Self-enhancement, the motive to view oneself in positive light, and its manifestations have received wide attention in behavioral sciences. The self-enhancement manifestations vary on a continuum from a subjective level (agentic narcissism, communal narcissism, narcissistic grandiosity) through an intermediate level (better-than-average judgments) to an objective level (overclaiming one’s knowledge). Prior research has established the heritability of self-enhancement manifestations at the subjective and intermediate levels. The present twin study demonstrated that (1) the objective level of self-enhancement manifestation is also heritable; (2) a common core, which is moderately heritable, underlies the three levels of self-enhancement manifestations; (3) the relation between self-enhancement (manifested at all three levels) and psychological well-being is partly heritable; and (4) environmental influences, either shared by or unique to family members, are evident through (1), (2), and (3). The findings deepen understanding of the etiology of individual differences in self-enhancement and their links to psychological well-being.
AkaikeH. (1987). Factor-analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. doi:10.1007/BF02294359
2.
AlickeM. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621–1630. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.6.1621
3.
AlickeM. D.SedikidesC. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 1–48. doi:10.1080/10463280802613866
4.
AlickeM. D.SedikidesC. (2011). Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5.
AlickeM. D.ZellE.GuentherC. L. (2013). Social self-analysis: Constructing, protecting, and enhancing the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 173–234. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-407188-9.00004-1
6.
BianchiE. C. (2014). Entering adulthood in a recession tempers later narcissism. Psychological Science, 25, 1429–1437. doi:10.1177/0956797614532818
7.
BiernatM. (2005). Standards and expectancies: Contrast and assimilation in judgments of self and others. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
8.
BokerS. M.NealeM. C.MaesH. H.WildeM. J.SpiegelM.BrickT. R.…BrandmaierA. (2012). OpenMx 1.2 user guide. Charlottesville: University of Virginia, The OpenMX Project.
9.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.
10.
BrileyD. A.Tucker-DrobE. M. (2012). Broad bandwidth or high fidelity? Evidence from the structure of genetic and environmental effects on the facets of the Five Factor Model. Behavior Genetics, 42, 743–763. doi:10.1007/s10519-012-9548-8
11.
BrummelmanE.ThomaesS.NelemansS. A.Orobio de CastroB.OverbeekG.BushmanB. J. (2015). Origins of narcissism in children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 3659–3662. doi:10.1073/pnas.1420870112
12.
CaiH.WuL.ShiY.GuR.SedikidesC. (2016). Self-enhancement among Westerners and Easterners: A cultural neuroscience approach. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11, 1569–1578. doi:10.1093/scan/nsw072
ChenJ.LiX. Y.ChenZ. Y.YangX. D.ZhangJ.DuanQ.GeX. (2010). Optimization of zygosity determination by questionnaire and DNA genotyping in Chinese adolescent twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 13, 194–200.
15.
ChenJ.LiX.ZhangJ.NatsuakiM. N.LeveL. D.HarenoldG. T.…GeX. (2013). The Beijing Twin Study (BeTwiSt): A longitudinal study of child and adolescent development. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 91–97. doi:10.1017/thg.2012.115
16.
ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.MillerG. E. (2013). Are narcissists hardy or vulnerable? The role of narcissism in the production of stress-related biomarkers in response to emotional distress. Emotion, 13, 1004–1011. doi:10.1037/a0034410
17.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
ColvinC. R.GriffoR. (2008). On the psychological costs of self-enhancement. In ChangE. C. (Ed.), Self-criticism and self-enhancement: Theory, research, and clinical implications (pp. 123–140). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11624-008
19.
CroweM.CarterN. T.CampbellW. K.MillerJ. D. (2016). Validation of the narcissistic grandiosity scale and creation of reduced item variants. Psychological Assessment, 28, 1550–1560. doi:10.1037/pas0000281
20.
DienerE. D.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
21.
DienerE. D.SuhE. M.LucasR. E.SmithH. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
22.
DienerE. D.WirtzD.TovW.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiD.-W.OishiS.Biswas-DienerR. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
23.
DufnerM.GebauerJ. E.SedikidesC.DenissenJ. J. A. (2019). Self-enhancement and psychological adjustment: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23, 48–72. doi:10.1177/1088868318756467
24.
FerrisD. L.JohnsonR. E.SedikidesC. (2018). The self at work: Fundamental theory and research. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
25.
FosterJ. D.CampbellW. K.TwengeJ. M. (2003). Individual differences in narcissism: Inflated self-views across the lifespan and around the world. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 469–486. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00026-6
26.
FranzC. E.PanizzonM. S.EavesL. J.ThompsonW.LyonsM. J.JacobsonK. C.…KremenW. S. (2012). Genetic and environmental multidimensionality of well- and ill-being in middle aged twin men. Behavior Genetics, 42, 579–591. doi:10.1007/s10519-012-9538-x
27.
GebauerJ. E.SedikidesC.VerplankenB.MaioG. R. (2012). Communal narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 854–878. doi:10.1037/a0029629
28.
HaworthC. M. A.CarterK.EleyT. C.PlominR. (2017). Understanding the genetic and environmental specificity and overlap between well-being and internalizing symptoms in adolescence. Developmental Science, 20, e12376. doi:10.1111/desc.12376
29.
HepperE. G.GramzowR. H.SedikidesC. (2010). Individual differences in self-enhancement and self-protection strategies: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality, 78, 781–814. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00633
30.
HepperE. G.SedikidesC.CaiH. (2013). Self-enhancement and self-protection strategies in China: Cultural expressions of a fundamental human motive. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 5–23. doi:10.1177/0022022111428515
31.
KnopikV. S.NeiderhiserJ. M.DeFriesJ. C.PlominR. (2017). Behavioral genetics (7th ed.). New York, NY: Worth, Macmillan Learning.
32.
LiemG. A. D.McInerneyD. M. (Eds.). (2018). Big theories revisited 2. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press.
33.
LuoY. L. L.CaiH.SedikidesC.SongH. (2014). Distinguishing communal narcissism from agentic narcissism: A behavior genetics analysis on the agency-communion model of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 49, 52–58. http://doi:10.1016/j.jrpdoi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.01.001
34.
LuoY. L. L.CaiH.SongH. (2014). A behavioral genetic study of intrapersonal and interpersonal dimensions of narcissism. PLoS One, 9, e93403. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093403
35.
LuoY. L. L.LiuY.CaiH.WildschutT.SedikidesC. (2016). Nostalgia and self-enhancement: Phenotypic and genetic approaches. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 857–866. doi:10.1177/1948550616660158
36.
MacmillanN. A.CreelmanC. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37.
MatosicD.NtoumanisN.BoardleyI. D.SedikidesC.StewartB. D.ChatzisarantisN. (2017). Narcissism and coach behaviours: A self-determination theory perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 27, 254–261. doi:10.1111/sms.12635
38.
McGueM.BouchardT. J. (1984). Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex. Behavior Genetics, 14, 325–343. doi:10.1007/BF01080045
39.
MelchersM.PliegerT.MontagC.ReuterM.SpinathF. M.HahnE. (2018). The heritability of response styles and its impact on heritability estimates of personality: A twin study. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 16–24. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.023
40.
PaulhusD. L.HarmsP. D.BruceM. N.LysyD. C. (2003). The over-claiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 890–904. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.890
41.
PurcellS. (2002). Variance components models for gene–environment interaction in twin analysis. Twin Research, 5, 554–571. doi:10.1375/twin.5.6.554
42.
RafteryA. E. (1995). Bayesian Model selection in social research [with discussion]. In MarsdenP. V. (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1995 (pp. 111–195). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
43.
RaskinR.TerryH. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.
44.
ReinhardD. A.KonrathS. H.LopezW. D.CameronH. G. (2012). Expensive egos: Narcissistic males have higher cortisol. PLoS One, 7, e30858. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030858
45.
RosenthalS. A.HooleyJ. M.SteshenkoY. (2007). Distinguishing grandiosity from self-esteem: Development of the Narcissistic Grandiosity Scale. Unpublished Manuscript.
46.
SedikidesC. (2018). On the doggedness of self-enhancement and self-protection: How constraining are reality constraints?Self and Identity. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/15298868.2018.1562961
47.
SedikidesC.AlickeM. D. (2012). Self-enhancement and self-protection motives. In RyanR. M. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of motivation (pp. 303–322). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
48.
SedikidesC.AlickeM. D. (2019). The five pillars of self-enhancement and self-protection. In RyanR. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (2nd ed., pp. 307–319). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
49.
SedikidesC.GaertnerL.CaiH. (2015). On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: The case for the universality of self-esteem. Advances in Motivation Science, 2, 185–241. doi:10.1016/bs.adms.2015.04.002
50.
SedikidesC.GreggA. P. (2008). Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 102–116. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00068.x
51.
SedikidesC.StrubeM. J. (1997). Self-evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self be better. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 209–269. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60018-0
52.
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
53.
ThomaesS.BrummelmanE.SedikidesC. (2017). Why most children think highly of themselves. Child Development, 88, 1873–1884. doi:10.1111/cdev.12937
54.
VerhulstB. (2017). A power calculator for the classical twin design. Behavior Genetics, 47, 255–261. doi:10.1007/s10519-016-9828-9
55.
YangZ.SedikidesC.GuR.LuoY. L. L.WangY.CaiH. (2018a). Narcissism and risky decisions: A neurophysiological approach. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13, 889–897. doi:10.1093/scan/nsy053
56.
YangZ.SedikidesC.GuR.LuoY. L. L.WangY.YangY.…CaiH. (2018b). Communal narcissism: Social decisions and neurophysiological reactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 76, 65–73. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2018.07.003
57.
YoungS. E.StallingsM. C.CorleyR. P.KrauterK. S.HewittJ. K. (2000). Genetic and environmental influences on behavioral disinhibition. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 96, 684–695.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
