Did the 2016 U.S. presidential election’s outcome affect Americans’ expression of gender bias? Drawing on theories linking leadership with intergroup attitudes, we proposed it would. A preregistered exploratory survey of two independent samples of Americans pre- and postelection (ns = 1,098 and 1,192) showed no pre–post differences in modern sexism, concern with the gender pay gap, or perceptions of gender inequality and progress overall. However, supporters of Donald Trump (but not of Hillary Clinton) expressed greater modern sexism post- versus preelection—which in turn predicted reporting lower disturbance with the gender pay gap, perceiving less discrimination against women but more against men, greater progress toward gender equality, and greater female representation at top levels in the United States. Results were reliable when evaluated against four robustness standards, thereby offering suggestive evidence of how historic events may affect gender-bias expression. We discuss the theoretical implications for intergroup attitudes and their expression.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
BeckerJ. C.WagnerU. (2009). Doing gender differently: The interplay of strength of gender identification and content of gender identity in predicting women’s endorsement of sexist beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 487–508. doi:10.1002/ejsp.551
3.
BrodishA. B.BrazyP. C.DevineP. G. (2008). More eyes on the prize: Variability in White Americans’ perceptions of progress toward racial equality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 513–527. doi:10.1177/0146167207311337
4.
ButzD. A.YogeeswaranK. (2011). A new threat in the air: Macroeconomic threat increases prejudice against Asian Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 22–27. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.014
5.
CampbellB.SchellenbergE. G.SennC. Y. (1997). Evaluating measures of contemporary sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 89–102. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00102.x
6.
ClarkJ. K.WegenerD. T.BriñolP.PettyR. E. (2009). Discovering that the shoe fits: The self-validating role of stereotypes. Psychological Science, 20, 846–853.
7.
ColumbC.PlantE. A. (2011). Revisiting the Obama effect: Exposure to Obama reduces implicit prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 499–501.
8.
ConwayL. G.RepkeM. A.HouckS. C. (2017). Donald trump as a cultural revolt against perceived communication restriction: Priming political correctness norms causes more Trump support. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5, 244–259. doi:10.5964/jspp.v5i1.732
9.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414–446. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414
10.
CrandallC. S.MillerJ. M.WhiteM. H. (2018). Changing norms following the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 186–192. doi:10.1177/1948550617750735
11.
CundiffJ. L.ZawadzkiM. J.DanubeC. L.ShieldsS. A. (2014). Using experiential learning to increase the recognition of everyday sexism as harmful: The WAGES intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 703–721. doi:10.1111/josi.12087
12.
DasguptaN.AsgariS. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642–658. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003
13.
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.56.1.5
14.
DoesS.GündemirS.ShihM. (2018). The Divided States of America—How the 2016 U.S. presidential election shaped perceived levels of gender equality. Social Psychological and Personality Science. doi:10.1177/1948550618757033
15.
EchterhoffG.HigginsE. T.LevineJ. M. (2009). Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others’ inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 496–521. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01161.x
16.
EffronD. A.CameronJ. S.MoninB. (2009). Endorsing Obama licenses favoring Whites. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 590–593. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.001
17.
EibachR. P.EhrlingerJ. (2006). “Keep your eyes on the prize”: Reference points and racial differences in assessing progress toward equality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 66–77. doi:10.1177/0146167205279585
18.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
19.
FiskeS. T.NorthM. S. (2015). Measures of stereotyping and prejudice. In BoyleG.SaklofskeD. H.MatthewsG. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 684–718). New York, NY: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00024-3
20.
GeorgeacO. A. M.RattanA. (2018). Progress in women’s representation in top leadership weakens people’s disturbance with gender inequality in other domains. Manuscript submitted for publication.
21.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
22.
GlickP.FiskeS. T.MladinicA.SaizJ. L.AbramsD.MasserB.…LópezW. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763
23.
HardinC. D.ConleyT. D. (2001). A relational approach to cognition: Shared experience and relationship affirmation in social cognition. In MoskowitzG. B. (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 3–17). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
HardinC. D.HigginsE. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In SorrentinoR.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 28–84). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
HayesA. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
HigginsE. T.BarghJ. A. (1987). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369–425. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.002101
27.
HoggM. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184–200. doi:10.1207/S15327957pspr0503_1
28.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
29.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2003). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111–153. doi:10.1080/10463280240000046
30.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
31.
JostJ. T.KayA. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
32.
KaiserC. R.DruryB. J.SpaldingK. E.CheryanS.O’BrienL. T. (2009). The ironic consequences of Obama’s election: Decreased support for social justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 556–559. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.006
33.
KayA. C.GaucherD.PeachJ. M.LaurinK.FriesenJ.ZannaM. P.SpencerS. J. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 421–434. doi:10.1037/a0015997
34.
KilmartinC.SmithT.GreenA.HeinzenH.KuchlerM.KolarD. (2008). A real time social norms intervention to reduce male sexism. Sex Roles, 59, 264–273. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9446-y
35.
LoweryB. S.HardinC. D.SinclairS. (2001). Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 842–855. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.842
36.
MillerD. T.EffronD. A. (2010). Psychological license: When it is needed and how it functions. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 117–158). San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
37.
NortonM. I.SommersS. R. (2011). Whites see racism as a zero-sum game that they are now losing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 215–218. doi:10.1177/1745691611406922
38.
NosekB. A.SmythF. L.HansenJ. J.DevosT.LindnerN. M.RanganathK. A.…BanajiM. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36–88. doi:10.1080/10463280701489053
39.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G.CoxW. T.ColumbC.MillerS. L.GoplenJ.PerucheB. M. (2009). The Obama effect: Decreasing implicit prejudice and stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 961–964.
40.
PrenticeD. A.MillerD. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 160–164. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.160
41.
RatliffK. A.RedfordL.ConwayJ.SmithC. T. (2017). Engendering support: Hostile sexism predicts voting for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430217741203
42.
RichardF. D.BondC. F.Stokes-ZootaJ. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331–363. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
43.
RuckerD. D.PreacherK. J.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359–371. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x
44.
SankohA. J.HuqueM. F.DubeyS. D. (1997). Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 16, 2529–2542.
45.
SawyerJ.GampaA. (2018). Implicit and explicit racial attitudes changed during Black Lives Matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. doi:10.1177/0146167218757454
46.
SherifM. (Ed.). (1962). Intergroup relations and leadership: Approaches and research in industrial, ethnic, cultural and political areas. Oxford, England: Wiley.
47.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.7.4.422
48.
SkinnerA. L.CheadleJ. E. (2016). The “Obama effect”? Priming contemporary racial milestones increases implicit racial bias among Whites. Social Cognition, 34, 544–558.
49.
SwimJ. K.AikinK. J.HallW. S.HunterB. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199
50.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L.CohenL. L.FergusonM. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00200
51.
SwimJ. K.MallettR.Russo-DevosaY.StangorC. (2005). Judgments of sexism: A comparison of the subtlety of sexism measures and sources of variability in judgments of sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 406–411. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00240.x
52.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The Social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
53.
TankardM. E.PaluckE. L. (2017). The effect of a supreme court decision regarding gay marriage on social norms and personal attitudes. Psychological Science, 28, 1334–1344. doi:10.1177/0956797617709594
54.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Overview of race and Hispanic origin: 2010(2010 Census Briefs No. C2010BR–02). Retrieved fromhttp://www.census.gov/population/race/
55.
van KnippenbergD.HoggM. A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 243–295.
56.
ZhaoX.LynchJ. G. J.ChenQ. (2010). Reconsidering baron and kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206. doi:10.1086/651257
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
