Many college students intend to pursue science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) careers but quickly abandon these goals when confronted with notoriously competitive STEM courses that often pit students against each other. This emphasis on interpersonal competition could be especially detrimental for first-generation (FG) college students, an underrepresented group in STEM fields which more strongly values communality and collaboration relative to their continuing-generation peers. Thus, FG students may experience more imposter feelings in STEM courses perceived as having a competitive culture. A longitudinal study (with 818 students and 2,638 experience-sampling observations) found that perceived classroom competition was associated with greater daily in-class imposter feelings among all students—but especially among FG students. Imposter feelings in turn predicted students’ end-of-term course engagement, attendance, dropout intentions, and course grades. Classroom competition and the imposter feelings it engenders may be an overlooked barrier for promoting the engagement, performance, and retention of FG students in STEM.
AbouserieR. (1994). Sources and levels of stress in relation to locus of control and self esteem in university students. Educational Psychology, 14, 323–330. doi:10.1080/0144341940140306
2.
AdamsJ. D.BlackG. C.ClemmonsJ. R.StephanP. E. (2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999. Research Policy, 34, 259–285.
AmesC.ArcherJ. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260
5.
AspelmeierJ. E.LoveM. M.McGillL. A.ElliottA. N.PierceT. W. (2012). Self-esteem, locus of control, college adjustment, and GPA among first- and continuing-generation students: A moderator model of generational status. Research in Higher Education, 53, 755–781. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9252-1
6.
BealD. J. (2015). ESM 2.0: State of the art and future potential of experience sampling methods in organizational research. The Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 383–407. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111335
7.
BrownE. R.SteinbergM.LuY.DiekmanA. B. (2017). Is the lone scientist an American dream? Perceived communal opportunities in stem offer a pathway to closing U.S.–Asia gaps in interest and positivity. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 11–23. doi:10.1177/1948550617703173
8.
BrunoA.JuryM.ToczekM. C.DarnonC. (2019). Are performance-avoidance goals always deleterious for academic achievement in college? The moderating role of social class. Social Psychology of Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11218-019-09480-y
9.
CabreraN. L.MinerD. D.MilemJ. F. (2013). Can a summer bridge program impact first-year persistence and performance? A case study of the new start summer program. Research in Higher Education, 54, 481–498. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-9286-7
10.
CalarcoJ. M. (2014). Coached for the classroom: Parents’ cultural transmission and children’s reproduction of educational inequalities. American Sociological Review, 79, 1015–1037. doi:10.1177/0003122414546931
11.
CataldiE. F.BennettC. T.ChenX. (2018). First-generation students: College access, persistence, and post-bachelor’s outcomes. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved fromhttps://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018421.pdf
12.
ChenX.CarrollC. D. (2005). First generation students in postsecondary education: A look at their college transcripts. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
13.
ChenX.SoldnerM. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields (2014-001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
14.
ClanceP. R. (1985). The impostor phenomenon: Overcoming the fear that haunts your success. Atlanta, GA: Peachtree.
15.
ClanceP. R.ImesS. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, and Practice, 15, 241–247. doi:10.1037/h0086006
16.
ClanceP. R.O’TooleM. A. (1987). The imposter phenomenon: An internal barrier to empowerment and achievement. Women & Therapy, 6, 51–64. doi:10.1300/J015V06N03_05
17.
CokleyK.McClainS.EncisoA.MartinezM. (2013). An examination of the impact of minority status stress and impostor feelings on the mental health of diverse ethnic minority college students. Multicultural Counseling and Development, 41, 82–95. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1912.2013.00029.x
18.
ConnerT. S.TennenH.FleesonW.Feldman BarrettL. (2009). Experience sampling methods: A modern idiographic approach to personality research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 292–313. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00170.x
19.
CozzarelliC.MajorB. (1990). Exploring the validity of the impostor phenomenon. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 401–417. doi:10.1521/jscp.1990.9.4.401
20.
CroizetJ.-C.ClaireT. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype and threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 588–594. doi:10.1177/0146167298246003
21.
CroizetJ.-C.DutrévisM. (2004). Socioeconomic status and intelligence: Why test scores do not equal merit. Journal of Poverty, 8, 91–107. doi:10.1300/J134v08n03_05
22.
CsikszentmihalyiM.LarsonR. (2014). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. In CsikszentmihalyiM. (Ed.), Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 35–54). doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_3
23.
DancyT. E.BrownM. C. (2011). The mentoring and induction of educators of color: Addressing the impostor syndrome in academe. Journal of School Leadership, 21, 607–634. doi:10.1177/105268461102100405
24.
DarnonC.JuryM.AeleneiC. (2018). Who benefits from mastery-approach and performance-approach goals in college? Students’ social class as a moderator of the link between goals and grade. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33, 713–726. doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0351-z
25.
DavisJ. (2012). The first generation student experience: Implications for campus practice, and strategies for improving persistence and success. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
26.
DiekmanA. B.BrownE. R.JohnstonA. M.ClarkE. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21, 1051–1057. doi:10.1177/0956797610377342
27.
DiekmanA. B.ClarkE. K.JohnstonA. M.BrownE. R.SteinbergM. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to stem careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 902–918. doi:10.1037/a0025199
28.
GaddisS. M. (2013). The influence of habitus in the relationship between cultural capital and academic achievement. Social Science Research, 42, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.08.002
29.
GarriottP. O.NisleS. (2018). Stress, coping, and perceived academic goal progress in first-generation college students: The role of institutional supports. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 11, 436. doi:10.1037/dhe0000068
30.
HarackiewiczJ. M.CanningE. A.TibbettsY.GiffenC. J.BlairS. S.RouseD. I.HydeJ. S. (2014). Closing the social class achievement gap for first-generation students in undergraduate biology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 375–389.
HutchinsH. M. (2015). Outing the imposter: A study exploring imposter phenomenon among higher education faculty. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 27, 3–12. doi:10.1002/nha3.20098
33.
JacksonM. C.GalvezG.LandaI.BuonoraP.ThomanD. B. (2016). Science that matters: The importance of a cultural connection in underrepresented students’ science pursuit. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15, 1–12.
34.
JohnsonD. W.MaruyamaG.JohnsonR.NelsonD.SkonL. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.47
35.
JuryM.SmedingA.DarnonC. (2015). First-generation students’ underperformance at university: The impact of the function of selection. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00710
36.
KumarS.JagacinskiC. M. (2006). Imposters have goals too: The imposter phenomenon and its relationship to achievement goal theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 147–157. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.014
37.
LaDonnaK. A.GinsburgS.WatlingC. (2018). “Rising to the level of your incompetence”: What physicians’ self-assessment of their performance reveals about the imposter syndrome in medicine. American Medicine, 93, 763–768. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002046
38.
LearyM. R.PattonK. M.OrlandoA. E.FunkW. W. (2000). The impostor phenomenon: Self-perceptions, reflected appraisals, and interpersonal strategies. Journal of Personality, 68, 725–756. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00114
39.
MarkusH. R.ConnerA. C. (2013). Clash! Eight cultural conflicts that make us who we are. New York, NY: Penguin (Hudson Street Press).
40.
McGregorL. N.GeeD. E.PoseyK. E. (2008). I feel like a fraud and it depresses me: The relation between the imposter phenomenon and depression. Social Behavior and Personality, 36, 43–48. doi:10.2224/sbp.2008.36.1.43
41.
MeeceJ. L.AndermanE. M.AndermanL. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487–503. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258
42.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
ParkmanA. (2016). The imposter phenomenon in higher education: Incidence and impact. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 16, 51.
46.
PascarellaE. T.TerenziniP. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
47.
PeteetB. J.BrownC. M.LigeQ. M.LanawayD. A. (2015). Impostorism is associated with greater psychological distress and lower self-esteem for African American students. Current Psychology, 34, 154–163. doi:10.1007/s12144-014-9248-z
48.
PosseltJ. R.LipsonS. K. (2016). Competition, anxiety, and depression in the college classroom: Variations by student identity and field of study. Journal of College Student Development, 57, 973–989. doi:10.1353/csd.2016.0094
49.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analyses methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
RedfordJ.HoyerK. M. (2017). First-generation and continuing-generation college students: A comparison of high school and postsecondary experiences. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of education. Retrieved fromhttps://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018009.pdf
51.
ScollonC. N.Kim-PrietoC.DienerE. (2003). Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 5–34. doi:10.1023/A:1023605205115
52.
ShawE. J.BarbutiS. (2010). Patterns of persistence in intended college major with a focus on STEM majors. NACADA Journal, 30, 19–34.
53.
SkomsvoldP. (2015). Web tables—Profile of undergraduate students: 2011–12 (NCES 2015-167). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of education. Retrieved fromhttps://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2015167
54.
SnibbeA. C.MarkusH. R. (2005). You can’t always get what you want: Educational attainment, agency, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 703–720. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.88.4.703
55.
SommetN.PulfreyC.ButeraF. (2013). Did my M.D. really go to university to learn? Detrimental effects of numerus clausus on self-efficacy, mastery goals and learning. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084178
56.
SommetN.QuiamzadeA.JuryM.MugnyG. (2015). The student-institution fit at university: Interactive effects of academic competition and social class on achievement goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00769
57.
StaklisS. (2016). Employment and enrollment status of baccalaureate degree recipients 1 year after graduation: 1994, 2001, and 2009 (NCES 2017-407). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of education. Retrieved fromhttps://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017407
58.
StephensN. M.FrybergS. A.MarkusH. R.JohnsonC. S.CovarrubiasR. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1178–1197. doi:10.1037/a0027143
59.
StephensN. M.HamedaniM. G.DestinM. (2014). Closing the social-class achievement gap: A difference-education intervention improves first-generation students’ academic performance and all students’ college transition. Psychological Science, 25, 943–953. doi:10.1177/0956797613518349
60.
TaoK. W.GloriaA. M. (2018). Should I stay or should I go? The role of impostorism in STEM persistence. Psychology of Women Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0361684318802333
61.
TerenziniP. T.SpringerL.YaegerP. M.PascarellaE. T.NoraA. (1996). First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 37, 1–22. doi:10.1007/BF01680039
62.
U.S. Department of Education. (2016). STEM 2026: A vision for innovation in STEM education. Washington, DC: Office of Innovation and Improvement.
63.
U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Beginning postsecondary students longitudinal study 2012-2014 (Report No. BPS:12/14). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
64.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2019). Occupational outlook handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
65.
UrdanT. (2004). Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 251–264. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.251
66.
VaughnA. R.TaasoobshiraziG.JohnsonM. L. (2019). Imposter phenomenon and motivation: Women in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1568976
67.
WardL.SiegelM. J.DevenportZ. (2012). First-generation college students: Understanding and improving the experience from recruitment to commencement. San Francisco, CA: San Jossey-Bass.
68.
WilkinsonR. G.PickettK. E. (2009). Income inequality and social dysfunction. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 493–511. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115926
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
