Stressful life circumstances can destabilize the couples’ relationships by increasing tensions and hindering positive exchanges between partners. Yet, stress may be linked not only to what individuals do in their relationship but also to what they see, as stress can shift individuals’ attentional focus toward negative stimuli. To test this possibility, the current study examined whether individuals confronting more stressful life events and/or daily hassles are more likely to attentively monitor their partner’s negative relationship behaviors. A daily diary study of 79 newlywed couples revealed that individuals who recently experienced more stressful life events were especially attuned to day-to-day fluctuations in their partner’s negative behaviors, but not their partner’s positive behaviors. Moreover, these individuals generally perceived their partner as enacting more negativity across the diary period compared with individuals who faced fewer stressful events. These findings held when adjusting for several individual difference factors known to predict perceptual biases within relationships.
Bar-HaimY.LamyD.PergaminL.Bakermans-KraneburgM. J.van IJzendoornM. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1
2.
BarnettR. C.MarshallN. L.RaudenbushS. W.BrennanR. T. (1993). Gender and the relationship between job experiences and psychological distress: A study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 794–806. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.64.5.794
3.
BartonA. W.FutrisT. G.NielsenR. B. (2015). Linking financial distress to marital quality: The intermediary roles of demand/withdraw and spousal gratitude expressions. Personal Relationships, 22(3), 536–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12094
4.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
BradleyB. P.MoggK.LeeS. C. (1997). Attentional biases for negative information in induced and naturally occurring dysphoria. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(10), 911–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(97)00053-3
7.
BuckA. A.NeffL. A. (2012). Stress spillover in early marriage: The role of self-regulatory depletion. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(5), 698–708. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029260
8.
EysenckH. J.EysenckS. B. G. (1978). Manual for the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Hodder & Stoughton.
9.
FinkenauerC.Wijngaards-de MeijL.ReisH. T.RusbultC. E. (2010). The importance of seeing what is not there: A quasi-signal detection analysis of positive and negative behavior in newlywed couples. Personal Relationships, 17(4), 615–633. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01300.x
10.
GableS.PooreJ. (2008). Which thoughts count? Algorithms for evaluating satisfaction in relationships. Psychological Science, 19(10), 1030–1036. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02195.x
11.
GableS.ReisH.DowneyG. (2003). He said, she said: A quasi-signal detection analysis of daily interactions between close relationship partners. Psychological Science, 14(2), 100–105. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01426
12.
KannerA. D.CoyneJ. C.SchaeferC.LazarusR. S. (1981). Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00844845
13.
KreuzerM.GollwitzerM. (2022). Neuroticism and satisfaction in romantic relationships: A systematic investigation of intra- and interpersonal processes with a longitudinal approach. European Journal of Personality, 36(2), 149–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211001258
14.
LamarcheV. M.MurrayS. L. (2014). Selectively myopic? Self-esteem and attentional bias in response to potential relationship threats. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 5(7), 786–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614532377
15.
LaneS. P.HennesE. P. (2018). Power struggles: Estimating sample size for multilevel relationships research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517710342
16.
LaurenceauJ.-P.BolgerN. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.1.86
17.
LiuJ.LiH. (2020). How individuals perceive time in an anxious state. The mediating effect of attentional bias. Emotion, 20(5), 761–772. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000586.supp
18.
MillerP. J.NiehuisS.HustonT. L. (2006). Positive illusions in marital relationships: A 13-year longitudinal study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(12), 1579–1594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206292691
19.
MoggK.MathewsA.BirdC.Macgregor-MorrisR. (1990). Effects of stress and anxiety on the processing of threat stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1230–1237. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1230
20.
MurrayS. L.GriffinD. W.DerrickJ. L.HarrisB.AloniM.LederS. (2011). Tempting fate or inviting happiness?: Unrealistic idealization prevents the decline of marital satisfaction. Psychological Science, 22(5), 619–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611403155
21.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G. (1999). The (mental) ties that bind: Cognitive structures that predict relationship resilience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1228–1244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1228
22.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641–666. 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641
23.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2004). How does context affect intimate relationships? Linking external stress and cognitive processes within marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203255984
24.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2005). To know you is to love you: The implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 480–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.480
25.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2009). Stress and reactivity to daily relationship experiences: How stress hinders adaptive processes in marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015663
26.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2017). Acknowledging the elephant in the room: How stressful environmental contexts shape relationship dynamics. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.013
27.
NeffL. A.NguyenT. T. T.WilliamsonH. C. (2021). Too stressed to help? The effects of stress on noticing partner needs and enacting support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(11), 1565–1579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220974490
28.
RandallA. K.BodenmannG. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.004
RobertsN. A.LevensonR. W. (2001). The remains of the workday: Impact of job stress and exhaustion on marital interaction in police couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(4), 1052–1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01052.x
31.
RosenbergS. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
32.
RuedH.HilmertC.StrahmA.ThomasL. (2019). The influence of stress on attentional bias to threat: An angry face and a noisy crowd. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 943–950. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1538-2
33.
SarasonI. G.JohnsonJ. H.SiegelJ. M. (1978). Assessing the impact of life changes: Development of the Life Experiences Survey. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(5), 932–946. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.46.5.932
34.
SeridoJ.AlmeidaD. M.WethingtonE. (2004). Chronic stressors and daily hassles: Unique and interactive relationships with psychological distress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650404500102
35.
SimpsonJ. A.IckesW.OriñaM. (2001). Empathic accuracy and preemptive relationship maintenance. In HarveyJ.WenzelA. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 27–46). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
36.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (2012). Adult attachment orientations, stress, and romantic relationships. In DevineP.PlantA. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 45, pp. 279–328). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394286-9.00006-8
37.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.PhillipsD. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5), 899–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.899
WestT. V.KennyD. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118(2), 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022936
40.
WeymarM.SchwabeL.LöwA.HammA. O. (2012). Stress sensitizes the brain: Increased processing of unpleasant pictures after exposure to acute stress. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(7), 1511–1518. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00174
41.
WilliamsonH. C.KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (2013). Financial strain and stressful events predict newlyweds’ negative communication independent of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031104
42.
ZhangL.QinS.YaoZ.ZhangK.WuJ. (2016). Long-term academic stress enhances early processing of facial expressions. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 109, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.08.010
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
