AbramsHL: The vertebral and azygos venous systems and some variations in systemic venous return. Radiology69: 508–526, 1957.
2.
AbramsHLSpiroRGoldsteinN: Metastases in carcinoma. Analysis of 1000 autopsied cases. Cancer74–85, 1950.
3.
AdaponBDLegadaBDLimEVA: CT-guided closed biopsy of the spine. J Comput Assist Tomogr5: 73–78, 1981.
4.
Von AllgayerBFlierdtEGumppenbergS: Die Kernspintomographie im Vergleich zur Skelettszintigraphie nach traumatischen Wirbelkörperfrakturen. Fortschr Röntgenstr152: 677–681, 1990.
5.
AlgraPRBloemJHValkJ: Loss of visibility of the basivertebral vein; a new MR sign of diffuse bone marrow disease. Am J Radiol157: 1129–1130, 1991.
6.
AlgraPRBloemJLVerboomLJ: MRI vs scintigraphy in the detection of vertebral metastases. Radiographics11: 219–232, 1991.
7.
AlgraPRBloemJLVerboomL: Detection of vertebral metastases; MRI versus bone scintigraphy. Preliminary results. Proceedings Tissue characterization in MR imaging. Higer and Bielke eds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin1990. ISBN 3-540-51532-1.
8.
AndersonRK: Diodrast studies of the vertebral and cranial venous system to show their probable role in the spread of metastases. J Neurosurg8: 411–422, 1951.
9.
ArcangeliGMicheliAArcangeliG: The responsiveness of bone metastases to radiotherapy: The effect of site, histology and radiation dose on pain relief. Radiotherapy and Oncology14: 95–101, 1989.
10.
ArdranGM: Bone destruction not demonstrable by radiography. Brit J Radiol24: 107–109, 1951.
11.
AsdourianPLWeidenbaumMDewaldRL: The pattern of vertebral involvement in metastatic vertebral breast cancer. Clin Orthop250: 164–170, 1990.
12.
AvrahamiETachmorRDallyO: Early MR demonstration of spinal metastases in patients with normal radiographs, CT and radionuclide bone scans. J Comput Assist Tomogr13: 598–602, 1989.
13.
BakerLLGoodmanSBPerkashI: Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: Assessment with conventional spin echo, chemical shift, and STIR MR imaging. Radiology174: 495–502, 1990.
14.
BarcenaALobatoRDRivasJJ: Spinal metastatic disease: Analysis of factors determining functional prognosis and the choice of treatment. Neurosurgery15: 820–827, 1984.
15.
BatsonOV: The function of the vertebral veins and their role in the spread of metastases. Ann Surg112: 138–149, 1940.
16.
BatsonOV: The role of the vertebral veins in metastatic processes. Ann Intern Med16: 38–45, 1942.
17.
BatsonOV: The vertebral vein system. Am J Radiol78: 195–212, 1957.
18.
BatsonOV: The Valsalva manoeuver and the vertebral vein system. Angiology11: 443–447, 1960.
19.
BlackP: Spinal metastasis. Current status and recomended guidelines for treatment. Neurosurg5: 726–746, 1979.
20.
BlomqvistCElommaaIVirkunnenP: The response evaluation of bone metastases in mammary carcinoma. The value of radiology, scintigraphy and biochemical markers of bone metabolism. Cancer60: 2907–2912, 1987.
21.
BoesenJJohnsenAHelweg-LarsenS: Diagnostic value of spinal computer tomography in patients with intraspinal metastases causing complete block on myelography. Acta radiologica32: 1–2, 1991.
22.
BoringCCSquiresTSTongT: Cancer statistics. Ca42: 19–38, 1992.
23.
BrunningRDBloomfieldCDMcKennaRW: Bilateral trephine bone marrow biopsies in lymphoma and other neoplastic disease. Ann Intern Med82: 365–366, 1975.
24.
CanerBKitapçlMUnlüM: Technetium 99-m-MIBI uptake in benign and malignant bone lesions: A comparative study with Tc-99m-MDP. J Nucl Med33: 319–324, 1992.
25.
CanerBEErcanMTBekdikCF: Visualization of bone pathologies and lung cancer with 99m-Tc-glucose phosphate: A comparative study. Nuklear Medizin30: 132–136, 1991.
26.
CarmodyRFYangPJSeeleyGW: Spinal cord compression due to metastatic disease: Diagnosis with MR imaging versus myelography. Radiology173: 225–229, 1989.
27.
CastilloMMalkoJAHoffmanJC: The bright intervertebral disk, an indirect sign of abnormal spinal bone marrow on T1-weighted MR images. Am J Neuroradiol11: 23–26, 1990.
28.
ChadwickDJGillatDAMukerjeeA: Magnetic resonance imaging of spinal metastases. J Royal Soc Med84: 196–200, 1991.
29.
CitrinDLHougenCZweibelW: The use of serial bone scans in assessing response of bone metastases to systemic treatment. Cancer47: 680–685, 1981.
30.
CitrinDLBessentRGGreigWR: A comparison of the sensitivity and accuracy of the 99m-Tc phosphate bone scan and skeletal radiograph in the diagnosis of bone metastases. Clin Radiol28: 107–117, 1977.
31.
CollettiPMDangHTDeseranMW: Spinal MR imaging in suspected metastases: Correlation with skeletal scintigraphy. Magn Reson Imag9: 349–355, 1991.
32.
ColmanLKPorterBERedmondJ: Early diagnosis of spinal metastases by CT and MR studies. J Comput Assist Tomog12: 423–426, 1988.
33.
ComanDRDe LongRP: Role of the vertebral venous system in the metastasis of cancer to the spinal column. Experiments with tumor cell suspensions in rats and rabbits. Cancer4: 610–618, 1951.
34.
CoombesRCDadyPParsonsC: Assessment of response of bone metastases to systemic treatment in patients with breast cancer. Cancer52: 610–614, 1983.
35.
CorbettROlliffJFairleyN: A prospective comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, meta-iodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy and marrow histology / cytology in neuroblastoma. Eur J Cancer27: 1560–1564, 1991.
36.
Crone-MnzebrockWCarlUM: Dual energy CT scan quantification of recalcification in osteolysis of the vertebral body due to mammary carcinomas in the course of antineoplastic treatment. Clin Expl Metastasis8: 173–179, 1990.
37.
CusterRPAhlfeldtFE: Studies on the structure and function of bone marrow. Variations in cellularity in various bones with advancing years of life and their relative response to stimuli. J Lab & Clin Med17: 951–962, 1932.
38.
DaffnerRHLupetinARDashN: MRI in detection of malignant infiltration of bone marrow. Am J Radiol146: 353–358, 1986.
39.
DatzFTaylorF: The clinical use of radionuclide bone marrow imaging. Semin Nucl Med15: 239–259, 1985.
40.
DawsonKLMooreSGRowlandJM: Age-related marrow changes in the pelvis: MR and anatomic findings. Radiology183: 47–51, 1992.
41.
DoomsGCFisherMRHricakH: Bone marrow imaging: MR studies related to age and sex. Radiology155: 429–432, 1985.
42.
DoddsPRCarideVJLyttonB: The role of vertebral veins in the dissemination of prostatic carcinoma. J Urol126: 753–755, 1981.
43.
DruryRABPalmerPHHighmanWJ: Carcinomatous metastasis to the vertebral bodies. J Clin Pathol17: 448–457, 1964.
44.
DunnRCKelleyWAWohnsRNW: Spinal epidural neoplasia. A 15-year review of the results of surgical therapy. J Neurosurg52: 47–51, 1980.
45.
du BoulayGHHawkesSLeeCC: Comparing the cost of spinal MR with conventional myelography and radiculography. Neuroradiology32: 124–136, 1990.
Fraser-HillMARenfrewDL: Percutaneous needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions. Cost-effectiveness. Am J Radiol158: 813–818, 1992.
58.
Fraser-HillMARenfrewDLHilsenrathPE: Percutaneous needle biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions. Effective accuracy and diagnostic utility. Am J Radiol158: 809–812, 1992.
59.
GalaskoCSB: Incidence and distribution of skeletal metastases. In: Skeletal metastases. GalaskoCSB (ed). Butterworths & Co Publishers LTD. London1986: 14–21.
60.
GalaskoCSB: Detection of skeletal metastases. In: Skeletal metastases. GalaskoCSB (ed). Butterworth & Co Publishers LTD. London1986: 52–87.
61.
GalaskoCSB: The pathologic basis for skeletal scintigraphy. J Bone JT Surg57: 353–359, 1975.
62.
GalaskoCSB: Mechanisms of bone destruction in the development of skeletal metastases. Nature263: 507–508, 1976.
63.
HarringtonKD: Anterior cord decompression and spinal stabilization for patients with metastatic lesions of the spine. J Neurosurg61: 107–117, 1984.
64.
HarringtonKD: Anterior decompression and stabilization of the spine as a treatment for vertebral collapse and spinal cord compression from metastatic malignancy. Clin Ortop Rel Res233: 177–197, 1988.
65.
HelmsCACannCEBrunelleFO: Detection of bone-marrow metastases using quantitative computed tomography. Radiology140: 745–750, 1981.
66.
Helweg-LarsenSRasmussonBSørensenPS: Recovery of gait after radiotherapy in paralytic patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. Neurology40: 1234–1236, 1990.
67.
HendricksonFRShehataWMKirchnerAB: Radiation therapy for osseous metastasis. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys1: 275–278, 1976.
68.
HermannGRoseJS: CT in bone and soft tissue pathology of the extremities. J Comput Assist Tomogr3: 58–66, 1979.
69.
HermannGHermanP: Computerized tomography of the spine in metastatic disease. Mount Sinai J Med49: 400–405, 1982.
70.
HermannGRoseJSStraussL: Tumor infitration of the bone marrow: Comparative study using computed tomography. Skeletal Radiology11: 17–21, 1984.
71.
HilzMJHukWSchellmannB: Fatal complications after myelography with meglumine diatrizoate. Neuroradiology32: 70–73, 1990.
Van Holten-VerzantvoortATBijvoetOLMHermansJ: Reduced morbidity from skeletal metastases in breast cancer patients during long term biphosphonate treatment. Lancet11: 983–985, 1987.
74.
HorowitzSFineMAzar-KiaB: Differentiation of benign versus metastatic vertebral body compression fractures. Neuroradiology33: 114–116, 1991.
75.
JacobsonAFStomperPCCroninEB: Bone scans with one or two new abnormalities in cancer patients with no known metastases: Reliability of interpretation of initial correlative radiographs. Radiology174: 503–507, 1990.
76.
JacobsonAFCroninEBStomperPC: Bone scans with one or two new abnormalities in cancer patients with no known metastases: Frequency and serial scintigraphic behaviour of benign and malignant lesions. Radiology175: 229–232, 1990.
77.
JelinekJSRedmondJPerryJJ: Small cell lung cancer; staging with MR imaging. Radiology177: 837–842, 1990.
78.
JenkinsJPRStehlingMSivewrightG: Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of vertebral bodies: A T1 and T2 study. Magn Reson Imaging7: 17–23, 1989.
79.
JohnstonAD: Pathology of metastatic tumors in bone. Clin Orthop73: 8–32, 1970.
80.
KambyCGuldhammerBVejborgI: The presence of tumor cells in bone marrow at the time of first recurrence of breast cancer. Cancer60: 1306–1312, 1987.
81.
KambyCVejborgIDaugaard: Clinical and radiological characteristics of bone metastases in breast cancer. Cancer60: 2524–2531, 1987.
82.
KattapuramSVRosenthalDI: Percutaneous biopsy of the cervical spine using CT guidance. Am J Radiol149: 539–541, 1987.
83.
KattapuramSVKhuranaJSScottJA: Negative scintigraphy with positive magnetic resonance imaging in bone metastases. Skeletal Radiol19: 113–116, 1990.
KricunME: Red-yellow marrow conversion: Its effect on the location of some solitary bone lesions. Skeletal radiol14: 10–19, 1985.
86.
ManabeSTanakaHHigoY: Experimental analysis of the spinal cord compressed by spinal metastasis. Spine14: 1308–1315, 1989.
87.
MaranzanoELatiniPCheccagliniF: Radiation therapy in metastatic spinal cord compression. A prospective analysis of 105 consecutive patients. Cancer67: 1311–1317, 1991.
88.
Le BlancADSchonfeldESchneiderVS: The spine: Change in T2-relaxation times from disuse. Radiology169: 105–107, 1988.
89.
MartonKIGeanAD: The spinal tap: A new look at an old test. Ann Intern Med104: 840–848, 1986.
90.
MooreSGDawsonKL: Red and yellow marrow in the femur: Age related changes in appearance at MR imaging. Radiology175: 219–223, 1990.
91.
MunzDLSandrockD: Comparison of immunoscintigraphy and colloid scintigraphy of bone marrow. Lancet28: 258–259, 1990.
92.
MurphyWADestouetJMGilulaLA: Percutaneous skeletal biopsy 1981: A procedure for radiologists. Results, review, and recommendations. Radiology139: 545–549, 1981.
93.
NicolsonGL: Organ specifity of tumor metastasis; role of preferential adhesion, invasion and growth of malignant cells at specific secondary sites. Cancer Metastasis Rev7: 143–188, 1988.
94.
PagetS: The distribution of the secondary growths in cancer of the breast. Lancet1: 571–573, 1889.
95.
Petrén-MallminMNordströmBAndréassonI: MR imaging with histopathological correlation in vertebral metastases of breast cancer. Acta Radiol33: 213–220, 1992.
96.
v RecklinghausenF: Ueber die venöse embolie und den retrograden transport in den venen und in den lymphgefässen. Virchows Arch100: 503–539, 1885.
97.
RenfrewDLWhittenCGWieseJA: CT-guided percutaneous transpedicular biopsy of the spine. Radiology180: 574–576, 1991.
98.
ReskeSN: Recent advances in bone marrow scanning. Eur J Nucl Med18: 203–221, 1991.
99.
RicciRCovaMKangYS: Normal age-related patterns of cellular and fatty bone marrow distribution in the axial skeleton: MR imaging study. Radiology177: 83–88, 1990.
100.
RichardsMAWebbJAWJewellSE: In vivo measurements of spin lattice relaxation time of bone marrow in healthy volunteers: The effect of age and sex. Brit J Rad61: 30–33, 1988.
101.
RobertsonHJSmithRD: Cervical myelography: Survey of modes of practice and major complications. Radiology174: 79–83, 1990.
102.
RodichokLDRuckdeschelJCHarperGR: Early detection and treatment of spinal epidural metastases: The role of myelography. Ann Neurol20: 696–702, 1986.
103.
RodichokLDHarperGRRuckdeschelJC: Early diagnosis of spinal epidural metastases. Am J Med70: 1181–1188, 1981.
104.
RosatiGdi PrioloLeto STironeP: Serious or fatal complications after inadvertent administration of ionic water-soluble contrast media in myelography. Eur J Rad15: 95–100, 1992.
105.
SalazarOMRubinPHendricksonFR: Single dose half-body irradiation for the palliation of multplie bone metastases from solid tumors. Int J Rad Onc Biol Phys7: 773–781, 1981.
106.
Van Der SandeJJKrogerRBoogerdW: Multiple spinal epidural metastases; an unexpectedly frequent finding. J Neurol, Neurosurg, Psych53: 1001–1003, 1990.
107.
SartorisDJCloptonPNemcekA: Vertebral body collapse in focal and diffuse disease: Patterns of pathologic processes. Radiology160: 479–483, 1986.
108.
ScheidVBuzdarAUSmithTL: Clinical course of breast cancer patients with osseous metastasis treated with combination chemotherapy. Cancer58: 2589–2593, 1986.
109.
SherryMMGrecoFAJohnsonDH: Breast cancer with skeletal metastases at initial diagnosis. Distinctive clinical characteristics and favorable prognosis. Cancer58: 178–182, 1986.
110.
SiegalTSiegalTRobinG: Anterior decompression of the spine for metastatic epidural cord compression: A promising avenue of therapy?Ann Neurol11: 28–34, 1982.
111.
SiegalTSiegalT: Current considerations in the management of neoplastic spinal cord compression. Spine14: 223–228, 1989.
112.
StevensSKMooreSGAmylonMD: Repopulation of marrow after transplantation: MR imaging with pathologic correlation. Radiology175: 213–218, 1990.
113.
SubramaniamGMcAfeeJG: A new complex of 99mTc polyphosphate for skeletal imaging. Radiology99: 192–196, 1971.
114.
SundaresanNDiGiacintoGVHughesJEO: Surgical treatment of spinal metastases. Clin Neurosurg33: 503–522, 1986.
115.
TikkakoskiTLähdeSPuranenJ: Combined CT-guided biopsy and cytology in diagnosis of bony lesions. Acta Rad33: 225–229, 1992.
116.
TokuhashiYMatsuzakiHToriyamaS: Scoring system for the preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine15: 1110–1113, 1990.
117.
VechtChJHaaxma-ReicheVan PuttenWLJ: Initial bolus of conventional versus high-dose dexamethasone in metastatic spinal cord compression. Neurology39: 1255–1257, 1989.
118.
WeinrebJC: MR imaging of bone marrow: A map could help. Radiology177: 23–24, 1990.
119.
WhitehouseJMA: Site dependent response to chemotherapy for carcinoma of the breast. J R Soc Med78: 15–21, 1985.
120.
WiddingAStilboIHansenSW: Scintigraphy with nanocolloid Tc99m in patients with small cell lung cancer, with special reference to bone marrow and hepatic metastases. Eur J Nucl Med16: 717–719, 1990.
121.
WillisRA: The spread of tumours in the human body. Butterworths & Co.3rd ed.1973. Great Britain.
122.
YamashitaKUedfaTKomatsubaraY: Breast cancer with bone-only metastases. Cancer68: 634–637, 1991.