Non-ability-based confidence is confidence in one’s ability that is not calibrated to actual ability. Here, we examine what psychological factors are associated with possessing more or less confidence relative to one’s ability and to what extent genetic and environmental processes contribute to these links. Using data from the Texas Twin Project (N = 1,588 participants, aged 7–15 years), we apply a latent variable residual approach to calculate non-ability-based confidence as self-rated confidence net of ability on standardized cognitive tests. Non-ability-based confidence was modestly heritable (9%–28%) and strongly positively correlated with the need for cognition, mastery goal orientation, grit, openness, and emotional stability. These correlations were partly mediated by genetic factors (57% of the association on average). This widespread pattern of associations between non-ability-based confidence and several other measures of thinking, feeling, and acting suggest that non-ability-based confidence can be conceptualized as a personality attribute.
AbbesM. B. (2012). Does overconfidence bias explain volatility during the global financial crisis?Transition Studies Review, 19(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11300-012-0234-6
2.
AlickeM. D.KlotzM. L.BreitenbecherD. L.YurakT. J.VredenburgD. S. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 804–825. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.804
3.
AmesC.ArcherJ. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267.
BashirT.AzamN.ButtA. A.JavedA.TanvirA. (2013). Are behavioral biases influenced by demographic characteristics & personality traits? Evidence from Pakistan. European Scientific Journal, 9(29), 277–293.
6.
BiaisB.HiltonD.MazurierK.PougetS. (2005). Judgemental overconfidence, self-monitoring, and trading performance in an experimental financial market. The Review of Economic Studies, 72(2), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2005.00333.x
7.
BrileyD. A.DomiteauxM.Tucker-DrobE. M. (2014). Achievement-relevant personality: Relations with the Big Five and validation of an efficient instrument. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.010
8.
BrileyD. A.LivengoodJ.DerringerJ.Tucker-DrobE. M.FraleyR. C.RobertsB. W. (2019). Interpreting behavior genetic models: Seven developmental processes to understand. Behavior Genetics, 49(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-018-9939-6
CamererC.LovalloD. (1999). Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. The American Economic Review, 89(1), 306–318. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.1.306
12.
CesariniD.LichtensteinP.JohannessonM.WallaceB. (2009). Heritability of overconfidence. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2–3), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.617
13.
CoutinhoS. A.NeumanG. (2008). A model of metacognition, achievement goal orientation, learning style and self-efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 11(2), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-008-9042-7
14.
DahlM.AllwoodC. M.RennemarkM.HagbergB. (2010). The relation between personality and the realism in confidence judgements in older adults. European Journal of Ageing, 7(4), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-010-0164-2
15.
DuckworthA. L.PetersonC.MatthewsM.KellyD. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
16.
DuckworthA. L.QuinnP. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174.
17.
DweckC. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Psychology Press.
HackerD. J.BolL.KeenerM. C. (2008). Metacognition in education: A focus on calibration. In DunloskyJ.BjorkR. A. (Eds.), Handbook of metamemory and memory (pp. 429–457). Psychology Press.
20.
HardenK. P.Tucker-DrobE. M.TackettJ. L. (2013). The Texas Twin Project. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2012.97
21.
HarrisonD. A.ShafferM. A. (1994). Comparative examinations of self-reports and perceived absenteeism norms: Wading through Lake Wobegon. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.240
22.
HeathA. C.NyholtD. R.NeumanR.MaddenP. A. F.BucholzK. K.ToddR. D.NelsonE. C.MontgomeryG. W.MartinN. G. (2003). Zygosity diagnosis in the absence of genotypic data: An approach using latent class analysis. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 6(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.6.1.22
23.
HeckmanJ. J.RubinsteinY. (2001). The importance of noncognitive skills: Lessons from the GED testing program. American Economic Review, 91(2), 145–149. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.145
24.
HeckmanJ. J.StixrudJ.UrzuaS. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 411–482. https://doi.org/10.1086/504455
25.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five taxonomy. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). Guilford Press.
26.
JohnsonD. D. P. (2004). Overconfidence and war. Harvard University Press.
27.
KleitmanS.GibsonJ. (2011). Metacognitive beliefs, self-confidence and primary learning environment of sixth grade students. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(6), 728–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.08.003
28.
KokisJ. V.MacphersonR.ToplakM. E.WestR. F.StanovichK. E. (2002). Heuristic and analytic processing: Age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83(1), 26–52.
29.
KovasY.Garon-CarrierG.BoivinM.PetrillS. A.PlominR.MalykhS. B.VitaroF. (2015). Why children differ in motivation to learn: Insights from over 13,000 twins from 6 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 80, 51–63.
30.
KrugerJ.DunningD. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
31.
LuongC.StrobelA.WollschlägerR.GreiffS.VainikainenM.-P.PreckelF. (2017). Need for cognition in children and adolescents: Behavioral correlates and relations to academic achievement and potential. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.019
32.
MalanchiniM.RimfeldK.WangZ.PetrillS. A.Tucker-DrobE. M.PlominR.KovasY. (2020). Genetic factors underlie the association between anxiety, attitudes and performance in mathematics. Translational Psychiatry, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-0711-3
33.
MalanchiniM.WangZ.VoroninI.SchenkerV. J.PlominR.PetrillS. A.KovasY. (2017). Reading self-perceived ability, enjoyment and achievement: A genetically informative study of their reciprocal links over time. Developmental Psychology, 53(4), 698–712.
34.
MalmendierU.TateG. (2008). Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market’s reaction. Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.07.002
35.
MarshH. W.AbduljabbarA. S.ParkerP. D.MorinA. J. S.AbdelfattahF.NagengastB.MöllerJ.Abu-HilalM. M. (2015). The internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept and achievement relations: Age-cohort and cross-cultural differences. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 168–202. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214549453
36.
MarshH. W.TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.KöllerO.BaumertJ. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76(2), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x
37.
McGueM.BouchardT. J. (1984). Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex. Behavior Genetics, 14(4), 325–343.
38.
MidgleyC.MaehrM. L.HrudaL. Z.AndermanE.AndermanL.FreemanK. E.UrdanT. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. University of Michigan.
MurphyS. C.BarlowF. K.von HippelW. (2017). A longitudinal test of three theories of overconfidence. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1948550617699252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617699252
41.
MurphyS. C.von HippelW.DubbsS. L.AngillettaM. J.WilsonR. S.TriversR.BarlowF. K. (2015). The role of overconfidence in romantic desirability and competition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 0146167215588754. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215588754
NealeM. C.CardonL. R. (1992). The scope of genetic analyses. In NealeM. C.CardonL. R. (Eds.), Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families (pp. 1–33). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8018-2_1
44.
PallierG.WilkinsonR.DanthiirV.KleitmanS.KnezevicG.StankovL.RobertsR. D. (2002). The role of individual differences in the accuracy of confidence judgments. The Journal of General Psychology, 129(3), 257–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221300209602099
45.
ParkG.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18(11), 948–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02007.x
46.
PintrichP. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544–555. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544
47.
PlominR.DanielsD. (1987). Why are children in the same family so different from one another?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00055941
48.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
49.
PurcellS. (2002). Variance components models for gene–environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 5(6), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.5.6.554
SalthouseT. A.BabcockR. L. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 763–776.
52.
SchaeferP. S.WilliamsC. C.GoodieA. S.CampbellW. K. (2004). Overconfidence and the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(5), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2003.09.010
53.
SchrawG. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3
54.
StankovL. (2013). Noncognitive predictors of intelligence and academic achievement: An important role of confidence. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(7), 727–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.006
55.
StankovL.LeeJ. (2008). Confidence and cognitive test performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 961–976. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012546
56.
StankovL.LeeJ.LuoW.HoganD. J. (2012). Confidence: A better predictor of academic achievement than self-efficacy, self-concept and anxiety?Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.013
57.
Tucker-DrobE. M.BrileyD. A. (2014). Continuity of genetic and environmental influences on cognition across the life span: A meta-analysis of longitudinal twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 949–979. http://doi.org.proxy2.library.illinois.edu/10.1037/a0035893
58.
Tucker-DrobE. M.BrileyD. A.EngelhardtL. E.MannF. D.HardenK. P. (2016). Genetically-mediated associations between measures of childhood character and academic achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 790–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000098
59.
Tucker-DrobE. M.BrileyD. A.HardenK. P. (2013). Genetic and environmental influences on cognition across development and context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 349–355.
60.
von StummS.PlominR. (2018). Monozygotic twin differences in school performance are stable and systematic. Developmental Science, 21(6), e12694. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12694
WechslerD. (2011). WASI-II Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. PsychCorp.
63.
WestfallJ.YarkoniT. (2016). Statistically controlling for confounding constructs is harder than you think. PLoS One, 11(3), e0152719. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152719
64.
WilloughbyE. A.LoveA. C.McGueM.IaconoW. G.QuigleyJ.LeeJ. J. (2019). Free will, determinism, and intuitive judgments about the heritability of behavior. Behavior Genetics, 49(2), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-018-9931-1
65.
WoodcockR. W.MatherN.McGrewK. S. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities. Riverside Publishing Company.
66.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Riverside Publishing Company.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
