Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The current research presents a general framework for assessing the subjective perception of situations. The framework was used to assess freely listed situations relevant to participants’ daily lives as well as laboratory situations in which behavior was objectively assessed. Exploratory factor analyses revealed five common situation dimensions that map closely to the Big Five: positive affect (PA)/affiliation, negative affect (NA), achievement, dominance/aggression, and situation strength. Results indicate that the five situation dimensions are sensitive to experimentally manipulated characteristics of situations. Further, correlations between subjective situation dimensions and both self-reported and nonself-reported behavior indicate that the situation dimensions possess predictive validity and that the subjective perception of situations is associated with situation-specific behavior. The correspondence between situation perception and personality is discussed.

Keywords

situations situation dimensions situation assessment personality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport

G. W.

(1938). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York, NY: H. Holt and Company.

Allport

G. W.

(1966). Traits revisited. American Psychologist, 21, 1–10.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R.

(1988). From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258–265.

Edwards

J. A.

Templeton

(2005). The structure of perceived qualities of situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 705–723.

Emmons

R. A.

Diener

(1986). Situation selection as a moderator of response consistency and stability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1013–1019.

Fehr

Russell

J. A.

(1984). Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 464–486.

Fleeson

(2007). Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior. Journal of Personality, 75, 825–862.

Forgas

J. P.

(1976). The perception of social episodes: Categorical and dimensional representations in two different social milieus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 199–209.

Funder

D. C.

(2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197–221.

10.

Funder

D. C.

(2006). Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 21–34.

11.

Funder

D. C.

Furr

R. M.

Colvin

C. R.

(2000). The Riverside Behavioral Q-sort: A tool for the description of social behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 451–489.

12.

Furr

R. M.

Funder

D. C.

(2004). Situational similarity and behavioral consistency: Subjective, objective, variable-centered, and person-centered approaches. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 421–447.

13.

Griffo

Colvin

C. R.

(2009). A brief look at interactionism: Past and present. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 243–244.

14.

Hogan

(2009). Much ado about nothing: The person-situation debate. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 249–249.

15.

Jackson

D. N.

(1999). Personality Research Form manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.

16.

John

O. P.

Srivastava

(1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin

L. A.

John

O. P.

Pervin

L. A.

John

O. P.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

17.

Marwell

Hage

(1970). The organization of role relationships: A systematic description. American Sociological Review, 35, 884–900.

18.

McClelland

D. C.

(1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40, 812–825.

19.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

(1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.

20.

Mischel

(1977). The interaction of person and situation. In Magnusson

Endler

N. S.

(Eds.), Personality at the cross-roads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333–352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

21.

Mischel

Shoda

(1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.

22.

Murray

H. A.

(1938). Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

23.

Parrigon

Woo

S. E.

Tay

Wang

(2017). CAPTION-ing the situation: A lexically-derived taxonomy of psychological situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 642–681.

24.

Pervin

L. A.

(1976). A free-response description approach to the analysis of person-situation interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 465–474.

25.

Rauthmann

J. F.

Gallardo-Pujol

Guillaume

E. M.

Todd

Nave

C. S.

Sherman

R. A.

… Funder

D. C

. (2014). The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677–718.

26.

Rauthmann

Sherman

. (2018). The description of situations: Towards replicable domains of psychological situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 482–488.

27.

Rauthmann

J. F.

Sherman

R. A.

Funder

D. C.

(2015). Principles of situation research: Towards a better understanding of psychological situations. European Journal of Personality, 29, 363–381.

28.

Roberts

B. W.

(2007). Contextualizing personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 75, 1071–1082.

29.

Sherman

R. A

. (2015). multicon: An R package for the analysis of multivariate constructs (R Package Version 1.6) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=multicon

30.

Sherman

R. A.

Funder

D. C.

(2009). Evaluating correlations in studies of personality and behavior: Beyond the number of significant findings to be expected by chance. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1053–1063.

31.

Sherman

R. A.

Nave

C. S.

Funder

D. C.

(2010). Situational similarity and personality predict behavioral consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 330–343.

32.

Sherman

R. A.

Rauthmann

J. F.

Brown

N. A.

Serfass

D. G.

Jones

A. B.

(2015). The independent effects of personality and situations on real-time expressions of behavior and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 872–888.

33.

Srivastava

(2010). The five-factor model describes the structure of social perceptions. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 69–75.

34.

Wagerman

S. A.

Funder

D. C.

(2009). Situations. In Corr

P. J.

Matthews

(Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality (pp. 27–42). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Watson

Clark

L. A.

(1991). Preliminary manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (Expanded Form). Unpublished manuscript, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX.

36.

Wish

Deutsch

Kaplan

S. J.

(1976). Perceived dimensions of interpersonal relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 409–420.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

An Exploration of Subjective Situation Dimensions Associated With Situation-Specific Behavior

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material