Beliefs About Religious and Scientific Entities Among Parents and Children in Iran

Abstract

Previous research has shown that children and adults express more confidence in the existence of unobservable scientific (e.g., germs), as compared to religious, phenomena (e.g., the soul). We asked if the same pattern would emerge among parents (N = 77) and children (N = 85) in Iran, a country with widespread commitment to religious values and beliefs. Parents expressed confidence in the existence of various scientific and religious phenomena but were more confident that scientific phenomena exist. Moreover, even though Iranian parents expressed a high valuation of both science and religion, their valuation of science was higher than that of religion. Like their parents, older children also expressed greater confidence in the existence of scientific, as compared to religious, phenomena. We conclude that with age, the kind of discourse children are exposed to elicits more confidence in the existence of scientific phenomena even in a religious society.

Keywords

unobservable phenomena science/religion culture community consensus

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler

N. E.

Epel

E. S.

Castellazzo

Ickovics

J. R.

(2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19, 586.

Ashtarian

(2015). UNESCO Science Report: Towards 2030 (pp. 388–407). Retrieved from http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/unesco-science-report-towards-2030- part1.pdf

Astuti

Harris

P. L.

(2008). Understanding mortality and the life of the ancestors in rural Madagascar. Cognitive Science, 32, 713–740.

Bahari

(2009). Quarks and the Koran: Iran’s Islamic embrace of science. Newsweek. Retrieved from https://www.newsweek.com/quarks-and-koran-irans-islamic-embrace-science-80063

Buckser

(1996). Religion, science, and secularization theory on a Danish island. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35, 432–441.

Canfield

C. F.

Ganea

P. A.

(2014). ‘You could call it magic’: What parents and siblings tell preschoolers about unobservable entities. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15, 269–286.

Corriveau

K. H.

Harris

P. L.

(2014). Learning from testimony about religion and science. In Robinson

E. J.

Shiri

(Eds.), Trust and Skepticism: Children’s Selective Learning from Testimony (pp. 36–49). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Evans

J. H.

Evans

M. S.

(2008). Religion and science: Beyond the epistemological conflict narrative. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 87–105.

Guerrero

Enesco

Harris

P. L.

(2010). Oxygen and the soul: Children’s conception of invisible entities. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 123–151.

10.

Harris

P. L.

Abarbanell

Pasquini

E. S.

Duke

(2007). Imagination and testimony in the child’s construction of reality. Intellectica, 2, 69–84.

11.

Harris

P. L.

Giménez

(2005). Children’s acceptance of conflicting testimony: The case of death. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5, 143–164.

12.

Harris

P. L.

Pasquini

E. S.

Duke

Asscher

J. J.

Pons

(2006). Germs and angels: The role of testimony in young children’s ontology. Developmental Science, 9, 76–96.

13.

Heiphetz

Spelke

E. S.

Harris

P. L.

Banaji

M. R.

(2013). The development of reasoning about beliefs: Fact, preference, and ideology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 559–565.

14.

Heiphetz

Spelke

E. S.

Harris

P. L.

Banaji

M. R.

(2014). What do different beliefs tell us? An examination of factual, opinion-based, and religious beliefs. Cognitive development, 30, 15–29.

15.

Iliffe

(2017). Priest of Nature: The Religious Worlds of Isaac Newton. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

16.

Kazemipur

Rezaei

(2003). Religious life under theocracy: The case of Iran. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 347–361.

17.

Legare

C. H.

Evans

E. M.

Rosengren

K. S.

Harris

P. L.

(2012). The coexistence of natural and supernatural explanations across cultures and development. Child Development, 83, 779–793.

18.

Legare

C. H.

Gelman

S. A.

(2008). Bewitchment, biology, or both: The co-existence of natural and supernatural explanatory frameworks across development. Cognitive Science, 32, 607–642.

19.

Lewis

(1980). Abus Salam—Biographical. In Odelberg

(Ed.), Les Prix Nobel. The Nobel Prizes 1979. Stockholm, Sweden: Nobel Foundation.

20.

Mehran

(1997). Education xxiv. Education in post-revolutionary Persia, 1979–1995. In Encyclopedia Iranica (Vol. VIII, Fasc. 3, pp. 230–233). New York, NY: Columbia University Center for Iranian Studies. Retrieved from http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/education-xxiveducation-in-postrevolutionary-persia-1979-95

21.

Mehran

(2007). Iran: A Shi’ite curriculum to serve the Islamic state. In Doumato

E. A.

Starrett

(Eds.), Teaching Islam: Textbook and religion in the Middle East (pp. 53–70). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

22.

Mistry

R. S.

Brown

C. S.

White

E. S.

Chow

K. A.

Gillen O’Neel

(2015). Elementary school children’s reasoning about social class: A mixed-methods study. Child Development, 86, 1653–1671.

23.

Payir

Davoodi

Sianaki

M. J.

Harris

P. L.

Corriveau

(2018). Coexisting religious and scientific beliefs among Iranian parents. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24, 240.

24.

Shtulman

(2013). Epistemic similarities between students’ scientific and supernatural beliefs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 199.

25.

Van Leeuwen

(2014). Religious credence is not factual belief. Cognition, 133, 698–715.

26.

World Values Survey Association. (2005). World Values Survey 2005. Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp

27.

Yarshater

(2004). Iran ii. Iranian history—Islamic period. In Encyclopedia Iranica (Vol. XIII, Fasc. 3, pp. 243–246). New York, NY: Columbia University Center for Iranian Studies. Retrieved from http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/iran-ii2-islamic-period-page-1