Determined Yet Dehumanized: People Higher in Self-Control Are Seen as More Robotic

Abstract

Desire is part of human nature, and being vulnerable to desire is part of what differentiates humans from machines. However, individuals with high self-control—who demonstrate impressive resistance to their desires—may appear to lack such human vulnerability. We propose that people perceived as high in self-control tend to be dehumanized as more robotic, relating to potentially negative social consequences. Across six studies (N = 2,007), people perceived those higher in self-control as more robotic. In addition, we found some evidence that this robotic-dehumanization was related to less interest in spending time with the high self-control person. This outcome was reliably linked to lower warmth perceptions that correlated with greater robotic-dehumanization. Together, our results offer new insights into the social dynamics of exhibiting high self-control.

Keywords

self-control dehumanization social perception interpersonal consequences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bastian

Haslam

(2011). Experiencing dehumanization: Cognitive and emotional effects of everyday dehumanization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33(4), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2011.614132

Bastian

Laham

S. M.

Wilson

Haslam

Koval

(2011). Blaming, praising, and protecting our humanity: The implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X521383

Baumeister

R. F.

Heatherton

T. F.

(1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0701_1

Baumeister

R. F.

Vohs

K. D.

Tice

D. M.

(2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x

Becker

J. C.

Asbrock

(2012). What triggers helping versus harming of ambivalent groups? Effects of the relative salience of warmth versus competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.015

Cain

Roger

T. N.

(2020). Tesla billionaire Elon Musk’s demanding daily routine. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-daily-schedule-2017-6

Clifford

(2017). Elon Musk’s morning routine and top productivity tip. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/20/elon-musks-morning-routine-and-top-productivity-tip.html

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

A. J. C.

Glick

(2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005

10.

Fujita

(2011). On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(4), 352–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411165

11.

Haslam

(2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4

12.

Haslam

Kashima

Loughnan

Shi

Suitner

(2008). Subhuman, inhuman, and superhuman: Contrasting humans with nonhumans in three cultures. Social Cognition, 26(2), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.248

13.

Haslam

Loughnan

Reynolds

Wilson

(2007). Dehumanization: A new perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 409–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00030.x

14.

Heck

R. H.

Thomas

S. L.

Tabata

L. N.

(2013). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS. Routledge.

15.

Hofmann

Baumeister

R. F.

Förster

Vohs

K. D.

(2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1318–1335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026545

16.

Hofmann

Friese

Strack

(2009). Impulse and self-control from a Dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x

17.

Hofmann

Kotabe

(2012). A general model of preventive and interventive self-control. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(10), 707–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1751-9004.2012.00461.X

18.

Koval

C. Z.

vanDellen

M. R.

Fitzsimons

G. M.

Ranby

K. W.

(2015). The burden of responsibility: Interpersonal costs of high self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(5), 750–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000015

19.

Kunda

(1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480

20.

Leidner

Castano

Ginges

(2013). Dehumanization, retributive and restorative justice, and aggressive versus diplomatic intergroup conflict resolution strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212472208

21.

Leidner

Castano

(2014). Toward a comprehensive taxonomy of dehumanization: Integrating two senses of humanness, mind perception theory, and stereotype content model. TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM21.3.4

22.

Loughnan

Haslam

(2007). Animals and androids: Implicit associations between social categories and nonhumans. Psychological Science, 18(2), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01858.x

23.

Martinez

A. G.

Piff

P. K.

Mendoza-Denton

Hinshaw

S. P.

(2011). The power of a label: Mental illness diagnoses, ascribed humanity, and social rejection. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2011.30.1.1

24.

Maszk

Eisenburg

Guthrie

I. K.

(1999). Relations of children’s social status to their emotionality and regulation: A Short-Term Longitudinal Study on JSTOR. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23092582?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

25.

Metcalfe

Mischel

(1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.3

26.

Milyavskaya

Inzlicht

(2017). What’s so great about self-control? Examining the importance of effortful self-control and temptation in predicting real-life depletion and goal attainment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(6), 603––611. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616679237

27.

Montoya

A. K.

Hayes

A. F.

Montoya

(2017). Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework. Association, 22(1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000086

28.

Mori

MacDorman

K. F.

Kageki

(2012). The uncanny valley. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 19(2), 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811

29.

Obermann

M. L.

(2011). Moral disengagement in self-reported and peer-nominated school bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 37(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20378

30.

O’Shea

(2002). Desiring desire: How desire makes us human, all too human. Sociology, 36(4), 925–940. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803850203600407

31.

Petch

(2016). What real discipline looks like. Entrepreneur Middle East. https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/281542

32.

Righetti

Finkenauer

(2011). If you are able to control yourself, I will trust you: The role of perceived self-control in interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 874–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021827

33.

Röseler

Ebert

Schütz

Baumeister

R. F.

(2021). The upsides and downsides of high self-control: Evidence for effects of similarity and situation dependency. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.2639

34.

Rudman

L. A.

Mescher

(2012). Of animals and objects: Men’s implicit dehumanization of women and likelihood of sexual aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(6), 734–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212436401

35.

Smith

E. N.

Young

M. D.

Crum

A. J.

(2020). Stress, mindsets, and success in Navy SEALs special warfare training. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2962. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2019.02962/BIBTEX

36.

Tangney

J. P.

Baumeister

R. F.

Boone

A. L.

(2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x

37.

Twenge

J. M.

Catanese

K. R.

Baumeister

R. F.

(2003). Social exclusion and the deconstructed state: Time perception, meaninglessness, lethargy, lack of emotion, and self-awareness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.409

38.

Vaes

Paladino

M. P.

Castelli

Leyens

J. P.

Giovanazzi

(2003). On the behavioral consequences of infrahumanization: The implicit role of uniquely human emotions in intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1016–1034. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1016

39.

Vohs

K. D.

Finkenauer

Baumeister

R. F.

(2011). The sum of friends’ and lovers’ self-control scores predicts relationship quality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610385710

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.69 MB