Feeling Like an Imposter: The Effect of Perceived Classroom Competition on the Daily Psychological Experiences of First-Generation College Students

Abstract

Many college students intend to pursue science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) careers but quickly abandon these goals when confronted with notoriously competitive STEM courses that often pit students against each other. This emphasis on interpersonal competition could be especially detrimental for first-generation (FG) college students, an underrepresented group in STEM fields which more strongly values communality and collaboration relative to their continuing-generation peers. Thus, FG students may experience more imposter feelings in STEM courses perceived as having a competitive culture. A longitudinal study (with 818 students and 2,638 experience-sampling observations) found that perceived classroom competition was associated with greater daily in-class imposter feelings among all students—but especially among FG students. Imposter feelings in turn predicted students’ end-of-term course engagement, attendance, dropout intentions, and course grades. Classroom competition and the imposter feelings it engenders may be an overlooked barrier for promoting the engagement, performance, and retention of FG students in STEM.

Keywords

first-generation college students classroom competition imposter feelings experience-sampling methodology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abouserie

(1994). Sources and levels of stress in relation to locus of control and self esteem in university students. Educational Psychology, 14, 323–330. doi:10.1080/0144341940140306

Adams

J. D.

Black

G. C.

Clemmons

J. R.

Stephan

P. E.

(2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981-1999. Research Policy, 34, 259–285.

American College Testing. (2015). The condition of college and career readiness 2014: First-generation college students. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/newsroom/data/2014/states/pdf/FirstGeneration.pdf

Ames

Archer

(1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260

Aspelmeier

J. E.

Love

M. M.

McGill

L. A.

Elliott

A. N.

Pierce

T. W

. (2012). Self-esteem, locus of control, college adjustment, and GPA among first- and continuing-generation students: A moderator model of generational status. Research in Higher Education, 53, 755–781. doi:10.1007/s11162-011-9252-1

Beal

D. J.

(2015). ESM 2.0: State of the art and future potential of experience sampling methods in organizational research. The Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 383–407. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111335

Brown

E. R.

Steinberg

Diekman

A. B.

(2017). Is the lone scientist an American dream? Perceived communal opportunities in stem offer a pathway to closing U.S.–Asia gaps in interest and positivity. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 11–23. doi:10.1177/1948550617703173

Bruno

Jury

Toczek

M. C.

Darnon

. (2019). Are performance-avoidance goals always deleterious for academic achievement in college? The moderating role of social class. Social Psychology of Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11218-019-09480-y

Cabrera

N. L.

Miner

D. D.

Milem

J. F.

(2013). Can a summer bridge program impact first-year persistence and performance? A case study of the new start summer program. Research in Higher Education, 54, 481–498. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-9286-7

10.

Calarco

J. M.

(2014). Coached for the classroom: Parents’ cultural transmission and children’s reproduction of educational inequalities. American Sociological Review, 79, 1015–1037. doi:10.1177/0003122414546931

11.

Cataldi

E. F.

Bennett

C. T.

Chen

. (2018). First-generation students: College access, persistence, and post-bachelor’s outcomes. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018421.pdf

12.

Chen

Carroll

C. D.

(2005). First generation students in postsecondary education: A look at their college transcripts. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

13.

Chen

Soldner

(2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields (2014-001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

14.

Clance

P. R.

(1985). The impostor phenomenon: Overcoming the fear that haunts your success. Atlanta, GA: Peachtree.

15.

Clance

P. R.

Imes

(1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, and Practice, 15, 241–247. doi:10.1037/h0086006

16.

Clance

P. R.

O’Toole

M. A

. (1987). The imposter phenomenon: An internal barrier to empowerment and achievement. Women & Therapy, 6, 51–64. doi:10.1300/J015V06N03_05

17.

Cokley

McClain

Enciso

Martinez

(2013). An examination of the impact of minority status stress and impostor feelings on the mental health of diverse ethnic minority college students. Multicultural Counseling and Development, 41, 82–95. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1912.2013.00029.x

18.

Conner

T. S.

Tennen

Fleeson

Feldman Barrett

(2009). Experience sampling methods: A modern idiographic approach to personality research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 292–313. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00170.x

19.

Cozzarelli

Major

(1990). Exploring the validity of the impostor phenomenon. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 401–417. doi:10.1521/jscp.1990.9.4.401

20.

Croizet

J.-C.

Claire

(1998). Extending the concept of stereotype and threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 588–594. doi:10.1177/0146167298246003

21.

Croizet

J.-C.

Dutrévis

. (2004). Socioeconomic status and intelligence: Why test scores do not equal merit. Journal of Poverty, 8, 91–107. doi:10.1300/J134v08n03_05

22.

Csikszentmihalyi

Larson

. (2014). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. In Csikszentmihalyi

(Ed.), Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 35–54). doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_3

23.

Dancy

T. E.

Brown

M. C.

(2011). The mentoring and induction of educators of color: Addressing the impostor syndrome in academe. Journal of School Leadership, 21, 607–634. doi:10.1177/105268461102100405

24.

Darnon

Jury

Aelenei

(2018). Who benefits from mastery-approach and performance-approach goals in college? Students’ social class as a moderator of the link between goals and grade. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33, 713–726. doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0351-z

25.

Davis

(2012). The first generation student experience: Implications for campus practice, and strategies for improving persistence and success. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

26.

Diekman

A. B.

Brown

E. R.

Johnston

A. M.

Clark

E. K.

(2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21, 1051–1057. doi:10.1177/0956797610377342

27.

Diekman

A. B.

Clark

E. K.

Johnston

A. M.

Brown

E. R.

Steinberg

(2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to stem careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 902–918. doi:10.1037/a0025199

28.

Gaddis

S. M.

(2013). The influence of habitus in the relationship between cultural capital and academic achievement. Social Science Research, 42, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.08.002

29.

Garriott

P. O.

Nisle

(2018). Stress, coping, and perceived academic goal progress in first-generation college students: The role of institutional supports. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 11, 436. doi:10.1037/dhe0000068

30.

Harackiewicz

J. M.

Canning

E. A.

Tibbetts

Giffen

C. J.

Blair

S. S.

Rouse

D. I.

Hyde

J. S.

(2014). Closing the social class achievement gap for first-generation students in undergraduate biology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 375–389.

31.

Holmes

D. L.

Slate

J. R.

(2017). Differences in GPA by gender and ethnicity/race as a function of first-generation status for community college students. Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 17. Retrieved from https://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/download/2232/2121

32.

Hutchins

H. M.

(2015). Outing the imposter: A study exploring imposter phenomenon among higher education faculty. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 27, 3–12. doi:10.1002/nha3.20098

33.

Jackson

M. C.

Galvez

Landa

Buonora

Thoman

D. B.

(2016). Science that matters: The importance of a cultural connection in underrepresented students’ science pursuit. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15, 1–12.

34.

Johnson

D. W.

Maruyama

Johnson

Nelson

Skon

(1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.47

35.

Jury

Smeding

Darnon

(2015). First-generation students’ underperformance at university: The impact of the function of selection. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00710

36.

Kumar

Jagacinski

C. M.

(2006). Imposters have goals too: The imposter phenomenon and its relationship to achievement goal theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 147–157. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.014

37.

LaDonna

K. A.

Ginsburg

Watling

. (2018). “Rising to the level of your incompetence”: What physicians’ self-assessment of their performance reveals about the imposter syndrome in medicine. American Medicine, 93, 763–768. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002046

38.

Leary

M. R.

Patton

K. M.

Orlando

A. E.

Funk

W. W.

(2000). The impostor phenomenon: Self-perceptions, reflected appraisals, and interpersonal strategies. Journal of Personality, 68, 725–756. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00114

39.

Markus

H. R.

Conner

A. C.

(2013). Clash! Eight cultural conflicts that make us who we are. New York, NY: Penguin (Hudson Street Press).

40.

McGregor

L. N.

Gee

D. E.

Posey

K. E.

(2008). I feel like a fraud and it depresses me: The relation between the imposter phenomenon and depression. Social Behavior and Personality, 36, 43–48. doi:10.2224/sbp.2008.36.1.43

41.

Meece

J. L.

Anderman

E. M.

Anderman

L. H.

(2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487–503. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258

42.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O

. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

43.

National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2018). Trends and predictions. Retrieved from https://www.naceweb.org/job-market/trends-and-predictions/

44.

National Science Board. (2015). Revisiting the STEM workforce: A companion to science and engineering indicators 2014. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2015/nsb201510.pdf

45.

Parkman

(2016). The imposter phenomenon in higher education: Incidence and impact. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 16, 51.

46.

Pascarella

E. T.

Terenzini

P. T

. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

47.

Peteet

B. J.

Brown

C. M.

Lige

Q. M.

Lanaway

D. A.

(2015). Impostorism is associated with greater psychological distress and lower self-esteem for African American students. Current Psychology, 34, 154–163. doi:10.1007/s12144-014-9248-z

48.

Posselt

J. R.

Lipson

S. K.

(2016). Competition, anxiety, and depression in the college classroom: Variations by student identity and field of study. Journal of College Student Development, 57, 973–989. doi:10.1353/csd.2016.0094

49.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analyses methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

50.

Redford

Hoyer

K. M

. (2017). First-generation and continuing-generation college students: A comparison of high school and postsecondary experiences. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018009.pdf

51.

Scollon

C. N.

Kim-Prieto

Diener

(2003). Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 5–34. doi:10.1023/A:1023605205115

52.

Shaw

E. J.

Barbuti

(2010). Patterns of persistence in intended college major with a focus on STEM majors. NACADA Journal, 30, 19–34.

53.

Skomsvold

. (2015). Web tables—Profile of undergraduate students: 2011–12 (NCES 2015-167). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2015167

54.

Snibbe

A. C.

Markus

H. R.

(2005). You can’t always get what you want: Educational attainment, agency, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 703–720. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.88.4.703

55.

Sommet

Pulfrey

Butera

. (2013). Did my M.D. really go to university to learn? Detrimental effects of numerus clausus on self-efficacy, mastery goals and learning. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084178

56.

Sommet

Quiamzade

Jury

Mugny

(2015). The student-institution fit at university: Interactive effects of academic competition and social class on achievement goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00769

57.

Staklis

. (2016). Employment and enrollment status of baccalaureate degree recipients 1 year after graduation: 1994, 2001, and 2009 (NCES 2017-407). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017407

58.

Stephens

N. M.

Fryberg

S. A.

Markus

H. R.

Johnson

C. S.

Covarrubias

(2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1178–1197. doi:10.1037/a0027143

59.

Stephens

N. M.

Hamedani

M. G.

Destin

(2014). Closing the social-class achievement gap: A difference-education intervention improves first-generation students’ academic performance and all students’ college transition. Psychological Science, 25, 943–953. doi:10.1177/0956797613518349

60.

Tao

K. W.

Gloria

A. M

. (2018). Should I stay or should I go? The role of impostorism in STEM persistence. Psychology of Women Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0361684318802333

61.

Terenzini

P. T.

Springer

Yaeger

P. M.

Pascarella

E. T.

Nora

(1996). First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 37, 1–22. doi:10.1007/BF01680039

62.

U.S. Department of Education. (2016). STEM 2026: A vision for innovation in STEM education. Washington, DC: Office of Innovation and Improvement.

63.

U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Beginning postsecondary students longitudinal study 2012-2014 (Report No. BPS:12/14) . Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

64.

U.S. Department of Labor. (2019). Occupational outlook handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

65.

Urdan

(2004). Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 251–264. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.251

66.

Vaughn

A. R.

Taasoobshirazi

Johnson

M. L

. (2019). Imposter phenomenon and motivation: Women in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1568976

67.

Ward

Siegel

M. J.

Devenport

(2012). First-generation college students: Understanding and improving the experience from recruitment to commencement. San Francisco, CA: San Jossey-Bass.

68.

Wilkinson

R. G.

Pickett

K. E.

(2009). Income inequality and social dysfunction. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 493–511. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115926

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB