Phase-contrast magnetic resonance (PCMRA) flow quantification can determine vascular velocities and volumetric flow rate (VFR) non-invasively for in vitro and in vivo studies. Recently, the increasing power of MR imaging units and the reduced time for data acquisition and post-processing have led to an increasing number of investigations on the use of phase-contrast flow measurements as an additional source of quantitative functional information in MR imaging. In addition, PCMRA can be added to morphologic MRI sequences, offering the option to correlate flow to morphology based on data generated during one examination. This review discusses the basics of phase-contrast imaging, describing the errors and avoiding methods associated with PCMRA, providing guidelines for flow measurement and data analysis, and presenting the current clinical cerebral applications.
SpiltABoxFMAGeestRJ: Reproducibility of total cerebral blood flow measurements using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging16: 1–5, 2002.
8.
MehtaNRJonesLKrautMA: Physiologic variations in dural venous sinus flow on phase-contrast MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol175: 221–225, 2000.
9.
KatoTIndoTYoshidaE: Contrast-enhanced 2D cine phase MR angiography for measurement of basilar artery blood flow in posterior circulation ischemia. Am J Neuroradiol23: 1346–1351, 2002.
10.
HendrikseJHartkampMJHillenB: Collateral ability of the circle of Willis in patients with unilateral internal carotid artery occlusion. Stroke32: 2768–2773, 2001.
11.
LuetmerPHHustonJFriedmanJA: Measurement of cerebrospinal fluid flow at the cerebral aqueduct by use of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: Technique validation and utility in diagnosing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery50: 534–543, 2002.
12.
HaanMWHEngelshovenJMAHoubenAJHM: Phase-contrast magnetic resonance flow quantification in renal arteries: Comparison with 133xenon washout measurements. Hypertension41: 114–118, 2003.
13.
EverdingenKJKlijnCJKappelleLJ: MRA flow quantification in patients with a symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion. Stroke28: 1595–1600, 1997.
HirabukiNWatanabeYManoT: Quantitation of flow in the superior sagittal sinus performed with cine phase-contrast MR imaging of healthy and achondroplastic children. Am J Neuroradiol21: 1497–1501, 2000.
16.
SpiltABoomRVKamperAM: MR assessment of cerebral vascular response: A comparison of two methods. J Magn Reson Imaging16: 610–616, 2002.
17.
MoranPRMoranPAKarstaedtN: Verification and evaluation of internal flow and motion. Radiology154: 433–411, 1985.
18.
SpritzerCEPelcNJLeeJN: Rapid MR imaging of blood flow with a phase-sensitive, limited-flip-angle, gradient recalled pulse sequence: Preliminary experience. Radiology176: 255–262, 1990.
19.
HangiandreouNJRossmanPJRiedererSJ: Analysis of MR phase-contrast measurements of pulsatile velocity waveforms. J Magn Reson Imaging3: 387–394, 1993.
20.
BakkerCJGHoogeveenRMViergeverMA: Construction of a protocol for measuring blood flow by two-dimensional phase-contrast MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging: 119–127, 1999.
21.
HofmanMBMKouwenhovenMSprengerM: Nontriggered magnetic resonance velocity measurement of the time-average of pulsatile velocity. Magn Reson Med29: 648–655, 1993.
22.
KondoCCaputoGRSemelkaR: Right and left ventricular stroke volume measurements with velocity encoding cine MR imaging: In vitro and invivo validation. AJR Am J Roentgenol157: 9–16, 1991.
23.
HoperMMTongersJLeppertA: Evaluation of right ventricular performance with a right ventricular ejection fraction thermodilution catheter and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Chest120: 502–507, 2001.
24.
BogrenHGBuonocoreMH: Blood flow measurements in the aorta and major arteries with MR velocity mapping. J Magn Reson4: 119–130, 1994.
25.
BuonocoreMHBogrenH: Factors influencing the accuracy and precision of velocity-encoded phase imaging. Magn Reson Med26: 141–154, 1992.
26.
AndersenAHKirschJE: Analysis of noise in phase contrast MR imaging. Med Phys23: 857–868, 1996.
WolfREhmanRRiedererS: Analysis of systematic and random error in MR volumetric flow measurements. Magn Reson Med30: 82–91, 1993.
29.
BakkerCJGKouwenhovenMHartkampMJ: Accuracy and precision of time-averaged flow as measured by non-triggered 2D phase-contrast MR angiography: A phantom study. Magn Reson Imaging13: 959–965, 1995.
30.
TangCBlatterDDParkerDL: Accuracy of phase-contrast flow measurements in the presence of partial-volume effects. J Magn Reson Imaging3: 377–385, 1993.
31.
NitzWRBradleyWGJrWatanabeAS: Flow dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid: Assessment with phase-contrast velocity MR imaging performed with retrospective cardiac gating. Radiology183: 395–405, 1992.
32.
ObataTShishidoFKogaM: Three-vessel study of cerebral blood flow using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: Effect of physical characteristics. MRI14: 1143–1148, 1996.
33.
MarksMPPelcNJRossMR: Determination of cerebral blood flow with a phase-contrast cine MR imaging technique: Evaluation of normal subjects and patients with arteriovenous malformations. Radiology182: 467–476, 1992.
34.
BogrenHGBuonocoreMHGuWZ: Carotid and vertebral artery blood flow in left- and right-handed healthy subjects measured with MR velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging4: 37–42, 1994.
35.
KetySSSchmidtDF: The nitrous oxide method for the quantitative determination of cerebral blood flow in man: Theory, procedure, and normal values. J Clin Invest27: 476–483, 1948.
36.
ShirahataNHenriksenLNorstrupS: Regional cerebral blood flow assessed by 133Xe inhalation and emission tomography: Normal values. J Comput Assist Tomogra9: 861–866, 1985.
37.
BoorderMJHendrikseJGrondJVD: Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements of cerebral autoregulation with a breath-hold challenge: A feasibility study. Stroke35: 1350–1354, 2004.
38.
EickeBMBussEBahrRR: Influence of aceta-zolamide and CO2 on extracranial flow volume and intracranial blood flow velocity. Stroke30: 76–80, 1999.
39.
SpetzlerRFSelmanWR: Pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia accompanying arteriovenous malformations. In: WilsonCBSteinBM, eds. Intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins1984: 24–31.
40.
EngelsGMullerEReynenK: Phase-mapping technique for the evaluation of aortic valve stenosis by MR. Eur Radiol2: 299–304, 1992.
41.
WassermanBALinWTarrRW: Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Flow quantitation by means of two-dimensional cardiac-gated phase-contrast MR imaging. Radiology194: 681–686; 1995.
42.
RossMRPelcNJEnzmannDR: Qualitative phase contrast MRA in the normal and abnormal circle of Willis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 14: 19–25, 1993.
43.
MirallesMDolzJLCotillasJ: The role of the circle of Willis in carotid occlusion assessment with phase contrast MR angiography and transcranial duplex. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg10: 424–430, 1995.
44.
EnzmannDRPelcNJ: Normal flow patterns of intracranial and spinal cerebrospinal fluid defined with phase-contrast cine MR imaging. Radiology178: 467–474, 1991.
45.
NitzWRBradleyWGJrWatanabeAS: Flow dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid: Assessment with phase-contrast velocity MR imaging performed with retrospective cardiac gating. Radiology183: 395–405, 1992.
46.
RutgersDRBlankensteijnJDGrondJVD: Preoperative MRA flow quantification in CEA patients: Flow differences between patients who develop cerebral ischemia and patients who do not develop cerebral ischemia during cross-clamping of the carotid artery. Stroke31: 3021–3028, 2000.
