dose of subcutaneous canakinumab 150 mg, eye inflammation resolved and the patient remained attack free for 8 weeks.

In another report, canakinumab was administered for the treatment of resistant fevers, recurrent oral and genital aphtosis, arthritis, ileocolic ulcers, and persistently elevated inflammatory markers in one patient who was unresponsive or intolerant to prednisone, several disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS), etanercept, infliximab, and anakinra. Canakinumab 150 mg every 8 weeks proved efficacious in achieving a prompt and complete disease response without evidence of any adverse events. At 6-month follow up, the patient was fever and symptom free, and serum amyloid A concentration remained stable within the normal range [Cantarini et al. 2012].

Anakinra was also reported to be successful in treating one patient with BD with recurrent fevers, oral and genital ulcers, colonic involvement, arthralgia, and elevated inflammatory markers [Botsios et al. 2008] who was unresponsive to prednisone and several immunosuppressive agents. Within 7–10 days of initiation of anakinra 100 mg/day, there was dramatic resolution in fever, marked improvement in oral and genital ulcers, and decrease in inflammatory markers. After 20 months of using anakinra (100 mg/day) and prednisone (5 mg/day), the patient remained disease free.

Data on the efficacy of IL-6 inhibition using tocilizumab are conflicting. It has been reported to be effective in the treatment of two patients with refractory neuro-Behçet [Urbaniak et al. 2012; Shapiro et al. 2012]. The first patient presented with progression of myelitis despite 4-weekly infusions of infliximab in combination with glucocorticoids and azathioprine. The second patient presented with recurrent meningo-encephalitis manifested by headaches and fever, and had disease resistant to several DMARDS, IFN, daclizumab, cyclophosphamide, and infliximab. Treatment with tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks resulted in a satisfactory increase in the walking distance in the first case and in total remission of symptoms in the second case.

Similarly, in one patient with recurrent oral ulcers, erythema nodosum, and posterior uveitis resistant to DMARDS and infliximab, tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks [Hirano et al. 2012] was effective. The treatment, as monotherapy, suppressed the patient’s clinical manifestations, including ocular attacks, for 1 year and improved her visual acuity.

However, tocilizumab did not show any benefit in two patients with BD with mouth and genital ulcers [Diamantopoulos and Hatemi, 2013]. In both patients, treatment with prednisone, colchicine, several immunosuppressive agents, etanercept, and infliximab led to either short efficacy or side effects. One patient had a deterioration of mouth and genital ulcers after the first infusion of tocilizumab. The other patient had recurrence of the painful genital ulcers immediately after her third infusion necessitating treatment with steroid and high doses of opioid analgesics.

Although both IL-6 and IL-1β are intimately involved in the pathogenesis of BD [Zhou et al. 2012], the routine use of their inhibitors in clinical practice should be guided by future studies.

Interferon α

IFNα has shown benefit in treating mucocutaneous, articular, and ocular manifestations of BD.

One RCT [Alpsoy et al. 2002] and several open studies [Boyvat et al. 2000; O’Duffy et al. 1998; Georgiou et al. 1998; Azizlerli et al. 1996; Alpsoy et al. 1994] showed IFNα to be effective for the management of the mucocutaneous lesions. The 3-month RCT showed that IFNα-2a at a dose of 6 MU subcutaneously three times weekly significantly decreased the duration and pain of oral ulcers, and the frequency of genital ulcers and papulopustular lesions compared with placebo. It also reduced the severity and rate of recurrence of attacks of eye disease. All symptoms, however, returned to pretreatment level after stopping the drug.

There are no RCTs evaluating the efficacy of IFNα in eye involvement. In an uncontrolled, prospective study, 50 patients with refractory ocular BD were each treated with 6 MU of IFNα-2a tapered according to a preset schedule [Kotter et al. 2003]. The ocular response was 92%. Retinal infiltrates resolved after 2–4 weeks in all patients, and remission in affected eyes was reached by week 24. Forty percent of the patients remained disease free of all medications at 30 months of follow up. The same study showed that, whereas extraocular manifestations such as genital ulcerations, arthritis, and skin lesions remitted with IFNα, only 36% of the oral ulcers responded [Kotter et al. 2004b]. Similarly, several other open and retrospective studies showed IFNα to be beneficial in ocular BD [Onal et al. 2011; Sobaci et al. 2010; Deuter et al. 2010; Bodaghi et al. 2007; Tugal-Tutkun et al. 2006; Deuter et al. 2004; Krause et al. 2003; Calguneri et al. 2003; Hamuryudan et al. 2002; Wechsler et al. 2000; Yalcindag and Uzun, 2012].

A systematic review conducted in 2004 included data on IFNα treatment published between 1986 and 2002 [Kotter et al. 2004a]. In 32 articles and 4 abstracts analyzed, 338 patients were treated with IFNα. Eighty-six percent of the patients with mucocutaneous symptoms, 96% with arthritis, and 94% with uveitis exhibited a partial or complete response. Long-term remission after cessation of IFNα therapy was noted in almost 60% of patients.

Finally, IFNα has been used in severe cases of parenchymal neurologic involvement, although the data for its efficacy in such conditions are limited to case reports [Nichols et al. 2001; Kuemmerle-Deschner et al. 2008; Chroni et al. 2008; Calguneri et al. 2005; Monastirli et al. 2010].

Side effects of this drug include an influenza-like syndrome occurring within several hours after administration, myelosuppression, transaminitis, alopecia, and interstitial nephritis. Patients should be screened for depression prior to initiation of therapy.

Apremilast

In a recent double-blind placebo-controlled trial [Melikoglu et al. 2013], apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor used at 30 mg orally twice daily, was effective in reducing oral ulcers in patients with BD compared with placebo. For the few patients with genital ulcers (n = 16), aprelimast was superior to placebo. Side effects noted included one case of reversible diplegia and one case of anal fissure with hemorrhoids out of 50 patients treated with apremilast.

Traditional treatments

Corticosteroids

Although high-quality placebo-controlled trials with CS are lacking, these agents are commonly used in BD. In the only controlled study of CS, 86 patients with BD who had active disease with genital ulcers were randomized to receive either intramuscular CS injections (40 mg methylprednisolone acetate) or placebo every 3 weeks for 27 weeks [Mat et al. 2006]. At the end of the trial, no significant differences in the mean number of genital and oral ulcers, or folliculitis between groups were found. However, the mean number of erythema nodosum lesions was significantly less in the corticosteroid group. The side effects described as a response in the questionnaire at each visit were similar in the CS and placebo arms and these events were mild. The mean body weights of corticosteroid- and placebo-treated patients were 65.1 ± 10 and 65.6 ± 10 kg respectively at the last visit, which were not different from the baseline in both groups.

Despite the absence of RCTs, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommends early initiation of CS for the management of severe or life-threatening manifestations, such as ocular, vascular, gastrointestinal, or neurologic disease [Hatemi et al. 2008]. In such instances, pulse dose steroids (1 g intravenous methylprednisolone infusions daily) are often used for 3 days, followed by 1 mg/kg/day prednisolone tapered slowly.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) are commonly used by rheumatologists to treat joint pains in patients with BD. One RCT compared the NSAID azapropazone 900 mg/day given for 3 weeks with placebo in patients with BD presenting with acute arthritis of less than 10 days’ duration [Moral et al. 1995]. Although the visual analogue scale for pain during the first week was less in the azapropazone group, at the end of the trial the arthritis persisted in 53.5% (15/28) of the patients on azapropazone and in 41.3% (12/29) of those on placebo, which was not statistically significant.

In an open-label study, 30 patients with BD were treated with oral indomethacin 25 mg four times daily for 3 months [Simsek et al. 1991]. At the initiation of therapy, 28 patients had oral aphthous lesions, 23 had joint involvement, 13 had genital ulcerations, 8 had cutaneous lesions, and 4 had eye involvement. Eighty-eight percent of patients with skin lesions, 80% with joint involvement, 43% with oral aphthous lesions, and 38% with genital ulcerations responded to indomethacin therapy. No serious adverse reactions were observed. Only three patients developed nausea, anorexia, and abdominal pain that resolved when indomethacin was changed to a suppository form. Thus, NSAIDS may be effective in treating pain in some patients who have BD-related arthritis.

Colchicine

Colchicine is the most frequently prescribed medication for the treatment of mucocutaneous manifestations of BD. Three RCTs have evaluated this agent. The first study was a 6-month, placebo-controlled study including 14 male patients in each group. Colchicine improved arthralgias and erythema nodosum in young male patients, but had no effect on mucocutaneous lesions [Aktulga et al. 1980]. The second study was a 2-year study that randomized 116 patients to either colchicine or placebo. Colchicine was shown to reduce recurrence of genital ulcers in female patients with BD, in treating arthritis, and preventing erythema nodosum lesions in both men and women [Yurdakul et al. 2001]. Neither study showed beneficial effect of colchicine on oral ulcers. In the third randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial, 169 patients with BD without major organ involvement were selected consecutively. The overall disease activity as well as the oral and genital aphthosis, pseudofolliculitis, and erythema nodosum improved significantly with colchicine but not with placebo [Davatchi et al. 2009].

Based on the above randomized controlled trials, colchicine is effective in the treatment of joint symptoms as well as in the management and prevention of erythema nodosum. Clinical observations, however, suggest that there might be a subgroup of patients with oral ulcers who might benefit from this treatment [Mizushima et al. 1977] and thus the drug should be considered for this indication. The lack of confirmation of colchicine’s efficacy for treatment of mucocutanous lesions could be related to relative lack of power of the studies or to inappropriate study design. A subgroup of BD with oral ulcers might indeed be responsive to colchicine, and a withdrawal study among the responders is helpful to show whether colchicine is beneficial for the treatment of oral ulcers in this subset [Hatemi et al. 2009].

Azathioprine

Ocular disease

There is only one RCT that evaluated azathioprine in BD [Yazici et al. 1990]. In this 2-year trial, 73 patients with and without ocular involvement were treated with glucocorticoids and either azathioprine or placebo. Azathioprine proved to be superior to placebo in decreasing the number of uveitis attacks [number needed to treat (NNT) = 4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1–16.3] and in preserving visual acuity. It also decreased the development of new eye disease among patients with BD without eye involvement (NNT = 2; 95% CI 1.2–4.4) and was effective in preventing the development of new genital ulcers, arthritis, and thrombophlebitis. A 7-year follow up of these patients [Hamuryudan et al. 1997] demonstrated that patients originally allocated to the azathioprine group had less blindness (NNT = 4; 95% CI 1.9–43.9) and less development of new eye disease (NNT = 3; 95% CI 1.3–3.3). More recently, a retrospective study [Saadoun et al. 2010] evaluated the efficacy of azathioprine combined with prednisolone in 157 consecutive patients with BD with active posterior uveitis or panuveitis. After a mean follow up of 71.5 months, 93% of the patients had either partial or complete response.

Thus, azathioprine and CS are recommended as the initial therapy for all patients with BD with inflammation of the posterior segment of the eye [Hatemi et al. 2008]. Testing for thiopurine methyltranferase activity should be considered prior to initiating treatment with azathioprine [Zhou, 2006].

Vascular disease

There are no controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of azathioprine in patients with vascular manifestations of BD. Nevertheless, patients in the treatment group of the above-mentioned RCT [Yazici et al. 1990] developed less vascular disease compared with the placebo group, suggesting that the drug may be beneficial in the treatment of this complication. Thus Hatemi and colleagues suggest the use of azathioprine 2.5 mg/kg/day for the treatment of acute venous thrombosis of the extremities and for maintenance therapy in the management of patients with peripheral and pulmonary artery aneurysms [Hatemi et al. 2008].

Entero-Behçet and neuro-Behçet

The largest series on the use of azathioprine in entero-Behçet is reported from a multidisciplinary BD clinic in Turkey. In the 51 patients who were diagnosed with entero-Behçet, the presenting symptoms were perforation in 4, massive bleeding in 8, and abdominal pain or diarrhea in 39 patients. Thirty-three patients were prescribed azathioprine (2–2.5 mg/kg/day) as first-line therapy. Twenty-two of these 33 patients (67%) had complete remission and no relapses during a mean follow-up period of 44.3 ± 46.9 months. Also, three-quarters of patients who used azathioprine after nonresponse to 5-aminosalicylic acid derivatives went into remission [Hatemi et al. 2013], suggesting that azathioprine may be efficacious in the management of the various manifestations of entero-Behçet.

In a similar manner, there are no RCTs evaluating the use of azathioprine in patients with CNS involvement. Large series suggest a beneficial effect when the prognosis of patients treated in the pre versus post azathioprine era is compared [Kurtuncu et al. 2008].

Mycophenolate mofetil

Only one study evaluated prospectively the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in mucocutaneous manifestations of BD. The trial was discontinued due to lack of efficacy in the first six patients [Adler et al. 2001]. More recently, a case series reported on four patients with parenchymal neuro-Behçet treated with MMF at a dose of 2 g/day [Shugaiv et al. 2011]. While treated with MMF, all patients remained relapse free during 3–7 years of follow up. These results suggest that MMF could be an alternative drug in parenchymal neuro-Behçet but not in mucocutaneous disease. Large controlled studies are needed for verification of these results.

Cyclosporine A

Several trials suggested that cyclosporine may have a beneficial effect on the ocular manifestations of BD. Three RCTs have been published comparing CsA with cyclophosphamide in one [Ozyazgan et al. 1992], colchicine in the second [Masuda et al. 1989], and conventional therapy (steroid or chlorambucil) in the third [BenEzra et al. 1988]. In the first trial, CsA produced a rapid and significant improvement in visual acuity over the first 6 months [Ozyazgan et al. 1992]. However, this effect was not sustained at 2 years. When CsA was compared with colchicine, the frequency and severity of ocular attacks decreased [Masuda et al. 1989] in the CsA group compared with colcichine. In the third RCT, the visual acuity improved in most patients after 1-year follow up and remained stable or improved from baseline after 3 years [BenEzra et al. 1988]. All other noncontrolled trials also supported the efficacy of CsA in eye disease [Ermakova, 2003; Ozdal et al. 2002; Fujino et al. 1999; Sullu et al. 1998; Whitcup et al. 1994; Sajjadi et al. 1994; Pacor et al. 1994; Hayasaka et al. 1994; Atmaca and Batioglu, 1994; Chavis et al. 1992; Nussenblatt et al. 1985; Diaz-Llopis et al. 1990; Binder et al. 1987; Wechsler et al. 1986; Muftuoglu et al. 1987]. Currently, cyclosporine is considered one of the therapeutic options for refractory or severe eye disease defined as more than two lines of drop in visual acuity on a 10/10 scale or retinal disease (retinal vasculitis or macular involvement) [Hatemi et al. 2009].

For physicians taking care of patients with BD, the decision to use cyclosporine has to be counterbalanced with the risk of developing neurotoxicity. Three case–control studies reported an increased frequency of neurologic involvement among patients with BD treated with CsA [Kotter et al. 2006; Kotake et al. 1999; Kato et al. 2001]. Compared with nonusers, those who used cyclosporine had an OR for developing serious neurological involvement of 9.9 (95% CI 3.9–25.2) [Kotter et al. 2006], over 79 (95% CI 7.9–620) [Kotake et al. 1999], and 6.8 (95% CI 0.8–60) [Kato et al. 2001]. It is unclear whether these findings are confounded by indication [Hatemi et al. 2013], as there is an association between neurologic involvement and eye involvement, the main indication for the use of cyclosporine in BD. However, a large retrospective series compared patients, matched for severity of eye involvement, who used CsA (group 1, 92 patients) with those who used other immunosuppressants (group 2, 132 patients), and colchicine (group 3, 45 patients) and did not use CsA. The frequency of parenchymal neurologic involvement was significantly higher in the first group (eight cases) compared with the other two groups (one case in each), suggesting that cyclosporine is truly associated with an increased risk of neurologic disease. EULAR guidelines recommend that CsA not be used in patients with BD with CNS involvement unless necessary for intraocular inflammation [Hatemi et al. 2008].

In addition to its efficacy in eye disease, CsA might be beneficial for the management of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT). In one open-label study [Cantini et al. 1999], seven patients with venous thrombosis had complete remission of thrombophlebitis within 2 months without residual venous insufficiency and no recurrences as long as treatment was continued. Oral aphthous ulcers, dermal lesions, and genital ulcerations may also be reduced with the use of CsA [Masuda et al. 1989].

Tacrolimus

Tacrolimus (FK506), a calcineurin inhibitor similar to cyclosporine, may have similar efficacy, but the drug was not tested in an RCT in BD. Open studies showed some benefit for eye involvement.

A multicenter open-label clinical trial assessed the effect of FK506 on 26 patients with BD with refractory uveitis. Uveitis decreased in 60% and visual acuity improved in 32% of the eyes, and did not change in 50%. The effect of FK506 was dose dependent. Renal toxicity was present in four cases, all treated with cyclosporine previously. Thus, special care should be considered with patients treated previously with cyclosporine in whom tacrolimus is to be prescribed [Mochizuki et al. 1991].

Two other clinical trials studied the efficacy of FK506 in BD uveitis and uveitis in other medical conditions. A total of 13 patients (both studies combined) received doses ranging from 0.05 to 0.2 mg/kg/day. A trend showed improvement of the visual acuity, although clinical significance could not be shown due to the small number of patients. The studies also showed that the efficacy as well as the toxicity profile of FK506, like cyclosporine, is dose dependent [Ishioka et al. 1994; Mochizuki et al. 1992].

Cyclophosphamide

The main indications for cyclophosphamide in BD are major vascular and parenchymal neurologic involvement.

There are no RCTs directly addressing the treatment of vessel wall inflammation in BD. Two retrospective studies, published 10 years apart, showed that monthly pulses of cyclophosphamide up to 2 years followed by maintenance treatment with azathioprine resulted in significant decrease in mortality in patients with pulmonary artery aneurysms [Hamuryudan et al. 1994, 2004]. In 2008, the EULAR guidelines suggested that cyclophosphamide be used preferentially for thrombosis of the superior vena cava or Budd–Chiari syndrome that are usually treated more aggressively than peripheral artery aneurysms for which systemic immunosuppressives such as azathioprine could be used [Hatemi et al. 2008].

A 2012 retrospective series described 40 patients with severe neuro-Behçet who presented with meningoencephalitis (48.8% of cases), cerebral deep venous thrombosis (43.6% of cases), and myelopathy (7.7% of cases). All patients were treated with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m² of body surface area on day 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 followed by a bolus of 600 mg/m² of body surface area every 2 months for 2 years. The 40 patients evolved positively with clinical improvement and good tolerance for cyclophosphamide [Ait Ben Haddou et al. 2012].

A systematic review from the Cochrane database illustrated the lack of efficacy of cyclophosphamide for ocular disease [Saenz et al. 2000]. Currently, the EULAR does not recommend the use of this drug for treatment of any of the ocular manifestations associated with BD [Hatemi et al. 2008].

Thalidomide

Thalidomide is effective in the treatment of orogenital ulcerations in patients with BD. In a 24-week RCT, thalidomide was superior to placebo in decreasing oral and genital ulcers in men with BD [Hamuryudan et al. 1998]. A complete response occurred in 2 of the 32 patients receiving thalidomide, 100 mg/day; in 5 of the 31 patients receiving thalidomide, 300 mg/day; and in none of the 32 patients receiving placebo. The suppressive effect of thalidomide with either dosage was evident at 4 weeks for oral ulcers and at 8 weeks for genital ulcers and follicular lesions. The use of the drug was associated with an increase in erythema nodosum in the first 8 weeks of the study. Four patients developed polyneuropathy as a complication of the treatment. Thus, thalidomide at 100 mg/day is effective for the treatment of orogenital ulcers.

Three other open-label studies using thalidomide showed similar efficacy on orogenital ulcers [Gardner-Medwin et al. 1994; Hamza, 1986; Saylan and Saltik, 1982]. Paresthaesias, somnolence, nausea, vomiting, and skin rash were reported in few of these patients.

Additionally, thalidomide has been reported in several case reports to be helpful in the treatment of BD colitis. Three patients presented with ileocolitis that was resistant to treatment with azathioprine, sulfasalazine, methylprednisolone, cyclophosphamide, or surgical debridement. Thalidomide 100–300 mg/day resulted in complete resolution of their symptoms within a few weeks [Sayarlioglu et al. 2004b; Larsson, 1990; Postema et al. 1996].

Methotrexate

An observational report with MTX showed some benefit in patients with eye involvement [Davatchi et al. 2003]. Weekly high- and low-dose MTX was effective in reducing ocular inflammation in patients with BD, but high doses were more effective.

Two open successive studies involving a small number of patients receiving MTX from the same center suggested beneficial effects in neuro-Behçet [Kikuchi et al. 2003; Hirohata et al. 1998]. In the first study, in which patients were followed for 12 months, there were six patients and in the extension study another four patients were added and treated for up to 4 years. MTX showed stabilization of neuropsychiatric findings, intelligence test, brain MRI scans, and decreased cerebrospinal fluid IL-6 levels. However, patients experienced significant exacerbations 6 months after discontinuation of MTX.

Dapsone

A double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial, assessed the effect of dapsone in the treatment of mucocutaneous lesions in 20 patients [Sharquie et al. 2002]. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either dapsone 100 mg daily or placebo for 3 months. After 3 months, patients crossed over and followed up for another 3 months. The frequency and duration of oral ulcers and the number and frequency of genital ulcers were significantly decreased in the dapsone group, but not in the placebo group.

Anticoagulation

There are no controlled data to guide on whether anticoagulants should be used in the management of patients with BD with DVT or cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT).

A retrospective study of 37 patients with BD with venous thrombosis compared anticoagulation treatment, immunosuppressive agents, and the combination of immunosuppressive agents and anticoagulation treatment [Ahn et al. 2008]. The most commonly involved sites were the superficial and common femoral veins. Three of the four patients in the anticoagulant-treated group developed new thromboses, compared with 2 of 16 patients in the immunosuppressive agent-treated group and 1 of 17 patients in the combination-treated group, suggesting that immunosuppressive therapy is essential and that anticoagulation therapy may not be required.

In CVT, anticoagulants may be more helpful. In one of the largest series, 62 of 64 patients with BD and CVT were anticoagulated [Saadoun et al. 2009]. Forty-eight of these 62 patients received treatment with steroids (prednisone or equivalent 1 mg/kg/day). This resulted in regression or disappearance of neurologic symptoms within 1 month in 56 of 64 patients. Four patients experienced hemorrhagic complications [psoas hematoma (two cases), leg hematoma (one case), and subdural hematoma (one case)] that recovered without sequelae. This study favored anticoagulation as a safe and effective therapy in patients with BD and CVT.

Additionally, a systematic review identified 290 patients with BD and CVT [Aguiar de Sousa et al. 2011]. This review found that the most frequent therapy used was the association of both immunosuppressant and anticoagulation therapies. Around 90% of these patients were prescribed CS with or without immunosuppressives and 74% were prescribed anticoagulants.

Interestingly, a physician’s decision to use anticoagulants seems to be mostly related to the prevalence of the disease in the country where the physician is practicing. Around 87% of physicians practicing in countries with low to intermediate prevalence of BD anticoagulate their patients with DVT in comparison to only 44% in whom the prevalence is much higher [Tayer-Shifman et al. 2012].

Currently, due to the lack of evidence of benefit with anticoagulant in the management of DVT or arterial lesions in BD, the EULAR does not recommend the use of anticoagulant for this indication [Hatemi et al. 2009]. Further studies attempting to determine the need for anticoagulation for the treatment of venous and arterial thrombosis in patients with BD are clearly needed.

Other therapies

Rebapamide, although rarely used, is an alternative for reducing oral ulcers pain in patients with BD [Matsuda et al. 2003]. Topical treatment with CS, topical anesthetics, antimicrobial mouthwashes, sucralfate [Keogan, 2009] and topical granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [Bacanli et al. 2006] can be helpful in the management of mucocutanous lesions. Additionally, a number of antibiotics and antivirals, based on the possible role of herpes and Streptococcus sanguinis in the pathogenesis of the disease, have been used primarily for the treatment of mucocutaneous manifestations with variable responses [Calguneri et al. 1996a, 1996b; Davies et al. 1988] and thus are not part of the routine care of patients with BD.

Conclusion

The management of patients with BD has evolved considerably over the last decade, with more insight into the better use of older agents and the development of newer remedies such as biologics. Despite that, treatment remains challenging as it continues to be largely based on case reports, case series, and only a few randomized clinical trials. Large, well designed, multicenter trials are still needed to advance our knowledge of this complex syndrome. Newer therapeutic options, including alemtuzumab and hematopoetic stem cell transplantation, are currently being investigated. These efforts will undoubtedly provide insight into optimal treatment.

Footnotes

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in preparing this article.

References

Abalos-Medina

Sanchez-Cano

Ruiz-Villaverde

Quirosa Flores

Raya Alvarez

(2009) Successful use of infliximab in a patient with neuro-Behcet’s disease. Int J Rheum Dis 12: 264–266.

Abu El-Asrar

Abboud

Aldibhi

Al-Arfaj

(2005) Long-term safety and efficacy of infliximab therapy in refractory uveitis due to Behcet’s disease. Int Ophthalmol 26: 83–92.

Accorinti

Pirraglia

Paroli

Priori

Conti

Pivetti-Pezzi

(2007) Infliximab treatment for ocular and extraocular manifestations of Behcet’s disease. Jap J Ophthalmol 51: 191–196.

Adan

Hernandez

Ortiz

Molina

Pelegrin

Espinosa

Sanmarti

(2010) Effects of infliximab in the treatment of refractory posterior uveitis of Behcet’s disease after withdrawal of infusions. Int Ophthalmol 30: 577–581.

Adler

Baumgartner

Villiger

P. M.

(2012) Behcet’s disease: successful treatment with infliximab in 7 patients with severe vascular manifestations. A retrospective analysis. Arthritis Care Res 64: 607–611.

Adler

Mansmann

Zouboulis

(2001) Mycophenolate mofetil is ineffective in the treatment of mucocutaneous Adamantiades-Behcet’s disease. Dermatology 203: 322–324.

Aguiar De Sousa

Mestre

Ferro

(2011) Cerebral venous thrombosis in Behcet’s disease: a systematic review. J Neurol 258: 719–727.

Ahn

Lee

Jeon

Koh

Cha

(2008) Treatment of venous thrombosis associated with Behcet’s disease: immunosuppressive therapy alone versus immunosuppressive therapy plus anticoagulation. Clin Rheumatol 27: 201–205.

Aikawa

Goncalves

Silva

Goncalves

Bonfa

De Carvalho

(2011) Late response to anti-TNF- therapy in refractory mucocutaneous lesions of Behcet’s disease. Rheumatol Int 31: 1097–1099.

10.

Ait Ben Haddou

Imounan

Regragui

Mouti

Benchakroune

Abouqal

. (2012) Neurological manifestations of Behcet’s disease: evaluation of 40 patients treated by cyclophosphamide. Rev Neurol Paris 168: 344–349.

11.

Aktulga

Altac

Muftuoglu

Ozyazgan

Pazarli

Tuzun

. (1980) A double blind study of colchicine in Behcet’s disease. Haematologica 65: 399–402.

12.

Al-Rayes

Al-Swailem

Al-Balawi

Al-Dohayan

Al-Zaidi

Tariq

(2008) Safety and efficacy of infliximab therapy in active Behcet’s uveitis: an open-label trial. Rheumatol Int 29: 53–57.

13.

Almoznino

Ben-Chetrit

(2007) Infliximab for the treatment of resistant oral ulcers in Behcet’s disease: a case report and review of the literature. Clin Exp Rheumatol 25: S99–S102.

14.

Alokaily

Alsaleh

Al-Balawi

Al-Rashidi

(2010) Efficacy of infliximab on the acute attack of uveitis. Saudi Med J 31: 82–85.

15.

Alpsoy

Durusoy

Yilmaz

Ozgurel

Ermis

Yazar

. (2002) Interferon alfa-2a in the treatment of Behcet disease: a randomized placebo-controlled and double-blind study. Arch Dermatol 138: 467–471.

16.

Alpsoy

Yilmaz

Basaran

(1994) Interferon therapy for Behcet’s disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 31: 617–619.

17.

Arayssi

Hamdan

(2004) New insights into the pathogenesis and therapy of Behcet’s disease. Curr Opin Pharmacol 4: 183–188.

18.

Arayssi

Hamra

Homeidan

Uthman

Awwad

Mroue

. (2005) The efficacy of a single dose of infliximab in the treatment of Behcet’s disease uveitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 23: 427.

19.

Arida

Fragiadaki

Giavri

Sfikakis

(2011) Anti-TNF agents for Behcet’s disease: analysis of published data on 369 patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum 41: 61–70.

20.

Ariyachaipanich

Berkelhammer

Nicola

(2009) Intestinal Behcet’s disease: maintenance of remission with adalimumab monotherapy. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15: 1769–1771.

21.

Atmaca

Batioglu

(1994) The efficacy of cyclosporin-A in the treatment of Behcet’s disease. Ophthal Surg 25: 321–327.

22.

Atzeni

Leccese

D’Angelo

Sarzi-Puttini

Olivieri

(2010) Successful treatment of leg ulcers in Behcet’s disease using adalimumab plus methotrexate after the failure of infliximab. Clin Exp Rheumatol 28: S94.

23.

Azizlerli

Sarica

Kose

Ovul

Kavala

Kayabali

(1996) Interferon alfa-2a in the treatment of Behcet’s disease. Dermatology 192: 239–241.

24.

Bacanli

Yerebakan Dicle

Parmaksizoglu

Yilmaz

Alpsoy

(2006) Topical granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of oral and genital ulcers of patients with Behcet’s disease. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 20: 931–935.

25.

Bawazeer

Raffa

Nizamuddin

(2010) Clinical experience with adalimumab in the treatment of ocular Behcet disease. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 18: 226–232.

26.

Belzunegui

Lopez

Paniagua

Intxausti

Maiz

(2008) Efficacy of infliximab and adalimumab in the treatment of a patient with severe neuro-Behcet’s disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol 26: S133–S134.

27.

BenEzra

Cohen

Chajek

Friedman

Pizanti

De Courten

(1988) Evaluation of conventional therapy versus cyclosporine A in Behcet’s syndrome. Transplant Proc 20: 136–143.

28.

Benitez-Del-Castillo

Martinez-De-La-Casa

Pato-Cour

Mendez-Fernandez

Lopez-Abad

Matilla

(2005) Long-term treatment of refractory posterior uveitis with anti-TNFalpha (infliximab). Eye 19: 841–845.

29.

Binder

Graham

Sanders

Dinning

James

Denman

(1987) Cyclosporin A in the treatment of severe Behcet’s uveitis. Br J Rheumatol 26: 285–291.

30.

Bodaghi

Gendron

Wechsler

Terrada

Cassoux

Huong Du

(2007) Efficacy of interferon alpha in the treatment of refractory and sight threatening uveitis: a retrospective monocentric study of 45 patients. Br J Ophthalmol 91: 335–339.

31.

Borhani Haghighi

Safari

(2008) Anti-tumor necrotic factor antibody for treatment of neuro-Behcet’s disease, a case report. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 110: 315–316.

32.

Botsios

Sfriso

Furlan

Punzi

Dinarello

(2008) Resistant Behcet disease responsive to anakinra. Ann Intern Med 149: 284–286.

33.

Boyvat

Sisman-Solak

Gurler

(2000) Long-term effects of interferon alpha 2A treatment in Behcet’s disease. Dermatology 201: 40–43.

34.

Calguneri

Ertenli

Kiraz

Erman

Celik

(1996a) Effect of prophylactic benzathine penicillin on mucocutaneous symptoms of Behcet’s disease. Dermatology 192: 125–128.

35.

Calguneri

Kiraz

Ertenli

Benekli

Karaarslan

Celik

(1996b) The effect of prophylactic penicillin treatment on the course of arthritis episodes in patients with Behcet’s disease. A randomized clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum 39: 2062–2065.

36.

Calguneri

Onat

Ozturk

Ozcakar

Ureten

Akdogan

(2005) Transverse myelitis in a patient with Behcet’s disease: favorable outcome with a combination of interferon-alpha. Clin Rheumatol 24: 64–66.

37.

Calguneri

Ozturk

Ertenli

Kiraz

Apras

Ozbalkan

(2003) Effects of interferon alpha treatment on the clinical course of refractory Behcet’s disease: an open study. Ann Rheum Dis 62: 492–493.

38.

Cantarini

Vitale

Borri

Galeazzi

Franceschini

(2012) Successful use of canakinumab in a patient with resistant Behcet’s disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol 30: S115.

39.

Cantini

Niccoli

Nannini

Kaloudi

Cassara

Susini

Lenzetti

(2012) Efficacy of infliximab in refractory Behcet’s disease-associated and idiopathic posterior segment uveitis: a prospective, follow-up study of 50 patients. Biologics 6: 5–12.

40.

Cantini

Salvarani

Niccoli

Padula

Arena

Bellandi

. (1999) Treatment of thrombophlebitis of Behcet’s disease with low dose cyclosporin A. Clin Exp Rheumatol 17: 391–392.

41.

Capella

Foster

(2012) Long-term efficacy and safety of infliximab in the treatment of Behcet’s disease. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 20: 198–202.

42.

Chan

Lee

(2012) Combination therapy with infliximab and methotrexate in recalcitrant mucocutaneous Behcet disease. Cutis 89: 185–190.

43.

Chavis

Antonios

Tabbara

(1992) Cyclosporine effects on optic nerve and retinal vasculitis in Behcet’s disease. Doc Ophthalmol 80: 133–142.

44.

Chroni

Monastirli

Polychronopoulos

Pasmatzi

Georgiou

Vryzaki

. (2008) Epileptic seizures as the sole manifestation of neuro-Behcet’s disease: complete control under interferon-alpha treatment. Seizure 17: 744–747.

45.

Connolly

Armstrong

Buckley

(2005) Infliximab treatment for severe orogenital ulceration in Behcet’s disease. Br J Dermatol 153: 1073–1075.

46.

Curigliano

Giovinale

Fonnesu

Cerquaglia

Verrecchia

Turco

. (2008) Efficacy of etanercept in the treatment of a patient with Behcet’s disease. Clin Rheumatol 27: 933–936.

47.

Davatchi

Sadeghi Abdollahi

Tehrani Banihashemi

Shahram

Nadji

Shams

. (2009) Colchicine versus placebo in Behcet’s disease: randomized, double-blind, controlled crossover trial. Mod Rheumatol 19: 542–549.

48.

Davatchi

Shahram

Chams

Jamshidi

Nadji

Chams

. (2003) High dose methotrexate for ocular lesions of Behcet’s disease. Preliminary short-term results. Adv Exp Med Biol 528: 579–584.

49.

Davatchi

Shams

Rezaipoor

Sadeghi-Abdollahi

Shahram

Nadji

. (2010) Rituximab in intractable ocular lesions of Behcet’s disease; randomized single-blind control study (pilot study). Int J Rheum Dis 13: 246–252.

50.

Davies

Palmer

Denman

(1988) Treatment with acyclovir does not affect orogenital ulcers in Behcet’s syndrome: a randomized double-blind trial. Br J Rheumatol 27: 300–302.

51.

De Cassan

De Vroey

Dussault

Hachulla

Buche

Colombel

(2011) Successful treatment with adalimumab in a familial case of gastrointestinal Behcet’s disease. J Crohn’s Colitis 5: 364–368.

52.

De Menthon

Lavalley

Maldini

Guillevin

Mahr

(2009) HLA-B51/B5 and the risk of Behcet’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control genetic association studies. Arthritis Rheum 61: 1287–1296.

53.

Deuter

Kotter

Gunaydin

Zierhut

Stubiger

(2004) [Ocular involvement in Behcet’s disease: first 5-year-results for visual development after treatment with interferon alfa-2a]. Ophthalmologe 101: 129–134.

54.

Deuter

Zierhut

Mohle

Vonthein

Stobiger

Kotter

(2010) Long-term remission after cessation of interferon-alpha treatment in patients with severe uveitis due to Behcet’s disease. Arthritis Rheum 62: 2796–2805.

55.

Diamantopoulos

Hatemi

(2013) Lack of efficacy of tocilizumab in mucocutaneous Behcet’s syndrome: report of two cases. Rheumatology 52: 1923-1924.

56.

Diaz-Llopis

Cervera

Menezo

(1990) Cyclosporin A treatment of Behcet’s disease: a long-term study. Curr Eye Res 9(Suppl.): 17–23.

57.

Ermakova

(2003) Efficacy of corticosteroids and cyclosporin in the treatment of retinal vasculitis in patients with Behcet’s disease. Adv Exp Med Biol 528: 563–565.

58.

Falappone

Iannone

Scioscia

Grattagliano

Covelli

Lapadula

(2004) [The treatment of recurrent uveitis with TNF-alpha inhibitors]. Reumatismo 56: 185–189.

59.

Fujikawa

Aratake

Kawakami

Aramaki

Iwanaga

Izumi

. (2007) Successful treatment of refractory neuro-Behcet’s disease with infliximab: a case report to show its efficacy by magnetic resonance imaging, transcranial magnetic stimulation and cytokine profile. Ann Rheum Dis 66: 136–137.

60.

Fujino

Joko

Masuda

Yagi

Kogure

Sakai

. (1999) Ciclosporin microemulsion preconcentrate treatment of patients with Behcet’s disease. Jpn J Ophthalmol 43: 318–326.

61.

Gardner-Medwin

Smith

Powell

(1994) Clinical experience with thalidomide in the management of severe oral and genital ulceration in conditions such as Behcet’s disease: use of neurophysiological studies to detect thalidomide neuropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 53: 828–832.

62.

Georgiou

Monastirli

Pasmatzi

Gartaganis

Goerz

Tsambaos

(1998) Efficacy and safety of systemic recombinant interferon-alpha in Behcet’s disease. J Intern Med 243: 367–372.

63.

Giansanti

Barbera

Virgili

Pieri

Emmi

Menchini

(2004) Infliximab for the treatment of posterior uveitis with retinal neovascularization in Behcet disease. Eur J Ophthalmol 14: 445–448.

64.

Giardina

Ferrante

Ciccia

Vadala

Giardina

Triolo

(2011) One year study of efficacy and safety of infliximab in the treatment of patients with ocular and neurological Behcet’s disease refractory to standard immunosuppressive drugs. Rheumatol Int 31: 33–37.

65.

Gul

Tugal-Tutkun

Dinarello

Reznikov

Esen

Mirza

. (2012) Interleukin-1beta-regulating antibody XOMA 052 (gevokizumab) in the treatment of acute exacerbations of resistant uveitis of Behcet’s disease: an open-label pilot study. Ann Rheum Dis 71: 563–566.

66.

Gulli

Arrigo

Bocchino

Morgante

Sangari

Castagna

. (2003) Remission of Behcet’s disease with anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody therapy: a case report. BMC Musculoskel Disord 4: 19.

67.

Hamdan

Mansour

Uthman

Masri

Nasr

Arayssi

(2006) Behcet’s disease in Lebanon: clinical profile, severity and two-decade comparison. Clin Rheumatol 25: 364–367.

68.

Hamuryudan

Seyahi

Akman

Tuzun

Fresko

. (2004) Pulmonary artery aneurysms in Behcet syndrome. Am J Med 117: 867–870.

69.

Hamuryudan

Mat

Saip

Ozyazgan

Siva

Yurdakul

. (1998) Thalidomide in the treatment of the mucocutaneous lesions of the Behcet syndrome. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 128: 443–450.

70.

Hamuryudan

Ozyazgan

Fresko

Mat

Yurdakul

Yazici

(2002) Interferon alfa combined with azathioprine for the uveitis of Behcet’s disease: an open study. Isr Med Assoc J 4: 928–930.

71.

Hamuryudan

Ozyazgan

Hizli

Mat

Yurdakul

Tuzun

. (1997) Azathioprine in Behcet’s syndrome: effects on long-term prognosis. Arthritis Rheum 40: 769–774.

72.

Hamuryudan

Yurdakul

Moral

Numan

Tuzun

Tuzuner

. (1994) Pulmonary arterial aneurysms in Behcet’s syndrome: a report of 24 cases. Br J Rheumatol 33: 48–51.

73.

Hamza

(1986) Treatment of Behcet’s disease with thalidomide. Clin Rheumatol 5: 365–371.

74.

Handa

Tsunekawa

Yoneda

Watanabe

Mukai

Yamamura

. (2011) Long-term remission of ocular and extraocular manifestations in Behcet’s disease using infliximab. Clin Exp Rheumatol 29: S58–S63.

75.

Hassard

Binder

Nelson

Vasiliauskas

(2001) Anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody therapy for gastrointestinal Behcet’s disease: a case report. Gastroenterology 120: 995–999.

76.

Hatemi

Silman

Bang

Bodaghi

Chamberlain

Gul

. (2008) EULAR recommendations for the management of Behcet disease. Ann Rheum Dis 67: 1656–1662.

77.

Hatemi

Silman

Bang

Bodaghi

Chamberlain

Gul

. (2009) Management of Behcet disease: a systematic literature review for the European League Against Rheumatism evidence-based recommendations for the management of Behcet disease. Ann Rheum Dis 68: 1528–1534.

78.

Hatemi

Yazici

(2013) Behcet’s syndrome. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 39: 245–261.

79.

Hayasaka

Kawamoto

Noda

Kodama

(1994) Visual prognosis in patients with Behcet’s disease receiving colchicine, systemic corticosteroid or cyclosporin. Ophthalmologica 208: 210–213.

80.

Hirano

Ohguro

Hohki

Hagihara

Shima

Narazaki

. (2012) A case of Behcet’s disease treated with a humanized anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, tocilizumab. Mod Rheumatol 22: 298–302.

81.

Hirohata

Suda

Hashimoto

(1998) Low-dose weekly methotrexate for progressive neuropsychiatric manifestations in Behcet’s disease. J Neurol Sci 159: 181–185.

82.

Hou

Xiao

Jiang

Kijlstra

Yang

(2012) Two-stage association study in Chinese Han identifies two independent associations in CCR1/CCR3 locus as candidate for Behcet’s disease susceptibility. Hum Genet 131: 1841–1850.

83.

Hughes

Coit

Adler

Yilmaz

Aksu

Duzgun

. (2013) Identification of multiple independent susceptibility loci in the HLA region in Behcet’s disease. Nat Genet 45: 319–324.

84.

Ishioka

Ohno

Nakamura

Isobe

Watanabe

Ishigatsubo

. (1994) FK506 treatment of noninfectious uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 118: 723–729.

85.

Iwata

Saito

Yamaoka

Tsujimura

Nawata

Hanami

. (2011) Efficacy of combination therapy of anti-TNF-alpha antibody infliximab and methotrexate in refractory entero-Behcet’s disease. Mod Rheumatol 21: 184–1891.

86.

Kwok

Seo

Yoon

Kim

Park

(2007) Successful treatment of life-threatening intestinal ulcer in Behcet’s disease with infliximab: rapid healing of Behcet’s ulcer with infliximab. Clin Rheumatol 26: 1383–1385.

87.

Kasugai

Watanabe

Mizutani

Masuda

Zako

Mukai

. (2010) Infliximab treatment of severe genital ulcers associated with Behcet disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 62: 162–164.

88.

Kato

Numaga

Kato

Kaburaki

Kawashima

Fujino

(2001) Central nervous system symptoms in a population of Behcet’s disease patients with refractory uveitis treated with cyclosporine A. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 29: 335–336.

89.

Keino

Okada

Watanabe

Taki

(2011) Decreased ocular inflammatory attacks and background retinal and disc vascular leakage in patients with Behcet’s disease on infliximab therapy. Br J Ophthalmol 95: 1245–1250.

90.

Keogan

(2009) Clinical Immunology Review Series: an approach to the patient with recurrent orogenital ulceration, including Behcet’s syndrome. Clin Exp Immunol 156: 1–11.

91.

Kikuchi

Aramaki

Hirohata

(2008) Effect of infliximab in progressive neuro-Behcet’s syndrome. J Neurol Sci 272: 99–105.

92.

Kikuchi

Aramaki

Hirohata

(2003) Low dose MTX for progressive neuro-Behcet’s disease. A follow-up study for 4 years. Adv Exp Med Biol 528: 575–578.

93.

Kirino

Zhou

Ishigatsubo

Mizuki

Tugal-Tutkun

Seyahi

. (2013) Targeted resequencing implicates the familial Mediterranean fever gene MEFV and the toll-like receptor 4 gene TLR4 in Behcet disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 8134–8139.

94.

Kotake

Higashi

Yoshikawa

Sasamoto

Okamoto

Matsuda

(1999) Central nervous system symptoms in patients with Behcet disease receiving cyclosporine therapy. Ophthalmology 106: 586–589.

95.

Kotter

Gunaydin

Batra

Vonthein

Stubiger

Fierlbeck

. (2006) CNS involvement occurs more frequently in patients with Behcet’s disease under cyclosporin A (CSA) than under other medications – results of a retrospective analysis of 117 cases. Clin Rheumatol 25: 482–486.

96.

Kotter

Gunaydin

Zierhut

Stubiger

(2004a) The use of interferon alpha in Behcet disease: review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum 33: 320–335.

97.

Kotter

Vonthein

Zierhut

Eckstein

Ness

Gunaydin

. (2004b) Differential efficacy of human recombinant interferon-alpha2a on ocular and extraocular manifestations of Behcet disease: results of an open 4-center trial. Semin Arthritis Rheum 33: 311–319.

98.

Kotter

Zierhut

Eckstein

Vonthein

Ness

Gunaydin

. (2003) Human recombinant interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of Behcet’s disease with sight threatening posterior or panuveitis. Br J Ophthalmol 87: 423–431.

99.

Kram

May

Goodman

Molinas

(2003) Behcet’s ileocolitis: successful treatment with tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody (infliximab) therapy: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 46: 118–121.

100.

Krause

Turnbull

Torun

Pleyer

Zouboulis

Foerster

(2003) Interferon alfa-2a in the treatment of ocular Adamantiades-Behcet’s disease. Adv Exp Med Biol 528: 511–519.

101.

Kuemmerle-Deschner

Tzaribachev

Deuter

Zierhut

Batra

Koetter

(2008) Interferon-alpha – a new therapeutic option in refractory juvenile Behcet’s disease with CNS involvement. Rheumatology 47: 1051–1053.

102.

Kural-Seyahi

Fresko

Seyahi

Ozyazgan

Mat

Hamuryudan

. (2003) The long-term mortality and morbidity of Behcet syndrome: a 2-decade outcome survey of 387 patients followed at a dedicated center. Medicine (Baltimore) 82: 60–76.

103.

Kurtuncu

Tuzun

Mutlu

. (2008) Clinical patterns and course of neuro-Behcet’s disease: analysis of 354 patients comparing cases presented before and after 1990. Clin Exp Rheumatol 26 (4 Suppl 50): S17.

104.

Lanthier

Parc

Scavennec

Dhote

Brezin

Guillevi

(2005) Infliximab in the treatment of posterior uveitis in Behcet’s disease. Long term follow up in four patients. Presse Medicale 34: 916–918.

105.

Larsson

(1990) Treatment of severe colitis in Behcet’s syndrome with thalidomide (CG-217). J Intern Med 228: 405–407.

106.

Lee

Kim

Choi

Jang

Shin

Lee

. (2007) Remission of intestinal Behcet’s disease treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody (Infliximab). Korean J Intern Med 22: 24–27.

107.

Lee

Kim

Jung

Chung

(2010) Adalimumab treatment for life threatening pulmonary artery aneurysm in Behcet disease: a case report. Clin Rheumatol 29: 91–93.

108.

Lee

Horie

Wallace

Choi

Park

Choi

. (2013) Genome-wide association study identifies GIMAP as a novel susceptibility locus for Behcet’s disease. Ann Rheum Dis 72: 1510–1516.

109.

Lestre

Trindade

Martins

Baptista

Feio

Lopes

(2009) [Behcet’s disease – infliximab in the treatment of mucocutaneous manifestations]. Acta Reumatol Port 34: 633–640.

110.

Licata

Pinto

Tuttolomondo

Banco

Ciccia

Ferrante

. (2003) Anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody therapy for recalcitrant cerebral vasculitis in a patient with Behcet’s syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 62: 280–281.

111.

Lindstedt

Baarsma

Kuijpers

Van Hagen

(2005) Anti-TNF-alpha therapy for sight threatening uveitis. Br J Ophthalmol 89: 533–536.

112.

Markomichelakis

Delicha

Masselos

Fragiadaki

Kaklamanis

Sfikakis

(2011) A single infliximab infusion versus corticosteroids for acute panuveitis attacks in Behcet’s disease: a comparative 4-week study. Rheumatology 50: 593–597.

113.

Markomichelakis

Delicha

Masselos

Sfikakis

(2012) Intravitreal infliximab for sight-threatening relapsing uveitis in Behcet disease: a pilot study in 15 patients. Am J Ophthalmol 154: 534–541.e1.

114.

Maruyama

Hisamatsu

Matsuoka

Naganuma

Inoue

Ogata

. (2012) A case of intestinal Behcet’s disease treated with infliximab monotherapy who successfully maintained clinical remission and complete mucosal healing for six years. Intern Med 51: 2125–9.

115.

Masuda

Nakajima

Urayama

Nakae

Kogure

Inaba

(1989) Double-masked trial of cyclosporin versus colchicine and long-term open study of cyclosporin in Behcet’s disease. Lancet 1: 1093–1096.

116.

Mat

Yurdakul

Uysal

Gogus

Ozyazgan

Uysal

. (2006) A double-blind trial of depot corticosteroids in Behcet’s syndrome. Rheumatology 45: 348–352.

117.

Matsuda

Ohno

Hirohata

Miyanaga

Ujihara

Inaba

. (2003) Efficacy of rebamipide as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of recurrent oral aphthous ulcers in patients with Behcet’s disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Drugs R D 4: 19–28.

118.

Meguro

Inoko

Ota

Katsuyama

Oka

Okada

. (2010) Genetics of Behcet disease inside and outside the MHC. Ann Rheum Dis 69: 747–754.

119.

Melikoglu

Fresko

Mat

Ozyazgan

Gogus

Yurdakul

. (2005) Short-term trial of etanercept in Behcet’s disease: a double blind, placebo controlled study. J Rheumatol 32: 98–105.

120.

Melikoglu

Tunc

Korkmaz

Turgut Ozturk

Mat

Merkel

. (2013) Apremilast for the treatment of Behçet’s syndrome: a phase II randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. San Diego, CA: American College of Rheumatology.

121.

Merino

Varas

Diaz

Gutierrez

Massardo

Pacheco

. (2006) [Effectiveness of infliximab in patients with Behcet syndrome and severe uveoretinitis. Report of five cases]. Revista Medica de Chile 134: 875–882.

122.

Mizuki

Meguro

Ota

Ohno

Shiota

Kawagoe

. (2010) Genome-wide association studies identify IL23R-IL12RB2 and IL10 as Behcet’s disease susceptibility loci. Nat Genet 42: 703–706.

123.

Mizushima

Matsumura

Mori

Shimizu

Fukushima

Mimura

. (1977) Colchicine in Behcet’s disease. Lancet 2: 1037.

124.

Mochizuki

Ikeda

Shirao

Fujito

Yoshimura

Shimada

(1992) Preclinical and clinical study of FK506 in uveitis. Curr Eye Res 11(Suppl.): 87–95.

125.

Mochizuki

Masuda

Sakane

Inaba

Ito

Kogure

. (1991) A multicenter clinical open trial of FK 506 in refractory uveitis, including Behcet’s disease. Japanese FK 506 Study Group on Refractory Uveitis. Transplant Proc 23: 3343–3346.

126.

Monastirli

Chroni

Georgiou

Ellul

Pasmatzi

Papathanasopoulos

. (2010) Interferon-alpha treatment for acute myelitis and intestinal involvement in severe Behcet’s disease. QJM 103: 787–790.

127.

Moral

Hamuryudan

Yurdakul

Yazici

(1995) Inefficacy of azapropazone in the acute arthritis of Behcet’s syndrome: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 13: 493–495.

128.

Morris

Gavin

Sturrock

(2003) The effect of anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (infliximab) on sight-threatening uveitis in a patient with Behcet’s disease. Adv Exp Med Biol 528: 557–559.

129.

Muftuoglu

Pazarli

Yurdakul

Yazici

Ulku

Tuzun

. (1987) Short term cyclosporin A treatment of Behcet’s disease. Br J Ophthalmol 71: 387–390.

130.

Munoz-Fernandez

Hidalgo

Fernandez-Melon

Schlincker

Martin-Mola

(2001) Effect of infliximab on threatening panuveitis in Behcet’s disease. Lancet 358: 1644.

131.

Mushtaq

Saeed

Situnayake

Murray

(2007) Adalimumab for sight-threatening uveitis in Behcet’s disease. Eye (Lond) 21: 824–825.

132.

Naganuma

Sakuraba

Hisamatsu

Ochiai

Hasegawa

Ogata

. (2008) Efficacy of infliximab for induction and maintenance of remission in intestinal Behcet’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 14: 1259–1264.

133.

Niccoli

Nannini

Benucci

Chindamo

Cassara

Salvarani

. (2007) Long-term efficacy of infliximab in refractory posterior uveitis of Behcet’s disease: a 24-month follow-up study. Rheumatology 46: 1161–1164.

134.

Nichols

Ince

Akduman

Mann

(2001) Interferon-alpha 2a treatment of neuro-Behcet disease. J Neuroophthalmol 21: 109–111.

135.

Nussenblatt

Palestine

Chan

Mochizuki

Yancey

(1985) Effectiveness of cyclosporin therapy for Behcet’s disease. Arthritis Rheum 28: 671–679.

136.

O’Duffy

Calamia

Cohen

Goronzy

Herman

Jorizzo

. (1998) Interferon-alpha treatment of Behcet’s disease. J Rheumatol 25: 1938–1944.

137.

Ohno

Nakamura

Hori

Shimakawa

Kawashima

Mochizuki

. (2004) Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of multiple administration of infliximab in Behcet’s disease with refractory uveoretinitis. J Rheumatol 31: 1362–1368.

138.

Okada

Goto

Ohno

Mochizuki

and Ocular Behcet’s Disease Research Group Of Japan (2012) Multicenter study of infliximab for refractory uveoretinitis in Behcet disease. Arch Ophthalmol 130: 592–598.

139.

Olivieri

Latanza

Siringo

Peruz

Di Iorio

(2008) Successful treatment of severe Behcet’s disease with infliximab in an Italian Olympic athlete. J Rheumatol, 35: 930–932.

140.

Olivieri

Leccese

D’Angelo

Padula

Nigro

Palazzi

. (2011) Efficacy of adalimumab in patients with Behcet’s disease unsuccessfully treated with infliximab. Clin Exp Rheumatol 29: S54–S57.

141.

Olivieri

D’Angelo

Padula

Leccese

Mennillo

(2009) Successful treatment of recalcitrant genital ulcers of Behcet’s disease with adalimumab after failure of infliximab and etanercept. Clin Exp Rheumatol 27: S112.

142.

Onal

Kazokoglu

Koc

Akman

Bavbek

Direskeneli

. (2011) Long-term efficacy and safety of low-dose and dose-escalating interferon alfa-2a therapy in refractory Behcet uveitis. Arch Ophthalmol 129: 288–294.

143.

Ozdal

Ortac

Taskintuna

Firat

(2002) Long-term therapy with low dose cyclosporin A in ocular Behcet’s disease. Doc Ophthalmol 105: 301–312.

144.

Ozyazgan

Yurdakul

Yazici

Tuzun

Iscimen

Tuzun

. (1992) Low dose cyclosporin A versus pulsed cyclophosphamide in Behcet’s syndrome: a single masked trial. Br J Ophthalmol 76: 241–243.

145.

Pacor

Biasi

Lunardi

Cortina

Caramaschi

Girelli

. (1994) Cyclosporin in Behcet’s disease: results in 16 patients after 24 months of therapy. Clin Rheumatol 13: 224–227.

146.

Perra

Alba

Callejas

Mesquida

Rios-Fernandez

Adan

. (2012). Adalimumab for the treatment of Behcet’s disease: experience in 19 patients. Rheumatology 51: 1825–1831.

147.

Pipitone

Olivieri

Padula

D’Angelo

Nigro

Zuccoli

. (2008) Infliximab for the treatment of Neuro-Behcet’s disease: a case series and review of the literature. Arthritis Rheum 59: 285–290.

148.

Postema

Den Haan

Van Hagen

Van Blankenstein

(1996) Treatment of colitis in Behcet’s disease with thalidomide. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 8: 929–931.

149.

Remmers

Cosan

Kirino

Ombrello

Abaci

Satorius

. (2010) Genome-wide association study identifies variants in the MHC class I, IL10, and IL23R-IL12RB2 regions associated with Behcet’s disease. Nat Genet 42: 698–702.

150.

Ribi

Sztajzel

Delavelle

Chizzolini

(2005) Efficacy of TNF {alpha} blockade in cyclophosphamide resistant neuro-Behcet disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76: 1733–1735.

151.

Rosenbaum

(2004) Blind insight: eyeing anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment in uveitis associated with Behcet’s disease. J Rheumatol 31: 1241–1243.

152.

Saadoun

Wechsler

Resche-Rigon

Trad

Le Thi Huong

Sbai

. (2009) Cerebral venous thrombosis in Behcet’s disease. Arthritis Rheum 61: 518–526.

153.

Saadoun

Wechsler

Terrada

Hajage

Le Thi Huong

Resche-Rigon

. (2010) Azathioprine in severe uveitis of Behcet’s disease. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 62: 1733–1738.

154.

Sadreddini

Noshad

Molaeefard

Noshad

(2008) Treatment of retinal vasculitis in Behcet’s disease with rituximab. Mod Rheumatol 18: 306–308.

155.

Saenz

Ausejo

Shea

Wells

Welch

Tugwell

(2000) Pharmacotherapy for Behcet’s syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001084.

156.

Sajjadi

Soheilian

Ahmadieh

Hassanein

Parvin

Azarmina

. (1994) Low dose cyclosporin-A therapy in Behcet’s disease. J Ocul Pharmacol 10: 553–560.

157.

Sakane

Takeno

Suzuki

Inaba

(1999) Behcet’s disease. N Engl J Med 341: 1284–1291.

158.

Sarwar

McGrath

Jr Espinoza

(2005) Successful treatment of long-standing neuro-Behcet’s disease with infliximab. J Rheumatol 32: 181–183.

159.

Sawalha

Hughes

Nadig

Yilmaz

Aksu

Keser

. (2011) A putative functional variant within the UBAC2 gene is associated with increased risk of Behcet’s disease. Arthritis Rheum 63: 3607–3612.

160.

Sayarlioglu

Cinal

Topcu

Demirok

(2004a) Effect of infliximab on refractory uveitis in Behcet’s disease. Ann Pharmacother 38: 901–902.

161.

Sayarlioglu

Kotan

Topcu

Bayram

Arslanturk

Gul

(2004b) Treatment of recurrent perforating intestinal ulcers with thalidomide in Behcet’s disease. Ann Pharmacother 38: 808–811.

162.

Saylan

Saltik

(1982) Thalidomide in the treatment of Behcet’s syndrome. Arch Dermatol 118: 536.

163.

Schreiber

Noor

Juli

Haskard

(2011) Resolution of Behcet’s syndrome associated pulmonary arterial aneurysms with infliximab. Semin Arthritis Rheum 41: 482–487.

164.

Sfikakis

(2002) Behcet’s disease: a new target for anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment. Ann Rheum Dis 61(Suppl. 2): ii51–ii53.

165.

Sfikakis

Kaklamanis

Elezoglou

Katsilambros

Theodossiadis

Papaefthimiou

. (2004) Infliximab for recurrent, sight-threatening ocular inflammation in Adamantiades-Behcet disease. Ann Inter Med 140: 404–406.

166.

Sfikakis

Theodossiadis

Katsiari

Kaklamanis

Markomichelakis

(2001) Effect of infliximab on sight-threatening panuveitis in Behcet’s disease. Lancet 358: 295–296.

167.

Shapiro

Farrell

Haghighi

(2012) Tocilizumab treatment for neuro-Behcet’s disease, the first report. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 114: 297–298.

168.

Sharquie

Najim

Abu-Raghif

(2002) Dapsone in Behcet’s disease: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. J Dermatol 29: 267–279.

169.

Shugaiv

Tuzun

Mutlu

Kiyat-Atamer

Kurtuncu

Akman-Demir

(2011) Mycophenolate mofetil as a novel immunosuppressant in the treatment of neuro-Behcet’s disease with parenchymal involvement: presentation of four cases. Clin Exp Rheumatol 29: S64–S67.

170.

Simsek

Dundar

Telatar

(1991) Treatment of Behcet disease with indomethacin. Int J Dermatol 30: 54–57.

171.

Sobaci

Erdem

Durukan

Erdurman

Bayer

Koksal

. (2010) Safety and effectiveness of interferon alpha-2a in treatment of patients with Behcet’s uveitis refractory to conventional treatments. Ophthalmology 117: 1430–1435.

172.

Sullu

Oge

Erkan

Ariturk

Mohajeri

(1998) Cyclosporin-A therapy in severe uveitis of Behcet’s disease. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76: 96–99.

173.

Tabbara

Al-Hemidan

(2008) Infliximab effects compared to conventional therapy in the management of retinal vasculitis in Behcet disease. Am J Ophthalmol 146: 845–850.e1.

174.

Takamoto

Kaburaki

Numaga

Fujino

Kawashima

(2007) Long-term infliximab treatment for Behcet’s disease. Jap J Ophthalmol 51: 239–240.

175.

Takase

Ohno

Ideguchi

Uchio

Takeno

Ishigatsubo

(2011) Successful switching to adalimumab in an infliximab-allergic patient with severe Behcet disease-related uveitis. Rheumatol Int 31: 243–245.

176.

Takayama

Ishikawa

Enoki

Kojima

Takeuchi

(2013) Successful treatment with infliximab for Behcet disease during pregnancy. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 21: 321-323.

177.

Tanaka

Sugita

Yamada

Kawaguchi

Iwanaga

Kamoi

. (2010) [Effects and safety of infliximab administration in refractory uveoretinitis with Behcet’s disease]. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 114: 87–95.

178.

Tayer-Shifman

Seyahi

Nowatzky

Ben-Chetrit

(2012) Major vessel thrombosis in Behcet’s disease: the dilemma of anticoagulant therapy – the approach of rheumatologists from different countries. Clin Exp Rheumatol 30: 735–740.

179.

Tognon

Graziani

Marcolongo

(2007) Anti-TNF-alpha therapy in seven patients with Behcet’s uveitis: advantages and controversial aspects. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1110: 474–484.

180.

Travis

Czajkowski

McGovern

Watson

Bell

(2001) Treatment of intestinal Behcet’s syndrome with chimeric tumour necrosis factor alpha antibody. Gut 49: 725–728.

181.

Triolo

Vadala

Accardo-Palumbo

Ferrante

Ciccia

Giardina

. (2002) Anti-tumour necrosis factor monoclonal antibody treatment for ocular Behcet’s disease. Ann Rheum Dis 61: 560–561.

182.

Tugal-Tutkun

Guney-Tefekli

Urgancioglu

(2006) Results of interferon-alfa therapy in patients with Behcet uveitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244: 1692–1695.

183.

Tugal-Tutkun

Mudun

Urgancioglu

Kamali

Kasapoglu

Inanc

. (2005) Efficacy of infliximab in the treatment of uveitis that is resistant to treatment with the combination of azathioprine, cyclosporine, and corticosteroids in Behcet’s disease: an open-label trial. Arthritis Rheum 52: 2478–2484.

184.

Ugurlu

Ucar

Seyahi

Hatemi

Yurdakul

(2012) Canakinumab in a patient with juvenile Behcet’s syndrome with refractory eye disease. Ann Rheum Dis 71: 1589–1591.

185.

Urbaniak

Hasler

Kretzschmar

(2012) Refractory neuro-Behcet treated by tocilizumab: a case report. Clin Exp Rheumatol 30: S73–S75.

186.

Wechsler

Bodaghi

Huong

Fardeau

Amoura

Cassoux

. (2000) Efficacy of interferon alfa-2a in severe and refractory uveitis associated with Behcet’s disease. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 8: 293–301.

187.

Wechsler

Mertani

Le Hoang

De Groc

Piette

Beaufils

. (1986) Cyclosporin A is effective, but not safe, in the management of Behcet’s disease. Arthritis Rheum 29: 574–575.

188.

Wechsler

Sable-Fourtassou

Bodaghi

Huong

Cassoux

Badelon

. (2004) Infliximab in refractory uveitis due to Behcet’s disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol 22: S14–S16.

189.

Whitcup

Salvo

Jr Nussenblatt

(1994) Combined cyclosporine and corticosteroid therapy for sight-threatening uveitis in Behcet’s disease. Am J Ophthalmol 118: 39–45.

190.

Yalcindag

Uzun

(2012) Results of interferon alpha-2a therapy in patients with Behcet’s disease. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 28: 439–443.

191.

Yamada

Sugita

Tanaka

Kamoi

Kawaguchi

Mochizuki

(2010) Comparison of infliximab versus ciclosporin during the initial 6-month treatment period in Behcet disease. Br J Ophthalmol 94: 284–288.

192.

Yazici

Pazarli

Barnes

Tuzun

Ozyazgan

Silman

. (1990) A controlled trial of azathioprine in Behcet’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 322: 281–285.

193.

Yoshida

Takeuchi

Yoshikawa

Ozaki

Fujiki

Hata

(2012) Good response to infliximab in a patient with deep vein thrombosis associated with Behcet disease. Mod Rheumatol 22: 791–795.

194.

Yurdakul

Mat

Tuzun

Ozyazgan

Hamuryudan

Uysal

. (2001) A double-blind trial of colchicine in Behcet’s syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 44: 2686–2692.

195.

Zhou

(2006) Clinical pharmacogenomics of thiopurine S-methyltransferase. Curr Clin Pharmacol 1: 119–128.

196.

Zhou

Chen

Shen

(2012) Cytokines and Behcet’s disease. Autoimmun Rev 11: 699–704.

Update on the therapy of Behçet disease

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Therapeutic options in Behçet’s disease

Biologics and monoclonal therapy

Tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors

Infliximab

Etanercept

Adalimumab

Rituximab

Other biologics

Interferon α

Apremilast

Traditional treatments

Corticosteroids

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Colchicine

Azathioprine

Ocular disease

Vascular disease

Entero-Behçet and neuro-Behçet

Mycophenolate mofetil

Cyclosporine A

Tacrolimus

Cyclophosphamide

Thalidomide

Methotrexate

Dapsone

Anticoagulation

Other therapies

Conclusion

Footnotes

Funding

Conflict of interest statement

References