Communities across the United States are removing Confederate monuments from public spaces. Little work, however, has considered downstream consequences of these decisions. Across three experiments and four replications in Supplemental Material, we examine impacts of community decisions on individuals’ perceptions of communities’ efforts toward racial equity. We find that the removal of monuments leads White Americans—but not Black Americans—to believe that communities will sufficiently prioritize policies aimed at redressing racial inequity in the future. Taken together, these findings suggest that the symbolic removal of Confederate monuments may signal different structural equity investments to different constituencies, with Whites anticipating that communities will engage in sufficient racial equity policy efforts and Black Americans remaining skeptical.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (1981). The self-attention-induced feedback loop and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17(6), 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(81)90039-1
3.
CheryanS.PlautV. C.DaviesP. G.SteeleC. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239
4.
CooperC. A.HuffmonS. H.KnottsH. G.McKeeS. C. (2021). Heritage versus hate: Assessing opinions in the debate over confederate monuments and memorials. Social Science Quarterly, 102(3), 1098–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12969
5.
CoxK. L. (2003). Dixie’s daughters: The United Daughters of the confederacy and the preservation of confederate culture (1st ed.). University Press of Florida.
6.
EibachR. P.EhrlingerJ. (2006). “Keep your eyes on the prize”: Reference points and racial differences in assessing progress toward equality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205279585
7.
EibachR. P.Purdie-VaughnsV. (2011). How to keep on keeping on: Framing civil rights accomplishments to bolster support for egalitarian policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 274–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.10.005
8.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
9.
FishbachA.DharR. (2005). Goals as excuses or guides: The liberating effect of perceived goal progress on choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 370–377. https://doi.org/10.1086/497548
HendersonK.PowersS.ClaibournM.Brown-IannuzziJ. L.TrawalterS. (2021). Confederate monuments and the history of lynching in the American South: An empirical examination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(42), e2103519118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2103519118
12.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
13.
KaiserC. R.DruryB. J.SpaldingK. E.CheryanS.O’BrienL. T. (2009). The ironic consequences of Obama’s election: Decreased support for social justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.006
14.
KrausM. W.RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2017). Americans misperceive racial economic equality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(39), 10324–10331. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707719114
15.
LernerM. J. (1980). The belief in a just world. In LernerM. J. (Ed.), The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion (pp. 9–30). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5_2
16.
MonteithM. J.MarkA. Y. (2005). Changing one’s prejudiced ways: Awareness, affect, and self-regulation. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1), 113–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280500229882
17.
MotylM.PrimsJ. P.IyerR. (2020). How ambient cues facilitate political segregation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(5), 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219875141
18.
OnyeadorI. N.DaumeyerN. M.RuckerJ. M.DukerA.KrausM. W.RichesonJ. A. (2021). Disrupting beliefs in racial progress: Reminders of persistent racism alter perceptions of past, but not current, racial economic equality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(5), 753–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220942625
19.
PaulsI. L.ShumanE.van ZomerenM.SaguyT.HalperinE. (2022). Does crossing a moral line justify collective means? Explaining how a perceived moral violation triggers normative and nonnormative forms of collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2818
SaguyT.TauschN.DovidioJ. F.PrattoF. (2009). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02261.x
24.
SchmittM. T.DaviesK.HungM.WrightS. C. (2010). Identity moderates the effects of Christmas displays on mood, self-esteem, and inclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1017–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.026
TankardM. E.PaluckE. L. (2016). Norm perception as a vehicle for social change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 10(1), 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12022
27.
ValentinoN. A.BraderT. (2011). The sword’s other edge: Perceptions of discrimination and racial policy opinion after Obama. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr010
28.
van ZomerenM. (2013). Four core social-psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(6), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12031
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
