Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021
Examining Associations Between Major Negative Life Events,Changes in Weekly Reports of Post-Traumatic Growth and Global Reports of Eudaimonic Well-Being
Research on post-traumatic growth (PTG) has been compromised by methodological limitations. Recent process-oriented accounts of personality suggest, however, that positive changes may occur through short-term (i.e., state-level) changes in PTG. In the current year-long study, 1,247 participants provided weekly reports of significant negative events as well as state manifestations of PTG (up to 44 assessments per individual; 34,205 total). Trait assessments of eudaimonic well-being (EWB) were administered at intake and Weeks 45 and 52. Experiencing negative life events predicted increases in state PTG, which in turn predicted increases in EWB. However, stability was observed when modeling prospective changes in overall state PTG before and after the initial negative life event or across all negative life events occurring during the study time frame. These findings highlight the importance of studying PTG-related processes using appropriate research designs, analytic strategies, and time frames.
BlackieL. E. R.JayawickremeE. (2015). The example of adverse life experiences as unique situations. European Journal of Personality, 29, 385–386.
2.
BlackieL. E. R.JayawickremeE.HelzerE. G.ForgeardM. J.RoepkeA. M. (2015). Investigating the veracity of self-perceived posttraumatic growth: A profile analysis approach to corroboration. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 788–796.
3.
BlackieL. E. R.JayawickremeE.TsukayamaE.ForgeardM. J.RoepkeA. M.FleesonW. (2017). Posttraumatic growth as positive personality change: Developing a measure to assess within-person variability. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 22–32.
4.
BlackieL. E. R.RoepkeA. M.ForgeardM. J. C.JayawickremeE.FleesonW. (2014). Act well to be well: The promise of changing personality states to promote well-being. In ParksA. C. (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychological interventions (pp. 462–474). Wiley-Blackwell.
5.
BoalsA. (2010). Events that have become central to identity: Gender differences in the centrality of events scale for positive and negative events. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 24(1), 107–121.
6.
ChopikW. J. (2021). Modeling growth and resilience among military personnel: How using different models yield different answers. In InfurnaF. J.JayawickremeE. (Eds.), Redesigning research on posttraumatic growth: Challenges, pitfalls, and new directions (pp. 167–185). Oxford University Press.
7.
CostaP. T.JrZondermanA. B.McCraeR. R.HuntleyJ. C.LockeB. Z.BarbanoH. E. (1987). Longitudinal analyses of psychological well-being in a national sample: Stability of mean levels. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 50–55.
8.
DanhauerS. C.RussellG. B.TedeschiR. G.JesseM. T.VishnevskyT.DaleyK.CarrollS.TriplettK. N.CalhounL. G.CannA.PowellB. L. (2013). A longitudinal investigation of posttraumatic growth in adult patients undergoing treatment for acute leukemia. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 20(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-012-9304-5
9.
DanhauerS. C.RussellG.CaseL. D.SohlS. J.TedeschiR. G.AddingtonE. L.TriplettK.Van ZeeK. J.NaftalisE. Z.LevineB.AvisN. E. (2015). Trajectories of posttraumatic growth and associated characteristics in women with breast cancer. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 49(5), 650–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-015-9696-1
10.
FleesonW. (2014). Four ways of (not) being real, and whether they are essential for post-traumatic growth. European Journal of Personality, 28, 336–337. http://doi.org/10.1002/per.1970
FrazierP.TennenH.MeredithL. (2016). Three generations of research on perceived control. In ReichJ. W.InfurnaF. J. (Eds.), Perceived control: Theory, research, and practice in the first 50 years (pp.171–199). Oxford University Press.
13.
HeppnerW. L.KernisM. H.NezlekJ. B.FosterJ.LakeyC. E.GoldmanB. M. (2008). Within-person relationships among daily self-esteem, need satisfaction, and authenticity. Psychological Science, 19, 1140–1145.
14.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
15.
InfurnaF. J.JayawickremeE. (2019). Fixing the growth illusion: New directions for research in resilience and posttraumatic growth. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 152–158.
16.
InfurnaF. J.JayawickremeE. (2021). Redesigning research on post-traumatic growth: Challenges, pitfalls and new directions. Oxford University Press.
17.
JayawickremeE.BlackieL. E. R. (2014). Posttraumatic growth as positive personality change: Evidence, controversies and future directions. European Journal of Personality, 28, 312–331. http://doi.org/10.1002/per.1963
18.
JayawickremeE.InfurnaF. J. (2021). Toward a more credible understanding of post-traumatic growth. Journal of Personality, 89(1), 5–8.
19.
JayawickremeE.InfurnaF. J.AlajakK.BlackieL. E. R.ChopikW. J.ChungJ.DorfmanA.FleesonW.ForgeardM. J. C.FrazierP.FurrR. MGrossmannI.HellerA.LaceulleOLucasR. E.LuhmannM.LuongG.MeijerL.McLeanK. C…ZonneveldR. (2021). Posttraumatic growth as positive personality change: Challenges, opportunities and recommendations. Journal of Personality, 89, 145–165.
20.
JayawickremeE.MendonçaS. E. (2021). Using methods from personality psychology to study posttraumatic growth. In InfurnaF. J.JayawickremeE. (Eds.), Redesigning research on posttraumatic growth: Challenges, pitfalls, and new directions (pp. 73–88). Oxford University Press.
21.
JayawickremeE.RiversJ.RauthmannJ. M. (2018). Do we know how adversity impacts human development?Research in Human Development, 15, 294–316.
22.
JayawickremeE.TsukayamaE.BlackieL. E. R.WeissB. (2020). Examining within-person relationships between state assessments of affect and eudaimonic well-being using multi-level structural equation modeling. Journal of Positive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1818811
23.
JayawickremeE.ZachryC. EFleesonW. (2019). Whole trait theory: An integrative approach to examining personality structure and process. Personality and Individual Differences, 136, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.045
24.
JosephS.HefferonK. (2013). Posttraumatic growth: Eudaimonic happiness in the aftermath of adversity. In DavidS. A.BoniwellI.Conley AyersA. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 926–940). New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
JosephS.MaltbyJ.WoodA. M.StocktonH.HuntN.RegelS. (2012). The psychological well-being—posttraumatic changes questionnaire (PWB-PTCQ): Reliability and validity. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 4, 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024740
26.
KashdanT. B.StegerM. F. (2007). Curiosity and pathways to well-being and meaning in life: Traits, states, and everyday behaviors. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 159–173.
27.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford.
28.
LinleyP. A.JosephS. (2004). Positive change following trauma: A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603401
29.
LüdtkeO.RobertsB. W.TrautweinU.NagyG. (2011). A random walk down university avenue: Life paths, life events, and personality trait change at the transition to university life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 620–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023743
30.
LuhmannM.FassbenderI.AlcockM.HaehnerP. (2020). A dimensional taxonomy of perceived characteristics of major life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000291
31.
ManciniA. D. (2019). When acute adversity improves psychological health: A social–contextual framework. Psychological Review, 126(4), 486–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000144
32.
MangelsdorfJ.EidM.LuhmannM. (2019). Does growth require suffering? A systematic review and meta-analysis on genuine posttraumatic and postecstatic growth. Psychological Bulletin, 145, 302–338.
33.
MarzilianoA.TumanM.MoyerA. (2020). The relationship between post-traumatic stress and post-traumatic growth in cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psycho-Oncology, 29, 604–616.
34.
McCabeK. O.FleesonW. (2012). What is extraversion for? Integrating trait and motivational perspectives and identifying the purpose of extraversion. Psychological Science, 23, 1498–1505.
35.
McFarlandC.AlvaroC. (2000). The impact of motivation on temporal comparisons: Coping with traumatic events by perceiving personal growth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.327
36.
McLeanK. C.DelkerB. C.DunlopW. L.SaltonR.SyedM. (2020). Redemptive stories and those who tell them are preferred in the U.S. Collabra.
37.
RyffC. D.SingerB. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1–28.
38.
SeeryM. D.HolmanE. A.SilverR. C. (2010). Whatever does not kill us: Cumulative lifetime adversity, vulnerability, and resilience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 1025–1041.
39.
SheldonK. M.ElliotA. J.KimY.KasserT. (2001). What is satisfying about satisfying events?Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 325–339.
40.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University Press.
41.
StegerM. F.KashdanT. B.OishiS. (2008). Being good by doing good: Daily eudaimonic activity and well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 22–42.
42.
SuR.TayL.DienerE. (2014). The development and validation of the comprehensive inventory of thriving (CIT) and the brief inventory of thriving (BIT). Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 6, 251–279.
43.
TedeschiR. G.CalhounL. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01
44.
TedeschiR. G.ParkC. L.CalhounL. G. (Eds.). (1998). Posttraumatic growth: Positive changes in the aftermath of crisis. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
45.
TennenH.AffleckG. (2009). Assessing positive life change: In search of meticulous methods. In ParkC. L.LechnerS. C.AntoniM. H.StantonA. L. (Eds.), Medical illness and positive life change: Can crisis lead to personal transformation? (pp. 31–49). American Psychological Association.
46.
WrzusC.LuongG.WagnerG. G.RiedigerM. (2021). Longitudinal coupling of momentary stress reactivity and trait neuroticism: Specificity of states, traits, and age period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000308
47.
WrzusC.RobertsB. W. (2017). Processes of personality development in adulthood: The TESSERA framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21, 253–277.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
