Falling in love, moving in together, and raising a family are exciting milestones for couples; importantly, money is a critical component of all these experiences. While couples generally merge their financial lives as their relationship becomes more committed, partners often struggle with financial communication. Across three diary studies using a two-wave prospective–retrospective design, we examine how romantic partners perceive—and ultimately experience—financial conversations. We find that individuals systematically underestimate how enjoyable, informative, and socially connecting these conversations will be. This misprediction occurs because partners underestimate the extent to which they will reach an agreement. Extending research focused on forecasting errors in interactions between strangers or non-romantic partners, we show that individuals can mispredict conversational outcomes in highly intimate relationships. These findings have practical implications for both practitioners (e.g., financial advisors and marriage counselors) and couples seeking to better align their (financial) expectations with reality.
AkninL. B.SandstromG. M. (2024). People are surprisingly hesitant to reach out to old friends. Communications Psychology, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-024-00075-8
2.
AmatoP. R.RogersS. J. (1997). A longitudinal study of marital problems and subsequent divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59(3), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.2307/353949
3.
AtirS.WaldK. A.EpleyN. (2022). Talking with strangers is surprisingly informative. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(34), Article e2206992119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2206992119
4.
BoothbyE. J.CooneyG.SandstromG. M.ClarkM. S. (2018). The liking gap in conversations: Do people like us more than we think?Psychological Science, 29(11), 1742–1756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618783714
5.
BuehlerR.GriffinD.PeetzJ. (2010). The planning fallacy: Cognitive, motivational, and social origins. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 1–62). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43001-4
CollinsH. K.HagertyS. F.QuoidbachJ.NortonM. I.BrooksA. W. (2022). Relational diversity in social portfolios predicts well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(43), Article e2120668119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120668119
9.
CollinsH. K.MinsonJ. A.KristalA.BrooksA. W. (2024). Conveying and detecting listening during live conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 153(2), 473–494. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001454
10.
CooneyG.BoothbyE. J.LeeM. (2022). The thought gap after conversation: Underestimating the frequency of others’ thoughts about us. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(5), 1069–1088. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001134
11.
CooneyG.GilbertD. T.WilsonT. D. (2017). The novelty penalty: Why do people like talking about new experiences but hearing about old ones?Psychological Science, 28(3), 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616685870
DorisonC. A.MinsonJ. A. (2022). You can’t handle the truth! Conflict counterparts over-estimate each other’s feelings of self-threat. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 170, Article 104147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104147
14.
DunganJ. A.EpleyN. (2024). Surprisingly good talk: Misunderstanding others creates a barrier to constructive confrontation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 153(3), 779–797. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001528
15.
EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J.KrishnamurtiT.LoewensteinG. (2008). Mispredicting distress following romantic breakup: Revealing the time course of the affective forecasting error. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 800–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.001
16.
EpleyN.KardasM.ZhaoX.AtirS.SchroederJ. (2022). Undersociality: Miscalibrated social cognition can inhibit social connection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(5), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.02.007
17.
EpleyN.SchroederJ. (2014). Mistakenly seeking solitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 1980–1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037323
18.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
19.
GarbinskyE. N.GladstoneJ. J.NikolovaH.OlsonJ. G. (2020). Love, lies, and money: Financial Infidelity in Romantic Relationships. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz052
20.
GladstoneJ. J.GarbinskyE. N.MogilnerC. (2022). Pooling finances and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(6), 1293–1314. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000388
21.
HartE.VanEppsE. M.SchweitzerM. E. (2021). The (better than expected) consequences of asking sensitive questions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 162, 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.10.014
HowardR. C.“Chuck”HardistyD. J.SussmanA. B.LukasM. F. (2022). Understanding and Neutralizing the Expense Prediction Bias: The Role of Accessibility, Typicality, and Skewness. Journal of Marketing Research, 59(2), 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437211068025
24.
KardasM.KumarA.EpleyN. (2022). Overly shallow?: Miscalibrated expectations create a barrier to deeper conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(3), 367–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000281
25.
LaurenceauJ.-P.BarrettL. F.PietromonacoP. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238–1251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1238
26.
LaurenceauJ.-P.BarrettL. F.RovineM. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314
27.
LeBaron-BlackA. B.SaxeyM. T.TotenhagenC. J.WheelerB. E.ArchuletaK. L.YorgasonJ. B.JamesS. (2023). Financial communication as a mediator between financial values and marital outcomes. Family Relations, 72(4), 1974–1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12786
28.
LemayE. P.Jr.LinJ. L.MuirH. J. (2015). Daily affective and behavioral forecasts in romantic relationships: Seeing tomorrow through the lens of today. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(7), 1005–1019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215588756
29.
McGorrayE. L.EmeryL. F.Garr-SchultzA.FinkelE. J. (2023). “Mostly White, heterosexual couples”: Examining demographic diversity and reporting practices in relationship science research samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(2), 316–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000417
30.
MeisterM.GladstoneJ. J.GarbinskyE. N. (2025). Opening up about money: The unexpected benefits of personal financial disclosure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 189, Article 104430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2025.104430
31.
MinsonJ. A.ChenF. S. (2022). Receptiveness to opposing views: Conceptualization and integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26(2), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683211061037
32.
MinsonJ. A.DorisonC. A. (2022). Why is exposure to opposing views aversive? Reconciling three theoretical perspectives. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47, Article 101435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101435
33.
MishraN.GarbinskyE. N.ShuS. B. (2024). Discussing money with the one you love: How financial stress influences couples’ financial communication. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 35(2), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1430
34.
MontoyaA. K.HayesA. F. (2017). Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework. Psychological Methods, 22(1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000086
35.
OlsonJ. G.RickS. I. (2022). “You spent how much?” Toward an understanding of how romantic partners respond to each other’s financial decisions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.006
36.
OlsonJ. G.RickS. I. (2023). Subjective knowledge differences within couples predict influence over shared financial decisions. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 8(4), 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1086/726430
37.
OlsonJ. G.RickS. I.SmallD. A.FinkelE. J. (2023). Common cents: Bank account structure and couples’ relationship dynamics. Journal of Consumer Research, 50(4), 704–721. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucad020
38.
PeetzJ. (2025). Talk about shared money: Account pooling is associated with financial communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 42, 983–1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075241312690
39.
PeetzJ.MeloffZ.RoyleC. (2023). When couples fight about money, what do they fight about?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40, 3723–3751. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231187897
40.
PennebakerJ. W.GraybealA. (2001). Patterns of natural language use: Disclosure, personality, and social integration. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(3), 90–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00123
ReisH. T.CollinsW. A.BerscheidE. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 844–872. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.844
43.
ReisH. T.ShaverP. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In DuckS. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367–389). John Wiley & Sons.
44.
RickS. I.SmallD. A.FinkelE. J. (2011). Fatal (fiscal) attraction: Spendthrifts and tightwads in marriage. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(2), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.2.228
45.
Rossignac-MilonM.BolgerN.ZeeK. S.BoothbyE. J.HigginsE. T. (2021). Merged minds: Generalized shared reality in dyadic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 882–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000266
46.
SaxeyM. T.LeBaron-BlackA. B.DewJ. P.YorgasonJ. B.JamesS. L.HolmesE. K. (2023). Money to marriage, or marriage to money? Examining the directionality between financial processes and marital processes among newlywed couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(8), 2445–2465. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221149967
47.
WardA. F.LynchJ. G. (2019). On a need-to-know basis: How the distribution of responsibility between couples shapes financial literacy and financial outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 1013–1036. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy037
48.
WilsonT. D.GilbertD. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35(35), 345–411.
49.
WilsonT. D.GilbertD. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00355
50.
WilsonT. D.WheatleyT.MeyersJ. M.GilbertD. T.AxsomD. (2000). Focalism: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 821–836. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.821
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
