Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a syndrome that comprises a triad of gait disturbance, dementia and urinary incontinence, associated with ventriculomegaly in the absence of elevated intraventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure. It is important to identify patients with iNPH because some of its clinical features may be reversed by the insertion of a CSF shunt. The diagnosis is based on clinical history, physical examination and brain imaging, especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Recently, some papers have investigated the role of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in evaluating white matter alterations in patients with iNPH. DTI analysis in specific anatomical regions seems to be a promising MR biomarker of iNPH and could also be used in the differential diagnosis from other dementias. However, there is a substantial lack of structured reviews on this topic. Thus, we performed a literature search and analyzed the most recent and pivotal articles that investigated the role of DTI in iNPH in order to provide an up-to-date overview of the application of DTI in this setting. We reviewed studies published between January 2000 and June 2020. Thirty-eight studies and four reviews were included. Despite heterogeneity in analysis approaches, the majority of studies reported significant correlations between DTI and clinical symptoms in iNPH patients, as well as different DTI patterns in patients with iNPH compared to those with Alzheimer or Parkinson diseases. It remains to be determined whether DTI could predict the success after CSF shunting.
AdamsRDFisherCMHakimS, et al.
Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with “normal” cerebrospinal-fluid pressure. A treatable syndrome.New Engl J Med1965;
273: 117–126.
2.
AnderssonJRosellMKockumK, et al.
Prevalence of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: A prospective, population-based study. PLoS One2019;
14(5): e0217705. Published 2019 May 29.
3.
JarajDRabieiKMarlowT, et al.
Prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurology2014;
82(16): 1449–1454.
4.
ZaccariaVBacigalupoIGervasiG, et al.
A systematic review on the epidemiology of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand2020;
141(2): 101–114.
5.
KeongNCPenaAPriceSJ, et al.
Diffusion tensor imaging profiles reveal specific neural tract distortion in normal pressure hydrocephalus. PLoS One2017;
17: 1–25.
MoriEIshikawaMKatoT, et al.
Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)2012;
52(11): 775–809.
8.
WilliamsMARelkinNR.Diagnosis and management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Clin Pract2013;
3(5): 375–385.
9.
EspayAJDa PratGADwivediAK, et al.
Deconstructing normal pressure hydrocephalus: Ventriculomegaly as early sign of neurodegeneration. Ann Neurol2017;
82(4): 503–513.
10.
VirhammarJLaurellKCesariniKG, et al.
Preoperative prognostic value of MRI findings in 108 patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2014;
35(12): 2311–2318.
11.
IshiiKKandaTHaradaA, et al.
Clinical impact of the callosal angle in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Radiol2008;
18(11): 2678–2683.
12.
RadovnickýTAdámekDDernerM, et al.
Fractional anisotropy in patients with disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien)2016;
158(8): 1495–1500.
13.
AdachiMKawanamiTOhshimaF, et al.
Upper midbrain profile sign and cingulate sulcus sign: MRI findings on sagittal images in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus, Alzheimer's disease, and progressive supranuclear palsy. Radiat Med2006;
24(8): 568–572.
14.
KockumKLilja-LundOLarssonEM, et al.
The idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus Radscale: a radiological scale for structured evaluation. Eur J Neurol2018;
25(3): 569–576.
15.
KockumKVirhammarJRiklundK, et al.
Standardized image evaluation in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: consistency and reproducibility.Neuroradiology2019;
61(12): 1397–1406.
16.
BasserPJMattielloJLeBihanD.Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. J Mag Reson1994;
103: 247–254.
17.
BasserPJMattielloJLeBihanD.MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J1994;
66: 259–267.
18.
Ades-AronBYeagerSMiskinN, et al.
Diffusional kurtosis along the corticospinal tract in adult normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2018;
39(12): 2218–2223.
19.
AtasoyBAralasmakACetinkayaE, et al.
Normal pressure hydrocephalus: clinical symptoms, cerebrospinal fluid flow metrics and white matter changes. J Comput Assist Tomogr2020;
44(1): 59–64.
20.
ChenYCChiangSWChiCH, et al.
Early idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients with neuropsychological impairment are associated with increased fractional anisotropy in the anterior thalamic nucleus. Medicine (Baltimore)2016;
95(19): e3636.
21.
DaoukJChaaraniBZmudkaJ, et al.
Relationship between cerebrospinal fluid flow, ventricles morphology, and DTI properties in internal capsules: differences between Alzheimer's disease and normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Radiol2014;
55(8): 992–999.
22.
DemuraKMaseMMiyatiT, et al.
Changes of fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl2012;
113: 29–32.
23.
EleftheriouABlystadITisellA, et al.
Indication of thalamo-cortical circuit dysfunction in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a tensor imaging study. Sci Rep2020;
10(1): 6148. Published 2020 Apr 9.
24.
GrazziniIRediFSammartanoK, et al.
Diffusion tensor imaging in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: clinical and CSF flowmetry correlations. Neuroradiol J2020;
33(1): 66–74.
25.
HattingenEJurcoaneAMelberJ, et al.
Diffusion tensor imaging in patients with adult chronic idiopathic hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery2010;
66(5): 917–924.
26.
HattoriTYuasaTAokiS, et al.
Altered microstructure in corticospinal tract in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: comparison with Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease with dementia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2011;
32(9): 1681–1687.
27.
HattoriTSatoRAokiS, et al.
Different patterns of fornix damage in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2012;
33(2): 274–279.
28.
HattoriTItoKAokiS, et al.
White matter alteration in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: tract-based spatial statistics study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2012;
33(1): 97–103.
29.
HongYJYoonBShimYS, et al.
Differences in microstructural alterations of the hippocampus in Alzheimer disease and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a diffusion tensor imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2010;
31(10): 1867–1872.
30.
HořínekDŠtěpán-BuksakowskaISzabóN, et al.
Difference in white matter microstructure in differential diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer's disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg2016;
140: 52–59.
31.
IvkovicMReiss-ZimmermannMKatzenH, et al.
MRI assessment of the effects of acetazolamide and external lumbar drainage in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Fluids Barriers CNS2015;
12: 9.
32.
JurcoaneAKeilFSzelenyiA, et al.
Directional diffusion of corticospinal tract supports therapy decisions in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology2014;
56(1): 5–13.
33.
KamiyaKKamagataKMiyajimaM, et al.
Diffusional kurtosis imaging in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: correlation with severity of cognitive impairment. Magn Reson Med Sci2016;
15(3): 316–323.
34.
KamiyaKHoriMIrieR, et al.
Diffusion imaging of reversible and irreversible microstructural changes within the corticospinal tract in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroimage Clin2017;
14: 663–671. Published 2017 Mar 11.
35.
KangKYoonUChoiW, et al.
Diffusion tensor imaging of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the cerebrospinal fluid tap test. J Neurol Sci2016;
364: 90–96.
36.
KangKChoiWYoonU, et al.
Abnormal white matter integrity in elderly patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a tract-based spatial statistics study. Eur Neurol2016;
75(1-2): 96–103.
37.
KannoSAbeNSaitoM, et al.
White matter involvement in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a voxel-based diffusion tensor imaging study. J Neurol2011;
258(11): 1949–1957.
38.
KannoSSaitoMKashinouraT, et al.
A change in brain white matter after shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a tract-based spatial statistics study. Fluids Barriers CNS2017;
14(1): 1. Published 2017 Jan 30.
39.
KeongNCPenaAPriceSJ, et al.
Diffusion tensor imaging profiles reveal specific neural tract distortion in normal pressure hydrocephalus. PLoS One2017;
12(8): e0181624. Published 2017 Aug 17.
40.
KimMJSeoSWLeeKM, et al.
Differential diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus from other dementias using diffusion tensor imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2011;
32(8): 1496–1503.
41.
KoyamaTMarumotoKDomenK, et al.
Diffusion tensor imaging of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a voxel-based fractional anisotropy study. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)2012;
52(2): 68–74.
42.
KoyamaTMarumotoKDomenK, et al.
White matter characteristics of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a diffusion tensor tract-based spatial statistic study. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)2013;
53(9): 601–608.
43.
LenfeldtNLarssonANybergL, et al.
Diffusion tensor imaging reveals supplementary lesions to frontal white matter in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery2011;
68(6): 1586–1593.
44.
LockCKwokJKumarS, et al.
DTI profiles for rapid description of cohorts at the clinical-research interface. Front Med (Lausanne)2019;
5: 357. Published 2019 Jan 10.
45.
MarumotoKKoyamaTHosomiM, et al.
Diffusion tensor imaging in elderly patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus or Parkinson's disease: diagnosis of gait abnormalities. Fluids Barriers CNS2012;
9(1): 20. Published 2012 Sep 18.
46.
NakanishiAFukunagaIHoriM, et al.
Microstructural changes of the corticospinal tract in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a comparison of diffusion tensor and diffusional kurtosis imaging. Neuroradiology2013;
55(8): 971–976.
47.
NicotBBouzerarRGondry-JouetC, et al.
Effect of surgery on periventricular white matter in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients: comparison of two methods of DTI analysis. Acta Radiol2014;
55(5): 614–621.
48.
Reiss-ZimmermannMScheelMDenglM, et al.
The influence of lumbar spinal drainage on diffusion parameters in patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus using 3T MRI. Acta Radiol2014;
55(5): 622–630.
49.
SaitoAKamagataKUedaR, et al.
Ventricular volumetry and free-water corrected diffusion tensor imaging of the anterior thalamic radiation in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neuroradiol2020;
47(4): 312–317.
50.
ScheelMDiekhoffTSprungC, et al.
Diffusion tensor imaging in hydrocephalus – findings before and after shunt surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien)2012;
154(9): 1699–1706.
51.
TanKMeiriAMowreyWB, et al.
Diffusion tensor imaging and ventricle volume quantification in patients with chronic shunt-treated hydrocephalus: a matched case-control study. J Neurosurg2018;
129(6): 1611–1622.
52.
TsaiPHChenYCChiangSW, et al.
Changes in sensorimotor-related thalamic diffusion properties and cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics predict gait responses to tap test in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Radiol2018;
28(11): 4504–4513.
53.
YokotaHVijayasarathiACekicM, et al.
Diagnostic performance of glymphatic system evaluation using diffusion tensor imaging in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and mimickers. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res2019;
2019: 5675014. Published 2019 Jun 20.
54.
YounesKHasanKMKamaliA, et al.
Diffusion tensor imaging of the superior thalamic radiation and cerebrospinal fluid distribution in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neuroimaging2019;
29(2): 242–251.
55.
JellisonBJFieldASMedowJ, et al.
Diffusion tensor imaging of cerebral white matter: a pictorial review of physics, fiber tract anatomy, and tumor imaging patterns. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2004;
25: 356–369.
56.
SongSKSunSWRamsbottomMJ, et al.
Dysmyelination revealed through MRI as increased radial (but unchanged axial) diffusion of water. Neuroimage2002;
17(3): 1429–1436.
57.
TaeWSHamBJPyunSB, et al.
Current clinical applications of diffusion-tensor imaging in neurological disorders. J Clin Neurol2018;
14(2): 129–140.
58.
BasserPJ. Fiber-tractography via diffusion tensor MRI (DT-MRI). In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Sydney, Australia, 1998. p 1226.
59.
JeurissenBDescoteauxMMoriS, et al.
Diffusion MRI fiber tractography of the brain. NMR Biomed2019;
32(4): e3785.
60.
ReijmerYDFreezeWMLeemansA, et al.; Utrecht Vascular Cognitive Impairment Study Group.
The effect of lacunar infarcts on white matter tract integrity. Stroke2013;
44: 2019–2021.
61.
SmithSMJenkinsonMJohansen-BergH, et al.
Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage2006;
31(4): 1487–1505.
62.
TomaAKPapadopoulosMCStapletonS, et al.
Systematic review of the outcome of shunt surgery in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien)2013;
155(10): 1977–1980.
63.
MarmarouABergsneiderMKlingeP, et al.
The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery2005;
57(3 suppl): S17–S28.
64.
HalperinJJKurlanRSchwalbJM, et al.
Practice guideline: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Response to shunting and predictors of response. Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology2015;
85: 2063–2071.
65.
WilliamsMAMalmJ.Diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Continuum (Minneap Minn)2016;
22(2 Dementia): 579–599.
66.
SiasiosIKapsalakiEZFountasKN, et al.
The role of diffusion tensor imaging and fractional anisotropy in the evaluation of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a literature review. Neurosurg Focus2016;
41(3): E12.
67.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.; PRISMA Group.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med2009;
6(7)e1000097.
68.
HozaDVlasákAHořínekD, et al.
DTI-MRI biomarkers in the search for normal pressure hydrocephalus aetiology: a review. Neurosurg Rev2015;
38(2): 239–244.
69.
KeongNCPenaAPriceSJ, et al.
Imaging normal pressure hydrocephalus: theories, techniques, and challenges. Neurosurg Focus2016;
41(3): E11.
70.
ZhangLHussainZRenZ.Recent advances in rational diagnosis and treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus: a critical appraisal on novel diagnostic, therapy monitoring and treatment modalities. Curr Drug Targets. 2019;
20(10): 1041–1057.
71.
DeckersbachTSavageCRHeninA, et al.
Reliability and validity of a scoring system for measuring organizational approach in the Complex Figure Test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol2000;
22(5): 640–648.
VollmarCO’MuircheartaighJBarkerGJ, et al.
Identical, but not the same: intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0T scanners. Neuroimage2010;
51: 1384–1394.
74.
VeraartJPootDHVan HeckeW, et al.
More accurate estimation of diffusion tensor parameters using diffusion Kurtosis imaging. Magn Reson Med2011;
65(1): 138–145.
75.
PapadakisNGXingDHuangCL, et al.
A comparative study of acquisition schemes for diffusion tensor imaging using MRI. J Magn Reson1999;
137: 67–82.
76.
AlexanderALHasanKLazarM, et al.
Analysis of partial volume effects in diffusion-tensor MRI. Magn Reson Med2001;
45: 770–780.
77.
MouraLMLuccasRde PaivaJPQ, et al.
Diffusion tensor imaging biomarkers to predict motor outcomes in stroke: a narrative review. Front Neurol2019;
10: 445. Published 2019 May 8.
78.
ZhangHSchneiderTWheeler-KingshottCA, et al.
NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage2012;
61(4): 1000–1016.
79.
FieremansEJensenJHHelpernJA.White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging. Neuroimage2011;
58(1): 177–188.
80.
JensenJHHelpernJA.MRI quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis. NMR Biomed2010;
23(7): 698–710.
81.
MataróMMatarínMPocaMA, et al.
Functional and magnetic resonance imaging correlates of corpus callosum in normal pressure hydrocephalus before and after shunting. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2007;
78: 395–398.
82.
DingYMcAllisterJPIIYaoB, et al.
Axonal damage associated with enlargement of ventricles during hydrocephalus: a silver impregnation study. Neurol Res2001;
23: 581–587.
83.
Del BigioMRWilsonMJEnnoT.Chronic hydrocephalus in rats and humans: white matter loss and behavior changes. Ann Neurol2003;
53: 337–346.
84.
AgostaFPievaniMSalaS, et al.
White matter damage in Alzheimer disease and its relationship to gray matter atrophy. Radiology2010;
258: 853–863.
85.
KantarciKAvulaRSenjemML, et al.
Dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer disease: neurodegenerative patterns characterized by DTI. Neurology2010;
74: 1814–1821.
86.
LiuYSpulberGLehtimakiKK, et al.
Diffusion tensor imaging and tract based spatial statistics in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging2011;
32: 1558–1571. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
87.
PievaniMAgostaFPaganiE, et al.
Assessment of white matter tract damage in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Brain Mapp2010;
31: 1862–1875.
88.
FolsteinMFFolsteinSEMcHughPR.“Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res1975;
12(3): 189–198.
89.
DuboisBSlachevskyALitvanI, et al.
The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology2000;
55(11): 1621–1626.
90.
MiyoshiNKazuiHOginoA, et al.
Association between cognitive impairment and gait disturbance in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord2005;
20: 71–76.
91.
KannoSSaitoMHayashiA, et al.
Counting-backward test for executive function in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand2012;
126: 279–286.
92.
PodsiadloDRichardsonS.The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc1991;
39: 142–148.
93.
BradleyWGJr.CSF flow in the brain in the context of normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2015;
36(5): 831–838.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
