The present work documents gendered colorism using social categorization paradigms. Specifically, we document how skin tone influences gender categorization, especially for Black women relative to Black men across a diverse sample in three studies (N = 443). We find that darker skin consistently facilitates fast and accurate racial categorization (Studies 1–3), and that skin tone has a larger effect on the accurate gender categorization of Black women versus men (Studies 1–2), with darker-skinned women being categorized the slowest and least accurately. Together, these findings suggest that gendered colorism may be most prominent when gender (but not race) is salient. They point to another way that Black women potentially experience intersectional invisibility, when their gender identity goes unrecognized and unacknowledged. Further research examining evaluative judgments is needed to examine this connection.
Bart-PlangeD. (2022). On the psychology of gendered colorism. University of Virginia, Psychology—Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18130/vrb4-w578
2.
BlairI. V.JuddC. M.ChapleauK. M. (2004). The influence of Afrocentric facial features in criminal sentencing. Psychological Science, 15(10), 674–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00739.x
3.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
4.
BrauerM.CurtinJ. J. (2018). Linear mixed-effects models and the analysis of nonindependent data: A unified framework to analyze categorical and continuous independent variables that vary within-subjects and/or within-items. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000159
5.
ConleyM. I.DellarcoD. V.Rubien-ThomasE.CohenA. O.CerveraA.TottenhamN.CaseyB. J. (2018). The racially diverse affective expression (RADIATE) face stimulus set. Psychiatry Research, 270, 1059–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.04.066
6.
CooleyE.WinslowH.VojtA.SheinJ.HoJ. (2018). Bias at the intersection of identity: Conflicting social stereotypes of gender and race augment the perceived femininity and interpersonal warmth of smiling Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.08.007
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
9.
FelicianoC. (2016). Shades of race: How phenotype and observer characteristics shape racial classification. American Behavioral Scientist, 60, 390–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215613401
10.
GoffP. A.ThomasM. A.JacksonM. C. (2008). “Ain’t I a woman?” Towards an intersectional approach to person perception and group-based harms. Sex Roles, 59, 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9505-4
11.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
12.
HannonL.DefinaR.BruchS. (2013). The relationship between skin tone and school suspension for African Americans. Race and Social Problems, 5(4), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-013-9104-z
JohnsonL. K.FreemanB. J.PaulkerK. (2012). Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025335
17.
KeithV. M.HerringC. (1991). Skin tone and stratification in the Black community. American Journal of Sociology, 97(3), 760–778. https://doi.org/10.1086/229819
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2017). LmerTest package. Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
MaD. S.CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5
22.
MacraeC. N.MartinD. (2007). A boy primed Sue: Feature-based processing and person construal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(5), 793–805. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.406
23.
MaddoxK. B.GrayS. A. (2002). Cognitive representations of Black Americans: Reexploring the role of skin tone. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202282010
24.
MakowskiD.Ben-ShacharM. S.PatilI.LüdeckeD. (2020). Estimation of model-based predictions, contrasts and means. CRAN.
MasseyD. S.MartinJ. A. (2003). The NIS Skin Color Scale. Princeton University Press.
27.
MinearM.ParkD. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 630–633. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206543
28.
MonkE. P. (2015). The cost of color: Skin color, discrimination, and health among African-Americans. American Journal of Sociology, 121(2), 396–444. https://doi.org/10.1086/682162
29.
MonkE. P. (2021). Colorism and Physical Health: Evidence from a National Survey. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 62(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146520979645
30.
PetskoC. D.BodenhausenG. V. (2020). Multifarious person perception: How social perceivers manage the complexity of intersectional targets. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(2), Article e12518. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12518
31.
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
32.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
33.
ReuterE. B. (1918). The mulatto in the United States: Including a study of the role of mixed-blood races throughout the world. Badger.
34.
RussellK.WilsonM.HallR. (1992). The color complex: The politics of skin color among African Americans. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
35.
SeskoA. K.BiernatM. (2010). Prototypes of race and gender: The invisibility of Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 356–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.016
36.
StroessnerS. J. (1996). Social categorization by race or sex: Effects of perceived non-normalcy on response times. Social Cognition, 14(3), 247–276. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1996.14.3.247
37.
StrohmingerN.GrayK.ChitucV.HeffnerJ.ScheinC.BrooksT. (2016). The MR2: A multi-racial, mega-resolution database of facial stimuli. Behavioral Research Methods, 48, 1197–1204. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0641-9
38.
ThomasE. L.DovidioJ. F.WestT. V. (2014). Lost in the categorical shuffle: Evidence for the social non-prototypicality of Black women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(3), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035096
WilloughbyC. D. E. (2018). Running away from drapetomania: Samuel A. Cartwright, medicine, and race in the antebellum South. Journal of Southern History, 84, 579–614. https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2018.0164
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
