HuberAKömpfD: Klinische Neuroophthalmologie. 1 ed.Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag1998.
11.
LeighRJZeeDS: The neurology of eye movements. 3 ed.New York: Oxford University Press1999.
12.
MarrD: Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company1982.
13.
HubelDH: Eye, brain, and vision. New York: Scientific American Library1988.
14.
LivingstoneMHubelDH: Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science240: 740–749, 1988.
15.
BrodmannK: Vergleichende Lokalisationslehere der Grosshirnrinde in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth1909.
16.
ZillesKClarkeS: Architecture, connectivity, and transmitter receptors of human extrastriate visual cortex. In: RocklandKSKaasJHPetersA, editors. Cerebral cortex, Vol. 12. New York: Plenum1997, 673–742.
17.
UngerleiderLGMishkinM: Two cortical visual systems. In: IngleDJGoodaleMAMansfieldRJW, editors. Analysis of visual behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press982, 549–586.
18.
HartlineHK: The response of single optic nerve fibers of the vertebrate eye to illumination of the retina. Am J Physiol121: 400–415, 1938.
19.
KufflerSW: Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalina retina. J Neurophysiol16: 37–68, 1953.
20.
HubelDHWieselTN: Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol148: 574–591, 1959.
21.
LivingstoneMSPackCCBornRT: Two-dimensional substructure of MT receptive fields. Neuron30: 781–793, 2001.
22.
RodieckRW: Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. Vision Res5: 583–601, 1965.
23.
GaborD: Theory of communication. J IEE93: 429–459, 1946.
24.
JonesJPPalmerLA: The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol58: 1187–1211, 1987.
25.
JonesJPStepnoskiAPalmerLA: The two-dimensional spectral structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol58: 1212–1232, 1987.
26.
JonesJPPalmerLA: An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol58: 1233–1258, 1987.
27.
DaugmanJG: Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. J Opt Soc Am A2: 1160–1169, 1985.
28.
ReidRC: Vision. In: ZigmondMJBloomFELandisSCRobertsJLSquireLR, editors. Fundamental neuroscience. San Diego: Academic Press1999, 821–851.
29.
CronerLJKaplanE: Receptive fields of P and M ganglion cells across the primate retina. Vision Res35: 7–24, 1995.
30.
ShapleyRReidRCKaplanE: Receptive fields of P and M cells in the monkey retina and their photoreceptor inputs. Neurosci Res Suppl15: S199–S211, 1991.
31.
ScheinSJDeM: Mapping of retinal and geniculate neurons onto striate cortex of macaque. J Neurosci7: 996–1009, 1987.
32.
WurtzRHKandelER. Central visual pathways. In: KandelERSchwartzJHJessellTM, editors. Principles of neural science. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000: 523–547.
33.
MartinPRWhiteAJGoodchildAK: Evidence that blue-on cells are part of the third geniculocortical pathway in primates. Eur J Neurosci9: 1536–1541, 1997.
34.
WieselTNHubelDH: Spatial and chromatic interactions in the lateral geniculate body of the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol29: 1115–1156, 1966.
35.
WolfeJPalmerLA: Temporal diversity in the lateral geniculate nucleus of cat. Vis Neurosci15: 653–675, 1998.
36.
WeiskrantzL: The Ferrier lecture, 1989. Outlooks for blindsight: Explicit methodologies for implicit processes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci239: 247–278, 1990.
37.
WilliamsCAzzopardiPCoweyA: Nasal and temporal retinal ganglion cells projecting to the midbrain: Implications for “blindsight”. Neuroscience65: 577–586, 1995.
38.
HubelDHWieselTN: Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol160: 106–154, 1962.
39.
HubelDHWieselTN: Brain mechanisms of vision. Sci Am241: 150–162, 1979.
40.
LeVaySConnollyMHoudeJ: The complete pattern of ocular dominance stripes in the striate cortex and visual field of the macaque monkey. J Neurosci5: 486–501, 1985.
41.
SanthouseAMHowardRJFfytcheDH: Visual hallucinatory syndromes and the anatomy of the visual brain. Brain123: 2055–2064, 2000.
42.
FfytcheDHHowardRJBrammerMJ: The anatomy of conscious vision: An fMRI study of visual hallucinations. Nat Neurosci1: 738–742, 1998.
43.
de MorsierG: Les automatismes visuels. (Hallucinations visuelles rétrochiasmatiques). Schweiz Med Wschr66: 700–703, 1936.
44.
de MorsierG: Le syndrom de Charles Bonnet: Hallucinations visuelles des vieillards sans deficience mentale. Annls Med Psychol125: 702, 1967.
45.
PanayiotopoulosCP: Elementary visual hallucinations, blindness, and headache in idiopathic occipital epilepsy: Differentiation from migraine. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry66: 536–540, 1999.
46.
ZekiSWatsonJDLueckCJ: A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex. J Neurosci11: 641–649, 1991.
47.
FellemanDJVan EssenDC: Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex1: 1–47, 1991.
48.
Ts'oDYRoeAWGilbertCD: A hierarchy of the functional organization for color, form and disparity in primate visual area V2. Vision Res41: 1333–1349, 2001.
PrevicFHLiottiMBlakemoreC: Functional imaging of brain areas involved in the processing of coherent and incoherent wide field-of-view visual motion. Exp Brain Res131: 393–405, 2000.
51.
LisbergerSGMorrisEJTychsenL: Visual motion processing and sensory-motor integration for smooth pursuit eye movements. Annu Rev Neurosci10: 97–129, 1987.
52.
MeriganWHMaunsellJH: How parallel are the primate visual pathways?Annu Rev Neurosci16: 369–402, 1993.
53.
GoldbergMEColbyCLDuhamelJR: Representation of visuomotor space in the parietal lobe of the monkey. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol55: 729–739, 1990.
54.
AndersenRASnyderLHLiCS: Coordinate transformations in the representation of spatial information. Curr Opin Neurobiol3: 171–176, 1993.
55.
BarashSBracewellRMFogassiL: Saccade-related activity in the lateral intraparietal area. I. Temporal properties; comparison with area 7a. J Neurophysiol66: 1095–1108, 1991.
56.
PetitLClarkVPIngeholmJ: Dissociation of saccade-related and pursuit-related activation in human frontal eye fields as revealed by fMRI. J Neurophysiol77: 3386–3390, 1997.
57.
von der HeydtRPeterhansEBaumgartnerG: Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. Science224: 1260–1262, 1984.
58.
DesimoneRScheinSJMoranJ: Contour, color and shape analysis beyond the striate cortex. Vision Res25: 441–452, 1985.
59.
GlimcherPW: Eye movements. In: ZigmondMJBloomFELandisSCRobertsJLSquireLR, editors. Fundamental neuroscience. San Diego: Academic Press1999, 993–1010.
60.
GoldbergME: The control of gaze. In: KandelERSchwartzJHJessellTM, editors. Principles of neural science. New York: McGraw-Hill2000, 782–800.
61.
Buttner-EnneverJA: Neuroanatomy of the oculomotor system. Reviews of oculomotor research. Vol 2. 1 ed.New York: Elsevier1988.
62.
HornAKButtnerUButtner-EnneverJA: Brainstem and cerebellar structures for eye movement generation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol55: 1–25, 1996.
ScudderCAFuchsAF: Physiological and behavioral identification of vestibular nucleus neurons mediating the horizontal vestibuloocular reflex in trained rhesus monkeys. J Neurophysiol68: 244–264, 1992.
65.
CannonSCRobinsonDA: Loss of the neural integrator of the oculomotor system from brain stem lesions in monkey. J Neurophysiol57: 1383–1409, 1987.
66.
RaphanTMatsuoVCohenB: Velocity storage in the vestibulo-ocular reflex arc (VOR). Exp Brain Res35: 229–248, 1979.
67.
LisbergerSGMilesFAZeeDS: Signals used to compute errors in monkey vestibuloocular reflex: Possible role of flocculus. J Neurophysiol52: 1140–1153, 1984.
68.
WaespeWCohenB: Flocculectomy and unit activity in the vestibular nuclei during visual-vestibular interactions. Exp Brain Res51: 23–35, 1983.
69.
MilesFALisbergerSG: Plasticity in the vestibulo-ocular reflex: A new hypothesis. Annu Rev Neurosci4: 273–299, 1981.
70.
BalohRW: Vertigo. Lancet352: 1841–1846, 1998.
71.
BrandtTDieterichM: Perceived vertical and lateropulsion: Clinical syndromes, localization, and prognosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair14: 1–12, 2000.
72.
SchwarzUIlgUJ: Asymmetry in visual motion processing. Neuroreport10: 2477–2480, 1999.
73.
HoffmannKP: Comparative neurobiology of the optokinetic reflex in mammals. Rev Bras Biol56Su 1 Pt 2: 303–314, 1996.
74.
FredericksCAGiolliRABlanksRH: The human accessory optic system. Brain Res454: 116–122, 1988.
75.
MaiJK: The accessory optic system and the retino-hypothalamic system. A review. J Hirnforsch19: 213–288, 1978.
76.
HoffmannKPDistlerC: Quantitative analysis of visual receptive fields of neurons in nucleus of the optic tract and dorsal terminal nucleus of the accessory optic tract in macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol62: 416–428, 1989.
77.
FuchsAFMustariMJ: The optokinetic response in primates and its possible neuronal substrate. Rev Oculomot Res5: 343–369, 1993.
HennVYoungLRFinleyC: Vestibular nucleus units in alert monkeys are also influenced by moving visual fields. Brain Res71: 144–149, 1974.
80.
BeckerW. Metrics: In: WurtzRHGoldbergME, editors. The neurobiology of saccadic eye movements. Reviews of oculomotor research. Vol 3. New York: Elsevier1989, 13–39.
81.
HornAKButtner-EnneverJA: Premotor neurons for vertical eye movements in the rostral mesencephalon of monkey and human: Histologic identification by parvalbumin immunostaining. J Comp Neurol392: 413–427, 1998.
82.
SommerMAWurtzRH: Frontal eye field sends delay activity related to movement, memory, and vision to the superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol85: 1673–1685, 2001.
83.
HanesDPWurtzRH: Interaction of the frontal eye field and superior colliculus for saccade generation. J Neurophysiol85: 804–815, 2001.
SegravesMAParkK.The relationship of monkey frontal eye field activity to saccade dynamics. J Neurophysiol69: 1880–1889, 1993.
86.
SparksDL. The neural encoding of the location of targets for saccadic eye movements. J Exp Biol146: 195–207, 1989.
87.
RobinsonDLMcClurkinJW: The visual superior colliculus and pulvinar. Rev Oculomot Res3: 337–360, 1989.
88.
GoldbergMESegravesMA: The visual and frontal cortices. Rev Oculomot Res3: 283–313, 1989.
89.
SchillerPHSandellJHMaunsellJH: The effect of frontal eye field and superior colliculus lesions on saccadic latencies in the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol57: 1033–1049, 1997.
90.
GuittonDBuchtelHADouglasRM: Frontal lobe lesions in man cause difficulties in suppressing reflexive glances and in generating goal-directed saccades. Exp Brain Res58: 455–472, 1985.
91.
MohlerCWWurtzRH: Role of striate cortex and superior colliculus in visual guidance of saccadic eye movements in monkeys. J Neurophysiol40: 74–94, 1977.
92.
WeberBSchwarzUKneifelS: Hierarchical visual processing is dependent on the oculomotor system. Neuroreport11: 241–247, 2000.
93.
HikosakaOTakikawaYKawagoeR: Role of the basal ganglia in the control of purposive saccadic eye movements. Physiol Rev80: 953–978, 2000.
94.
DorrisMCPareMMunozDP: Neuronal activity in monkey superior colliculus related to the initiation of saccadic eye movements. J Neurosci17: 8566–8579, 1997.
95.
EverlingSPareMDorrisMC: Comparison of the discharge characteristics of brain stem omnipause neurons and superior colliculus fixation neurons in monkey: Implications for control of fixation and saccade behavior. J Neurophysiol79: 511–528, 1998.
96.
BeauchampMSPetitLEllmoreTM: A Parametric fMRI Study of Overt and Covert Shifts of Visuospatial Attention. Neuroimage14: 310–321, 2001.
HeideWKompfD: Combined deficits of saccades and visuo-spatial orientation after cortical lesions. Exp Brain Res123: 164–171, 1998.
99.
HeideWBinkofskiFSeitzRJ: Activation of frontoparietal cortices during memorized triple-step sequences of saccadic eye movements: An fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci13: 1177–1189, 2001.
100.
GaymardBPlonerCJRivaudS: Cortical control of saccades. Exp Brain Res123: 159–163, 1998.
101.
SullivanEPJenkinsIHHendersonL: The functional anatomy of remembered saccades: A PET study. Neuroreport6: 2141–2144, 1995.
102.
HeideWBlankenburgMZimmermannE: Cortical control of doublestep saccades: Implications for spatial orientation. Ann Neurol38: 739–748, 1995.
103.
PierrotDRivaudSGaymardB: Cortical control of saccades. Ann Neurol37: 557–567, 1995.
104.
PierrotD: Saccade and smooth-pursuit impairment after cerebral hemispheric lesions. Eur Neurol34: 121–134, 1994.
105.
PierrotDRivaudSGaymardB: Cortical control of reflexive visually-guided saccades. Brain114: 1473–1485, 1991.
106.
NagelLBuchtelHAWelchKM: Cerebral control of directed visual attention and orienting saccades. Brain113: 237–276, 1990.
107.
FoxPTFoxJMRaichleME: The role of cerebral cortex in the generation of voluntary saccades: A positron emission tomographic study. J Neurophysiol54: 348–369, 1985.
108.
TychsenLLisbergerSG: Visual motion processing for the initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements in humans. J Neurophysiol56: 953–968, 1986.
109.
LindnerASchwarzUIlgUJ: Cancellation of self-induced retinal image motion during smooth pursuit eye movements. Vision Res41: 1685–1694, 2001.
110.
BornRTGrohJMZhaoR: Segregation of object and background motion in visual area MT: Effects of microstimulation on eye movements. Neuron26: 725–734, 2000.
111.
GreenleeMW: Human cortical areas underlying the perception of optic flow: Brain imaging studies. Int Rev Neurobiol44: 269–292, 2000.
112.
BartonJJSimpsonTKiriakopoulosE: Functional MRI of lateral occipitotemporal cortex during pursuit and motion perception. Ann Neurol40: 387–398, 1996.
113.
LekwuwaGUBarnesGR: Cerebral control of eye movements. I. The relationship between cerebral lesion sites and smooth pursuit deficits. Brain119: 473–490, 1996.
114.
PetitLHaxbyJV: Functional anatomy of pursuit eye movements in humans as revealed by fMRI. J Neurophysiol82: 463–471, 1999.
115.
Buttner-EnneverJAButtnerU: Neuroanatomy of the ocular motor pathways. Baillieres Clin Neurol1: 263–287, 1992.
116.
KawanoKShidaraMYamaneS: Neural activity in dorsolateral pontine nucleus of alert monkey during ocular following responses. J Neurophysiol67: 680–703, 1992.
117.
LeichnetzGR: Inferior frontal eye field projections to the pursuit-related dorsolateral pontine nucleus and middle temporal area (MT) in the monkey. Vis Neurosci3: 171–180, 1989.
118.
MustariMJFuchsAFWallmanJ: Response properties of dorsolateral pontine units during smooth pursuit in the rhesus macaque. J Neurophysiol60: 664–686, 1988.
119.
SuzukiDAKellerEL: Visual signals in the dorsolateral pontine nucleus of the alert monkey: Their relationship to smooth-pursuit eye movements. Exp Brain Res53: 473–478, 1984.
120.
SuzukiDAYamadaTHoedemaR: Smooth-pursuit eye-movement deficits with chemical lesions in macaque nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis. J Neurophysiol82: 1178–1186, 1999.
121.
MayJGKellerELSuzukiDA: Smooth-pursuit eye movement deficits with chemical lesions in the dorsolateral pontine nucleus of the monkey. J Neurophysiol59: 952–977, 1988.
122.
DeleuDMichotteAEbingerG: Impairment of smooth pursuit in pontine lesions: Functional topography based on MRI and neuropathologic findings. Acta Neurol Belg97: 28–35, 1997.
123.
NawrotMRizzoM.Motion perception deficits from midline cerebellar lesions in human. Vision Res35(5): 723–731, 1995.
124.
PageWKKingWMMeriganW: Magnocellular or parvocellular lesions in the lateral geniculate nucleus of monkeys cause minor deficits of smooth pursuit eye movements. Vision Res34: 223–239, 1994.
125.
MorrowMJSharpeJA: Retinotopic and directional deficits of smooth pursuit initiation after posterior cerebral hemispheric lesions. Neurology43: 595–603, 1993.
126.
KeatingEG: Lesions of the frontal eye field impair pursuit eye movements, but preserve the predictions driving them. Behav Brain Res53: 91–104, 1993.
127.
ThurstonSELeighRJCrawfordT: Two distinct deficits of visual tracking caused by unilateral lesions of cerebral cortex in humans. Ann Neurol23: 266–273, 1988.
128.
DurstelerMRWurtzRHNewsomeWT: Directional pursuit deficits following lesions of the foveal representation within the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol57: 1262–1287, 1987.
129.
LeighRJTusaRJ: Disturbance of smooth pursuit caused by infarction of occipitoparietal cortex. Ann Neurol17: 185–187, 1985.
130.
HeideWKurzidimKKompfD: Deficits of smooth pursuit eye movements after frontal and parietal lesions. Brain119: 1951–1969, 1996.
131.
HaarmeierTThierPRepnowM: False perception of motion in a patient who cannot compensate for eye movements. Nature389: 849–852, 1997.