Solidarity Imbalances After Racism and Sexism: Black Americans Are Expected to Express High Solidarity but Anticipate Lower Solidarity From Racial/Ethnic Outgroups

Abstract

Because claiming discrimination is not always taken seriously, marginalized groups may consider cues about whom to trust in providing support and solidarity. Black, Hispanic, and Asian participants (Study 1; N = 931) and women (Study 2; N = 1,207) from the United States imagined someone made a discriminatory comment to them and rated the likelihood of being supported by an individual who varied in identity and past solidarity-related behavior. Participants anticipated more support from their own racial/ethnic group for racism and from women for sexism, and then anticipated support by the following groups: Black > Hispanic > Asian ≥ White and women > men. Past behavior boosted anticipated support, especially from outgroups. Strikingly, we found solidarity imbalances; groups consistently anticipated that Black people would support them, yet Black people anticipated lower support from racial/ethnic outgroups.

Keywords

solidarity discrimination race ethnicity gender

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berger

Sarnyai

(2015). “More than skin deep”: Stress neurobiology and mental health consequences of racial discrimination. Stress, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3109/10253890.2014.989204

Branscombe

N. R.

Schmitt

M. T.

Harvey

R. D.

(1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 135–149.

Brown

V. A.

(2021). An introduction to linear mixed-effects modeling in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920960351. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920960351

Brysbaert

(2019). How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.72

Burgoon

J. K.

(2015). Expectancy violations theory. In Caughlin

Berger

C. R.

Dillard

J. P.

Wilson

S. R.

Roloff

M. E.

Solomon

(Eds.), The International encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 1–9). John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic102

Burrows

Selvanathan

H. P.

Lickel

(2021). My fight or yours: Stereotypes of activists from advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 01461672211060124. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211060124

Chen

J. M.

Joel

Castro Lingl

(2023). Antecedents and consequences of LGBT individuals’ perceptions of straight allyship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(4), 827–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000422

Christov-Moore

Simpson

E. A.

Coudé

Grigaityte

Iacoboni

Ferrari

P. F.

(2014). Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior. Elsevier Enhanced Reader. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001

Craig

M. A.

Richeson

J. A.

(2016). Stigma-based solidarity: Understanding the psychological foundations of conflict and coalition among members of different stigmatized groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415611252

10.

Cutrona

C. E.

(1986). Behavioral manifestations of social support: A microanalytic investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.201

11.

De Souza

Schmader

. (2024). When people do allyship: A typology of allyship action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683241232732

12.

Frith

C. D.

Frith

(2006). How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Research, 1079(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.126

13.

Gallagher

Haugh

Castro Solano

de laI glesia

McMahon

(2022). Social support imbalance and depressive symptoms in young adolescents: The negative effect of giving but not receiving. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 27(1), 528–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2022.2151715

14.

Gill

Matheson

(2006). Responses to discrimination: The role of emotion and expectations for emotional regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205279906

15.

Greenglass

E. R.

Fiksenbaum

Burke

R. J.

(1994). The relationship between social support and burnout over time in teachers. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9(2), 219–230.

16.

Hildebrand

L. K.

Jusuf

C. C.

Monteith

M. J.

(2020). Ally confrontations as identity-safety cues for marginalized individuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1318–1333. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2692

17.

Johnson

I. R.

Pietri

E. S.

Fullilove

Mowrer

(2019). Exploring identity-safety cues and allyship among Black women students in STEM environments. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319830926

18.

Johnson

P. C. D.

(2014). Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth’s R2GLMM to random slopes models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5(9), 944–946. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12225

19.

Joseph

T. D.

Hirshfield

L. E.

(2023). Reexamining racism, sexism, and identity taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 46(6), 1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2022.2143719

20.

Kaiser

C. R.

Miller

C. T.

(2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272010

21.

Kaiser

C. R.

Miller

C. T.

(2003). Derogating the victim: The interpersonal consequences of blaming events on discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(3), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302030063001

22.

Kutlaca

Radke

H. R. M.

(2023). Towards an understanding of performative allyship: Definition, antecedents and consequences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(2), Article e12724. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12724

23.

Lawrence

Laguer

Wright

S. M.

Newman

(2021). Black professional women & diversity in the workplace. In Proceedings of the Northeast Business & Economics Association (pp. 129–132). Northeast Business & Economics Association.

24.

Leach

C. W.

Iyer

Pedersen

(2006). Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(9), 1232–1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206289729

25.

Lee

E. A.

Soto

J. A.

Swim

J. K.

Bernstein

M. J.

(2012). Bitter reproach or sweet revenge: Cultural differences in response to racism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(7), 920–932. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212440292

26.

Löffler

C. S.

Greitemeyer

(2023). Are women the more empathetic gender? The effects of gender role expectations. Current Psychology, 42(1), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01260-8

27.

Lorah

(2018). Effect size measures for multilevel models: Definition, interpretation, and TIMSS example. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-018-0061-2

28.

Maimon

M. R.

Sanchez

D. T.

(2022). Women’s sexism-related coping support from male romantic partners. Gender Issues, 39(4), 478–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-022-09301-1

29.

Marshburn

C. K.

Campos

(2022). Seeking just us: A mixed methods investigation of racism-specific support among Black college students. Journal of Black Psychology, 48(1), 67–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/00957984211034961

30.

Moser

C. E.

Branscombe

N. R.

(2022). Male allies at work: Gender-equality supportive men reduce negative underrepresentation effects among women. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211033748

31.

O’Brien

L. T.

Casteigne

Waldon-Lee

Lowe

Simon

(2023). Attributions to discrimination in multiracial contexts: Isolating the effect of target group membership. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001475

32.

O’Neil

Brooks

Hopkins

(2018). Women’s roles in women’s career advancement: What do women expect of each other? Career Development International, 23, 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-10-2017-0196

33.

Petsko

C. D.

Bodenhausen

G. V.

(2020). Multifarious person perception: How social perceivers manage the complexity of intersectional targets. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(2), Article e12518. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12518

34.

Pew Research Center. (2021, January 13). The state of online harassment [Report]. https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2021/01/PI_2021.01.13_Online-Harassment_FINAL-1.pdf

35.

Radke

H. R. M.

Kutlaca

Siem

Wright

S. C.

Becker

J. C.

(2020). Beyond allyship: Motivations for advantaged group members to engage in action for disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(4), 291–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320918698

36.

R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

37.

Saguy

Fernández

Branscombe

N. R.

Shany

(2020). Justice agents: Discriminated group members are perceived to be highly committed to social justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(1), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219845922

38.

Salter

N. P.

Migliaccio

(2019). Allyship as a diversity and inclusion tool in the workplace. Diversity within Diversity Management, 22, 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1877-636120190000022008

39.

Seawell

A. H.

Cutrona

C. E.

Russell

D. W.

(2014). The effects of general social support and social support for racial discrimination on African American women’s well-being. Journal of Black Psychology, 40(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798412469227

40.

Selvanathan

H. P.

Lickel

Dasgupta

(2020). An integrative framework on the impact of allies: How identity-based needs influence intergroup solidarity and social movements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1344–1361. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2697

41.

Swim

J. K.

Hyers

L. L.

Cohen

L. L.

Ferguson

M. J.

(2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00200

42.

Tajfel

Turner

J. C.

(1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin

W. G.

Worchel

(Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.

43.

Taylor

S. E.

(2011). Social support: A review. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195342819.013.0009

44.

Taylor

S. E.

Klein

L. C.

Lewis

B. P.

Gruenewald

T. L.

Gurung

R. A. R.

Updegraff

J. A.

(2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107(3), 411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.411

45.

Townsend

S. S. M.

Major

Gangi

C. E.

Mendes

W. B.

(2011). From “in the air” to “under the skin”: Cortisol responses to social identity threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210392384

46.

Triana

del

Jayasinghe

Pieper

J. R.

(2015). Perceived workplace racial discrimination and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(4), 491–513. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1988

47.

Wang

Gruenewald

(2019). The psychological costs of social support imbalance: Variation across relationship context and age. Journal of Health Psychology, 24(12), 1615–1625. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105317692854

48.

Zou

L. X.

Cheryan

(2017). Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 696. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000080

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

5.48 MB