Despite political and societal efforts to reduce social inequality in education, students from nonacademic households (no parent holds a university degree) are less likely to enter higher education than their peers from academic households. Drawing on Cultural Mismatch Theory, we tested whether social disparities in enrollment intentions are related to students’ anticipated mismatch between their self-construal and expected higher education culture. Experimental data (N = 264) revealed a corresponding mismatch effect between students’ self-construal and expected culture on their anticipated fit in a higher education program. In addition, field data (N = 574) from upper secondary school students revealed that students from nonacademic households more strongly anticipate a mismatch and, in turn, have a lower intention to enter higher education. Corroborating our theorizing, these social disparities are contingent on the expected culture in higher education. These findings highlight the role of students’ self-construal and anticipated fit for higher education enrollment.
AcemogluD. (2022). Obedience in the labour market and social mobility: A socioeconomic approach. Economica, 89, 2–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12406
2.
AlwinD. F.HauserR. M. (1975). The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American Sociological Review, 4(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094445
3.
BaethgeM. (2008). Das berufliche Bildungswesen in Deutschland am Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts. In CortinaK.BaumertJ.LeschinskyA.MayerK. U.TrommerL. (Eds.), Das Bildungswesen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Strukturen und Entwicklungen im Überblick (pp. 541–597). Rowohlt.
4.
BaileyM.DynarskiS. (2011). Gains and gaps: Changing inequality in U.S. college entry and completion. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17633
5.
BianchiE. C.VohsK. D. (2016). Social class and social worlds: Income predicts the frequency and nature of social contact. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(5), 479–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616641472
6.
BullockJ. G.GreenD. P.HaS. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (Don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 550–558.
7.
DanielA.NeumannM. (2022). Schule und Studium. In HascherT.IdelT.-S.HelsperW. (Eds.), Handbuch Schulforschung (pp. 1–25). Springer.
8.
DanielA.WatermannR. (2018). The role of perceived benefits, costs, and probability of success in students’ plans for higher education. A quasi-experimental test of rational choice theory. European Sociological Review, 34(5), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy022
9.
EasterbrookM. J.KuppensT.MansteadA. S. R. (2016). The education effect: Higher educational qualifications are robustly associated with beneficial personal and socio-political outcomes. Social Indicators Research, 126(3), 1261–1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0946-1
10.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA. (2002). Motivation beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
11.
FiedlerK.HarrisC.SchottM. (2018). Unwarranted inferences from statistical mediation tests–An analysis of articles published in 2015. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 75, 95–102.
12.
FiedlerK.SchottM.MeiserT. (2011). What mediation analysis can (not) do. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1231–1236.
13.
FulmerC. A.GelfandM. J.KruglanskiA. W.Kim-PrietoC.DienerE.PierroA.HigginsE. T. (2010). On “feeling right” in cultural contexts: How person-culture match affects self-esteem and subjective well-being. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1563–1569.
14.
GrossmannI.VarnumM. E. (2011). Social class, culture, and cognition. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610377119
15.
HayesA. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22.
16.
HechtC. A.PriniskiS. J.TibbettsY.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2021). Affirming both independent and interdependent values improves achievement for all students and mitigates cultural mismatch for first-generation college students. Journal of Social Issues, 77(3), 851–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.1241
17.
HollandR. W.RoederU. R.RickB.vanB.BrandtA. C.HannoverB. (2004). Don’t stand so close to me: The effects of self-construal on interpersonal closeness. Psychological Science, 15(4), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00658.x
IhmeT. A.SonnenbergK.BarbarinoM. L.FisselerB.StürmerS. (2016). How university websites’ emphasis on age diversity influences prospective students’ perception of person-organization fit and student recruitment. Research in Higher Education, 57(8), 1010–1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9415-1
20.
JacksonM. (2013). Determined to succeed? Performance versus choice in educational attainment. Stanford University Press.
21.
LeysC.KleinO.DominicyY.LeyC. (2018). Detecting multivariate outliers: Use a robust variant of the Mahalanobis distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.011
22.
MansteadA. S. R. (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12251
23.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430.
24.
NeugebauerM.SchindlerS. (2012). Early transitions and tertiary enrolment: The cumulative impact of primary and secondary effects on entering university in Germany. Acta Sociologica, 55(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699311427747
25.
NieuwenhuisM.MansteadA. S. R.EasterbrookM. J. (2019). Accounting for unequal access to higher education: The role of social identity factors. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 22(3), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219829824
26.
PhillipsL. T.StephensN. M.TownsendS. S.GoudeauS. (2020). Access is not enough: Cultural mismatch persists to limit first-generation students’ opportunities for achievement throughout college. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(5), 1112–1131. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000234
27.
RohrerJ. M.HünermundP.ArslanR. C.ElsonM. (2022). That’s a lot to PROCESS! Pitfalls of popular path models. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 5(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221095827
28.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
StephensN. M.FrybergS. A.MarkusH. R.JohnsonC. S.CovarrubiasR. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027143
31.
StephensN. M.HamedaniM. Y. G.DestinM. (2014). Closing the social-class achievement gap: A difference-education intervention improves first-generation students’ academic performance and all students’ college transition. Psychological Science, 25(4), 943–953. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613518349
32.
StephensN. M.TownsendS. S. M.DittmannA. G. (2019). Social-class disparities in higher education and professional workplaces: The role of cultural mismatch. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(1), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418806506
33.
ValdésM. (2022). Unequal expectations? Testing decisional mechanisms for secondary effects of social origin. Social Science Research, 105, Article 102688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102688
34.
WeissF.SteiningerH. M. (2013). Educational family background and the realisation of educational career intentions: Participation of German upper secondary graduates in higher education over time. Higher Education, 66(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9598-0
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
