BracardSLebedinskyA: Endovascular treatment of Hunt and Hess grade IV and V aneuryms. Am J Neuroradiol23: 953–957, 2000.
2.
DukeBJKindtGWBreezeRE: Outcome after urgent surgery for grade IV subarachnoid haemorrhage. Surg Neurol50: 169–172, 1998.
3.
GrodenCKremerC: Comparison of operative and endovascular treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms in patients in poor grades. Neuroradiology43: 778–783, 2000.
4.
HijdraAvan GijnJ: Prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia, rebleeding, and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Stroke19: 1250–1256, 1988.
Le RouxPDElliottJP: Predicting outcome in poor grade patients with subaracnoid haemorrhage: a retrospective review of 159 aggressively managed cases. J Neurosurgery85: 39–49, 1996.
7.
van LoonJWaerzeggersY: Early endovascular treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients in very poor neurological condition. Neurosurgery50: 457–464, 2000.
8.
PagniCAFontanellaM: Therapeutic decisions and grading of subarachnoid haemorrhage. Minerva Anestesiol64: 159–162, 1998.
9.
RoosYBBeenenLF: Timing of surgery in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: rebleeding is still the major cause of poor outcome in neurosurgical units that aim at early surgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry63: 490–493, 1997.
10.
SpetzgerUGilsbachJM: Results of early aneurysm surgery in poor-grade patients. Neurol Res16: 27–30, 1994.
