In the evaluative conditioning effect, pairing neutral stimuli (conditioned stimuli) with valenced stimuli (unconditioned stimuli) changes the evaluation of the former. We examined this effect with a reverse correlation task that assesses how participants visually remember the conditioned stimuli. Importantly, this measure (1) does not require participants to evaluate stimuli and (2) allows them to capture multiple trait attributions. In a pre-registered experiment with US Prolific Academic users, we observed an evaluative conditioning effect in both an evaluation task and a reverse correlation task. Moreover, the effect in the reverse correlation task went beyond mere changes in valence. Our work opens new empirical and theoretical challenges for future conditioning research.
AbeleA. E.EllemersN.FiskeS. T.KochA.YzerbytV. (2021). Navigating the social world: Toward an integrated framework for evaluating self, individuals, and groups. Psychological Review, 128(2), 290–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000262
2.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
3.
AlvesH.ImhoffR. (2023). Evaluative context and conditioning effects among same and different objects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(4), 735–753. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000323
4.
BarbedorJ.ScheiderJ.YzerbytV.AbeleA. (under review). A novel approach to the evaluation of groups: Type of group and facet of evaluation matter.
ConeJ.Brown-IannuzziJ. L.LeiR.DotschR. (2021). Type I error is inflated in the two-phase reverse correlation procedure. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 760–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620938616
7.
De HouwerJ. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1138741600006491
8.
De HouwerJ. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3758/lb.37.1.1
De HouwerJ.HermansD.EelenP. J. (1998). Affective and identity priming with episodically associated stimuli. Cognition & Emotion, 12(2), 145–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999398379691
11.
De HouwerJ.RichetinJ.HughesS.PeruginiM. (2019). On the assumptions that we make about the world around us: A conceptual framework for feature transformation effects. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.229
12.
De HouwerJ.Van DesselP.MoranT. (2020). Attitudes beyond associations: On the role of propositional representations in stimulus evaluation. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 61, pp. 127–183). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2019.09.004
13.
De HouwerJ.Van DesselP.MoranT. (2021). Attitudes as propositional representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(10), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.003
14.
de LeeuwJ. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y
DotschR.TodorovA. (2012). Reverse correlating social face perception. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 562–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611430272
17.
DotschR.WigboldusD. H. J.van KnippenbergA. (2013). Behavioral information biases the expected facial appearance of members of novel groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1928
18.
EaglyA. H.AshmoreR. D.MakhijaniM. G.LongoL. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but...: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
19.
FördererS.UnkelbachC. (2015). Attribute conditioning: Changing attribute-assessments through mere pairings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(1), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.939667
20.
FrederickS. W.MochonD. (2012). A scale distortion theory of anchoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024006
21.
GastA.RothermundK. (2011). What you see is what will change: Evaluative conditioning effects depend on a focus on valence. Cognition and Emotion, 25(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931003696380
22.
JuddC. M.WestfallJ.KennyD. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028347
23.
KazakA. E. (2018). Editorial: Journal article reporting standards. American Psychologist, 73(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000263
24.
KimJ.AllenC. T.KardesF. R. (1996). An investigation of the mediational mechanisms underlying attitudinal conditioning. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(3), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379603300306
25.
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t66667-000
26.
ManginiM.BiedermanI. (2004). Making the ineffable explicit: Estimating the information employed for face classifications. Cognitive Science, 28(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2802_4
OosterhofN. N.TodorovA. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(32), 11087–11092. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805664105
30.
PeetersG. (1983). Relational and informational pattern in social cognition. In DoiseW.MoscoviciS. (Eds.), Current issues in European social psychology (pp. 201–237). Cambridge University Press.
31.
RescorlaR. A.WagnerA. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory, 2, 64–99.
32.
RougierM.De HouwerJ.RichetinJ.HughesS.PeruginiM. (2023). From halo to conditioning and back again: Exploring the links between impression formation and learning. Collabra: Psychology, 9(1), 84560. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.84560
33.
RougierM.SchmitzM.YzerbytV. (2021). When my actions shape your looks: Experience-based properties of approach/avoidance bias the visual representation of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(5), 1146–1174. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000268
34.
RStudio Team. (2021). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. RStudio. http://www.rstudio.com/
StahlC.UnkelbachC. (2009). Evaluative learning with single versus multiple unconditioned stimuli: The role of contingency awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35(2), 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013255
38.
TottenhamN.TanakaJ. W.LeonA. C.McCarryT.NurseM.HareT. A.. . .NelsonC. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168(3), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006
WenturaD.RothermundK.BakP. (2000). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach- and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1024–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1024
41.
WestfallJ.KennyD. A.JuddC. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 2020–2045. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000014
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
