Members of some marginalized groups are erroneously considered relatively insensitive to pain, an assumption that seems to reflect beliefs that they have been toughened up by the hardship they have endured. Autistic people represent a marginalized group, and some clinical accounts erroneously suggest that they, too, are relatively insensitive to pain. In two pre-registered studies involving college students and Prolific workers in the United States (N = 287), we found that both autistic and non-autistic participants believed that an autistic target had experienced more hardship than a non-autistic target and (unexpectedly) would feel more pain than the non-autistic target or themselves. We speculate that our findings may reflect that autistic people are infantilized, viewed as vulnerable, and as lacking the agency to toughen up from life hardship.
AkhtarN.DinishakJ.FrymiareJ. L. (2022). Still infantilizing autism? An update and extension of Stevenson et al. (2011). Autism in Adulthood, 4(3), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2022.0014
Baeza-VelascoC.CohenD.HamonetC.VlamynckE.DiazL.CraveroC.CappeE.GuinchatV. (2018). Autism, joint hypermobility-related disorders and pain. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, Article 656. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00656
4.
BalduzziS.RuckerG.SchwarzerG. (2019). How to perform a meta-analysis with R: A practical tutorial. Evidence-based Mental Health, 22, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117
5.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
6.
BothaM.FrostD. M. (2020). Extending the minority stress model to understand mental health problems experienced by the autistic population. Society and Mental Health, 10(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869318804297
7.
BurschB.IngmanK.VittiL.HymanP.ZeltzerL. K. (2004). Chronic pain in individuals with previously undiagnosed autistic spectrum disorders. The Journal of Pain, 5(5), 290–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.04.004
8.
ChevallierC.KohlsG.TroianiV.BrodkinE. S.SchultzR. T. (2012). The social motivation theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.02.007
CrainiceanuC.RuppertD. (2004). Likelihood ratio tests in linear mixed models with one variance component. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 66, 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2004.00438.x
11.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(4), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631
DeskaJ. C.KunstmanJ.LloydE. P.AlmarazS. M.BernsteinM. J.GonzalesJ. P.HugenbergK. (2020). Race-based biases in judgments of social pain. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 88, 103964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103964
14.
DietzP. M.RoseC. E.McArthurD.MaennerM. (2020). National and state estimates of adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(12), 4258–4266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04494-4
15.
DusenberyM. (2018). Doing harm: The truth about how bad medicine and lazy science leave women dismissed, misdiagnosed, and sick. HarperOne.
16.
ErikssonJ. M.AndersonL. M.BejerotS. (2013). RAADS-14 Screen: Validity of a screening tool for autism spectrum disorder in an adult psychiatric population. Molecular Autism, 4(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-4-49
17.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
18.
FrithU. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. Blackwell Publishing.
19.
GardinerE.IarocciG. (2014). Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder in the university context: Peer acceptance predicts intention to volunteer. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(5), 1008–1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1950-4
20.
Gillespie-LynchK.DaouN.Sanchez-RuizM.-J.KappS. K.ObeidR.BrooksP. J.SomekiF.SiltonN.Abi-HabibR. (2019). Factors underlying cross-cultural differences in stigma toward autism among college students in Lebanon and the United States. Autism, 23(8), 1993–2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318823550
21.
GoffP. A.JacksonM. C.Di LeoneB. A.CulottaC. M.DiTomassoN. A. (2014). The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing Black children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(4), 526–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035663
HoffmanK. M.TrawalterS. (2016). Assumptions about life hardship and pain perception. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(4), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215625781
24.
HoffmanK. M.TrawalterS.AxtJ. R.OliverM. N. (2016). Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(16), 4296–4301. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516047113
25.
HoffmanT.Bar-ShalitaT.GranovskyY.GalE.Kalingel-LeviM.DoriY.BuxbaumC.YarovinskyN.Weissman-FogelI. (2022). Indifference or hypersensitivity? Solving the riddle of the pain profile in individuals with autism. Pain, 164(4), 791–803. https://doi.org/j.pain.0000000000002767
26.
HoffmannD. E.TarzianA. J. (2001). The girl who cried pain: A bias against women in the treatment of pain. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 29(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2001.tb00037.x
27.
JaswalV. K.AkhtarN. (2019). Being versus appearing socially uninterested: Challenging assumptions about social motivation in autism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42, Article e82. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18001826
28.
JohnsonB. N.FreiburgerE.DeskaJ. C.KunstmanJ. W. (2023). Social class and social pain: Target SES biases judgments of pain and support for white target individuals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231156025
29.
Kalingel-LeviM.SchreuerN.GranovskyY.Bar-ShalitaT.Weissman-FogelI.HoffmanT.GalE. (2022). “When I’m in pain, everything is overwhelming”: Implications of pain in adults with autism on their daily living and participation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 911756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911756
30.
KappS. K.Gillespie-LynchK.ShermanL. E.HutmanT. (2013). Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028353
31.
KimS. Y.CheonJ. E.Gillespie-LynchK.KimY.-H. (2022). Is autism stigma higher in South Korea than the United States? Examining cultural tightness, intergroup bias, and concerns about heredity as contributors to heightened autism stigma. Autism, 26(2), 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211029520
LiP. H.KoenigM. (2019). Two sources of bias affecting the evaluation of autistic communication. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 42, Article E98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X18002327
34.
LloydE. P.PaganiniG. A.Ten BrinkeL. (2020). Gender stereotypes explain disparities in pain care and inform equitable policies. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732220942894
MasonD.InghamB.UrbanowiczA.MichaelC.BirtlesH.Woodbury-SmithM.BrownT.JamesI.ScarlettC.NicolaidisC.ParrJ. R. (2019). A systematic review of what barriers and facilitators prevent and enable physical healthcare services access for autistic adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(8), 3387–3400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04049-2
37.
Mende-SiedleckiP.BackerR.Qu-LeeJ.Van BavelJ. J. (2019). Perceptual contributions to racial bias in pain recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(5), 863–889. https://doi.org/1010.1037/xge0000600
38.
MiliterniR.BravaccioC.FalcoC.Puglisi-AllegraS.PascucciT.FicoC. (2000). Pain reactivity in children with autistic disorder. The Journal of Headache and Pain, 1(1), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101940050011
39.
MooreD. J. (2015). Acute pain experience in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A review. Autism, 19(4), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361314527839
40.
NakagawaS.SchielzethH. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
41.
Nario-RedmondM. R. (2020). Ableism: The causes and consequences of disability prejudice. John Wiley.
42.
Posit Team. (2023). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R [Posit Software]. PBC. http://www.posit.co/
ShawS. C.CarravallahL.JohnsonM.O’SullivanJ.ChownN.NeilsonS.DohertyM. (2023). Barriers to healthcare and a “triple empathy problem” may lead to adverse outcomes for autistic adults: A qualitative study. Autism, 0(0), 1–12. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613231205629
SummersK. M.DeskaJ. C.AlmarazS. M.HugenbergK.LloydE. P. (2021). Poverty and pain: Low-SES people are believed to be insensitive to pain. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 95, 104116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104116
49.
TaylorD. M.WrightS. C.MoghaddamF. M.LalondeR. N. (1990). The personal/group discrimination discrepancy: Perceiving my group, but not myself, to be a target for discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167290162006
WingL. (1996). The autistic spectrum: A guide for parents and professionals. Constable.
52.
WiseE. A.PriceD. D.MyersC. D.HeftM. W.RobinsonM. E. (2002). Gender role expectations of pain: Relationship to experimental pain perception. Pain, 96(3), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S304-3959(01)00473-0
53.
ZhangW.LiX.YaoJ.YeQ.PengW. (2021). Abnormalities in pain sensitivity among individuals with autism spectrum disorder: Evidence from meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(6), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00613
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
