A foodie call occurs when a person, despite a lack of romantic attraction to a suitor, chooses to go on a date to receive a free meal. The present study examines predictors of a deceptive form of the foodie call in the context of male–female dates: when a woman purposefully misrepresents her romantic interest in a man to dine at his expense. In two studies, we surveyed women regarding their foodie call behavior, dark triad personality traits, traditional gender role beliefs, and online dating history. We found 23–33% of women surveyed had engaged in a foodie call. In Study 1, dark triad and traditional gender role beliefs significantly predicted previous foodie call behavior and its perceived acceptability. Study 2 employed fuller measures and suggested again that dark triad traits predicted foodie calls and their perceived acceptability.
BaumeisterR. F.WotmanS. R.StillwellA. M. (1993). Unrequited love: On heartbreak, anger, guilt, scritplessness, and humiliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 377–394.
2.
BemS. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.
3.
BrewerG.AbellL.LyonsM. (2016). Machiavellianism, pretending orgasm, and sexual intimacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 155–158.
4.
BrownM. J.GladstoneN. (2012). Development of a short version of the Gender Role Beliefs Scale. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 154–158.
5.
CampbellW. K.FosterJ. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In SedikidesC.SpencerS. J. (Eds.), Frontiers of social psychology. The self (pp. 115–138). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
6.
ChristieR.GeisF. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
7.
DeluciaJ. L. (1987). Gender role identity and dating behavior: What is the relationship?Sex Roles, 17, 153–161.
8.
EaglyA. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A metaanalytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306–315.
10.
EcclesJ. S.JacobsJ. E.HaroldR. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents’ socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 183–201.
International Labour Organization. (2014). Global employment trends 2014: Risk of a jobless recovery?Retrieved fromhttp://www.ilo.org/global/research
13.
Jaramillo-SierraA. L.AllenK. R. (2013). Who pays after the first date? Young men’s discourses of the male-provider role. Psychology and Men and Masculinity, 14, 389–399.
14.
JonasonP. K.KavanaghP. (2010). The dark side of love: Love styles and the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 606–610.
15.
JonasonP. K.KoenigB. L.TostJ. (2010). Living a fast life. Human Nature, 21, 428–442.
16.
JonasonP. K.WebsterG. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22, 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
17.
JonasonP. K.WebsterG. D.SchmittD. P.LiN. P.CryselL. (2012). The antihero in popular culture: Life history theory and the dark triad personality traits. Review of General Psychology, 16, 192–199.
18.
KaplanH. S.GangestadS. W. (2005). Life History Theory and Evolutionary Psychology. In BussD. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 68–95). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
19.
LevensonM. R.KiehlK. A.FitzpatrickC. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151–158.
20.
MarchE.WagstaffD. L. (2017). Sending nudes: Sex, self-rated mate value, and trait Machiavellianism predict sending unsolicited explicit images. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–6.
21.
MillerJ. D.LynamD. R.HyattC. S.CampbellW. K. (2017). Controversies in narcissism. Annual Review in Clinical Psychology, 13, 291–315. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045244
22.
PaulhusD. L.WilliamsK. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism. Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.
23.
RaskinR.HallC. S. (1981). The Narcissistic Personality Inventory: Alternate form reliability and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 159–162.
24.
ReiseS. P.MooreT. M.HavilandM. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544–559.
Zeigler-HillV.TromblyD. R. (2018). Narcissism and mate value: Is beauty in the eye of the narcissistic beholder?Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 115–119.
