Across four studies (N = 1,427), we examined the impact of identity-safety cues (Black Lives Matter or Pride posters) on marginalized (Black, LGBTQ+) and advantaged (White, cisgender-heterosexual) parents’ evaluations of elementary classrooms. Black (Study 1) and LGBTQ+ parents (Studies 2 and 3a) perceived identity-relevant safety cues as more appropriate and as prompting more positive education-related outcomes (child belonging, classroom interest) than advantaged parents, who preferred control classrooms. Effects among cisgender-heterosexual parents were consistent between third- and eighth-grade classrooms (Study 3b); despite expressing less classroom interest in and finding Pride classrooms inappropriate across grades, cisgender-heterosexual parents’ expectations of child belonging, child grade, and teacher support did not differ between classrooms. Brief qualitative analyses assessed parents’ beliefs on appropriate inclusive imagery and who should educate on diversity-related information. We highlight identity-based disparities in perceptions of educational inclusivity efforts in the context of current movements toward heightened parental control in education.
BlazarD. (2021). Teachers of Color, culturally responsive teaching, and student outcomes: Experimental evidence from the random assignment of teachers to classes (Ed working paper no. 21-501). Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University.
3.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T. (2018). Gender-inclusive bathrooms signal fairness across identity dimensions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617737601
4.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.MaimonM. R. (2019). Stigmatized-identity cues in consumer spaces. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1075
5.
ChaneyK. E.SanchezD. T.RemediosJ. D. (2016). Organizational identity safety cue transfers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(11), 1564–1576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216665096
6.
ChaneyK. E.WiltonL. S.MorgenrothT.CipollinaR.Pereira-JorgeI. (2024). Predictors and implications of parents’ beliefs about the age appropriateness of LGBTQ+ topics for children. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 15, 863–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506241252198
7.
ClarkL. B. (2023). The critical racialization of parents’ rights. Yale Law Journal, 132(7), 2139–2204.
8.
CrawfordJ. T.VodapalliS.StingelR. E.RuscioJ. (2019). Do status-legitimizing beliefs moderate effects of racial progress on perceptions of anti-White bias? A replication of Wilkins and Kaiser (2014). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(6), 768–774. https://doi-org/10.1177/1948550618792057
9.
DayJ. K.IovernoS.RussellS. T. (2019). Safe and supportive schools for LGBT youth: Addressing educational inequities through inclusive policies and practices. Journal of School Psychology, 74, 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.05.007
10.
DeeT. S.PennerE. K. (2021). My brother’s keeper? The impact of targeted educational supports. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 40(4), 1171–1196. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22328
11.
EvansN. J. (2002). The impact of an LGBT safe zone project on campus climate. Journal of College Student Development, 43(4), 522–539.
GoldbergA. E.AbreuR. (2024). LGBTQ parent concerns and parent–child communication about the Parental Rights in Education Bill (“Don’t Say Gay”) in Florida. Family Relations, 73(1), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12894
16.
HarknessA.IsraelT. (2018). A thematic framework of observed mothers’ socialization messages regarding sexual orientation. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 5(2), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000268
17.
HobbyL.UllmanJ.FerfoljaT. (2021). Parental Attitudes Towards Inclusiveness Instrument (PATII): Psychometric evaluation of a new instrument measuring parental beliefs about gender and sexuality diversity inclusions in schools. Journal of School Psychology, 86, 222–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.02.008
18.
HornbeckD.MalinJ. R. (2023). Demobilizing knowledge in American schools: Censoring critical perspectives. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), Article 642. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02161-4
19.
HowanskyK.MaimonM.SanchezD. (2022). Identity safety cues predict instructor impressions, belonging, and absences in the psychology classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 49(3), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628321990362
JohnsonI. R.PietriE. S.BuckD. M.DaasR. (2021). What’s in a pronoun: Exploring gender pronouns as an organizational identity-safety cue among sexual and gender minorities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 97, Article 104194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104194
22.
KaerwerK.PritchettM. (2023). Critical Race Theory in education: How banning its tenets undermines our best hope for equity in education. Behavior and Social Issues, 32(1), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-023-00130-9
23.
KatzJ.FedericiD.CiovaccoM.CropseyA. (2016). Effect of exposure to a safe zone symbol on perceptions of campus climate for sexual minority students. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 3(3), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000186
24.
KnowlesE. D.LoweryB. S.ChowR. M.UnzuetaM. M. (2014). Deny, distance, or dismantle? How white Americans manage a privileged identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 594–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614554658
25.
KrukM.MatsickJ. L. (2021). A taxonomy of identity safety cues based on gender and race: From a promising past to an intersectional and translational future. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 7(4), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000304
MaleckiC. K.DemarayM. K.ElliottS. N.NoltenP. W. (1999). Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale (CASSS) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t57891-000
MurphyM. C.SteeleC. M.GrossJ. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18(10), 879–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x
OlsonK. R.DurwoodL.DeMeulesM.McLaughlinK. A. (2016). Mental health of transgender children who are supported in their identities. Pediatrics, 137(3), Article e20153223. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-3223
34.
OswaldF.AdamsR. B.Jr. (2023). Feminist social vision: Seeing through the lens of marginalized perceivers. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 27(3), 332–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221126582
35.
OswaldF.GriffinJ. W.AdamsR. B.JrChaneyK. E. (2024, May12). Minority representation as a visual safety cue for marginalized groups: Ensemble coding of race and gender. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9kbfq
36.
OswaldF.Pereira-JorgeI.Garr-SchultzA.ChaneyK. E. (2025, January27). “I know what’s best for my child”: Qualitative analysis of U.S. cisgender-heterosexual and LGBTQ+ parents’ perspectives on inclusive education policies. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6mndh
37.
PhippsR. (2023). Pride and Prejudice: Teacher autonomy and parent rights in the incorporation of LGBTQ+ studies in K-12 education. American Educator, 47(1), 35–37. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1380384
38.
PietriE. S.JohnsonI. R.OzgumusE. (2018). One size may not fit all: Exploring how the intersection of race and gender and stigma consciousness predict effective identity-safe cues for Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.06.021
39.
PiperR. E. (2019). The power of interactive multicultural read-alouds with elementary-aged children. Education Sciences, 9(2), Article 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020141
Purdie-VaughnsV.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G.DitlmannR.CrosbyJ. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 615–630. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615
42.
RenfroC. L.DuranA.StephanW. G.ClasonD. L. (2006). The role of threat in attitudes toward affirmative action and its beneficiaries 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(1), 41–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00003.x
ShumanE.van ZomerenM.SaguyT.KnowlesE.HalperinE. (2024). Defend, deny, distance, and dismantle: A new measure of advantaged identity management. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231216769
45.
SnappS. D.BurdgeH.LiconaA. C.MoodyR. L.RussellS. T. (2015). Students’ perspectives on LGBTQ-inclusive curriculum. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2015.1025614
46.
SpanglerP. T.LiuJ.HillC. E. (2012). Consensual qualitative research for simple qualitative data: An introduction to CQR-M. In HillC. E. (Ed.), Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena (pp. 269–283). American Psychological Association.
47.
StephanW. G.BonieckiK. A.YbarraO.BettencourtA.ErvinK. S.JacksonL. A.RenfroC. L. (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1242–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672022812009
48.
SullivanJ.WiltonL.ApfelbaumE. P. (2021). Adults delay conversations about race because they underestimate children’s processing of race. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(2), 395–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000851
49.
SullivanJ.WiltonL.ApfelbaumE. P. (2022). How age and race affect the frequency, timing, and content of conversations about race with children. Child Development, 93(3), 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13787
WeisskirchR. S. (2018). Grit, self-esteem, learning strategies and attitudes and estimated and achieved course grades among college students. Current Psychology, 37, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9485-4
52.
WellmanJ. D.LiuX.WilkinsC. L. (2016). Priming status-legitimizing beliefs: Examining the impact on perceived anti-White bias, zero-sum beliefs, and support for Affirmative Action among White people. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(3), 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12133
53.
WilkinsC. L.HirschA. A.KaiserC. R.InklesM. P. (2016). The threat of racial progress and the self-protective nature of perceiving anti-White bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(6), 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216631030
54.
WilkinsC. L.KaiserC. R. (2014). Racial progress as threat to the status hierarchy: Implications for perceptions of anti-White bias. Psychological Science, 25(2), 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508412
55.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.ToosiN. R.MillerC. A.LisnekJ. A.MartinL. A. (2022). Is LGBT progress seen as an attack on Christians? Examining Christian/sexual orientation zero-sum beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(1), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000363
56.
WiltonL. S.BellA. N.VahradyanM.KaiserC. R. (2020). Show don’t tell: Diversity dishonesty harms racial/ethnic minorities at work. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(8), 1171–1185. https://doi-org/10.1177/0146167219897149
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
