BegaudBChaslerieAHaramburuF: Organization et résultat de la pharmacovigilance en France. Rev Epidémiol Santé Publique42: 416–423, 1994.
2.
EdwardsIR: Who cares about pharmacovigilance?Eur J Clin Pharmacol53: 83–88, 1997.
3.
DelamotheT: Reporting adverse drug reactions. Br Med J304: 465, 1992.
4.
OlssonS: The role of the WHO programme on international drug monitoring in coordinating worldwide drug safety efforts. Drug safety19: 1–10, 1998.
5.
LumleyCEWalkerSRHallGC: The under-reporting of adverse reactions seen in general practice. Pharm Med1: 205–212, 1986.
6.
HaramburuF: Estimation of under-reporting. In: EdARME-P. Methodological approaches in pharmacoepidemiology. Application to spontaneous reporting. Elsevier Science Publishers1993: 39–49.
7.
MorideYHaramburuFRequejoAA: Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions in general practice. Br J Clin Pharmacol43: 177–181, 1997.
8.
SweisDWongICK: A survey on factors that could affect adverse drug reaction reporting according to hospital pharmacists in Great Britain. Drug Saf2: 165–72, 2000.
9.
van GrootheestKMesKyros Lolkjede Jong-Van den BergLTW: Attitudes of community pharmacists in the Netherlands towards adverse drug reaction reporting. Int J Pharm Pr10: 267–72, 2002.
10.
van GrootheestACvan PuijenbroekEPde Jong-Van den BergLTW: Contribution of pharmacists to the reporting of adverse drug reactions. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf11: 205–10, 2002.
11.
FDA: Guidelines for postmarketing reporting of adverse drug experiences. Department of Health and Human Services1992: 85D–0249.
12.
Accreditation Manual for Hospitals: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Oakbrook Terrace, Ill1993.
13.
Standards of Practice: Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists1990.
14.
ASHP guidelines on adverse drug reaction monitoring and reporting: Practice Standards of ASHP 1992–1993. American Society of Hospital Pharmacists, Bethesda MD1992.