DanielsenERRossB - Magnetic resonance spectroscopy diagnosis of neurological disease. New York. Marcel Dekker, 1999.
3.
HethcringtonHPMasonGFPanJWPonderSLVaughanJTTweigDBPohostGM– Evaluation of cerebral gray and white matter metabolite differences by spectroscopic imaging at 4. 1T. Magn Reson Med32:565–571, 1994.
4.
BurtscherIMHoltasS– Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in brain tumours: clinical applications. Neuroradiology43:345–352, 2001.
GonenOGrossmanRI– The accuracy of whole brain N -acetylaspartate quantification. Magn Reson Imag18:1255–1258, 2000.
7.
HuppiPS. – MR imaging and spectroscopy of brain development. Pediatric MR neuroimaging,9:1–17, 2001.
8.
TamiyaTKinoshitaKOnoYMatsumotoKFurutaTOhmotoT– Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy reflects cellular proliferative activity in astrocytomas. Neuroradiology42:333–338, 2000.
9.
YangDKorogiYSugaharaTKitajimaM.ShigematsuYLiangLUshioYTakahashiM– Cerebral gliomas: prospective comparison of multivoxel 2D chemical-shift imaging proton MR spectroscopy, echoplanar perfusion and diffusion-weighted MRI. Neuroradiology44:656–666, 2002.
10.
BurtschcrIMSkagerbergGGeijerBEnglundEStahlbergFHoltasS– Proton MR spectroscopy and preoperative diagnostic accuracy: an evaluation of intracranial mass lesions characterized by stereotactic biopsy findings. AJNR21:84–93, 2002.
11.
BurtscherIMHoltasS– In vivo 1H-MR spectroscopy in untreated and treated brain abscesses. AJNR20:1049–1053, 1999.
12.
SchlemmerHPBachertPHerfarthKKZunaIDebusJvan KaickG– Proton MR spectroscopy evaluation of suspicious brain lesions after stereotactic radiothcraphy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol22:1316–1324, 2001.
13.
FuLMatthewsPMDe StefanoN– Imaging axonal damage of normal appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. Brain121:103–113, 1998.
14.
VaughanJTGarwoodMCollinsCMLiuWDelaBarreLAdrianyGAndersenPMerkleHGoebelRSmithMBUgurbilK7T vs 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal-to-noise Comparison in Head Images. Magn Reson Med46:24–30, 2001.
15.
ThulbomKR– Clinical rationale for very-high-field (3.0 Tesla) functional magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging10:37–50, 1999.
16.
GonenOGrugerSBelindaLMlynarikVMoserE– Multivoxel 3D proton spectroscopy in the brain at 1.5 versus 3.0T: Signal-to-ratio and resolution comparison. AJNR22:1727–1731, 2001.
17.
BarkerPBHearshenDOBoskaMD– Single-Voxel Proton MRS of the Human Brain at 1.5T and 3.0T. Magn Reson Med45:765–769, 2001.
18.
GruetterRWeisdorfSARajanayaganV– Resolution improvements in vivo 1H NMR spectra with increased magnetic field strength. J. Magn. Reson135:260–264, 1998.
19.
BarthaRDrostDJMenonRWilliamsonPC– Comparison of quantification precision of human short echo time 1H spectroscopy at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med44:185–192, 1998.
20.
TkacIAndersenPAdrianyGMerkleHUgurbilKGruetterR– In vivo 1H NMR spectroscopy of the human brain at 7T. Magn Reson Med46:451–456, 2001.
21.
GruetterRGarwoodMUgurbilKSeaquistER– Observation of resolved glucose signals in 1H NMR spectra of the human brain at 4 Tesla. MRM36:1–6, 1996.
22.
BelindaLRegalJGonenO– SNR versus resolution in 3D H-MRS of the human brain at high magnetic fields. Magn Reson Med46:1049–1053, 2001.
23.
P TakahashiMUematsuHHatabuH– MR imaging at high magnetic fields. Eur J Radiol46:45–52, 2003.
24.
Guidance for significant risk investigations. US CDRH, FDA, DHHS. September 29, 1997)
25.
McKnightTRNoworolskiSMVigneronDBNelsonSJ– An automated technique for the quantitative assessment of 3D-MRSI data from patients with glioma. J Magn Reson13:167–177, 2001.