Usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient values for distinguishing between squamous cell carcinoma and malignant salivary gland tumor of the head and neck

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for differentiating between SCC and malignant salivary gland tumors of the head and neck.

Materials and methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 29 patients with SCCs and 10 patients with malignant salivary gland tumors who underwent pretreatment MRI of the head and neck. The minimum and average ADC values of the tumors were measured, with normalized tumor to spinal cord ADC ratios generated. Comparisons of ADC values and normalized ADC ratios between the two tumor types were performed using the unpaired t-test.

Results

The minimum and average ADC values and normalized average ADC ratios of SCCs (753.17 ± 214.47 × 10⁻⁶ mm²/s, 848.79 ± 250.13 × 10⁻⁶ mm²/s, and 0.92 ± 0.25, respectively) were significantly lower than those of malignant salivary gland tumors (1084.90 ± 242.60 × 10⁻⁶ mm²/s, 1305.90 ± 270.99 × 10⁻⁶ mm²/s, and 1.58 ± 0.31, respectively; all p < 0.001). A cutoff value of 1.31 for the normalized average ADC ratio was used to distinguish between SCCs and malignant salivary gland tumors and achieved an area under the curve of 0.93, sensitivity of 96.6%, specificity of 90%, and accuracy of 94.6%.

Conclusion

ADC value measurement could help differentiate between SCCs and malignant salivary gland tumors.

Keywords

ADC DWI squamous cell carcinoma malignant salivary gland tumor

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Maeda

Kato

Sakuma

, et al. Usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient in line scan diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing between squamous cell carcinomas and malignant lymphomas of the head and neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 1186–1192.

Milad

Elbegiermy

Shokry

, et al. The added value of pretreatment DW MRI in characterization of salivary glands pathologies. Am J Otolaryngol 2017; 38: 13–20.

SrinivAsAn

Mohan

Mukherji

. Biologic imaging of head and neck cancer: the present and the future. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: 586–594.

Serifoglu

Damar

, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the head and neck region: usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient values for characterization of lesions. Diagn Interv Radiol 2015; 21: 208–214.

Eida

Sumi

Sakihama

, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping of salivary gland tumors: prediction of the benignancy and malignancy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 116–121.

SrinivAsAn

DvoRak

Perni

, et al. Differentiation of benign and malignant pathology in the head and neck using 3T apparent diffusion coefficient values: early experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 40–44.

Habermann

Arndt

Graessner

, et al.

Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging of primary parotid gland tumors: is a prediction of different histologic subtypes possible?

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 591–596.

Matsushima

Maeda

Takamura

, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients of benign and malignant salivary gland tumors. Comparison to histopathological findings. J Neuroradiol 2007; 34: 183–189.

Koontz

Wiggins

RH,

3rd . Differentiation of benign and malignant head and neck lesions with diffusion tensor imaging and DWI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 208: 1110–1115.

10.

Abdel Razek

AAK

Gaballa

Elhawarey

, et al. Characterization of pediatric head and neck masses with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 201–208.

11.

Wang

Takashima

Takayama

, et al. Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 220: 621–630.

12.

Heneidy

Yosef

. Role of diffusion weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant head and neck tumors. J Med Imaging 2016; 4: 1–6.

13.

Ichikawa

Sumi

Sasaki

, et al. Efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging for the differentiation between lymphomas and carcinomas of the nasopharynx and oropharynx: correlations of apparent diffusion coefficients and histologic features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: 761–766.

14.

Bonello

Preda

Conte

, et al.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: what does the apparent diffusion coefficient tell us about its histology?

Acta Radiol 2016; 57: 1344–1351.

15.

Hunsche

Moseley

Stoeter

, et al. Diffusion-tensor MR imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T: initial Observations. Radiology 2001; 221: 550–556.

16.

Nakamura

Sumi

Van Cauteren

. Salivary gland tumors: preoperative tissue characterization with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping. In: Hayat

, ed. Methods of cancer diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis. Dordrecht: Springer 2010; 7: 255–269.

17.

Barrett

Speight

. Perineural invasion in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands: a valid prognostic indicator? Oral Oncol 2009; 45: 936–940.

18.

Chirilă

Bolboacă

Cosgarea

, et al. Perineural invasion of the major and minor nerves in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;140: 65–69.

19.

Kim

Loevner

Quon

, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting and detecting early response to chemoradiation therapy of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15: 986–994.

20.

Sistonen

Aro

Atula

, et al. Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in oropharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Neuroradiol 2021; 31: 1037–1048.