Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic has raised pressing questions about effective public health communication. Prior research has shown a persuasive advantage of arguments emphasizing a behavior’s benefits for others’ health compared to benefits for the recipients. We suggest that other-focused (vs. self-focused) messages function more as moral arguments and should thus be especially persuasive to people who moralize public health. Across three studies, people perceived other-focused (vs. self-focused) appeals for social distancing more as moral arguments. Further, evaluations of these messages’ persuasiveness were moderated by how much the recipient already moralized public health. Other-focused arguments tended to be perceived as more persuasive than self-focused arguments primarily among people who saw public health as a moral issue, which had corresponding effects on social distancing intentions. These findings provide critical insight to health communicators and underscore the importance of understanding that a message’s impact can depend on audience characteristics.

Keywords

COVID-19 moralization health communication message framing persuasion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken

L. S.

West

S. G.

(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions (pp. xi, 212). Sage.

Betsch

(2020). How behavioural science data helps mitigate the COVID-19 crisis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0866-1

Bonafide

K. E.

Vanable

P. A.

(2015). Male human papillomavirus vaccine acceptance is enhanced by a brief intervention that emphasizes both male-specific vaccine benefits and altruistic motives. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 42(2), 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000226

Brady

W. J.

Wills

J. A.

Jost

J. T.

Tucker

J. A.

Bavel

J. J. V.

(2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313–7318. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114

Cacioppo

J. T.

Petty

R. E.

Morris

K. J.

(1983). Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 805–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.805

Capraro

Sippel

Zhao

Hornischer

Savary

Terzopoulou

Faucher

Griffioen

S. F.

(2018). People making deontological judgments in the Trapdoor dilemma are perceived to be more prosocial in economic games than they actually are. PLOS ONE, 13(10), e0205066. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205066

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020, February 11). Social distancing, quarantine, and isolation. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/social-distancing.html

Covey

(2014). The role of dispositional factors in moderating message framing effects. Health Psychology, 33(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029305

Everett

J. A. C.

Colombatto

Chituc

Brady

W. J.

Crockett

(2020). The effectiveness of moral messages on public health behavioral intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9yqs8

10.

Ferrari

J. R.

Leippe

M. R.

(1992). Noncompliance with persuasive appeals for a prosocial, altruistic act: Blood donating. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb01523.x

11.

Gino

Schweitzer

M. E.

Mead

N. L.

Ariely

(2011). Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.001

12.

Grant

A. M.

Hofmann

D. A.

(2011). It’s not all about me: Motivating hand hygiene among health care professionals by focusing on patients. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1494–1499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611419172

13.

Hansen

S. L.

Eisner

M. I.

Pfaller

Schicktanz

(2018). “Are you in or are you out?!” Moral appeals to the public in organ donation poster campaigns: A multimodal and ethical analysis. Health Communication, 33(8), 1020–1034. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1331187

14.

Hatchett

R. J.

Mecher

C. E.

Lipsitch

(2007). Pandemic influenza: Studying the lessons of history. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(18), 7582–7587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702659104

15.

Hyde

M. K.

White

K. M.

(2009). To be a donor or not to be? Applying an extended theory of planned behavior to predict posthumous organ donation intentions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(4), 880–900. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00464.x

16.

Hyde

M. K.

White

K. M.

(2013). Testing an extended theory of planned behavior to predict young people’s intentions to join a bone marrow donor registry. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(12), 2462–2467. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12195

17.

Isler

Kopsacheilis

Ferguson

(2020). Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: A field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 240. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8246-3

18.

Jordan

Yoeli

Rand

(2020). Don’t get it or don’t spread it? Comparing self-interested versus prosocially framed COVID-19 prevention messaging. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yuq7x

19.

Kelly

B. J.

Hornik

R. C.

(2016). Effects of framing health messages in terms of benefits to loved ones or others: An experimental study. Health Communication, 31(10), 1284–1290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1062976

20.

Lipkus

I. M.

Ranby

K. W.

Lewis

M. A.

Toll

(2013). Reactions to framing of cessation messages: Insights from dual-smoker couples. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 15(12), 2022–2028. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntt091

21.

Ludolph

Schulz

P. J.

(2015). Does regulatory fit lead to more effective health communication? A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 128, 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.021

22.

Luttrell

Petty

R. E.

Briñol

Wagner

B. C.

(2016). Making it moral: Merely labeling an attitude as moral increases its strength. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.04.003

23.

Luttrell

Petty

R. E.

(2017). Replicating and fixing failed replications: The case of need for cognition and argument quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.006

24.

Luttrell

Philipp-Muller

A. Z.

Petty

R. E.

(2019). Challenging moral attitudes with moral messages. Psychological Science, 30(8), 1136–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619854706

25.

Newman

G. E.

Cain

D. M.

(2014). Tainted altruism: When doing some good is evaluated as worse than doing no good at all. Psychological Science, 25(3), 648–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504785

26.

Rivis

Sheeran

Armitage

C. J.

(2009). Expanding the affective and normative components of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis of anticipated affect and moral norms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(12), 2985–3019. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00558.x

27.

Schwartz

S. H.

(1977). Normative influences on altruism. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10., pp. 221–279). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5

28.

Teeny

J. D.

Siev

Briñol

Petty

R. E

. (in press). A review and conceptual framework for understanding personalized matching effects in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology.

29.

Van Bavel

J. J.

Baicker

Boggio

Capraro

Cichocka

Crockett

Cikara

Crum

Douglas

Druckman

Drury

Dube

Ellemers

Finkel

E. J.

Fowler

Gelfand

Han

Haslam

S. A.

Jetten

… Willer

(2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 460–471. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/y38m9

30.

Van Lange

P. A.

Liebrand

W. B.

(1989). On perceiving morality and potency: Social values and the effects of person perception in a give-some dilemma. European Journal of Personality, 3(3), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410030306

31.

Yılmaz

Karacan

Yöney

Yılmaz

(2006). Brief intervention on maternal smoking: A randomized controlled trial. Child: Care, Health and Development, 32(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00570.x

32.

Zuckerman

Reis

H. T.

(1978). Comparison of three models for predicting altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(5), 498–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.5.498

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.58 MB

Evaluations of Self-Focused Versus Other-Focused Arguments for Social Distancing: An Extension of Moral Matching Effects

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material