Negative stereotypes about atheists are widespread, robust, rooted in distrust, and linked to discrimination. Here, we examine whether social perceivers in the United States might additionally hold any positive stereotypes about atheists (and corresponding negative stereotypes of the religious). Experiments 1 (N = 401) and 2 (N = 398, preregistered) used methods of intuitive stereotypes (the conjunction fallacy). People tended to stereotype atheists as fun, open-minded, and scientific—even as they harbor extreme intuitive anti-atheist prejudice in Experiment 2. Experiment 3 (N = 382) used a quasi-behavioral partner-choice paradigm, finding that most people choose atheist (vs. religious) partners in stereotype-relevant domains. Overall, results suggest that people simultaneously possess negative and also positive stereotypes about atheists, but that corresponding negative stereotypes of the religious may be even stronger. These effects are robust among the nonreligious and somewhat religious, but evidence is mixed about whether the highly religious harbor these positive stereotypes.
CookC. L.CottrellC. A.WebsterG. D. (2015). No good without god: Antiatheist prejudice as a function of threats to morals and values. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000013
3.
CookC. L.LiY. J.NewellS. M.CottrellC. A.NeelR. (2018). The world is a scary place: Individual differences in belief in a dangerous world predict specific intergroup prejudices. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 21(4), 584–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216670024
4.
CottrellC. A.NeubergS. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770
5.
CzoppA. M.KayA. C.CheryanS. (2015). Positive stereotypes are pervasive and powerful. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615588091
6.
EdgellP.HartmannD.StewartE.GerteisJ. (2016). Atheists and other cultural outsiders: Moral boundaries and the non-religious in the United States. Social Forces, 95(2), 607–638. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sow063
7.
ErdfelderE.FaulF.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using g*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
8.
FranksA. S.ScherrK. C. (2014). A sociofunctional approach to prejudice at the polls: Are atheists more politically disadvantaged than gays and blacks?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(10), 681–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12259
9.
GervaisW. M. (2014). Everything is permitted? People intuitively judge immorality as representative of atheists. PLoS One, 9(4), e92302. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092302
10.
GervaisW. M.ShariffA. F.NorenzayanA. (2011). Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1189–1206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025882
11.
GervaisW. M.XygalatasD.McKayR. T.van ElkM.BuchtelE. E.AveyardM.SchiavoneS. R.Dar-NimrodI.Svedholm-HakkinenA. M.RiekkiT.KlocovaE. K.RamsayJ. E.BulbuliaJ. A. (2017). Global evidence of extreme intuitive moral prejudice against atheists. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(8), Article 0151. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0151
12.
GroveR. C.RubensteinA.TerrellH. K. (2019). Distrust persists after subverting atheist stereotypes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219874103
13.
HarperM. (2007). The stereotyping of nonreligious people by religious students: Contents and subtypes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46(4), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00376.x
14.
HoneL. S. E.McCauleyT. G.PedersenE. J.CarterE. C.McCulloughM. E. (2020). The sex premium in religiously motivated moral judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000296
15.
JacksonJ. C.HalberstadtJ.JongJ.FelmanH. (2015). Perceived openness to experience accounts for religious homogamy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(6), 630–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615574302
16.
JohnsonM. K.RowattW. C.LabouffJ. P. (2012). Religiosity and prejudice revisited: In-group favoritism, out-group derogation, or both?Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(2), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025107
17.
LeeJ.ZhouM. (2014). The success frame and achievement paradox: The costs and consequences for Asian Americans. Race and Social Problems, 6(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-014-9112-7
18.
LitmanL.RobinsonJ.AbberbockT. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z
19.
MackeyC. D.SilverC. F.RiosK.CowgillC. M.HoodR. W. (2020). Concealment of nonreligious identity: Exploring social identity threat among atheists and other nonreligious individuals. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220905661
McPhetresJ.JongJ.ZuckermanM. (2020). Religious Americans have less positive attitudes towards science, but this does not generalize to other cultures around the world. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620923239
MoonJ. W.KremsJ. A.CohenA. B. (2018). Religious people are trusted because they are viewed as slow life-history strategists. Psychological Science, 29(6), 947–960. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617753606
24.
MoonJ. W.KremsJ. A.CohenA. B.KenrickD. T. (2019). Is nothing sacred? Religion, sex, and reproductive strategies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419838242
25.
MukkamalaS.SuyemotoK. L. (2018). Racialized sexism/sexualized racism: A multimethod study of intersectional experiences of discrimination for Asian American women. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000104
26.
NeelR.NeufeldS. L.NeubergS. L. (2013). Would an obese person whistle Vivaldi? Targets of prejudice self-present to minimize appearance of specific threats. Psychological Science, 24(5), 678–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612458807
27.
NeubergS. L.KenrickD. T.SchallerM. (2010). Evolutionary social psychology. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 761–796). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002021
28.
NeubergS. L.WilliamsK. E. G.SngO.PickC. M.NeelR.KremsJ. A.PirlottA. G. (2020). Toward capturing the functional and nuanced nature of social stereotypes: An affordance management approach. In Advances in experimental social psychology (1st ed.). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.04.004
29.
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
30.
OppenheimerD. M.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
31.
PennycookG.CheyneJ. A.BarrN.KoehlerD. J.FugelsangJ. A. (2014). Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection. Memory & Cognition, 42(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7
32.
RiosK.ChengZ. H.TottonR. R.ShariffA. F. (2015). Negative stereotypes cause Christians to underperform in and disidentify with science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(8), 959–967. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615598378
33.
RowattW. C.Al-KireR. L. (2021). Dimensions of religiousness and their connection to racial, ethnic, and anti-atheist prejudices. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.022
34.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90(4), 293–315.
35.
VorauerJ. D.MainK. J.O’ConnellG. B. (1998). How do individuals expect to be viewed by members of lower status groups? Content and implications of meta-stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 917–937. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.917
36.
WeedenJ.KurzbanR. (2013). What predicts religiosity? A multinational analysis of reproductive and cooperative morals. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(6), 440–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.006
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
