This article discusses the implications of the UN Security Council's asset freezing regime on the EU legal order and on the rights of targeted individuals and entities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnderssonTorbjörnCameronIainNordbackKenneth, “EU-listing: The Renaissance of Imperial Power, but on a Global Scale”, European Business Law Review14 (2003), 111–141.
2.
d'AspremontJeanDopagneFréderic, “Two Constitutionalisms in Europe: Pursuing an Articulation of the European and International Legal Orders”, Heidelberg Journal of International Law69 (2009), 939–978.
3.
BessonSamantha, “European Legal Pluralism after Kadi”, European Constitutional Review5 (2009), 237–264.
4.
CameronIain (2009), “Sökandet efter en rättvis lösning på FN:s riktade sanktioner: Et sisyfosarbete”, Svensk Juristtidning (2009), 64–83.
5.
CameronIain (2008), “Respecting Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and EU/UN Sanctions: State of Play”, Study requested by the European Parliament's Subcommittee on Human Rights, European Parliament, Policy Department, External Policies.
6.
CameronIain (2003), “UN Targeted Sanctions, Legal Safeguards and the European Convention on Human Rights”, Nordic Journal of International Law72 (2003) 159–214.
7.
ChristensenAne Maria Røddik, Judicial Accommodation of Human Rights in the European Union. DJØF Publishing, Copenhagen (2007).
8.
EckesChristina, EU Counter-Terrorist Policies and Fundamental Rights. The Case of Individual Sanctions. Oxford University Press (2009).
9.
GattiniAndrea, “Joined Cases C-402/05 P & 415/05 P, Yassin Abdullah Kadi, Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council and Commission, judgment of the Grand Chamber of 3 September 2008, nyr”, Common Market Law Review, 46 (2009) 213–39.
10.
GrillerStefan, “International Law, Human Rights and the European Community's Autonomous Legal Order: Notes on the European Courts of Justice Decision in Kadi”, European Constitutional Review4 (2008) 528–553.
11.
GuruléJimmy, “The Demise of the UN Economic Sanctions Regime to Deprive Terrorists of Funding”, Case Western Reserve University Journal of International Law41 (2009) 19–63.
12.
HalberstamDanielSteinEric, “The United Nations, the European Union and the King of Sweden: Economic sanctions and individual rights in a plural world order”, Common Market Law Review46 (2009), 13–72.
13.
HapazGuy, “The European Court of Justice and its Relations with the European Court of Human Rights: The quest for enhanced reliance, coherence and legitimacy”, Common Market Law Review46 (2009), 105–141.
14.
International Commission of Jurists, Assessing Damage, Urging Action. Report of the Eminent Jurists Panel on Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights, Geneva (2009).
15.
KruseAnders, “Internationella sanktioner mot enskilda - rättssäkerheten i vågskålen”, Europarättsligt Tidsskrift (2009), 189–195.
16.
KunoyBjørnDawesAnthony, “Plate Tectonics in Luxembourg: The Ménage à Trois Between EC Law, International Law and the European Convention on Human Rights following the UN Sanctions Cases”, Common Law Review46 (2009), 73–104.
17.
LebeckCarl, “Art. 308 EC-Treaty: From a democratic to a constitutional deficit? Implied powers, accountability and the structure of the European Community”, Europarättsligt Tidsskrift (2007), 365–409.
18.
MaduroMiguel Poiares, “Interpreting European Law. Judicial Adjudication in a Context of Constitutional Pluralism”, European Journal of Legal Studies1 (2007), 1–21.
19.
MeyerFrank, “EU Terrorism Lists in the Eyes of the Rule of Law”, eucrim (2008) 81–88.
20.
PassasNikos, “Combatting Terrorist Financing”, Case Western Reserve University Journal of International Law41 (2009), 243–266.
