Abstract
According to attachment theory, attachment bonds are foundational for subjective well-being. But does that mean that having more attachment relationships is better than having fewer? The current research assessed this question in a cross-sectional study of 4,625 people. We found that the association between the number of targets used for attachment-related needs and well-being was essentially zero. However, exploratory analyses revealed that, among people who had anxious attachments with their attachment figures, having more figures for attachment-related needs was associated with lower subjective well-being. The reverse was found among more secure people (i.e., less anxious) in their attachments. These findings imply that there is not a straightforward relationship between the number of attachment figures people have and their well-being. It is possible that using multiple people for attachment functions may reflect a compensatory process for those who are anxious about their attachments.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
