Abstract
Background
Although multiple clinical trials have established the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in managing acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the general population, its outcomes specifically in elderly patients remain uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MT in elderly patients with AIS, providing a clearer understanding of its potential benefits in this population.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing MT with standard medical management in patients with AIS, with data available for elderly patients (over 70 years). Outcomes included functional recovery (≥1-point mRS improvement), excellent (mRS 0–2), good (mRS 0–3), poor (mRS ≥5) outcomes, and mortality at 90 days. Pooled odds and risk ratios (OR and RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effects model.
Results
Fifteen RCTs, involving 1481 elderly patients, were included. MT was associated with a better functional recovery (OR 1.54; 95% CI: 1.22–1.94; P < .01), higher rates of excellent (RR 1.60; 95% CI: 1.11–2.30; P = .01) and good (RR 1.84; 95% CI: 1.45–2.35; P < .01), and lower rates of poor functional outcomes (RR 0.71; 95% CI: 0.58–0.85; P < .01) and mortality (RR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.45–0.96; P = .03). Subgroup analyses based on age threshold (>80 years), anterior/posterior circulation, and country socioeconomic status were consistent with the overall results.
Conclusions
This updated meta-analysis suggests that MT may be associated with better functional outcomes and lower mortality in selected elderly patients with AIS; however, limited elderly specific safety data and selective trial populations warrant cautious interpretation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
