Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

While language style is considered to be automatic and relatively stable, its plasticity has not yet been studied in translations that require the translator to “step into the shoes of another person.” In the present study, we propose a psychological model of language adaptation in translations. Focusing on an established interindividual difference marker of language style, that is, gender, we examined whether translators assimilate to the original gendered style or implicitly project their own gendered language style. In a preregistered study, we investigated gender differences in language use in TED Talks (N = 1,647) and their translations (N = 544) in same- versus opposite-gender speaker/translator dyads. The results showed that translators assimilated to gendered language styles even when in mismatch to their own gender. This challenges predominating views on language style as fixed and fosters a more dynamic view of language style as also being shaped by social context.

Keywords

language adaptation language use gender translation TED Talks

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association. (2015). Guidelines for psychological practice with transgender and gender nonconforming people. The American Psychologist, 70, 832–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039906

Angermeyer

P. S.

(2009). Translation style and participant roles in court interpreting. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13, 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00394.x

Argamon

Koppel

Fine

Shimoni

A. R.

(2003). Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written texts. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 23, 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2003.014

Boyd

R. L.

(2018). Mental profile mapping: A psychological single-candidate authorship attribution method. PLoS One, 13, e0200588. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200588

Boyd

R. L.

Pasca

Conroy-Beam

(2019). You’re only Jung once: Building generalized motivational systems theories using contemporary research on language. Psychological Inquiry, 30, 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2019.1633122

Boyd

R. L.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2015). Did Shakespeare write double falsehood? Identifying individuals by creating psychological signatures with text analysis. Psychological Science, 26, 570–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614566658

Brody

L. R.

(2000). The socialization of gender differences in emotional expression: Display rules, infant temperament, and differentiation. In Fischer

A. H.

(Ed.), Studies in emotion and social interaction. Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 24–47). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628191.003

Brody

L. R.

Hall

J. A.

(2008). Gender and emotion in context. In Lewis

Haviland-Jones

J. M.

Barrett

L. F.

(Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 395–408). Guilford Press.

Cheng

Chandramouli

Subbalakshmi

K. P.

(2011). Author gender identification from text. Digital Investigation, 8, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2011.04.002

10.

Chung

C. K.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2007). The psychological functions of function words. In Fiedler

(Ed.), Frontiers of social psychology: Social communication (pp. 343–359). Psychology Press.

11.

Costa

P. T.

Terracciano

McCrae

R. R.

(2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.2.322

12.

Doyle

Frank

M. C.

(2016). Investigating the sources of linguistic alignment in conversation. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (pp. 526–536). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P16-1050

13.

Ekman

Sorenson

E. R.

Friesen

W. V.

(1969). Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science, 164, 86–88. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.164.3875.86

14.

Giles

Mulac

Bradac

J. J.

Johnson

(1987). Speech accommodation theory: The first decade and beyond. Annals of the International Communication Association, 10, 13–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1987.11678638

15.

Hayeri

. (2014). Does gender affect translation? Analysis of English talks translated to Arabic. The University of Texas at Austin. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/2152/25082/1/HAYERI-DISSERTATION-2014.pdf

16.

Hlavac

(2012). Sociolinguistic profiles of users and providers of lay and professional interpreting services: The experiences of a recently-arrived Iraqi language community in Melbourne. Translation & Interpreting, 3, 1–32.

17.

Ireland

M. E.

Slatcher

R. B.

Eastwick

P. W.

Scissors

L. E.

Finkel

E. J.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2011). Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610392928

18.

Kenny

D. A.

Kashy

D. A.

Cook

W. L.

(2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.

19.

Lakoff

R. T.

(1975). Language and woman’s place. Harper Colophon Books.

20.

Leaper

Ayres

M. M.

(2007). A meta-analytic review of gender variations in adults’ language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 328–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307302221

21.

Meier

Boyd

R. L.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Mehl

M. R.

Martin

Wolf

Horn

A. B

. (2018). “LIWC auf deutsch”: The development, psychometrics, and Introduction of DE-LIWC2015. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/tfqzc

22.

Mulac

Bradac

J. J.

Gibbons

(2001). Empirical support for the gender-as-culture hypothesis. Human Communication Research, 27, 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00778.x

23.

Newman

M. L.

Groom

C. J.

Handelman

L. D.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45, 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530802073712

24.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2011). The secret life of pronouns: What our words say about us. Bloomsbury Press.

25.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Boyd

R. L.

Jordan

Blackburn

(2015). The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015. https://doi.org/10.15781/T29G6Z

26.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Chung

C. K.

Frazee

Lavergne

G. M.

Beaver

D. I.

(2014). When small words foretell academic success: The case of college admissions essays. PLoS One, 9, e115844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115844

27.

Pennebaker

J. W.

Mehl

M. R.

Niederhoffer

K. G.

(2003). Psychological aspects of natural language. Use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547–577. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041

28.

Ramírez-Esparza

Gosling

S. D.

Benet-Martínez

Potter

J. P.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2006). Do bilinguals have two personalities? A special case of cultural frame switching. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.001

29.

Rodríguez-Arauz

Ramírez-Esparza

Pérez-Brena

Boyd

R. L.

(2017). Hablo Inglés y español: Cultural self-schemas as a function of Language. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 885. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00885

30.

Schwartz

H. A.

Eichstaedt

J. C.

Kern

M. L.

Dziurzynski

Ramones

S. M.

Agrawal

Shah

Kosinski

Stillwell

Seligman

M. E. P.

Ungar

L. H.

(2013). Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: The open-vocabulary approach. PLoS One, 8, e73791.

31.

Schwieter

J. W.

Ferreira

(Eds.). (2017). The handbook of translation and cognition (1st ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

32.

Smithson

(2001). Correct confidence intervals for various regression effect sizes and parameters: The importance of noncentral distributions in computing intervals. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 605–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640121971392

33.

Tausczik

Y. R.

Pennebaker

J. W.

(2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676

34.

Thomson

Murachver

Green

(2001). Where is the gender in gendered language? Psychological Science, 12, 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00329

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.20 MB

0.00 MB

(Not) Lost in Translation: Psychological Adaptation Occurs During Speech Translation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material