Past research has investigated deliberate mental acts that allow people to remain entrenched in their convictions. The purpose of the current investigation was to examine whether opinion-confirmation processes can occur involuntarily. We conducted experiments wherein participants made speeded judgments of the grammatical accuracy of statements pertaining to various matters of opinion, and subsequently rated their agreement with those statements. The results show that participants more readily verify the grammaticality of a statement when it corresponds to their opinion. These findings may help explain why opinions are sometimes change resistant, in showing that acceptance (rejection) of confirmatory (contradictory) opinions can occur involuntarily. We discuss possible applications of the paradigm described herein.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
2.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 1–33.
3.
BanduraA. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287.
4.
Barnes-HolmesD.Barnes-HolmesY.StewartI.BolesS. (2010). A sketch of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the Relational Elaboration and Coherence (REC) model. The Psychological Record, 60, 527–542.
5.
CousineauD. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.
6.
De HouwerJ. (2003). A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 219–244). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
De HouwerJ.HeiderN.SpruytA.RoetsA.HughesS. (2015). The relational responding task: Toward a new implicit measure of beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00319
8.
DijksterhuisA.van KnippenbergA.KruglanskiA. W.SchaperC. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Need for closure effects on memory and judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 254–270. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.0012
9.
DittoP. H.MunroG. D.ApanovitchA. M.ScepanskyJ. A.LockhartL. K. (2003). Spontaneous skepticism: The interplay of motivation and expectation in responses to favorable and unfavorable medical diagnoses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1120–1132.
10.
FairhallS. L.CaramazzaA. (2013). Brain regions that represent amodal conceptual knowledge. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 10552–10558.
11.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
12.
FrithC. D.FrithU. (2006). The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron, 50, 531–534.
13.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
14.
HartW.AlbarracínD.EaglyA. H.BrechanI.LindbergM. J.MerrillL. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 555–588.
15.
HermannD. J.RubenfeldL. S. (1985). Lexical representation of fact and opinion. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 14, 81–95.
16.
HoltonB.PyszczynskiT. (1989). Biased information search in the interpersonal domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 42–51.
17.
IsbernerM. B.RichterT. (2013). Can readers ignore implausibility? Evidence for nonstrategic monitoring of event-based plausibility in language comprehension. Acta Psychologica, 142, 15–22. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.10.003
18.
IsbernerM.-B.RichterT. (2014). Does validation during language comprehension depend on an evaluative mindset?Discourse Processes, 51, 7–25.
19.
KossowskaM. (2007). The role of cognitive inhibition in motivation toward closure. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1117–1126. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.026
20.
KruglanskiA. W.WebsterD. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing”. Psychological Review, 103, 263.
21.
KruglanskiA. W.WebsterD. M.KlemA. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861–876. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.861
22.
KuhnD.CheneyR.WeinstockM. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309–328.
23.
LordC. G.RossL.LepperM. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.
24.
McConahayJ. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
NickersonR. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220.
26.
RichterT.SchroederS.WöhrmannB. (2009). You don’t have to believe everything you read: Background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 538–558.
27.
RokeachM. (1954). The nature and meaning of dogmatism. Psychological Review, 61, 194–204. doi:10.1037/h0060752
28.
SmithS. M.FabrigarL. R.PowellD. M.EstradaM.-J. (2007). The role of information-processing capacity and goals in attitude-congruent selective exposure effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 948–960.
29.
ValloneR. P.RossL.LepperM. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 577–585.
30.
WebsterD. M.KruglanskiA. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049.
31.
WyerR. SJr. (2014). The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
