Patency of anterior choroidal artery after flow diverter deployment with assessment of magnetic resonance imaging follow-up

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to analyse the patency rate of the anterior choroidal artery, and presented imaging and neurological findings, after deployment of a flow diverter in the anterior choroidal artery in the treatment of patients with intracranial aneurysms.

Methods

Among the 139 patients who underwent a flow diverter deployment from December 2012 to September 2017 in our hospital, there were 21 patients (15.1%) for whom their anterior choroidal artery was covered for the procedure with a flow diverter. The patients' age, sex, size of aneurysm and the presence or absence of an anterior choroidal artery occlusion, neurological findings and postoperative infarction in the anterior choroidal artery region were analysed retrospectively.

Results

The mean age of the six male and 15 female patients was 61.5 years (range 32–77 years). The mean maximal diameter of the aneurysms was 16.4 mm (range 10.0–29.4 mm). The anterior choroidal artery was patent in all 21 patients; however, a haemodynamic alteration in the anterior choroidal artery was detected in one patient. Postoperatively, hemiparesis was observed in two patients (9.5%) and a visual field defect in one patient (4.8%), both of which were the symptoms of infarction of the cortical branch of the middle cerebral artery or retinal artery ischaemia. However, no patients had symptoms due to ischaemia of the anterior choroidal artery confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging.

Conclusions

In all patients who underwent flow diverter deployment, the anterior choroidal artery was patent and no ischaemia was detected in the imaging or evidenced by neurological findings. Therefore, flow diverter deployment in the anterior choroidal artery was considered to be a safe procedure.

Keywords

Aneurysm flow diverter anterior choroidal artery

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Nelson

Lylyk

Szikora

et al.

The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 34–40.

Becske

Kallmes

Saatci

et al.

Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013; 267: 858–868.

Kallmes

Hanel

Lopes

et al.

International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 108–115.

Liu

Zhou

et al.

Parent artery reconstruction for large or giant cerebral aneurysms using the Tubridge flow diverter: a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial (PARAT). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018; 39: 807–816.

Yang

Liu

et al.

Flow-diverter devices in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Neuroradiol J 2016; 29: 66–71.

Briganti

Leone

Marseglia

et al.

Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: a systematic review. Neuroradiol J 2015; 28: 365–375.

Oishi

Teranishi

Yatomi

et al.

Paradigm shift of endovascular therapy after clinical introduction of a flow diverter for large intracranial aneurysms. Jpn J Neurosurg (Tokyo) 2017; 26: 104–111.

Petr

Brinjikji

Cloft

et al.

Current trends and results of endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms at a single institution in the flow-diverter era. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 1106–1113.

Brinjikji

Kallmes

Cloft

et al.

Patency of the anterior choroidal artery after flow-diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 537–541.

10.

Raz

Shapiro

Becske

et al.

Anterior choroidal artery patency and clinical follow-up after coverage with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 937–942.

11.

Rangel-Castilla

Munich

Jaleel

et al.

Patency of anterior circulation branch vessels after pipeline embolization: longer-term results from 82 aneurysms cases. J Neurosurg 2017; 126: 1064–1069.

12.

Neki

Caroff

Jittapiromsak

et al.

Patency of the anterior choroidal artery covered with a flow-diverter stent. J Neurosurg 2015; 123: 1540–1545.

13.

al-Rodhan

Piepgras

Sundt

TM Jr

. Transitional cavernous aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. Neurosurgery 1993; 33: 993–996.

14.

van Swieten

Koudstaal

Visser

et al.

Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988; 19: 604–607.

15.

Benaissa

Tomas

Clarencon

et al.

Retrospective analysis of delayed intraparenchmal hemorrhage after flow-diverter treatment: presentation of a retrospective multicenter trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 475–480.

16.

Cruz

Chow

O'Kelly

et al.

Delayed ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage following flow diversion for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: 603–608.

17.

Kulcsar

Houdart

Bonafe

et al.

Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 20–25.

18.

Fujii

Takeuchi

Koike

et al.

Heparin administration and monitoring for neuroangiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15: 51–54.

19.

Lim Fat

Al-Hazzaa

Bussiere

et al.

Heparin dosing is associated with diffusion weighted imaging lesion load following aneurysm coiling. J Neurointerv Surg 2013; 5: 366–370.

20.

Takahashi

Tobita

Takahashi

et al.

Retrograde filling of the anterior choroidal artery: vertebral angiographic sign of obstruction in the carotid system. Neuroradiology 1992; 34: 504–507.

21.

Srinivasan

Ghali

MGZ

Cherian

et al.

Flow diversion for anterior choroidal artery (AchA) aneurysms: a multi-institutional experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2018; 10: 634–637.

22.

Chen

Drake

Chiu

et al.

Pipeline embolization device induced collateral channels in elective flow diversion treatment. J Neurointerv Surg. Epub ahead of print 9 March 2016. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012297.rep.

23.

Fischer

Vajda

Aguilar Perez

et al.

Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysm and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012; 54: 369–382.

24.

Rhoton

Fujii

Fradd

. Microsurgical anatomy of the anterior choroidal artery. Surg Neurol 1979; 12: 171–187.

25.

Bhogal

Ganslandt

Bazner

et al.

The fate of side branches covered by flow diverters-results from 140 patients. World Neurosurg 2017; 103: 789–798.

26.

Lopes

Ringer

Boulos

et al.

Fate of branch arteries after intracranial stenting. Neurosurgery 2003; 52: 1275–1278.

27.

Trivelato

Salles Rezende

Ulhoa

et al.

Occlusion rates of intracranial aneurysms treated with the Pipeline embolization device: the role of branches arising from the sac. J Neurosurg. Epub ahead of print 6 April 2018. DOI: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS172175.

28.

Rouchaud

Ramana

Brinjikji

et al.

Wall apposition is a key factor for aneurysm occlusion after flow diversion: a histologic evaluation in 41 rabbits. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 2087–2091.

29.

King

Brooks

Langan

et al.

Communicating malapposition of flow diverters assessed with optical coherence tomography correlates with delayed aneurysm occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg 2018; 10: 693–697.

30.

Kallmes

Ding

Dai

et al.

A second-generation, endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 1153–1158.

31.

Iosif

Camilleri

Saleme

et al.

Diffusion-weighted imaging-detected ischemic lesions associated with flow-diverting stents in intracranial aneurysms: safety, potential mechanisms, clinical outcome, and concerns. J Neurosurg 2015; 122: 627–636.