In-stent hypodense area at two weeks following carotid artery stenting predicts neointimal hyperplasia after two years

Abstract

Introduction

It has not been reported how long the follow-up study after carotid artery stenting (CAS) should be continued. The purpose of the present study is to clarify the dynamic change of the in-stent neointimal layer and residual arterial lumen by two years following CAS using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography (3D CTA) with volume rendering.

Methods

Thirty-six stented carotid arteries in 34 consecutive patients were examined by 3D CTA with volume rendering at two weeks and 3, 6, 12, 24 months of follow-up.

Results

An in-stent hypodense area could be detected in 10 of 36 (27.8%) carotid arteries at two weeks after CAS. In-stent hypodense areas gradually declined thereafter by three months. In the course of longer follow-up, the layer of the in-stent hypodense area (neointimal hyperplasia) continued to grow in size for up to 24 months. Patients with an in-stent hypodense area at two weeks have a thicker layer of neointimal hyperplasia at 24 months than patients without in-stent hypodense area at two weeks’ follow-up. The predictive factors for growing neointimal hyperplasia at 24 months in multiple regression analysis are ulcer formation in pretreatment stenosis and the thickness of in-stent hypodense area at two weeks following CAS.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that follow-up study should be continued for a longer period even if in-stent restenosis could not be detected at one year following CAS. Especially in cases with ulcer formation in pretreatment stenosis and with a subacute in-stent hypodense area after CAS, longer follow-up is strongly recommended.

Keywords

Carotid artery stenting in-stent thrombus neointimal hyperplasia neoatherosclerosis restenosis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Yadav

Wholey

Kuntz

et al.

Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1493–1501.

Gurm

Yadav

Fayad

et al.

Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1572–1579.

Brott

Hobson

2nd Howard

et al.

Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 11–23.

Gröschel

Riecker

Schulz

et al.

Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 2005; 36: 367–373.

Wholey

Mathias

et al.

Global experience in cervical carotid artery stent placement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 50: 160–167.

Eckstein

Ringleb

Allenberg

et al.

Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: A multinational, prospective, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7: 893–902.

Watarai

Kaku

Yamada

et al.

Follow-up study on in-stent thrombosis after carotid stenting using multidetector CT angiography. Neuroradiology 2009; 51: 243–251.

Maintz

Tombach

Juergens

et al.

Revealing in-stent stenoses of the iliac arteries: Comparison of multidetector CT with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography in a Phantom model. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 1319–1322.

Leclerc

Gauvrit

Pruvo

. Usefulness of CT angiography with volume rendering after carotid angioplasty and stenting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 820–822.

10.

North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators

Barnett

HJM

Taylor

et al.

Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 445–453.

11.

Habara

Terashima

Nasu

et al.

Difference of tissue characteristics between early and very late restenosis lesions after bare-metal stent implantation: An optical coherence tomography study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 232–238.

12.

Robbin

Lockhart

Weber

et al.

Carotid artery stents: Early and intermediate follow-up with Doppler US. Radiology 1997; 205: 749–756.

13.

Willfort-Ehringer

Ahmadi

Gschwandtner

et al.

Single-center experience with carotid stent restenosis. J Endovasc Ther 2002; 9: 299–307.

14.

Heck

. Incidence and time course of carotid in-stent restenosis in a consecutive series of 295 patients. J Neurointerv Surg 2009; 1: 44–47.

15.

Nakazawa

Otsuka

Nakano

et al.

The pathology of neoatherosclerosis in human coronary implants bare-metal and drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 1314–1322.

16.

Takano

Yamamoto

Inami

et al.

Appearance of lipid-laden intima and neovascularization after implantation of bare-metal stents extended late-phase observation by intracoronary optical coherence tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 55: 26–32.

17.

Willfort-Ehringer

Ahmadi

Gruber

et al.

Arterial remodeling and hemodynamics in carotid stents: A prospective duplex ultrasound study over 2 years. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39: 728–734.

18.

French

Rewcastle

. Sequential morphological changes at the site of carotid endarterectomy. J Neurosurg 1974; 41: 745–754.

19.

Komatsu

Ueda

Naruko

et al.

Neointimal tissue response at sites of coronary stenting in humans: Macroscopic, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses. Circulation 1998; 98: 224–233.

20.

Matsumoto

Yako

Masuo

et al.

A case of in-stent neoatherosclerosis 10 years after carotid artery stent implantation: Observation with optical coherence tomography and plaque histological findings. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2014; 54: 139–144.

21.

Koskinas

Chatzizisis

Antoniadis

et al.

Role of endothelial shear stress in stent restenosis and thrombosis: Pathophysiologic mechanisms and implications for clinical translation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 1337–1349.