Can a perceiver’s belief about a target’s transgender status (distinct from gender nonconforming appearance) affect perceptions of the target’s attractiveness? Cisgender, heterosexual men and women (N = 319) received randomly assigned labels (cisgender cross-gender, transgender man, transgender woman, or nonbinary) paired with 48 cross-sex targets represented by photos and rated the attractiveness and related characteristics of those targets. The gender identity labels had a strong, pervasive effect on ratings of attraction. Nonbinary and especially transgender targets were perceived as less attractive than cisgender targets. The effect was particularly strong for male perceivers, and for women with traditional gender attitudes. Sexual and romantic attraction are not driven solely by sexed appearance; information about gender identity and transgender status also influences these assessments. These results have important implications for theoretical models of sexual orientation and for the dating lives of transgender people.
AbbeyA. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females’ friendliness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830–838. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.5.830
AltemeyerB.HunsbergerB. E. (2004). A revised religious fundamentalism scale: The short and sweet of it. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14, 47–54.
BaileyJ. M.VaseyP. L.DiamondL. M.BreedloveS. M.VilainE.EpprechtM. (2016). Sexual orientation, controversy, and science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17, 45–101. doi:10.1177/1529100616637616
BelawskiS. E.SojkaC. J. (2014). Intimate relationships. In Erickson-SchrothL. (Ed.), Trans bodies, trans selves: A resource for the transgender community (pp. 335–355). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
BettcherT. M. (2007). Evil deceivers and make-believers: On transphobic violence and the politics of illusion. Hypatia, 22, 43–66. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb01090.x
Bleske-RechekA.SomersE.MickeC.EricksonL.MattesonL.StoccoC.RitchieL. (2012). Benefit or burden? Attraction in cross-sex friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 569–596. doi:10.1177/0265407512443611
12.
ChingB. H. H.XuJ. T. (2017). The effects of gender neuroessentialism on transprejudice: An experimental study. Sex Roles, 1–14. doi:10.1007/s11199-017-0786-3
13.
DankM.LachmanP.ZweigJ. M.YahnerJ. (2014). Dating violence experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 846–857. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-9975-8
14.
FactorR.RothblumE. (2008). Exploring gender identity and community among three groups of transgender individuals in the United States: MTFs, FTMs, and genderqueers. Health Sociology Review, 17, 235–253. doi:10.5172/hesr.451.17.3.235
15.
FelicianoC.RobnettB.KomaieG. (2009). Gendered racial exclusion among white internet daters. Social Science Research, 38, 39–54. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.09.004
GalinskyA. D.HallE. V.CuddyA. J. C. (2013). Gendered races: Implications for interracial marriage, leadership selection, and athletic participation. Psychological Science, 24, 498–506. doi:10.1177/0956797612457783
18.
GalupoM. P.LomashE.MitchellR. C. (2016). All of my lovers fit into this scale: Sexual minority individuals’ responses to two novel measures of sexual orientation. Journal of Homosexuality, 64, 145–165. doi:10.1080/00918369.2016.1174027
19.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
GerhardsteinK.AndersonV. (2010). There’s more than meets the eye: Facial appearance and evaluations of transsexual people. Sex Roles, 63, 361–373.
21.
GlickP.WhiteheadJ. (2010). Hostility toward men and the perceived stability of male dominance. Social Psychology, 41, 177–185. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000025
22.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ.IyerR.KolevaS.DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366–385. doi:10.1037/a0021847
HillD.WilloughbyB. (2005). The development and validation of the Genderism and Transphobia Scale. Sex Roles, 53, 531–544. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-7140-x
JamesS. E.HermanJ. L.RankinS.KeislingM.MottetL.AnafiM. (2016). The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality.
27.
JuddC. M.WestfallJ.KennyD. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 54–69.
28.
KesslerS. J.McKennaW. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
KuperL. E.NussbaumR.MustanskiB. (2012). Exploring the diversity of gender and sexual orientation identities in an online sample of transgender individuals. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 244–254. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.596954
30.
LeeC.KwanP. (2014). The trans panic defense: Masculinity, heteronormativity, and the murder of transgender women. Hastings Law Journal, 66, 77–132. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2430390
31.
MaD.CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1122–1135.
32.
Manganelli RattazziA. M.BobbioA.CanovaL. (2007). A short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1223–1234. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.013
MorrisonM. A.MorrisonT. G. (2003). Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women. Journal of Homosexuality, 43, 15–37.
35.
NagoshiJ. L.AdamsK.TerrellH.HillE.BrzuzyS.NagoshiC. (2008). Gender differences in correlates of homophobia and transphobia. Sex Roles, 59, 521–531. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9458-7
36.
NagoshiJ. L.NagoshiC. T.TerrellH. K.BrzuzyS. (2014). The complex negotiations of gender roles, gender identity, and sexual orientation among heterosexual, gay/lesbian, and transgender individuals. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 8, 205–221.
37.
NortonA.HerekG. (2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex Roles, 68, 738–753. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
40.
RosarioM.SchrimshawE. W. (2014). Theories and etiologies of sexual orientation. In TolmanD. L.DiamondL. M. (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology: Vol. 1 Person-based approaches. (pp. 555–596). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
41.
SellR. L. (1997). Defining and measuring sexual orientation: A review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 643–658. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9415799
42.
SeranoJ. (2007). Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.
SternC.RuleN. O. (2017). Physical androgyny and categorization difficulty shape political conservatives’ attitudes toward transgender people. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 109. doi:10.1177/1948550617703172
45.
StolierR. M.FreemanJ. B. (2016). Neural pattern similarity reveals the inherent intersection of social categories. Nature Neuroscience, 19, 795–797. doi:10.1038/nn.4296
46.
TateC. C.YoussefC. P.BettergarciaJ. N. (2014). Integrating the study of transgender spectrum and cisgender experiences of self-categorization from a personality perspective. Review of General Psychology, 18, 302–312.
47.
van AndersS. M. (2015). Beyond sexual orientation: Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual configurations theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0490-8
48.
WalchS. E.NgamakeS. T.FranciscoJ.StittR. L.ShinglerK. A. (2012). The attitudes toward transgendered individuals scale: Psychometric properties. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1283–1291. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9995-6
49.
WestfallJ.KennyD. A.JuddC. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 143, 2020–2045.
50.
WilkinsC. L.ChanJ. F.KaiserC. R. (2011). Racial stereotypes and interracial attraction: Phenotypic prototypicality and perceived attractiveness of Asians. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17, 427–431. doi:10.1037/a0024733
51.
WoddaA.PanfilV. (2015). Don’t talk to me about deception: The necessary erosion of the trans* panic defense. Albany Law Review, 78, 927–971. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
52.
WolffM.WellsB.Ventura-DiPersiaC.RensonA.GrovC. (2017). Measuring sexual orientation: A review and critique of U.S. data collection efforts and implications for health policy. Journal of Sex Research, 54, 507–531. doi:10.1080/00224499.2016.1255872
53.
WorthenM. G. F. (2013). An argument for separate analyses of attitudes toward lesbian, gay, bisexual men, bisexual women, MtF and FtM transgender individuals. Sex Roles, 68, 703–723. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0155-1
54.
WrightL. W.AdamsH. E.BernatJ. (1999). Development and validation of the homophobia scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 21, 337–347.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
