Research on the relationship between the Big Five and prejudice suggests that low agreeableness and low openness to experience are the most consistent personality correlates of prejudice. However, research on this topic has not examined racial resentment (RR) among White Americans, an affectively charged hostility to Blacks rooted in the perception that they lack self-reliance. Based on work suggesting that prejudices like this may have a value-laden component, we argue that the strongest predictors of RR will be those associated with conservatism: conscientiousness and openness. Using three national surveys, we find that conscientiousness and openness are the strongest predictors of RR among White Americans—matching the predictors of ideology but not a stereotyping measure. Extending this, we demonstrate that conscientiousness and openness predict changes in RR over time.
AkramiN. (2005). Prejudice: The interplay of personality, cognition, and social psychology(Doctoral dissertation). Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
2.
AkramiN.EkehammarB.BerghR. (2011). Generalized prejudice: Common and specific components. Psychological Science, 22, 57–59.
3.
AkramiN.EkehammarB.BerghR.DahlstrandE.MalmstenS. (2009). Prejudice: The person in the situation. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 890–897.
4.
AltemeyerB.1998. The other ‘authoritarian personality.’ In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego, CA: Academic.
5.
ArceneauxK. (2006). Do campaigns help voters learn? A cross-national analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 36, 159–173.
6.
BaguleyT. (2009). Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported?British Journal of Psychology, 100, 603–617. doi:10.1348/000712608X377117
7.
BanksA. (2014). Anger and racial politics: The emotional foundation of racial attitudes in America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BerelsonB. R.LazarsfeldP. F.McPheeW. N. (1954). Voting. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
BerghR.AkramiN.EkehammarB. (2012). The personality underpinnings of explicit and implicit generalized prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 614–621.
10.
BouchardT. J.LoehlinJ. C. (2001). Genes, evolution, and personality. Behavior Genetics, 31, 243–273.
11.
BrandtM. J.ChambersJ. R.CrawfordJ. T.WetherellG.ReynaC. (2015). Bounded openness: The effect of openness to experience on intolerance is moderated by target group conventionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 549–568.
12.
CapraraG. V.SchwartzS.CapannaC.VecchioneM.BarbaranelliC. (2006). Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology, 27, 1–28.
13.
CarneyD. R.JostJ. T.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807–840.
14.
CaspiA.RobertsB. W.ShinerR. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.
15.
ChambersJ. R.SchlenkerB. R.CollissonB. (2013). Ideology and prejudice: The role of value conflicts. Psychological Science, 24, 140–149.
16.
CrawfordJ. T.BrandtM. J. (2017). The Big Five and inclusive generalized prejudice (Unpublished manuscript).Department of Psychology, The College of New Jersey, Ewing Township, NJ.
17.
DigmanJ. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.
18.
DonnellanM. B.OswaldF. L.BairdB. M.LucasR. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192.
19.
EkehammarB.AkramiN.GyljeM.ZakrissonI. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism?European Journal of Personality, 18, 463–482.
20.
FeldmanS.HuddyL. (2005). Racial resentment and white opposition to race-conscious programs: Principles or prejudice?American Journal of Political Science, 49, 168–183.
21.
FernándezM. L.CastroY. R.TorrejónM. J. S. (2001). Sexism and racism in a Spanish sample of secondary school students. Social Indicators Research, 54, 309–328.
22.
FinkelS. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
FlynnF. J. (2005). Having an open mind: The impact of openness to experience on interracial attitudes and impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 816.
24.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M. (2011). The big five personality traits in the political arena. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 265–287.
25.
GerberA. S.HuberG. A.DohertyD.DowlingC. M.HaS. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104, 111–133.
26.
GoldbergL. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26.
27.
GoldbergL. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26.
28.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.
29.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20, 102–116. doi:10.1037/a0038889
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2, 102–138.
32.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
33.
KaplanN.ParkD. K.GelmanA. (2012). Polls and elections understanding persuasion and activation in presidential campaigns: The random walk and mean reversion models. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 42, 843–866.
34.
KinderD. R.SandersL. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
McArdleJ. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 577–605.
36.
McConahayJ. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In DovidioJ.GaertnerS. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
37.
McCraeR. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323.
38.
McCraeR. R. (2015). A more nuanced view of reliability. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 97–112.
39.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2, 139–153.
40.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment, 1, 273–294.
41.
MondakJ. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
42.
MondakJ. J.HalperinK. D. (2008). A framework for the study of personality and political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 335.
43.
SearsD. O. (1988). Symbolic racism. In KatzP.TaylorD. (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 53–84). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
44.
SearsD. O.HenryP. J. (2003). The origins of symbolic racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 259–275.
45.
SearsD. O.HenryP. J. (2005). Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 95–150. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(05)37002-x
46.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279.
47.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
48.
SnidermanP. M.PiazzaT. L. (1993). The scar of race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
SnidermanP. M.TetlockP. E. (1986). Symbolic racism: Problems of motive attribution in political analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 129–150.
50.
TeslerM. (2016). Post-racial or most-racial? Race and politics in the Obama era. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
Van GestelS.Van BroeckhovenC. (2003). Genetics of personality: Are we making progress?Molecular Psychiatry, 8, 840–852.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
