In a highly powered (n = 143) preregistered study, we investigated how individuals form generalized and contextualized beliefs about social groups. We adopted an impression formation paradigm in which participants were shown members of two groups exhibiting different behaviors within the same context (group as predictive cue) or only one group exhibiting different behaviors in two contexts (context as predictive cue). In the respective learning contexts, participants linked the presented groups with the characteristics underlying the behavior of their members. Differently, in the “group as predictive cue” condition, group characteristics were as strong in a novel context as in the learned contexts, indicating generalized stereotype formation, whereas in the “context as predictive cue” condition, they did not appear, indicating context-specific stereotype formation. These results suggest that whether beliefs about groups are learned in a generalized or in a context-specific way depends on the predictive value of the context information.
BarsalouL. W. (2009). Situating concepts. In RobbinsP.AydedeM. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 236–263). Cambridge University Press.
4.
BlairI. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_8
5.
BlairI. V.BanajiM. R. (1996). Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1142–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1142
6.
BoutonM. E.SwartzentruberD. (1986). Analysis of the associative and occasion-setting properties of contexts participating in a Pavlovian discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.12.4.333
7.
BrewerM. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In SrullT. K.Wyer, Jr.R. S. (Eds.), A dual process model of impression formation (pp. 1–36). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Callejas-AguileraJ. E.RosasJ. M. (2010). Ambiguity and context processing in human predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 36, 482–494. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018527
10.
CasperC.RothermundK.WenturaD. (2010). Automatic stereotype activation is context dependent. Social Psychology, 41, 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000019
11.
CasperC.RothermundK.WenturaD. (2011). The activation of specific facets of age stereotypes depends on individuating information. Social Cognition, 29, 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2011.29.4.393
12.
De HouwerJ. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3758/LB.37.1.1
13.
De HouwerJ.VandorpeS.BeckersT. (2005). On the role of controlled cognitive processes in human associative learning. In WillsA. J. (Ed.), New directions in human associative learning (pp. 41–63). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
14.
DennistonJ. C.SavastanoH. I.MillerR. R. (2001). The extended comparator hypothesis: Learning by contiguity, responding by relative strength. In MowrerR. R.KleinS. B. (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary learning theories (pp. 65–117). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
15.
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
16.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
17.
FiskeS. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 357–411). McGraw-Hill.
18.
FiskeS. T.NeubergS. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60317-2
19.
GawronskiB.RydellR. J.VervlietB.De HouwerJ. (2010). Generalization versus contextualization in automatic evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 683–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020315
20.
GawronskiB.SritharanR. (2010). Formation, change, and contextualization of mental associations: Determinants and principles of variations in implicit measures. In GawronskiB.PayneB. K. (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 216–240). Guilford Press.
21.
HackelL. M.Mende-SiedleckiP.LokenS.AmodioD. M. (2022). Context-dependent learning in social interaction: Trait impressions support flexible social choices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123, 655–675. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000296
22.
HagendoornL.KleinpenningG. (1991). The contribution of domain-specific stereotypes to ethnic social distance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1991.tb00923.x
23.
HamiltonD. L.GiffordR. K. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(76)80006-6
24.
HentschelT.HeilmanM. E.PeusC. V. (2019). The multiple dimensions of gender stereotypes: A current look at men’s and women’s characterizations of others and themselves. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00011
25.
HuangT.RothermundK. (2023a). Implicit and explicit age stereotypes assessed in the same contexts are still independent. Experimental Aging Research, 49, 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2022.2039507
26.
HuangT.RothermundK. (2023b). Endorsement and embodiment of cautiousness-related age stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1091763. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1091763
KornadtA. E.RothermundK. (2011). Contexts of aging: Assessing evaluative age stereotypes in different life domains. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66B, 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr036
29.
KornadtA. E.RothermundK. (2015). Views on aging: Domain-specific approaches and implications for developmental regulation. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 35, 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1891/0198-8794.35.121
30.
KroesM. C. W.DunsmoorJ. E.MackeyW. E.McClayM.PhelpsE. A. (2017). Context conditioning in humans using commercially available immersive virtual reality. Scientific Reports, 7, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08184-7
LeónS. P.AbadM. J. F.RosasJ. M. (2010). Giving contexts informative value makes information context-specific. Experimental Psychology, 57, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000006
33.
LovibondP. F. (2003). Causal beliefs and conditioned responses: Retrospective revaluation induced by experience and by instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.1.97
34.
MackintoshN. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076778
PearceJ. M.HallG. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.532
38.
PrestonG. C.DickinsonA.MackintoshN. J. (1986). Contextual conditional discriminations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 38B, 217–237.
39.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/
40.
RescorlaR. A.WagnerA. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In BlackA.ProkasyW. (Eds.), Classical conditioning Ii: Current theory and research. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
41.
RosasJ. M.AguileraJ. E. C.ÁlvarezM. M. R.AbadM. J. F. (2006). Revision of retrieval theory of forgetting: What does make information context-specific?International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 6, 147–166.
42.
RosasJ. M.NelsonJ. B. (2019). Context dependency as a function of prediction error-based attention. Psicológica, 40, 34–45. https://doi.org/10.2478/psicolj-2019-0003
43.
RydellR. J.GawronskiB. (2009). I like you, I like you not: Understanding the formation of context-dependent automatic attitudes. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1118–1152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802355255
44.
RydellR. J.McConnellA. R. (2006). Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91. 995–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.995
45.
SchmajukN. A.HollandP. C. (Eds.). (1998). Occasion setting: Associative learning and cognition in animals. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10298-000
46.
SchneiderD. J. (2004). The psychology of stereotyping. Guilford Press.
47.
ShanksD. R. (1995). The psychology of associative learning. Cambridge University Press.
48.
StroessnerS. J.PlaksJ. E. (2013). Illusory correlation and stereotype formation: Tracing the arc of research over a quarter century. In MoskowitzG. B. (Ed.), Cognitive Social Psychology (pp. 247–259). Psychology Press.
49.
WagnerA. R.RescorlaR. A. (1972). Inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning: Application of a theory. In BoakesR. A.HallidayM. S. (Eds.), Inhibition and Learning (pp. 301–336). Academic Press.
50.
WaldmannM. R. (2000). Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition, 26, 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.1.53
51.
WigboldusD. H. J.DijksterhuisA.van KnippenbergA. (2003). When stereotypes get in the way: Stereotypes obstruct stereotype-inconsistent trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 470–484. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.470
52.
YehW.BarsalouL. W. (2006). The situated nature of concepts. The American Journal of Psychology, 119, 349–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/20445349
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
