Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is crucial for evaluating the neonatal brain, but high-quality images require a controlled environment. We discuss principles for creating this environment, including effective planning, presence of trained professionals, monitoring, preparedness for adversity, and ensuring optimal immobility. Planning reduces waiting times and anxiety, and a dedicated imaging team including a neonatologist and a radiologist improve image quality. Monitoring vital signs allows early identification of adverse events, while MR-compatible emergency equipment and a readily available hands-on resuscitation team reduces risk of such adverse events. Optimal immobility is critical for high-quality images. A controlled environment facilitates acquisition of optimal quality images in a quick and safe manner, enabling accurate diagnoses and timely interventions for neonates with brain abnormalities.
DuboisJAlisonMCounsellSJ, et al.MRI of the neonatal brain: a review of methodological challenges and neuroscientific advances. J Magn Reson Imaging2021; 53: 1318–1343.
2.
OrzalesiMAiteL. Communication with parents in neonatal intensive care. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med2011; 24: 135–137.
3.
SorokanSTJefferiesALMillerSP. Imaging the term neonatal brain. Paediatr Child Health2018; 23: 322–328.
4.
ShroffMMSoares-FernandesJPWhyteH, et al.MR imaging for diagnostic evaluation of encephalopathy in the newborn. Radiographics2010; 30: 763–780.
5.
PlaisierARaetsMMvan der StarreC, et al.Safety of routine early MRI in preterm infants. Pediatr Radiol2012; 42: 1205–1211.
6.
MentLRBadaHSBarnesP, et al.Practice parameter: neuroimaging of the neonate: report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American academy of neurology and the practice committee of the child neurology society. Neurology2002; 58(12): 1726–1738.
7.
ArlachovYGanatraRH. Sedation/anaesthesia in paediatric radiology. Br J Radiol2012; 85: e1018–e1031.
8.
MathurAMNeilJJMcKinstryRC, et al.Transport, monitoring, and successful brain MR imaging in unsedated neonates. Pediatr Radiol2008; 38: 260–264.
9.
NordellALundhMHorschS, et al.The acoustic hood: a patient-independent device improving acoustic noise protection during neonatal magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Paediatr2009; 98: 1278–1283.
10.
AmaroEJrWilliamsSCShergillSS, et al.Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: current strategies and future prospects. J Magn Reson Imaging2002; 16: 497–510.
11.
MorrisBHPhilbinMKBoseC. Physiological effects of sound on the newborn. J Perinatol2000; 20: S55–S60.
12.
WattsCTrimEMetherallJ, et al.Neonatal transport—the comfort zone. Neonatal Transp2008; 4: 4.
13.
PhilbinMKTaberKHHaymanLA. Preliminary report: changes in vital signs of term newborns during MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol1996; 17: 1033–1036.
14.
AlmadhoobAOhlssonA. Sound reduction management in the neonatal intensive care unit for preterm or very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2020; 1: CD010333.
15.
TkachJALiYPrattRG, et al.Characterization of acoustic noise in a neonatal intensive care unit MRI system. Pediatr Radiol2014; 44: 1011–1019.
16.
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 60601-2-33. Medical electrical equipment – particular requirements for the safety of magnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis. Geneva, 2010.
17.
MalikSJBeqiriAPriceAN, et al.Specific absorption rate in neonates undergoing magnetic resonance procedures at 1.5 T and 3 T. NMR Biomed2015; 28: 344–352.
18.
LaddMEBachertPMeyerspeerM, et al.Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc2018; 109: 1–50.
19.
MillerSPMcQuillenPSHamrickS, et al.Abnormal brain development in newborns with congenital heart disease. N Eng J Med2017; 357: 1928–1938.
20.
BuszekSMIknerSWiedemannL, et al.Safety and feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging simulation for radiation treatment planning in pediatric patients: a single institution experience. Adv Radiat Oncol2018; 4: 362–366.
21.
Bekiesińska-FigatowskaMHelwichERutkowskaM, et al.Magnetic resonance imaging of neonates in the magnetic resonance compatible incubator. Arch Med Sci2016; 12: 1064–1070.
22.
BarkovichJMWilliamCBarkovichAJ. Technical and practical tips for performing brain magnetic imaging in premature neonates. Semin Perinatol2021; 45: 151468.
MalamateniouCMalikSJCounsellSJ, et al.Motion-compensation techniques in neonatal and fetal MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2013; 34: 1124–1136.
25.
HennigJNauerthAFriedburgH. RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn Reson Med1986; 3: 823–833.
26.
NitzWR. Fast and ultrafast non-echo-planar MR imaging techniques. Eur Radiol2002; 12: 2866–2882.
27.
HirschFWFrahmJSorgeI, et al.Real-time magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric radiology - new approach to movement and moving children. Pediatr Radiol2021; 51: 840–846.
28.
PipeJG. Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: application to head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med1999; 42: 963–969.
29.
Cordero-GrandeLFerrazziGTeixeiraRPAG, et al.Motion-corrected MRI with DISORDER: distributed and incoherent sample orders for reconstruction deblurring using encoding redundancy. Magn Reson Med2020; 84: 713–726.
