Prevalence of Scarpa’s ganglion enhancement on high-resolution MRI imaging

Abstract

Background and Purpose

The vestibular ganglion, or Scarpa’s ganglion, is a cluster of afferent vestibular neurons within the internal auditory canal (IAC). There is minimal literature describing enhancement of this region on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its correlation to clinical symptoms. Here, we sought to find the prevalence of enhancement at Scarpa’s ganglion, and determine whether such enhancement correlates with demographics or clinical symptoms.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review was performed of consecutive patients with an MRI of the IAC between 3/1/2021 and 5/20/2021. Two neuroradiologists independently reviewed for T1 and FLAIR enhancement of the Scarpa’s ganglion on post-contrast fat-saturated T1 and post-contrast FLAIR images. Discrepancies were agreed upon by consensus. Clinical variables (hearing loss, vestibular symptoms, tinnitus, and MRI indication) were gathered from a retrospective chart review.

Results

Eighty-nine patients were included (51 female); the mean age was 58 (range 19–85). The most common MRI indication was hearing loss (n = 53). FLAIR enhancement was present on the right in 7 patients, on the left in 7 patients, and bilaterally in 6 patients. No enhancement was seen on post-contrast T1 images. There was no statistically significant correlation between consensus FLAIR on at least one side and age (p = .74), gender (p = .29), hearing loss (p = .32), hearing loss side (p = .39), type of hearing loss (p = .87), vestibular symptoms (p = .71), or tinnitus (p = .81).

Conclusions

Enhancement is present in the minority of patients on post-contrast FLAIR images. If seen, it should be considered an uncommon but not unexpected finding with no clinical significance.

Keywords

Scarpa’s ganglion vestibular ganglion magnetic resonance imaging

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Tilikete

Vighetto

. Functional anatomy of the vestibular nerve. Neurochirurgie 2009; 55(2): 127–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2009.01.003.

Highstein

Holstein

. The anatomy of the vestibular nuclei. In: Büttner-Ennever

(ed) Progress in Brain Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006, pp. 157–203. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)51006-9. Vol 151. Neuroanatomy of the Oculomotor System.

Benoudiba

Toulgoat

Sarrazin

. The vestibulocochlear nerve (VIII). Diagn Interv Imaging 2013; 94(10): 1043–1050. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2013.08.015.

Guillotte

Zand

Ortiz

, et al. Clinical outcomes of resecting Scarpa’s ganglion during vestibular schwannoma surgery. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 76: 114–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.04.029.

Ozdoğmuş

Sezen

Kubilay

, et al. Connections between the facial, vestibular and cochlear nerve bundles within the internal auditory canal. J Anat 2004; 205(1): 65–75. DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00313.x.

Sato

Sando

Takahashi

. Three-Dimensional anatomy of human Scarpa’s ganglion. Laryngoscope 1992; 102(9): 1056–1063. DOI: 10.1288/00005537-199209000-00018.

Cho

Kim

, et al. Validation of inner ear MRI in patients with Ménière’s disease by comparing endolymphatic hydrops from histopathologic specimens. Sci Rep 2021; 11(1): 17738. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97213-7.

Attyé

Eliezer

. Endolymph magnetic resonance imaging: contribution of saccule and utricle analysis in the management of patients with sensorineural ear disorders. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2020; 137(1): 47–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2019.11.001.

Bartual-Pastor

. Vestibular neuritis: etiopathogenesis. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 2005; 126(4): 279–281.

10.

Takahashi

Sato

Toda

, et al. Vestibular and cochlear nerve enhancement on MRI and its correlation with vestibulocochlear functional deficits in patients with Ramsay hunt syndrome. Auris Nasus Larynx 2021; 48(3): 347–352. DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.08.027.

11.

Liu

Benson

Carr

, et al. Normal enhancement within the vestibular aqueduct: an anatomic review with high-resolution MRI. Am J Neuroradiol 2022; 43(9): 1346–1349. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7615.

12.

Bronstein

Dieterich

. Long-term clinical outcome in vestibular neuritis. Curr Opin Neurol 2019; 32(1): 174–180. DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000652.

13.

Bae

Choi

. Current diagnosis and treatment of vestibular neuritis: a narrative review. J Yeungnam Med Sci 2022; 39(2): 81–88. DOI: 10.12701/yujm.2021.01228.

14.

Venkatasamy

Huynh

Wohlhuter

, et al. Superior vestibular neuritis: improved detection using FLAIR sequence with delayed enhancement (1 h). Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 2019; 276(12): 3309–3316. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05639-7.

15.

Munawar

Raz

Dehkharghani

, et al.

Radial spoiled gradient T1 weighted imaging of the internal auditory canal: is Scarpa’s ganglion now an expected finding and source of fundal enhancement?

NeuroRadiol J 2022; 35(5): 563–565. DOI: 10.1177/19714009211067407.

16.

Malhotra

Kalra

, et al. Neuroimaging of Meckel’s cave in normal and disease conditions. Insights Imaging 2018; 9(4): 499–510. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-018-0604-7.

17.

Madhavan

Guerin

Eckel

, et al. Dorsal cauda equina nerve root enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging due to ANNA-1-associated paraneoplastic polyneuropathy. NeuroRadiol J 2020; 33(5): 443–447. DOI: 10.1177/1971400920919689.

18.

Fabiano

Plunkett

Gibbons

. Diagnosis of facial nerve schwannoma by magnetic resonance imaging enhancement of the geniculate ganglion. Arch Neurol 2010; 67(1): 112–113. DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.290.

19.

Canjels

LPW

Jansen

JFA

Alers

, et al. Blood–brain barrier leakage years after pre-eclampsia: dynamic contrast-enhanced 7-Tesla MRI study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60(4): 541–548. DOI: 10.1002/uog.24930.

20.

Heye

Culling

Valdés Hernández

MDC

, et al. Assessment of blood–brain barrier disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. A systematic review. NeuroImage Clin 2014; 6: 262–274. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.09.002.

21.

Karandikar

Goh

, et al. Imaging features differentiating vestibular ganglion from intracanalicular schwannoma on single-sequence non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging study. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2020; 49(2): 65–71.