Internet use is increasingly ubiquitous among older adults and may buffer against declines in cognitive engagement. We examined longitudinal associations between three types of internet use (media, social, and instrumental) and two indicators of cognitive engagement (Openness to Experience and Need for Cognition) in a nationally representative sample of Dutch older adults (N = 2,922 adults aged 65–99) assessed annually from 2008 to 2017. Preregistered analyses indicated that older adults who were more cognitively engaged used the internet more frequently, especially for instrumental purposes like search and email. Those who increased in their use of online media declined less in Need for Cognition than their peers. These associations remained constant over time even as internet use became more common. We benchmarked our findings against null associations between cognitive engagement and TV/radio use and tested associations in younger comparison samples. Findings bolster our understanding of the role that technology use plays in personality development and aging.
AckermanP. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22(2), 227–257.
2.
AtchleyR. C. (1999). Continuity and adaptation in aging: Creating positive experiences. Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
BaerL. H.TabriN.BlairM.ByeD.LiK. Z. H.PushkarD. (2013). Longitudinal associations of need for cognition, cognitive activity, and depressive symptomatology with cognitive function in recent retirees. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 68(5), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs112
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.Feng KaoC. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
ChopikW. J.RikardR. V.CottenS. R. (2017). Individual difference predictors of ICT use in older adulthood: A study of 17 candidate characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.014
8.
CorreaT.HinsleyA. W.de ZúñigaH. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003
9.
DeYoungC. G.PetersonJ. B.HigginsD. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of personality, 73(4), 825–858.
10.
EllisD. A.DavidsonB. I.ShawH.GeyerK. (2019). Do smartphone usage scales predict behavior?International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 130, 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.004
11.
FunderD. C.OzerD. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
12.
GoldbergL. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In MervieldeI.DearyI. F.De FruytF.OstendorfF. (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg University.
13.
GrahamE. K.RutsohnJ. P.TurianoN. A.BendayanR.BatterhamP. J.GerstorfD.KatzM. J.ReynoldsC. A.SharpE. S.YonedaT. B.BastaracheE. D.EllemanL. G.ZelinskiE. M.JohanssonB.KuhD.BarnesL. L.BennettD. A.DeegD. J. H.LiptonR. B.…MroczekD. K. (2017). Personality predicts mortality risk: An integrative data analysis of 15 international longitudinal studies. Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.07.005
14.
HartantoA.YongJ. C.TohW. X.LeeS. T. H.TngG. Y. Q.TovW. (2020). Cognitive, social, emotional, and subjective health benefits of computer use in adults: A 9-year longitudinal study from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS). Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106179
15.
HillP. L.AschwandenD.PayneB. R.AllemandM. (2020). Daily cognitive complaints and engagement in older adulthood: Personality traits are more predictive than cognitive performance. Psychology and Aging, 35(3), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000452
16.
HopeA.SchwabaT.PiperA. M. (2014). Understanding digital and material social communications for older adults. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI ‘14 (pp. 3903–3912). https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557133
IhmJ.HsiehY. P. (2015). The implications of information and communication technology use for the social well-being of older adults. Information, Communication & Society, 18(10), 1123–1138. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1019912
19.
LaiK.GreenS. B. (2016). The problem with having two watches: Assessment of fit when RMSEA and CFI disagree. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2–3), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306
20.
LilgendahlJ. P.HelsonR.JohnO. P. (2013). Does ego development increase during midlife? The effects of openness and accommodative processing of difficult events: Ego development in midlife. Journal of Personality, 81(4), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12009
21.
McCraeR. R.SutinA. R. (2009). Openness to experience. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 257–273). The Guilford Press.
22.
MorrisA.GoodmanJ.BradingH. (2007). Internet use and non-use: Views of older users. Universal Access in the Information Society, 6(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0057-5
23.
NimrodG. (2019). Aging well in the digital age: Technology in processes of selective optimization with compensation. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, gbz111. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbz111
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
26.
RevelleW. R. (2017). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research.
27.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
30.
ScherpenzeelA. (2011). Data collection in a probability-based internet panel: How the LISS panel was built and how it can be used. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 109(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106310387713
31.
SchwabaT. (2019). The structure, measurement, and development of openness to experience across adulthood. In McAdamsD. P.ShinerR. L.TackettJ. L. (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 185–201). Guilford Press.
32.
SchwabaT.BleidornW. (2020). Log on and prosper? Little evidence for co-development between psychological adjustment and technology use in older adulthood. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, gbaa073. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa073
33.
SchwabaT.LuhmannM.DenissenJ. J. A.ChungJ. M.BleidornW. (2018). Openness to experience and culture-openness transactions across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000150
34.
SimonsD. J.BootW. R.CharnessN.GathercoleS. E.ChabrisC. F.HambrickD. Z.Stine-MorrowE. A. (2016). Do “brain-training” programs work?. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(3), 103–186.
35.
Stine-MorrowE. A. L.ParisiJ. M.MorrowD. G.ParkD. C. (2008). The effects of an engaged lifestyle on cognitive vitality: A field experiment. Psychology and Aging, 23(4), 778–786. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014341
36.
Stine-MorrowE. A. L.PayneB. R.RobertsB. W.KramerA. F.MorrowD. G.PayneL.HillP. L.JacksonJ. J.GaoX.NohS. R.JankeM. C.ParisiJ. M. (2014). Training versus engagement as paths to cognitive enrichment with aging. Psychology and Aging, 29(4), 891–906. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038244
37.
TrappS.ZieglerM. (2019). How openness enriches the environment: Read more. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1123), 1–12.
38.
Von StummS.HellB.Chamorro-PremuzicT. (2011). The hungry mind: Intellectual curiosity is the third pillar of academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 574–588.
39.
VromanK. G.ArthanatS.LysackC. (2015). “Who over 65 is online?” Older adults’ dispositions toward information communication technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.018
40.
WrzusC.RobertsB. W. (2017). Processes of personality development in adulthood: The TESSERA framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(3), 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316652279
41.
ZieglerM.CengiaA.MusselP.GerstorfD. (2015). Openness as a buffer against cognitive decline: The Openness-Fluid-Crystallized-Intelligence (OFCI) model applied to late adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 30, 573. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039493
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
