ScarabinoTNemoreFGiannatempoGM: 3.0 T Magnetic Resonance in Neuroradiology. Eur J Radiol154–164, 2003.
4.
FrayneRGiidyearBGDickhoffP: Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla: Challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging. Investigative Radiology38: 385–402, 2003.
SchenckJF: MR Safety at high magnetic fields. MRI Clinics of North America6: 715–730, 1998.
7.
SchenckJFDumoulinCLRedingtonRWQ: Human exposure to 4.0 Tesla magnetic fields in a whole-body scanner. Med Phys5: 1089–1098, 1992.
8.
WeissJHerrickRCTaberKH: Bio-effects of high magnetic fields: A study using a simple animal model. Magn Reson Imaging10: 689–694, 1992.
9.
BudingerTFFisherHHentschelD: Physiological effects of fast oscillating magnetic gradient fields. J Comput Assist Tomogr15: 909–914, 1991.
10.
ShellockFGCruesJV: Corneal temperature changes induced by high-field-strength MR imaging with a head coil. Radiology167: 809–811, 1988.
11.
ShellockFG: Biomedical implants and devices: Assessment of magnetic field interaction with a 3.0 Tesla MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging16: 721–732, 2002.
12.
KnoppMVEssigMDebusJ: Unusual burns of the lower extremities caused by a closed conducting loop in a patient at MR imaging. Radiology200: 572–575, 1996.
13.
ShellockFGSlimpGL: Severe burn of the finger caused by using a pulse oxymeter during MR imaging (letter). Am J Radiol5: 1105, 1989.
14.
SchenckJF: Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging12: 2–19, 2000.
15.
KankarluARobitaillePML: Biological effects and health implications in magnetic resonance imaging (review). Concepts Magn Reson12: 321–359, 2000.
16.
KangarluA: Cognitive, cardiac, and physiological safety studies in ultra high field magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imag17: 10, 1999.
17.
McJuryMShellockFG: Auditory noise associated with MR procedures: A review. J Magn Reson Imag12, 2000.
