The current study assessed the effect of the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic on subjective well-being (SWB) and psychological well-being (PWB) and whether the pandemic moderated the effect of personality on well-being. Measures of Big Five personality, SWB (life satisfaction, positive affect, and negative affect), and PWB (positive relations, autonomy, environmental mastery, personal growth, purpose in life, and self-acceptance) were obtained from a sample of young adults in Melbourne, Australia (n = 1,132; July 13–August 11, 2020) during a second wave of viral transmission and lockdown and an identically recruited pre-COVID sample (n = 547). Well-being was lower in the COVID sample, and differences were largest for positive affect (d = −0.48) and negative affect (d = 0.70). While the effect of personality on well-being was relatively robust, the effect of personality on well-being was slightly reduced, and the effect of extroversion on positive affect was particularly attenuated during the pandemic.
AnglimJ.GrantS. (2016). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: Incremental prediction from 30 facets over the big 5 [Article]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(1), 59–80.
2.
AnglimJ.HorwoodS.SmillieL. D.MarreroR. J.WoodJ. K. (2020). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 279.
3.
AnglimJ.WeinbergM. K.CumminsR. A. (2015). Bayesian hierarchical modeling of the temporal dynamics of subjective well-being: A 10 year longitudinal analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 59, 1–14.
4.
BrooksS. K.WebsterR. K.SmithL. E.WoodlandL.WesselyS.GreenbergN.RubinG. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395, 912–920.
5.
CantareroK.van TilburgW. A. P.SmoktunowiczE. (2020). Affirming basic psychological needs promotes mental well-being during the COVID-19 outbreak [Article]. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620942708
6.
CasaleS.FlettG. L. (2020). Interpersonally-based fears during the covid-19 pandemic: Reflections on the fear of missing out and the fear of not mattering constructs [Article]. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 17(2), 88–93.
7.
CourtetP.OliéE.DebienC.VaivaG. (2020). Keep socially (but not physically) connected and carry on: Preventing suicide in the age of COVID-19. Journal of clinical Psychiatry, 81(3), e20com13370–e13320com13370.
8.
CumminsR. A. (2015). The theory of subjective wellbeing homeostasis: A contribution to understanding life quality. In MagginoF. (Ed.), A life devoted to quality of life—Festschrift in honor of Alex C. Michalos (pp. 71–79). Springer.
9.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1–11.
10.
DeNeveK. M.CooperH. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–229.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.
13.
DienerE.SuhE. M.LucasR. E.SmithH. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.
14.
EdwardsJ. R.CableD. M.WilliamsonI. O.LambertL. S.ShippA. J. (2006). The phenomenology of fit: Linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 802.
15.
EvansS.Mikocka-WalusA.KlasA.OliveL.SciberrasE.KarantzasG.WestruppE. (2020). From “It has stopped our lives” to “Spending more time together has strengthened bonds”: The varied experiences of Australian families during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 588667.
FolkD.Okabe-MiyamotoK.DunnE.LyubomirskyS. (2020). Did social connection decline during the first wave of COVID-19? The role of extraversion. Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), 37.
18.
FujitaF.DienerE. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 158–164.
19.
GoldbergL. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7, 7–28.
20.
GoldbergL. R.JohnsonJ. A.EberH. W.HoganR.AshtonM. C.CloningerC. R.GoughH. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96.
21.
GrantS.Langan-FoxJ.AnglimJ. (2009). The Big Five traits as predictors of subjective and psychological well-being [Article]. Psychological Reports, 105(1), 205–231.
22.
HeadeyB.WearingA. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 731–739.
23.
HeadeyB.WearingA. J. (1992). Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective well-being. Longman Cheshire.
24.
Jacques-HamiltonR.SunJ.SmillieL. D. (2019). Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(9), 1538.
25.
JørgensenF. J.BorA.LindholtM. F.PetersenM. B. (2020). Lockdown evaluations during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Psy-Arxiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4ske2
26.
KroenckeL.GeukesK.UteschT.KuperN.BackM. (2020). Neuroticism and emotional risk during the Covid-19 pandemic. PsyArxiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8c6nh
27.
LadesL.LaffanK.DalyM.DelaneyL. (2020). Daily emotional well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Health Psychology. Advance Online Access.
28.
LucasR. E.DienerE. (2008). Subjective well-being. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M.BarrettL. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 471–484). Guilford Publications.
29.
LucasR. E.DienerE.SuhE. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616–628.
30.
LucasR. E.LeK.DyrenforthP. S. (2008). Explaining the extraversion/positive affect relation: Sociability cannot account for extraverts’ greater happiness. Journal of Personality, 76(3), 385–414.
31.
LuhmannM.HofmannW.EidM.LucasR. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 592.
32.
MazzaC.RicciE.BiondiS.ColasantiM.FerracutiS.NapoliC.RomaP. (2020). A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Italian people during the covid-19 pandemic: Immediate psychological responses and associated factors [Article]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), Article 3165.
33.
MeléndezJ. C.SatorresE.CujiñoM.ReyesM. (2019). Big Five and psychological and subjective well-being in Colombian older adults. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 82, 88–93.
34.
MichinovE.MichinovN. (2020). Stay at Home! When personality profiles influence psychological adjustment and creativity during the COVID-19 outbreak. PsyArxiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wkhfr
35.
ModersitzkiN.PhanL. V.KuperN.RauthmannJ. (2020). Who is impacted? Personality predicts individual differences in psychological consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany.
36.
QianK.YaharaT. (2020). Mentality and behavior in COVID-19 emergency status in Japan: Influence of personality, morality and ideology [Article]. PLoS ONE, 15(7 July), Article e0235883.
37.
RecchiE.FerraginaE.HelmeidE.PaulyS.SafiM.SaugerN.SchradieJ. (2020). The “Eye of the Hurricane” Paradox: An unexpected and unequal rise of well-being during the Covid-19 lockdown in France. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 68, 100508.
RøysambE.NesR. B.CzajkowskiN. O.VassendO. (2018). Genetics, personality and wellbeing: A twin study of traits, facets and life satisfaction [Article]. Science Reports, 8(1), 12298.
40.
RussoD.HanelP. H.AltnickelS.van BerkelN. (2020). Predictors of well-being and productivity among software professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic—A longitudinal study. arXiv preprinthttps://arxiv.org/abs/2007.12580
41.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.
42.
RyffC. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.
43.
RyffC. D.KeyesC. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.
44.
SchimmackU.OishiS. (2005). The influence of chronically and temporarily accessible information on life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 395–406.
45.
SherL. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicide rates. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 113, 707–712.
46.
SibleyC. G.GreavesL. M.SatherleyN.WilsonM. S.OverallN. C.LeeC. H.MilojevP.BulbuliaJ.OsborneD.MilfontT. L. (2020). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown on trust, attitudes toward government, and well-being. American Psychologist, 75, 618–630.
SteelP.SchmidtJ.BoscoF.UggerslevK. (2019). The effects of personality on job satisfaction and life satisfaction: A meta-analytic investigation accounting for bandwidth–fidelity and commensurability. Human Relations, 72, 217–247.
49.
SteelP.SchmidtJ.ShultzJ. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161.
50.
SunJ.KaufmanS. B.SmillieL. D. (2018). Unique associations between Big Five personality aspects and multiple dimensions of well-being [Article]. Journal Personality, 86(2), 158–172.
51.
Van BavelJ. J.BaickerK.BoggioP. S.CapraroV.CichockaA.CikaraM.CrockettM. J.CrumA. J.DouglasK. M.DruckmanJ. N.DruryJ.DubeO.EllemersN.FinkelE. J.FowlerJ. H.GelfandM.HanS.HaslamS. A.JettenJ.KitayamaS.MobbsD.NapperL. E.WillerR. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 460–447.
52.
WangC.PanR.WanX.TanY.XuL.McIntyreR. S.ChooF. N.TranB.HoR.SharmaV. K. (2020). A longitudinal study on the mental health of general population during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 87, 40–48.
53.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.
54.
WeissA.BatesT. C.LucianoM. (2008). Happiness is a personal(ity) thing: The genetics of personality and well-being in a representative sample. Psychological Science, 19(3), 205–210.
55.
WilkinsR.BothaF.Vera-ToscanoE. (2020). The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey: Selected findings from Waves 1 to 18. Melbourne Institute: Applied Economic & Social Research.
56.
XiongJ.LipsitzO.NasriF.LuiL. M.GillH.PhanL.Chen-LiD.IacobucciM.HoR.MajeedA. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 277, 55–64.
57.
ZacherH.RudolphC. W. (2020). Individual differences and changes in subjective wellbeing during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000702
58.
ZajenkowskiM.JonasonP. K.LeniarskaM.KozakiewiczZ. (2020). Who complies with the restrictions to reduce the spread of COVID-19? Personality and perceptions of the COVID-19 situation. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 110199.
59.
ZelenskiJ. M.SantoroM. S.WhelanD. C. (2012). Would introverts be better off if they acted more like extraverts? Exploring emotional and cognitive consequences of counterdispositional behavior. Emotion, 12(2), 290.
60.
ZhaoX.LanM.LiH.YangJ. (2020). Perceived stress and sleep quality among the non-diseased general public in China during the 2019 coronavirus disease: A moderated mediation model [Article]. Sleep Medicine, S1389-9457(20), 0224–0.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
