The investment model of commitment has been used to understand relationship maintenance and dissolution across a variety of populations and relationship types. The current study used data from the Project on Partner Dynamics (POPD), a cohort study of young adults involved in nonmarital sexual relationships in the Los Angeles area, to test whether and how the investment model of commitment processes predicts individuals' self-reported categorizations of their relationships over time. We examined (1) how relationship categorizations are associated with variables outlined by the investment model and (2) whether model variables predict changes in relationship categorization over time. We found that changes in relationship self-categorization were associated with simultaneous changes in investment model variables, and that the model largely predicts the likelihood of future changes in relational self-categorization. These results are the first to examine how the investment model prospectively predicts the progression or regression of relationships beyond relationship dissolution.
AgnewC. R.ArriagaX. M.WilsonJ. E. (2008). Committed to what? Using the bases of commitment relational commitment model to understand continuity and changes in social relationships. In ForgasJ.FitnessJ. (Eds.), Social relationships: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes (pp. 147–164). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
2.
AgnewC. R.BesikciE.TanK. (in press). The investment model scale. In Zeigler-HillV.ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and human development. New York, NY: Springer.
3.
AgnewC. R.VanderDriftL. E. (2015). Relationship maintenance and dissolution. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 581–604). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4.
AgnewC. R.VanderDriftL. E. (in press). Commitment processes in personal relationship. In VangelistiA. L.PerlmanD. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5.
ArriagaX. B.AgnewC. R. (2001). Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1190–1203.
6.
BissonM. A.LevineT. R. (2009). Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 66–73.
7.
DaviesP. T.WindleM. (2000). Middle adolescents’ dating pathways and psychosocial adjustment. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 90–118.
8.
DavisL. E.StrubeM. J. (1993). An assessment of romantic commitment among Black and White dating couples. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 212–225.
9.
DuffyS. M.RusbultC. E. (1986). Satisfaction and commitment in homosexual and heterosexual relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 12, 1–23.
10.
EnglandP.ShaferE. F.FogartyA. C. (2008). Hooking up and forming romantic relationships on today’s college campuses. The Gendered Society Reader, 3, 531–593.
11.
FinkelE. J.EastwickP. W.KarneyB. R.ReisH. T.SprecherS. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3–66.
12.
FinkelE. J.RusbultC. E.KumashiroM.HannonP. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956–974. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.956
13.
GoodfriendW.AgnewC. R. (2008). Sunken costs and desired plans: Examining different types of investments in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1639–1652.
14.
ImpettE. A.BealsK. P.PeplauL. A. (2001). Testing the investment model of relationship commitment and stability in a longitudinal study of married couples. Current Psychology, 20, 312–326.
15.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
16.
KneeC. R.ReisH. T. (Eds.). (2016). Positive approaches to optimal relationship development (pp. 3–29). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
LeB.AgnewC. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57.
19.
LinY. W.RusbultC. E. (1995). Commitment to dating relationships and cross-sex friendships in America and China. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 7–26.
20.
MeierA.AllenG. (2009). Romantic relationships from adolescence to young adulthood: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. The Sociological Quarterly, 50, 308–335.
21.
PappL. M.DanielewiczJ.CayembergC. (2012). “Are we Facebook official?” Implications of dating partners’ Facebook use and profiles for intimate relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 85–90. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0291
22.
ReisH. T.de JongD. C.LeeK. Y.O’KeefeS. D.PetersB. J. (2016). Promoting intimacy: Strategies suggested by the appetitive side. In KneeC. R.ReisH. T. (Eds.), Positive approaches to optimal relationship development (pp. 3–29). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23.
RusbultC. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.
24.
RusbultC. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.
25.
RusbultC. E.AgnewC. R. (2010). Prosocial motivation and behavior in close relationships. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior (pp. 327–345). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26.
RusbultC. E.AgnewC. R.ArriagaX. B. (2012). The investment model of commitment processes. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 218–231). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
27.
RusbultC. E.ArriagaX. B.AgnewC. R. (2001). Interdependence in close relationships. In FletcherG. J. O.ClarkM. S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology, vol.2: Interpersonal processes (pp. 359–387). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
28.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M. (1995). Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 558–571.
29.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. A. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.
30.
SaslowL. R.MuiseA.ImpettE. A.DubinM. (2013). Can you see how happy we are? Facebook images and relationship satisfaction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 411–418.
31.
TanK.AgnewC. R.VanderDriftL. E.HarveyS. M. (2015). Committed to us: Predicting relationship closeness following nonmarital romantic relationship breakup. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 456–471.
32.
TofighiD.MacKinnonD. P. (2011). RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 692–700. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0076-x
33.
Van LangeP. A.RusbultC. E.DrigotasS. M.ArriagaX. B.WitcherB. S.CoxC. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1373–1395.
34.
VanderDriftL. E.AgnewC. R.WilsonJ. E. (2009). Nonmarital romantic relationship commitment and leave behavior: The mediating role of dissolution consideration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1220–1232.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
